Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for more primitive types #106

Open
maitredede opened this issue Jul 3, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Support for more primitive types #106

maitredede opened this issue Jul 3, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@maitredede
Copy link

Hi,
Is it possible for the TypeConverter class to add support for more primitive types ? I have to make workarounds when dealing with the missing types : Byte, SByte, Int16, Int64, UInt16, UInt64, Single.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@maitredede