forked from Peeragogy/PatternsOfPatterns
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathtitle-stuff.tex
193 lines (167 loc) · 7.01 KB
/
title-stuff.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
\title{Patterns of Patterns}
\author{Joseph Corneli}
\authornote{Both authors contributed equally to this research.}
\email{[email protected]}
\orcid{1234-5678-9012}
\author{Alex Murphy}
\email{[email protected]}
\affiliation{%
\institution{Oxford Brookes University}
\streetaddress{Gipsy Lane}
\city{Oxford}
\country{England, UK}
\postcode{OX3 0BP}
}
\author{Raymond S. Puzio}
\authornotemark[1]
\email{[email protected]}
\author{Leo Vivier}
\email{[email protected]}
\affiliation{%
\institution{Hyperreal Enterprises Ltd}
\streetaddress{114A New Street}
\city{Musselburgh}
\country{Scotland, UK}
\postcode{EH21 6LQ}}
\author{Noorah Alhasan}
\affiliation{%
\institution{LBJ School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin}
\streetaddress{P.O. Box Y}
\city{Austin}
\state{TX}
\country{USA}
\postcode{78713-8925}}
\email{[email protected]}
\author{Charles J. Danoff}
\affiliation{%
\institution{Mr Danoff’s Teaching Laboratory}
\streetaddress{PO Box 802738}
\city{Chicago}
\state{IL}
\country{USA}
\postcode{60680}}
\email{[email protected]}
\author{Vitor Bruno}
\affiliation{%
\institution{Milestone English}
\streetaddress{Rua Trieste 170, ap2}
\city{Palhoca}
\state{SC}
\country{Brazil}
\postcode{88132-227}}
\email{[email protected]}
% \author{Paola Ricaurte}
% \affiliation{%
% \institution{Tecnologico de Monterrey}
% \streetaddress{Calle del Puente 222 Col. Ejidos de Huipulco, Tlalpan}
% \city{Mexico City}
% \country{Mexico}
% }
% \email{[email protected]}
\author{Charlotte Pierce}
\affiliation{%
\institution{Pierce Press}
\streetaddress{PO Box 206}
\city{Arlington MA}
\country{USA}
\postcode{02476}
}
\email{[email protected]}
%%
%% By default, the full list of authors will be used in the page
%% headers. Often, this list is too long, and will overlap
%% other information printed in the page headers. This command allows
%% the author to define a more concise list
%% of authors' names for this purpose.
\renewcommand{\shortauthors}{Corneli et al.}
% (1) Review the intention: what do we expect to learn or make together?
% - Joe: Wanted to walk through the PoP paper with Rebecca, in order to help solidify my own grasp of the concepts and get her feedback.
% - Rebecca: This topic sounded interesting when you mentioned it and I wanted to learn about Pop
% (2) Establish what is happening: what and how are we learning?
% - Indeed we did speed through the paper, Rebecca pointed out a few places where there was friction with the wording or concepts, like ``PEER-TO-PEER'' and also suggested Operational Research and Strategy as an appropriate topic; mentioned “improvisatory” style
% - Interruptions were welcomed!
% - Rebecca: was hesitant to interrupt the narrative
% - This is a bit different from usual IEAI style...
% (3) What are some different perspectives on what’s happening?
% - Joe: appreciate the time Rebecca has put into this a lot, and I also think this was a good way to present the paper
% - Rebecca: I think you assume knowledge in the presentation, and I think you need to assume the listener (if they aren’t in the area) that they don’t know anything. It wouldn’t be patronising to explain the basic concepts.
% (4) What did we learn or change?
% - Talking to Karl, he would reconise one of the areas (probably) but not necessarily the other two. Everyone is going to be new to some of these concepts.
% - This was great as a ``final edit'' — we will also be able to edit this paper until December
% - RR: is it your aim to automate?
% (5) What else should we change going forward?
% - Joe: if it would be helpful to RR, I’d certainly be happy to meet again about these ideas
% - Would this (patterns of patterns) to actually be useful for ethical AI?
% - E.g., rethink in the context of moral machines
%%
%% The abstract is a short summary of the work to be presented in the
%% article.
% distributed peer-to-peer networks
\begin{abstract}
The purpose of this paper is to show how we can combine and adapt
methods from elite training, future studies, and
collaborative design, and apply them to address significant problems
in social networks. We focus on three such methods:
we use Action Reviews to implement social perception, Causal Layered
Analysis to implement social cognition, and Design Pattern Languages
to implement social action. To illustrate the methods in combination,
we first develop a case study, showing how we applied them to
bootstrap a distributed cross-disciplinary research seminar. We then
use Causal Layered Analysis to explore the ways in which the design
pattern discourse has been evolving. Building on these analyses, we
elaborate several scenarios for the future use of design patterns in
large-scale distributed collaboration. We conclude that the
combination of methods is robust to uncertainty—by supporting adaptations as circumstances change—and that they can help
people coming from different backgrounds work together. In
particular, we show how methods drawn from other domains enrich and
are enriched by design patterns; we believe the analysis will be of
interest to all of the communities whose methods we draw upon.
\end{abstract}
%%
%% The code below is generated by the tool at http://dl.acm.org/ccs.cfm.
%% Please copy and paste the code instead of the example below.
%%
\begin{CCSXML}
<ccs2012>
<concept>
<concept_id>10003456</concept_id>
<concept_desc>Social and professional topics</concept_desc>
<concept_significance>500</concept_significance>
</concept>
<concept>
<concept_id>10011007.10011074.10011075</concept_id>
<concept_desc>Software and its engineering~Designing software</concept_desc>
<concept_significance>300</concept_significance>
</concept>
<concept>
<concept_id>10011007.10011074.10011134.10003559</concept_id>
<concept_desc>Software and its engineering~Open source model</concept_desc>
<concept_significance>300</concept_significance>
</concept>
<concept>
<concept_id>10010405.10010481</concept_id>
<concept_desc>Applied computing~Operations research</concept_desc>
<concept_significance>300</concept_significance>
</concept>
<concept>
<concept_id>10010147.10010341</concept_id>
<concept_desc>Computing methodologies~Modeling and simulation</concept_desc>
<concept_significance>100</concept_significance>
</concept>
</ccs2012>
\end{CCSXML}
\ccsdesc[500]{Social and professional topics}
\ccsdesc[300]{Software and its engineering~Designing software}
\ccsdesc[300]{Software and its engineering~Open source model}
\ccsdesc[300]{Applied computing~Operations research}
\ccsdesc[100]{Computing methodologies~Modeling and simulation}
%%
%% Keywords. The author(s) should pick words that accurately describe
%% the work being presented. Separate the keywords with commas.
\keywords{Design Patterns, Pattern Languages, Action Reviews, Futures
Studies, Causal Layered Analysis, Emacs, Free Software, Peeragogy,
Climate Change, Innovation, Anticipation}
%%
%% This command processes the author and affiliation and title
%% information and builds the first part of the formatted document.
\maketitle