-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[add a voting system] Majority judgement #2
Comments
Short explanation : majority judgement is the same as score voting except that the median is taken instead of the mean. Thus it should not be hard to add ;) |
Ooh, thanks for sending this my way! I try not to add any major changes after I've officially "published" something, but I do like how it picks the median instead of mean! That way, with median instead of mean, you don't get this problem(?) where Score Voting can pick someone in a two-way race who does NOT have a majority: sandbox simulation |
@jibe-b If you want to play with Majority Judgment, I hacked together a fork today that can simulate it. I'm thinking about hosting it, but right now you'll have to download the whole repo and open up sandbox.html to play around with it. @ncase would I be allowed to host my fork on my own website if I credit you? |
So great to read a great article and find the great code in a great repo! :)
It would be nice to add another (ranking) voting system: "majority judgement"1, which is close to "score voting", but with voters giving a score to a subset of candidates (a better explanation @GBodin?).
There is interest for of having this around LaPrimaire.org
I see how clean and practical your code is, so maybe you can give us a few advices and @GBodin and I do it ;)
Yet, the key point is having both visualisation and mathematics behind valid and explicit. And for the moment I have no clue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: