-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document the stack specification format and output tagging #78
Labels
Affects: Metadata
Affects the stack output metadata
Affects: Spec Format
Affect the stack specification format
Category: Documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
Comments
ncoghlan
added
Category: Documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
Affects: Metadata
Affects the stack output metadata
Affects: Spec Format
Affect the stack specification format
labels
Nov 8, 2024
ncoghlan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2024
* Add new docs page for file format details * Check release note snippets when building docs * Allow single backtick for inline literals in docs (and docstrings) * Add OpenGraph metadata for more pages * Fail the docs build on warnings * Allow passing args to the docs build when running locally Initial steps towards #78
ncoghlan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2024
* Add new docs page for file format details * Check release note snippets when building docs * Allow single backtick for inline literals in docs (and docstrings) * Add OpenGraph metadata for more pages * Fail the docs build on warnings * Allow passing args to the docs build when running locally Initial steps towards #78
Explicitly documenting this also resulted in some format changes for the specification and layer metadata:
|
ncoghlan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2024
* Updated docs to actively discourage using ``@`` in layers names * Rename "explicitly versioned" to "externally versioned", and make it clear that is a separate concept from implicit layer lock versioning * Rename `fully_versioned_name` runtime layer spec field to `implementation_name` * Simplified ``runtime_name`` in layer metadata to always refer to the runtime install target * Added `implementation_name` to the published layer metadata * Added `bound_to_implementation` to the published layer metadata * Add mechanism to emit `FutureWarning` for renamed and removed spec fields (which still accepting them) Continues work on #78
ncoghlan
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2024
* Updated docs to actively discourage using ``@`` in layers names * Updated test cases to follow the docs guidance * Renamed "explicitly versioned" to "externally versioned", and made it clear that is a separate concept from implicit layer lock versioning * Dropped obsolete `build_requirements` layer spec field * Renamed `fully_versioned_name` runtime layer spec field to `python_implementation` * Renamed `runtime_name` to `runtime_layer` in layer metadata and simplified it to always refer to the runtime install target * Added `python_implementation` to the published layer metadata * Added `bound_to_implementation` to the published layer metadata * Added mechanism to emit `FutureWarning` for renamed and removed spec fields (while still accepting them) * Added new stack spec loading test cases for above changes (including one that confirms using `@` in layer names still works for both unversioned and implicitly versioned layers) Continues work on #78
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Affects: Metadata
Affects the stack output metadata
Affects: Spec Format
Affect the stack specification format
Category: Documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
With automatic layer versioning fixed in #64, we need explanatory documentation that covers the trade-offs between setting
versioned=true
on a layer and appending@NNN
manually to the layer names (there are specific reasons that the automatic versioning is an opt-in feature, mostly around the fact that it means that any update to that layer always requires republishing the layers that depend on it, even if nothing the upper layer uses actually changed).There's no good place to put that information in the initial version of the docs, so the best way to handle is to actually add the missing documentation for the stack specification format and the way it relates to the
--tagged-output
setting when publishing artifacts.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: