Release pages source tar balls

[Axel-Naumann]

• The "source distribution" part should go at the end, after the binaries.
• It should provide a link to "build from source"

[eguiraud]

I was going to open an issue about the release pages, but maybe can tack some comments on this one instead, and if you think some of them deserve attention/their own issue just let me know:

• the left-side navbar still links to resources in /download (should be replaced by /install)
• some of those resources should just go imo, namely "Using binaries", "Building ROOT", "Building ROOT with CMake"
• the "Installations in CVMFS" section of each release page leaves out the important info that you have to install runtime prerequisites yourself before you can use ROOT like that
• I don't think "Git" should be mentioned there, maybe just the name of the git tag, probably not even (git tag list will be faster for any git user than checking the release page)
• what's the usecase for the previous/next buttons to browse releases?

[eguiraud]

why assigned to me? 😅

[couet]

I was not sure. You seems to have ideas about it. It was unassigned. You can de-assign or assign it to somebody else.

[couet]

what's the usecase for the previous/next buttons to browse releases?

It is useless. They came from the default minimal-mistakes. This PR removes them #819

[ferdymercury]

• The "source distribution" part should go at the end, after the binaries.

  • It should provide a link to "build from source"

This part is already solved by #897 and #888

[ferdymercury]

• some of those resources should just go imo, namely "Using binaries", "Building ROOT", "Building ROOT with CMake"

• the "Installations in CVMFS" section of each release page leaves out the important info that you have to install runtime prerequisites yourself before you can use ROOT like that

• I don't think "Git" should be mentioned there, maybe just the name of the git tag, probably not even (git tag list will be faster for any git user than checking the release page)

Maybe open a separate issue for this?

[eguiraud]

I think the suggestions are on-topic for this issue, but if ROOT devs want to split things I have nothing against it of course.