arcadia 2 sprint 5: taxononomic names pipeline minihackathon

[myrmoteras]

Tim Robertson ([email protected]); Markus Döring ([email protected]); Olaf Banki [email protected]; Guido Sautter ([email protected]) [email protected]; Teodor Georgiev [email protected]; Felipe Simoes ([email protected]); Juliana Wingert [email protected]

Dear colleagues

Disentis is approaching fast. A goal we discussed is to go through the pipeline Publication – conversion – GBIF/ChecklistBank – extended COL and see how far we can go to entirely automate and for those names to get flagged for issues create ways to resolve the issues. Issues that might arise from the publishing side, the conversion or import side, to conflicting taxonomy.

I would like to see a presentation of the workflow, may be as life demo as possible, by Friday before or after lunch. That would be a great cheery on the topping.

I would like to suggest that we either do some planning before, eg decide how to communicate, goals, etc. or then meet Wednesday before or after the intro and dinner. This way you have Thursday all day and Friday at least the morning.

Does this make sense?

All the best

Donat

[lyubomirpenev]

IMHO, it would make a perfect sense to have a small technical meeting on this on Wednesday and present the results of this coordinated effort on Friday.

On 16.8.2024 г. 12:22, Donat Agosti wrote: Tim Robertson ***@***.***); Markus Döring ***@***.***); Olaf Banki ***@***.***; Guido Sautter ***@***.***) ***@***.***; Teodor Georgiev ***@***.***; Felipe Simoes ***@***.***); Juliana Wingert ***@***.*** Dear colleagues Disentis is approaching fast. A goal we discussed is to go through the pipeline Publication – conversion – GBIF/ChecklistBank – extended COL and see how far we can go to entirely automate and for those names to get flagged for issues create ways to resolve the issues. Issues that might arise from the publishing side, the conversion or import side, to conflicting taxonomy. I would like to see a presentation of the workflow, may be as life demo as possible, by Friday before or after lunch. That would be a great cheery on the topping. I would like to suggest that we either do some planning before, eg decide how to communicate, goals, etc. or then meet Wednesday before or after the intro and dinner. This way you have Thursday all day and Friday at least the morning. Does this make sense? All the best Donat — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#261>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABDFNGM5DAO4EPFKXOZAT53ZRXAG7AVCNFSM6AAAAABMTW3ZPOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQ3DSOBXGE2TGMQ>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Pensoft logo <https://pensoft.net> Prof. Dr. Lyubomir Penev Managing Director Pensoft Publishers <https://pensoft.net> Phone: +359-2-8704281 12 Prof. Georgi Zlatarski Street 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria <https://twitter.com/Pensoft> <https://www.facebook.com/Pensoft/> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/pensoft-publishers/> Blog <https://blog.pensoft.net>