Glossary scope and references

[waalge]

A general comment here regarding the orcfax glossary.

(It is my opinion that) We should liberally rely on external sources for definitions.
Especially where:

• Where a term or concept is not part of orcfax's core protocol or
• Our usage does not diverge in any meaningful way from the "generally accepted usage"

I would say "inline datum" meets both of these criteria. At worst we should be just signposting "See cip32".

Related: referencing :otherTerm infers that otherTerm is also an orcfax term. : is short hand for "glossary.orcfax.io". Given our current immaturity, we accept that these are not yet written, but :otherTerm should be in the scope outlined above.
Otherwise this should be an external source eg dictionaryOfComputerTerms:otherTerm

[Christian-MK]

This makes sense to me! makes our job easier