You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However - when it comes to life it is getting an IP of 192.168.0.11 - which is also an IP in my MetalLB IP Range. Is specifying loadBalancerIP supported? I am new to this - so quite possible I am making a mistake. Thanks for any feedback you might be able to provide!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @dingerkingh! Thank you for using the passbolt helm chart. Right now, this charts doesn't support this kind of service configuration. This will take a while to us to find the time to add a new feature to allow you using these kind of services (you can always open a PR if you think you know how to solve it).
A temporary solution, while you wait for the new feature, would be to create a service with your needed configuration instead of using the one we are providing. You are plenty of examples on k8s documentation to do so.
OK - I will take a stab at that! In the mean time - how does your service assign an IP address? I'm just really perplexed where it is getting that address at all.
Our service is not assigning that IP. I have never tried metalLb but I guess what is happening is that the chart is trying to create a load balancer with an empty loadBalancerIp field (because we don't support it yet) so the metalLb api is assigning one from the range that you configured.
Hi There!
I am trying to use MetalLB to assign a loadbalanced IP. I am using the following:
service:
annotations: {}
ports:
http:
name: http
port: 80
targetPort: 80
https:
name: https
port: 443
targetPort: 443
type: LoadBalancer
loadBalancerIP: 192.168.0.14
However - when it comes to life it is getting an IP of 192.168.0.11 - which is also an IP in my MetalLB IP Range. Is specifying loadBalancerIP supported? I am new to this - so quite possible I am making a mistake. Thanks for any feedback you might be able to provide!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: