Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

osf role #3

Open
MontrealSergiy opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

osf role #3

MontrealSergiy opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MontrealSergiy
Copy link

MontrealSergiy commented Mar 19, 2020

do we have a role for osf or should remove it from the tools section (or any other where it occurs) for now?

ps. more importantly there is a whole osf paragraph on the mission page, as @emmetaobrien found

@adora07
Copy link

adora07 commented Mar 20, 2020

@MontrealSergiy can you assign this to JB for response?

@MontrealSergiy
Copy link
Author

@adora07 Regretfully I do not have access to the issue assignment in this repo. More I do not think J.B. is among member of this repo or has interest using this repo. Perhaps you can contact j.b. and/or repo's admin ( @xlecours or perhaps @3design

@3design
Copy link
Collaborator

3design commented Mar 20, 2020

I have assigned to JB for now until Diana has access to assigning issues

@jbpoline
Copy link
Collaborator

@MontrealSergiy @3design @xlecours OSF will not be a core component of the infrastructure: it was thougtht to be too difficult to manage, with too many components (and hard to install). We will still experiment OSF (probably at the university level) and learn from it in terms of what are the useful functionalities, but more importantly what are the gaps and missing pieces that NeuroHub will be filling in. The link to compute power and management of pipelines is clearly one of them.

@MontrealSergiy
Copy link
Author

@jbpoline do I conclude that it is better to remove osf especially Project
space paragraph of the vision, while we can keep it on tool page?

@MontrealSergiy
Copy link
Author

MontrealSergiy commented Mar 20, 2020

An option could be a) keep as is, b) rewrite Project Space paragraph with CBrain-inspired project management system with mentioning we are looking osf for feature re-engineering, and/or c) move project space paragraph toward end of page

@jbpoline
Copy link
Collaborator

jbpoline commented Mar 20, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants