You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now that we have removed the Simple Profile type definitions from the TOSCA standard, I find myself frequently duplicating basic definitions for artifact types, capability and relationship types, and even interface types. It would be really helpful to create a standard profile that provides a function similar to standard libraries in other languages so that I can include that profile and avoid duplication. This profile would be maintained as a community contribution and we would strongly encourage developers of other profiles to use that profile as a starting point. Is there an appetite to work on such a profile?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Now that we have removed the Simple Profile type definitions from the TOSCA standard, I find myself frequently duplicating basic definitions for artifact types, capability and relationship types, and even interface types. It would be really helpful to create a standard profile that provides a function similar to standard libraries in other languages so that I can include that profile and avoid duplication. This profile would be maintained as a community contribution and we would strongly encourage developers of other profiles to use that profile as a starting point. Is there an appetite to work on such a profile?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions