You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on what was announced, NIST' s final standard for the ML-KEM and ML-DSA will enable private keys in seed format. Currently, the draft only refers to the NIST standard for the private key format. Thus this needs more specification, and it might be relevant to specify in the draft:
what is the single (?) secret key format in the NIST standard, that the draft is referring to
alternative option: that seed format is also possible for private keys (?)
that a private key in expanded format needs to be checked for consistency before usage
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is relevant only for ML-KEM, since FIPS 204 does not explicitly mention the seed format for the private key.
falko-strenzke
changed the title
Specify private key format for ML-* depending on final standard
Specify private key format for ML-KEM depending on final standard
Aug 22, 2024
falko-strenzke
changed the title
Specify private key format for ML-KEM depending on final standard
Specify private key format for ML-KEM when switching to FIPS final versions
Aug 22, 2024
falko-strenzke
changed the title
Specify private key format for ML-KEM when switching to FIPS final versions
Specify private key format for ML-KEM and ML-DSA when switching to FIPS final versions
Sep 26, 2024
Based on what was announced, NIST' s final standard for the ML-KEM and ML-DSA will enable private keys in seed format. Currently, the draft only refers to the NIST standard for the private key format. Thus this needs more specification, and it might be relevant to specify in the draft:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: