Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

loop subsumption resolving does not work when rules are in different layers #6

Open
levilucio opened this issue Jul 28, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

loop subsumption resolving does not work when rules are in different layers #6

levilucio opened this issue Jul 28, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@levilucio
Copy link
Owner

if two rules are in different layers the their match graphs completely overlap, the direction of the subsumption kept keeps the rule that appears later in front in the transformation, when it should be the opposite
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@levilucio