You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Mette,
Selina asked how the DiffCombObj.select_rules() can be adjusted to be more stringent (see loosolab/Datenanalyse-2021#4) . I had a look and it seems the user is able to adjust the pvalue theshold [y-axis]
Hi, thank you for catching this @vheger and @selinaLa! It is indeed quite inconsistent, I agree. I added the option to do: <CombObj>.select_significant_rules(x_threshold_percent=0.01, y_threshold_percent=0.01)
and <DiffCombObj>.select_rules(measure_threshold_percent=0.01)
So that will make the automatic selection more strict (default is 0.05 for all thresholds). But I will also have a look at the select_rules for DiffCombObj again. The p-value calculation is not working out so well, so I might change this function in the future (but the output will still be a subset of the original object, so nothing should change in the following steps).
Hi Mette,
Selina asked how the DiffCombObj.select_rules() can be adjusted to be more stringent (see loosolab/Datenanalyse-2021#4) . I had a look and it seems the user is able to adjust the pvalue theshold [y-axis]
But not the percentage used as distribution threshold [x-axis], although utils.get_threshold() provides this parameter:
This seems a bit inconsistent to me. Is there a reason for preventing the user to change this? Or should we add this option to select_rules() ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: