-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Multipoint constraints #3
Comments
Hi Max,
We can communicate directly on this.
Please try running a linear-elastic model with released
multi-point constraints — does that work ?
I suspect the issue is the sudden release of restraining nodal
forces (from the MPC) on already deformed elements.
Are you using large displacement formulation ?
For symmetry plane constraint releases, those forces are decreased gradually
over a number of time steps.
This issue has been on my list for a while….
Bob
… On Mar 6, 2018, at 2:31 AM, GithubMarkMike ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear professor Dodds
If I want to release the multipoint constraint, is that possible to be realized, This is mainly used to simulate the crack growth under low-cycle fatigue actions and the crack plane is not at the symmetry plane. I tried to modify the MPCs between the steps. It reports the errors: "the determinant of the Jacobian matrix for gauss point of the element is non-positive". "The element" denotes the element with MPCs
Thank you very much
Best regards
Max
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL4g_hpgUpQ7rT5wyY0wu-onHiYhw78fks5tbjtDgaJpZM4SeOrI>.
|
Hi professor I tried running the linear-elastic model with releases MPC, still cannot, the same error occurs. I used large displacement formulation before, now I tried small displacement, also cannot, the same error occurs. I checked the Warp3D manual, Warp3d tackles with MPCs by: " the incremental equilibrium equations are modified to eliminate the dependent displacements, the equations solved and the dependent terms recovered immediately from the constraint equations" does that mean no nodal force between the tied nodes, therefore we cannot release the MPCs like that we release the absolute constraints in Warp3D ( can release the nodal force gradually). It will be grateful and appreciative if you can elaborate on that. and the barriers of realizing the release MPCs in warp3D. Thank you very much |
Hi Liuyang,
I’ll run some problems this weekend. I’m giving mid-term
exams this week.
I suspect you have discovered the problem. When MPCs
“disappear” between time steps, the code does
*not* capture the corresponding nodal forces and release
them over a few subsequent steps.
That procedure is followed by the release of simple constraints
as you have found.
Best,
Bob
… On Mar 7, 2018, at 1:14 AM, GithubMarkMike ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi professor
I tried running the linear-elastic model with releases MPC, still cannot, the same error occurs. I used large displacement formulation before, now I tried small displacement, also cannot, the same error occurs.
I checked the Warp3D manual, Warp3d tackles with MPCs by: " the incremental equilibrium equations are modified to eliminate the dependent displacements, the equations solved and the dependent terms recovered immediately from the constraint equations" does that mean no nodal force between the tied nodes, therefore we cannot release the MPCs like that we release the absolute constraints in Warp3D ( can release the nodal force gradually).
It will be grateful and appreciative if you can elaborate on that. and the barriers of realizing the release MPCs in warp3D.
Thank you very much
Best regards
Liuyang
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL4g_rSXZIet3RVyKjjUPGM-69Ofc5fGks5tb3rNgaJpZM4SeOrI>.
|
Thank you very much, professor Best regards |
Dear professor Dodds
If I want to release the multipoint constraint, is that possible to be realized, This is mainly used to simulate the crack growth under low-cycle fatigue actions and the crack plane is not at the symmetry plane. I tried to modify the MPCs between the steps. It reports the errors: "the determinant of the Jacobian matrix for gauss point of the element is non-positive". "The element" denotes the element with MPCs
Thank you very much
Best regards
Max
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: