You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We recently reworked pruning (#221, #250, #252). It works more reliable now and can reduce computational overhead quite a lot.
However, for debugging, it can be useful to attempt all possible computations.
This can help to identify culprits and identify longest partial solutions in the current design.
I would propose to add a pruning property to the Task container and allow users to call setPruning(false) if they want to do so.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe, instead of defining this property in the top-level task container only, you want to do so at the individual container level?
I also suggest automatically inheriting this property from the parent.
Maybe, instead of defining this property in the top-level task container only, you want to do so at the individual container level?
I also suggest automatically inheriting this property from the parent.
Yes. I don't think we could implement it easily any other way, because the individual stages need to be able to see the flag.
I think there are also unresolved issues with default sources for inheritance though - I seem to recall we don't support them at the moment.
We recently reworked pruning (#221, #250, #252). It works more reliable now and can reduce computational overhead quite a lot.
However, for debugging, it can be useful to attempt all possible computations.
This can help to identify culprits and identify longest partial solutions in the current design.
I would propose to add a
pruning
property to theTask
container and allow users to callsetPruning(false)
if they want to do so.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: