[PRE REVIEW]: Coordinate: An Android application to organize samples into grids

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @trife (Trevor Rife)
Repository: https://github.com/PhenoApps/Coordinate
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v4.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7ed09ac01d259f5fe415d6c8b6107597"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7ed09ac01d259f5fe415d6c8b6107597/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7ed09ac01d259f5fe415d6c8b6107597/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/7ed09ac01d259f5fe415d6c8b6107597)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @trife. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@trife if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1093/g3journal/jkac078 is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.179901 is OK
- 10.1126/science.342.6155.191-a is OK
- 10.1186/s40478-017-0502-0 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- None

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.32 s (1411.2 files/s, 137411.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Java                           202           4125           2938          25143
XML                            172            699            271           4919
Kotlin                          45            969            259           3178
Markdown                        15            156              6            447
Text                             3             58              0            345
Gradle                           3             31             20            148
Bourne Shell                     1             28            109            103
DOS Batch                        1             21              2             68
TeX                              1              3              0             47
SQL                              4              5              0             43
JSON                             1              0              0             40
YAML                             3              2              4             40
HTML                             1              0              0             30
Properties                       2              0             17             11
ProGuard                         1              3             18              0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           455           6100           3644          34562
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

  1387	Peter Rosario
   132	Trevor Rife
    60	kamathprasad9
    44	chaneylc
    29	trife
    10	allcontributors[bot]
     5	Prasad Kamath
     2	bellerbrock

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 724

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v2.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

DearScholar: A mobile application to conduct qualitative and quantitative diary research
Submitting author: @pmkruyen
Handling editor: @cMadan (Retired)
Reviewers: @gcdeshpande, @kinow
Similarity score: 0.6894

DeGAUSS: Decentralized Geomarker Assessment for Multi-Site Studies
Submitting author: @cole-brokamp
Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired)
Reviewers: @vsoch, @george-githinji
Similarity score: 0.6663

Beiwe: A data collection platform for high-throughput digital phenotyping
Submitting author: @jponnela
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @Tam-Pham, @erik-whiting
Similarity score: 0.6544

MousebreedeR: A novel software to assist in the design of breeding schema for complex genotypes of experimental organisms
Submitting author: @sportiellomike
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @yjunechoe, @jsun
Similarity score: 0.6537

CollatriX: A GUI to collate MorphoMetriX outputs
Submitting author: @cbirdferrer
Handling editor: @KristinaRiemer (Retired)
Reviewers: @evaristor, @katmratliff
Similarity score: 0.6527

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[danielskatz]

👋 @trife - thanks for your submission. Please add countries to your affiliations, and then use the command @editorialbot generate pdf to update the PDF.

I also will be talking to other track editors to determine which track this should be in before we proceed further.

[trife]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

DearScholar: A mobile application to conduct qualitative and quantitative diary research
Submitting author: @pmkruyen
Handling editor: @cMadan (Retired)
Reviewers: @gcdeshpande, @kinow
Similarity score: 0.6871

DeGAUSS: Decentralized Geomarker Assessment for Multi-Site Studies
Submitting author: @cole-brokamp
Handling editor: @pjotrp (Retired)
Reviewers: @vsoch, @george-githinji
Similarity score: 0.6651

CollatriX: A GUI to collate MorphoMetriX outputs
Submitting author: @cbirdferrer
Handling editor: @KristinaRiemer (Retired)
Reviewers: @evaristor, @katmratliff
Similarity score: 0.6507

MousebreedeR: A novel software to assist in the design of breeding schema for complex genotypes of experimental organisms
Submitting author: @sportiellomike
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @yjunechoe, @jsun
Similarity score: 0.6501

Beiwe: A data collection platform for high-throughput digital phenotyping
Submitting author: @jponnela
Handling editor: @fboehm (Active)
Reviewers: @Tam-Pham, @erik-whiting
Similarity score: 0.6500

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.