-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New external service to check stats documentation #80
Comments
Actually @xuanxu two questions:
In other words, we don't want buffy to dump anything into the issue here at all, just to pass on parameters to the external service. How to we best ensure that? |
No need for an empty body, if there is no
For this you can use the silent param: |
Thanks @xuanxu, i think i've got everything in place now, including the external service spec via the above PR, but the command was not recognised. Any ideas why not? |
Is the command listed if you run |
Nope |
I saw the problem: the external_service is repetead in the config file, defined multiple times. All external services should be declared as an array under the same |
@xuanxu (I've been away on holidays, but now back and still trying to get this to work ..) The new config file with the external service matrix is this: buffy/config/settings-production.yml Lines 107 to 140 in dbbc066
The requests as sent to the external service then look like this:
so it seems buffy is sending an empty @maelle This is the reason for responses like these that just dump
because the parameters are no longer being passed correctly to the external service. I think this issue underlies all behaviour noted in ropensci-review-tools/roreviewapi#30 |
Can this be closed or are there remaining problems? |
@xuanxu @maelle I'm pretty sure you can both ignore this one. Implementation should just work.
@noamross Idea here is to implement a command for pre-submission stats enquiries,
@ropensci-review-bot check srr
, which will report on standards compliance to report total number of standards complied with, and confirm that that is > 50%. Any thoughts or comments?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: