Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fork Kafdrop due to inactivity? #321

Closed
davideicardi opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Fork Kafdrop due to inactivity? #321

davideicardi opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@davideicardi
Copy link
Collaborator

davideicardi commented Dec 20, 2021

Hello everybody!

Current maintainer of Kafdrop is not more active on the project. (@ekoutanov please correct me if I'm wrong :-) )

So I'm thinking to create a fork inside a new kafdrop organization.
But I need some help. Is someone interested in joining the organization?

If I found at least 2/3 developers I think we can try to continue the work in our spare time.

@davideicardi davideicardi changed the title Fork Kafdrop due to inactivity Fork Kafdrop due to inactivity? Dec 20, 2021
@aragozin
Copy link

@davideicardi please count me in

@mcs
Copy link
Contributor

mcs commented Dec 20, 2021

Yeah, why not? It's too useful to let it die a maintenance death...

@rachitnovostack
Copy link

rachitnovostack commented Dec 21, 2021

Yes, That'll be really great!

And please review PR #282 to your fork

@fstaudt
Copy link

fstaudt commented Dec 21, 2021

@davideicardi

You can count me in

@davideicardi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have been contacted by @ekoutanov, and fortunately he says that kafdrop is still active!! So no need to fork, that is always a good thing.🥳

But we still need your help, so please stay tuned for further news!

I will close the Kafdrop organization.

@ekoutanov
Copy link
Member

Heya folks,

Firstly, thanks everyone who's put their hand up for contributing to the project, and all those who're thinking of doing so. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to commit any time over the last year to do any work on it.

@davideicardi and I have indeed had a few email exchanges to determine what the best way forward is. The consensus for now is to maintain the present GitHub repo, which is heavily SEO-optimised, and to add people as maintainers.

All the best!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants