Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
249 lines (249 loc) · 7.05 KB

new-methods-to-detect-bias-in-peer-review.md

File metadata and controls

249 lines (249 loc) · 7.05 KB
ideaSubmitFormInstruction startDate votingAllowed newCampaign status commentCount challenge-id moderatorAdminOnlyIdeasEnabled funnelId ideaFromUnauthorizedMemberAllowed tagline groupName hideIdeaAuthor template campaignAttributes attributes total-prize-awarded-cash external-url submission-end why-use-prizes submission-start fiscal-year public-voting-end-date budget-and-resources total-prize-offered-cash campaign-owner public-voting-start-date legal-authority total-number-of-prizes-awarded evaluation-of-submissions agency-id solicitation-of-submissions total-submission-received total-number-of-participant show-winners-instead-of-prizes estimated-value-of-partner-contributions non-monetary-incentives-awarded partner-agencies-federal judging-end-date solicitation-methods advancing-the-agency-mission rules submission-start-date-1 hide-challenge-timeline judging-start-date winners-announced-date cash-prizes-and-non-cash-prize-awards campaign-owner-email solution-type partner-agencies-non-federal original-post-id total-number-of-winners-awarded hosting hide-challenge-funnel type-of-challenge participation-requirements number-of-phases how-to-enter partnerships groupAttributes judging-criteria-description-0 judging-criteria-percentage-0 judging-criteria-0 judging-criteria-description-1 judging-criteria-percentage-1 judging-criteria-1 judging-criteria-description-10 judging-criteria-percentage-10 judging-criteria-10 judging-criteria-description-11 judging-criteria-percentage-11 judging-criteria-11 judging-criteria-description-12 judging-criteria-12 judging-criteria-percentage-12 judging-criteria-description-13 judging-criteria-13 judging-criteria-percentage-13 judging-criteria-percentage-14 judging-criteria-14 judging-criteria-description-14 judging-criteria-percentage-15 judging-criteria-15 judging-criteria-description-15 judging-criteria-16 judging-criteria-percentage-16 judging-criteria-description-16 judging-criteria-17 judging-criteria-percentage-17 judging-criteria-description-17 judging-criteria-description-18 judging-criteria-percentage-18 judging-criteria-18 judging-criteria-description-19 judging-criteria-percentage-19 judging-criteria-19 judging-criteria-description-2 judging-criteria-2 judging-criteria-percentage-2 judging-criteria-description-3 judging-criteria-3 judging-criteria-percentage-3 judging-criteria-percentage-4 judging-criteria-4 judging-criteria-description-4 judging-criteria-percentage-5 judging-criteria-5 judging-criteria-description-5 judging-criteria-6 judging-criteria-percentage-6 judging-criteria-description-6 judging-criteria-7 judging-criteria-percentage-7 judging-criteria-description-7 judging-criteria-description-8 judging-criteria-percentage-8 judging-criteria-8 judging-criteria-description-9 judging-criteria-percentage-9 judging-criteria-9 prize-description-0 prize-cash-amount-0 prize-name-0 prize-description-1 prize-cash-amount-1 prize-name-1 prize-cash-amount-10 prize-name-10 prize-description-10 prize-cash-amount-11 prize-name-11 prize-description-11 prize-name-12 prize-cash-amount-12 prize-description-12 prize-name-13 prize-cash-amount-13 prize-description-13 prize-description-14 prize-cash-amount-14 prize-name-14 prize-description-15 prize-cash-amount-15 prize-name-15 prize-description-16 prize-name-16 prize-cash-amount-16 prize-description-17 prize-name-17 prize-cash-amount-17 prize-cash-amount-18 prize-name-18 prize-description-18 prize-description-2 prize-name-2 prize-cash-amount-2 prize-description-3 prize-name-3 prize-cash-amount-3 prize-cash-amount-4 prize-name-4 prize-description-4 prize-cash-amount-5 prize-name-5 prize-description-5 prize-name-6 prize-cash-amount-6 prize-description-6 prize-name-7 prize-cash-amount-7 prize-description-7 prize-description-8 prize-cash-amount-8 prize-name-8 prize-description-9 prize-cash-amount-9 prize-name-9 winner-solution-description-0 winner-solution-link-0 winner-name-0 winner-solution-title-0 winner-solution-link-1 winner-solution-description-1 winner-name-1 winner-solution-title-1 winner-solution-description-2 winner-solution-link-2 winner-solution-title-2 winner-name-2 winner-solution-link-3 winner-solution-description-3 winner-solution-title-3 winner-name-3 winner-name-4 winner-solution-title-4 winner-solution-description-4 winner-solution-link-4 winner-name-5 winner-solution-title-5 winner-solution-link-5 winner-solution-description-5 winner-solution-title-6 winner-name-6 winner-solution-description-6 winner-solution-link-6 winner-solution-title-7 winner-name-7 winner-solution-link-7 winner-solution-description-7 winner-solution-description-8 winner-solution-link-8 winner-name-8 winner-solution-title-8 winner-solution-link-9 winner-solution-description-9 winner-name-9 winner-solution-title-9 memberIdeaSubmissionAllowed showTitle description campaignStatusName templateId stageStatistics summaryEnabled voteCount ideaTabEnabledForChallenge moderatorAdminOnlyIdeasNotificationEnabled hideCommentAuthor authorizedGroupIds userSubscriptionAllowed bannerImage groupId showTagline challenge-title privateCampaign ideaCount memberIdeaAttachmentAllowed authorEdit permalink layout
2014-05-06T00:00:00
false
false
closed
0
423
false
4
true
CSR is seeking new methods to detect possible bias in the peer review of grant applications based on gender, race/ethnicity, area of science, and amount of research experience of applicants.
Department of Health and Human Services - National Institutes of Health
false
ideation
06/30/2014 04:00 AM
05/05/2014 08:00 PM
FY14
$10,000
Unspecified
102
Unknown
No
$10,000, $5,000
No
Ideas
58332
Externally (Challenge details will redirect to external url)
Yes
Ideas
10000
false
true
The NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR) is seeking ideas for the detection of bias in peer review of grant applications. CSR is particularly interested in approaches, strategies, methodologies, and/or measures that would be sensitive to detecting bias among reviewers based on gender, race/ethnicity, institutional affiliation, area of science, and amount of research experience of applicants. Prizes for best empirically-based and most create entries will be awarded.
Launched
0
false
0
true
false
false
false
165
true
New Methods to Detect Bias in Peer Review
true
0
false
false
/challenge/new-methods-to-detect-bias-in-peer-review/
json-page