You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for open-soursing this work.
I used the trained models "LIP_CE2P_trainVal_473.pth" "LIP_CE2P_trainVal_321_681.pth" "LIP_CE2P_train.pth" from baidu drive to predict test images in LIP , but the results are not so good.
So then I used the "LIP_CE2P_train.pth" to evaluate LIP_val images and use the code 'job_evaluat.sh ' you provided . The results are : Pixel accuracy: 0.735310 Mean accuracy: 0.384664 Mean IU: 0.264362
Is the results normal or there is something wrong ?
I wonder whether he three trained models from baidu drive are the well-trained models that can achive the best performance as your paper shows ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Liuyixuan95
The version of PyTorch we used is 0.3.1. Someone using pytorch 0.4.1 can not reproduce the results. The reason is that the align_corners of upsample function is set to default to False. Maybe you can try to replace all the Upsample(size=output_size, mode='bilinear')" with "Upsample(size=output_size, mode='bilinear',align_corners=True)".
Hi, thanks for open-soursing this work.
I used the trained models "LIP_CE2P_trainVal_473.pth" "LIP_CE2P_trainVal_321_681.pth" "LIP_CE2P_train.pth" from baidu drive to predict test images in LIP , but the results are not so good.
So then I used the "LIP_CE2P_train.pth" to evaluate LIP_val images and use the code 'job_evaluat.sh ' you provided . The results are : Pixel accuracy: 0.735310 Mean accuracy: 0.384664 Mean IU: 0.264362
Is the results normal or there is something wrong ?
I wonder whether he three trained models from baidu drive are the well-trained models that can achive the best performance as your paper shows ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: