-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
run_look
needs limit override
#11
Comments
Did this locally with success, will link to pull request when it is available |
This was also changed in the latest push, should be able to provide a limit override like so:
Note that for now, limits have to be specified as strings. Update coming on this so users can supply a number. |
Hi there, It seems I can only retrieve 100 rows even though I specify higher values. Is there a limitation? |
@eebsidian No, the maximum should be whatever you provide. If you run the same Look in the UI with a 100 row limit set, do you get a warning that you ht the row limit? |
+1 from me |
+1 from me as well. |
Update on this: Due to a problem with However, the limit overrides are working as expected on
I'll be updating the repository to not accept |
Any progress on this? We've got a few people in the company that could start using R to do some really interesting stuff with our modelled data if only they could get it into R. |
Last I checked, there was a secret workaround: |
If only I'd known! I created a very simple package to do this in the end: https://github.com/Rich1000/lookr |
+1 from from me too. |
Has any work be done to reinstate the limit option of run_look ? |
What we've done here as a workaround is use a little variable injection in the resultFormat string: |
Regenerate Java SDK and include arguments in R wrapper function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: