We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
for each brain, we want:
everything from eric (@vikramc1 populate this) TODO: Maybe we should just calculate the distributions instead of statistics on distributions
MI loss (if we do ndreg, or something else if we don't do ndreg)
nnz from DTI
Each qc image will be rated 0 (bad) or 1 (good) for each subject in all datasets in a csv file
csv rows are subjects, columns are scalar values
html page with all the multivariate plots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@gkiar
Sorry, something went wrong.
this is done, right @ebridge2
this is/has been done for a while for fMRI; I will be adapting dMRI to have similar QA for raw, preprocessing, and registration tomorrow.
@dmannan see this comment, and this: https://github.com/neurodata/ndmg/blob/merge-dmri-fmri/analysis/statistics.md
loftusa
dmannan
No branches or pull requests
for each brain, we want:
(ingested) coregistered images of:
multivariate statistics
each voxel in the corrected mri's timecourse
corrected timecourse
scalar statistics
everything from eric (@vikramc1 populate this)
TODO: Maybe we should just calculate the distributions instead of statistics on distributions
MI loss (if we do ndreg, or something else if we don't do ndreg)
nnz from DTI
qualitative assessments (0/1 score for):
Each qc image will be rated 0 (bad) or 1 (good) for each subject in all datasets in a csv file
csv rows are subjects, columns are scalar values
html page with all the multivariate plots
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: