Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rationale for terraform #2559

Open
mooperd opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Rationale for terraform #2559

mooperd opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@mooperd
Copy link

mooperd commented Oct 22, 2024

I'm a little confused why terraform is necessary for creating subnets? It seems this could be easier and better handled directly from ROSA without having to introduce ugly third party tooling.

Is there a plan to get rid of TF at some point?

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants