Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

To dos: redux #1315

Closed
ben18785 opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

To dos: redux #1315

ben18785 opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 9 comments

Comments

@ben18785
Copy link
Collaborator

ben18785 commented Mar 9, 2021

  1. Functional testing! Fergus and David?
  2. Automatic MCMC initialisation: Ben
  3. MultiNest: Ben
  4. Sort bug in populationMCMC: Michael
  5. Provide some way for model comparison: Rebecca, David and Richard?
  6. Clean up the example notebooks / add some more detail in places: ALL
  7. Sort a few other minor bugs: ALL
  8. Try to merge some of the existing slice sampling PRs: Ben + others

Fergus' rule was "Anything that's done at the time of planned publication goes in" was agreed on.

@MichaelClerx
Copy link
Member

I would keep point 1 and ditch the rest :D

@ben18785
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ben18785 commented Mar 9, 2021

Haha. Not point 4?

@MichaelClerx
Copy link
Member

As much as possible, but no method or bug is a deal breaker for me :-)
Thanks again for the overview earlier! Really made me think that we have enough to get started.

@MichaelClerx
Copy link
Member

Then again, we can do a list of things we really want fixed/added so that we can present PINTS in public without shame 😄 😄 😄
So let's do a short list but agree once that's done it's set in stone, so nothing more can be added?

@ben18785
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ben18785 commented Mar 9, 2021

Yep, that's fine with me. Shall we amend the current PINTS project then?

@MichaelClerx
Copy link
Member

Yes please

@MichaelClerx
Copy link
Member

@Rebecca-Rumney @alisterde @DavAug @rcw5890 anything you really want in before we write the big paper?

@alisterde
Copy link
Member

Thanks @MichaelClerx and @ben18785 I'd really like to get #1083 and #1160 done so that we have some 1st order sensitivity optimisers, but as you know I'm working on those at the moment!

@MichaelClerx
Copy link
Member

@ben18785 can this one be closed? I don't think we've done all of these, but priorities have shifted perhaps?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants