-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: move to RDF4J #6
Comments
Another reason to upgrade: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53299218/sparql-support-protege-5 |
FYI there is a fairly up-to-date Sesame-to-Rdf4j migration guide that documents what changes need to happen to move the codebase across. |
abrokenjester
added a commit
to abrokenjester/rdf-library
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2018
Signed-off-by: Jeen Broekstra <[email protected]>
abrokenjester
added a commit
to abrokenjester/rdf-library
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2018
Signed-off-by: Jeen Broekstra <[email protected]>
abrokenjester
added a commit
to abrokenjester/rdf-library
that referenced
this issue
Nov 17, 2018
Signed-off-by: Jeen Broekstra <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
not sure if anybody knows about this, but it look like the SPARQL plugin still depends on an older version of Sesame which has already been moved to RDF4J ~ 2 years ago. I guess many bugs have been solved since then, performance maybe increased and features added.
I came across this "issue" by this Stackoverflow post and the outcome was that some functions of SPARQL, especially the casting of literals, are not available in the SPARQL plugin of Protege.
For example
will fail although this is part of SPARQL 1.1 standard.
To be honest, I always thought Protege is already using RDF4J and not Sesame, but it's not case given the dependency in the
pom.xml
.I found a fix in the RDF4J repository, thus, I assume it will never make the way to Sesame, so there is no simple way to make the SPARQL plugin feature complete and even get rid of possible bugs without moving to RDF4J.
Cheers,
Lorenz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: