You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Apologies if this already exists, but I could not find an equivalent of patsy's incr_dbuilder (more info). This would be useful for several reasons, one of them being for parallelizing the actual building across cores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @zmbc ! Unfortunately, formulaic does not support incremental building; but in principle it would not be too difficult to implement. The equivalent data structure for DesignInfo in formulaic is the ModelSpec. If you know the categories in advance, you could construct the ModelSpec yourself.
You could also construct your ModelSpec on a subset of the data that is guaranteed to have all categories represented, and then just apply the ModelSpec in parallel. Since ModelSpec is guaranteed to be serializable, this is easy to pass around between process/etc.
The only thing I think that is missing is the original scan of the data to make sure than formulaic detects all categories... is that right?
Apologies if this already exists, but I could not find an equivalent of
patsy
'sincr_dbuilder
(more info). This would be useful for several reasons, one of them being for parallelizing the actual building across cores.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: