Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:pubky/pkarr language:Rust

Filter by

51 results
 (63 ms)

51 results

inpubky/pkarr (press backspace or delete to remove)

it s useful to be able to revoke a key, in case it s compromised (attacker has a copy of the key) BEP_0044 specifies that the sequence number must not be downgraded, and should not exceed MAX_INT64 if ...
  • hclarke
  • 3
  • Opened 
    2 days ago
  • #138

I am building a republisher. Following the instructions for CAS in the publish() method, I resolve the most recent packet first before I publish the packet again. Problem: publishing fails randomly even ...
  • SeverinAlexB
  • 3
  • Opened 
    4 days ago
  • #136

We were experimenting with pkarr packet churn rates when we found some weird behaviour. If we publish 100 public keys without using the cache the pkarr client would always return None even though the packet ...
  • SeverinAlexB
  • 11
  • Opened 
    11 days ago
  • #133

I am currently updating pkdns to pkarr v3.5.0. One of my tests fails occasionally with thread resolution::pkd::pkarr_resolver::tests::query_pubkey panicked at /Users/severinbuhler/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/pkarr-3.5.0/src/client/relays.rs:109:14: ...
  • SeverinAlexB
  • 2
  • Opened 
    12 days ago
  • #131

What s the purpose behind this? I don t need relays in pkdns so why error if there are no relays? @Nuhvi https://github.com/pubky/pkarr/blob/72fe80c271c1c1d2293e6a6800f227c570e8d4f5/pkarr/src/client.rs#L546 ...
  • SeverinAlexB
  • 1
  • Opened 
    12 days ago
  • #130

Hey @Nuhvi ! First of all, I am sorry if this is a very stupid question here. I am trying to understand the logic behind CasFailed errors. It seems we are throwing CasFailed errors when the new package ...
  • SHAcollision
  • 3
  • Opened 
    17 days ago
  • #126

While I am very against using Pkarr keys relative to another TLD like .pkarr or .key or whatever, the idea of looking up pkarr keys from a DNS server by querying key .my.trusted.dns.server is very useful. ...
  • Nuhvi
  • Opened 
    25 days ago
  • #114

Image
  • maacl
  • 1
  • Opened 
    25 days ago
  • #113

In the spec I noticed that the DNS record is signed, but the timestamp isn’t. Doesn t that permit replay attacks, like a bad actor publishing someone s obsolete record with a new timestamp?
  • snej
  • 6
  • Opened 
    26 days ago
  • #112

I have a code: #[builder(finish_fn(name = build ))] pub async fn new( #[builder(start_fn)] id: RostraId, #[builder(default = true)] start_request_handler: bool, db: Option ...
  • dpc
  • 9
  • Opened 
    on Feb 4
  • #110
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue search results · GitHub