Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

defining a task named `load' would shadow an existing method with that name (ArgumentError) #7

Open
singpolyma opened this issue May 10, 2012 · 17 comments

Comments

@singpolyma
Copy link

I'm using Capistrano and Rake with Rails3 and rake-rails. I've narrowed the error down to happening when it gets to defining the cap task for Rake's db:fixtures:load

/mnt/cache/var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/capistrano-2.12.0/lib/capistrano/configuration/namespaces.rb:97:in `task': defining a task named `load' would shadow an existing method with that name (ArgumentError)
        from /mnt/cache/var/lib/gems/1.9.1/gems/cape-1.4.0/lib/cape/capistrano.rb:103:in `block in implement'

The relevant Cap code is:

namespace :rakesnake do
  Cape do
    mirror_rake_tasks do |env|
      env['RAILS_ENV'] = rails_env
    end
  end
end
@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

Do you get the same exception if you try to mirror just that one task? For example:

namespace :rakesnake do
  Cape do
    mirror_rake_tasks 'db:fixtures:load' do |env|
      env['RAILS_ENV'] = rails_env
    end
  end
end

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

Yes, I reproduced this, both ways.

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

Unfortunately, this is going to require a workaround for now. Solving the problem will have implications for the Cape DSL.

Capistrano is complaining that we’re creating a recipe that shares the name of a Ruby method. Rake tasks db:fixtures:load and db:schema:load both run afoul of this Capistrano guard because of the existence of Kernel::load in the same scope. I just verified that a Rake task named require would not be able to be mirrored because of the existence of Kernel::require in the same scope.

Here’s the workaround. Use the Cape DSL to ignore tasks and namespaces whose names will collide with existing methods.

# config/deploy.rb
namespace :rake_tasks do
  Cape do
    each_rake_task do |t|
      begin
        mirror_rake_tasks t[:name], :roles => :app do |env|
          env['RAILS_ENV'] = rails_env
        end
      rescue ArgumentError => e
        $stderr.puts "Not mirroring Rake task `#{t[:name]}' because #{e.message}"
      end
    end
  end
end

I’ll probably add a feature to the DSL to allow you to specify a new name for the mirrored task, or possibly a prefix for tasks that collide with existing method names.

@singpolyma
Copy link
Author

That's not the nicest solution, but it's working for me. Thanks :)

@timuckun
Copy link

BTW the above solution does not work with capistrano multistage. The rails_env evaluates to :production changing the line to

env['RAILS_ENV'] = rails_env.to_s

solves the issue but of course the core problem is not solved

Not mirroring Rake task db:fixtures:load' because defining a task namedload' would shadow an existing method with that name
Not mirroring Rake task db:schema:load' because defining a task namedload' would shadow an existing method with that name
Not mirroring Rake task test' because defining a namespace namedtest' would shadow an existing method with that name
Not mirroring Rake task test:recent' because defining a namespace namedtest' would shadow an existing method with that name
Not mirroring Rake task test:single' because defining a namespace namedtest' would shadow an existing method with that name
Not mirroring Rake task test:uncommitted' because defining a namespace namedtest' would shadow an existing method with that name

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

njonsson commented Oct 3, 2012

@timuckun, I regret to say that I have not used the capistrano-ext gem — I have supported multiple stages through manual Capistrano configuration. Please elaborate on what you believe to be the root of the problem. Thanks in advance.

@timuckun
Copy link

timuckun commented Oct 4, 2012

The root of the problem seems to be a naming conflict between capistrano-ext and cape. In my case I chose to only mirror specific tasks but I think in the long run you still need to resolve this issue because capistrano-ext is widely used.

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

njonsson commented Oct 8, 2012

I agree that Cape needs to provide a way to deal gracefully with recipe name collisions.

Concerning the collision in question, I’ve just confirmed that although the Rake task db:fixtures:load collides with Kernel::load under Capistrano v2.11.2, there is no such problem under Capistrano v2.13.4.

@anujbiyani
Copy link

Concerning the collision in question, I’ve just confirmed that although the Rake task db:fixtures:load collides with Kernel::load under Capistrano v2.11.2, there is no such problem under Capistrano v2.13.4.

I'm having this problem in Capistrano v2.14.1, so it seems it came back.

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

The work on an enhanced DSL is nearing completion. Here’s a preview of how you will be able to resolve this issue using the enhanced DSL.

# config/deploy.rb
namespace :rake_tasks do
  Cape do
    mirror_rake_tasks do |recipes|
      recipes.options[:roles] = :app
      recipes.env['RAILS_ENV'] = lambda { rails_env }

      # The mirrored Capistrano recipe for a Rake task ‘foo’ will be named
      # ‘rake_tasks:foo_task’.
      recipes.rename do |rake_task_name|
        "#{rake_task_name}_task"
      end
    end
  end
end

In the above example, all Rake tasks are mirrored, and their recipe names all get the _task suffix tacked onto them. You could rename only specific tasks by writing multiple mirror_rake_tasks statements that match different sets of Rake tasks.

A cd DSL method that permits running tasks in a directory other than current_path is not demonstrated above.

Feedback on this is welcome.

@timuckun
Copy link

My solution was to namespace my tasks. I prefixed it with a z: so that it would end up on the bottom of the list when I did a rake -T

Cape do
  each_rake_task do |t|
    #only add the tasks that start with z
    next unless 'z' == t[:name][0, 1]
    begin
      mirror_rake_tasks t[:name], :name => 'tim', :roles => :db do |env|
        env['RAILS_ENV'] = rails_env.to_s
      end
    rescue ArgumentError => e
      $stderr.puts "Not mirroring Rake task `#{t[:name]}' because #{e.message}"
    end
  end
end

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

njonsson commented Mar 7, 2013

The new DSL is available in bd5a6aa and v1.7.0. It allows you to deal with this issue gracefully, renaming a task that collides with a Ruby method.

@njonsson njonsson closed this as completed Mar 7, 2013
@why-el
Copy link

why-el commented Nov 18, 2014

Hey @njonsson are you sure this solves the issue? I renamed all tasks but capistrano (version 2.15.5) still errors out and complains I am trying to define tasks in the test namespace.

@njonsson
Copy link
Owner

@why-el, please paste into this thread the Cape statements you’re using to rename tasks.

@njonsson njonsson reopened this Nov 27, 2014
@why-el
Copy link

why-el commented Dec 2, 2014

Hey @njonsson sorry I had since reverted to simply defining my tasks manually. What I wrote is exactly what happened but I am actually no longer at the company where this error happened. ;)

@cmckni3
Copy link

cmckni3 commented Sep 8, 2016

I am having the same issue as @njonsson

I'm using your code above. I use minitest and minitest-rails.

namespace :rake_tasks do
  Cape do
    mirror_rake_tasks do |recipes|
      recipes.options[:roles] = :app
      recipes.env['RAILS_ENV'] = lambda { rails_env }

      # The mirrored Capistrano recipe for a Rake task 'foo' will be named
      # 'rake_tasks:foo_task'.
      recipes.rename do |rake_task_name|
        "#{rake_task_name}_task"
      end
    end
  end
end

@cmckni3
Copy link

cmckni3 commented Sep 9, 2016

I ended up filtering out tasks I don't want to mirror. I had to change the namespace of my rake tasks as well. It seems the namespace system is reserved in capistrano.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants