Relationship between cache and store and offline "update" #8844
Chardrazle
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Did nothing because
This had to download |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
When working with offline modes for some commands, a fully populated cache seems mandatory.
Is there some reason to this? In other words, wouldn't the store contain the required packages anyway?
As a demonstration:
If we then try adding the package back:
OK, let's try adding direct to the store:
That^ actually worked, as it's moved on to the next package. Similarly adding that one (direct to the store) would resolve that error, too.
Is there an explanation for this behaviour?
It seems that restoring files to the "store" also fixes the "cache" (metadata), but it's not obvious in how to achieve that.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions