From 6a754e0e5f863ca2c598b41d875b91a86d804c08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Clegg Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:09:48 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix broken link guide_impact_scores -> guide_impact_score. fixes #1023 --- public_html/guide_reading_variant_reports.php | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/public_html/guide_reading_variant_reports.php b/public_html/guide_reading_variant_reports.php index 22dc02f..82bacea 100644 --- a/public_html/guide_reading_variant_reports.php +++ b/public_html/guide_reading_variant_reports.php @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ p(. !img/sample_variant_report_2.gif! -p(. After the summary, the variant report contains a set of "impact scores":guide_impact_scores. These scores are generally entered by people who review the variant and help us automatically interpret the variant when producing reports. +p(. After the summary, the variant report contains a set of "impact scores":guide_impact_score. These scores are generally entered by people who review the variant and help us automatically interpret the variant when producing reports. p(. The scores split into two sections: "variant evidence" and "clinical importance". These two sections reflect two very different aspects to understanding a genetic variant's impact -- how serious the effect is clinically, and how well-established the evidence is for that effect. For example, a variant might have been seen once in a family with a very severe genetic disease. The clinical importance of such a disease could be quite high. However, the strength of evidence supporting that variant as causing the disease could be extremely weak -- it was only seen that once, in one child, and not part of an extensive study comparing many patients and many controls.