diff --git a/Specs/AES.lean b/Specs/AES.lean
index 7eb13640..a97c6604 100644
--- a/Specs/AES.lean
+++ b/Specs/AES.lean
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Author(s): Yan Peng
 import Arm.BitVec
 import Arm.Insts.DPSFP.Crypto_aes
 import Specs.AESCommon
+import Tactics.Enum_bv
 
 -- References : https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.197-upd1.pdf
 --              https://csrc.nist.gov/csrc/media/projects/cryptographic-standards-and-guidelines/documents/aes-development/rijndael-ammended.pdf
@@ -165,18 +166,21 @@ def MixColumns {Param : KBR} (state : BitVec Param.block_size)
   let FFmul03 := fun (x : BitVec 8) => x ^^^ XTimes x
   h ▸ AESCommon.MixColumns (h ▸ state) FFmul02 FFmul03
 
--- TODO: looks like a SAT/SMT problem
+set_option maxRecDepth 3000 in
+set_option maxHeartbeats 300000 in
+set_option profiler true in
 protected theorem FFmul02_equiv : (fun x => XTimes x) = DPSFP.FFmul02 := by
   funext x
-  simp only [XTimes, DPSFP.FFmul02]
-  sorry
+  enum_bv 8 x
+  -- sorry
 
--- TODO: looks like a SAT/SMT problem
+set_option maxRecDepth 3000 in
+set_option maxHeartbeats 300000 in
+set_option profiler true in
 protected theorem FFmul03_equiv : (fun x => x ^^^ XTimes x) = DPSFP.FFmul03 := by
   funext x
-  simp only [XTimes, DPSFP.FFmul03]
-  sorry
-
+  enum_bv 8 x
+  -- sorry
 
 theorem MixColumns_table_lookup_equiv {Param : KBR}
   (state : BitVec Param.block_size):
diff --git a/Tactics/Enum_bv.lean b/Tactics/Enum_bv.lean
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..672b3559
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Tactics/Enum_bv.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Author(s): Yan Peng
+-/
+import Lean.Elab
+import Lean.Expr
+
+open BitVec
+
+theorem le_and_ne_implies_lt (x : Nat) (y : Nat) (h0 : x ≠ y) (h1 : x ≤ y): x < y := by
+  have h : x < y ∨ x = y := by apply Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le h1
+  cases h
+  · assumption
+  · contradiction
+
+-- An example
+-- def carry_less_add (x : BitVec 2) : BitVec 2 := x ^^^ 0b1#2
+-- def lookup_cla (x : BitVec 2) : BitVec 2 :=
+--   BitVec.cast (by omega) $
+--   if x.toNat == 0 then 0b01#2
+--   else if x.toNat == 1 then 0b0#2
+--   else if x.toNat == 2 then 0b11#2
+--   else 0b10#2
+
+-- theorem example_lemma_expanded : carry_less_add = lookup_cla := by
+--   funext x
+--   by_cases h₀ : x = BitVec.ofNat 2 0
+--   case pos =>
+--     simp only [h₀]
+--     decide
+--   case neg =>
+--     by_cases h₁ : x = BitVec.ofNat 2 1
+--     case pos =>
+--       simp only [h₁]
+--       decide
+--     case neg =>
+--       by_cases h₂ : x = BitVec.ofNat 2 2
+--       case pos =>
+--         simp [h₂]
+--         decide
+--       case neg =>
+--         by_cases h₃ : x = BitVec.ofNat 2 3
+--         case pos =>
+--           simp [h₃]
+--           decide
+--         case neg =>
+--           rw [← ne_eq, toNat_ne] at *
+--           have p4 : x.toNat < 4 := by
+--             exact isLt x
+--           have p3' : x.toNat ≤ 3 := by
+--             apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
+--             simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, p4]
+--           have p3 : x.toNat < 3 := by
+--             apply le_and_ne_implies_lt
+--             · exact h₃
+--             · simp only [p3']
+--           have p2' : x.toNat ≤ 2 := by
+--             apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
+--             simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, p3]
+--           have p2 : x.toNat < 2 := by
+--             apply le_and_ne_implies_lt
+--             · exact h₂
+--             · simp only [p2']
+--           have p1' : x.toNat ≤ 1 := by
+--             apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
+--             simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, p2]
+--           have p1 : x.toNat < 1 := by
+--             apply le_and_ne_implies_lt
+--             · exact h₁
+--             · simp only [p1']
+--           have p0' : x.toNat ≤ 0 := by
+--             apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
+--             simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, p1]
+--           have p0 : x.toNat = 0 := by
+--             exact Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero p0'
+--           contradiction
+
+partial def shrink (i : Nat) (N : Nat) (var : Lean.Ident)
+  : Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM (Lean.TSyntax `tactic) := do
+  let i_str := toString i
+  let i_num := Lean.Syntax.mkNumLit i_str
+  if i = N then
+    let p_name :=
+      Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous ("p" ++ i_str)
+    let rest ← shrink (i - 1) N var
+    `(tactic|
+      (have $p_name:ident : BitVec.toNat $var:ident < $i_num:num := by
+         exact isLt $var:ident
+       $rest:tactic))
+  else
+    let i_pre := toString (i + 1)
+    let p_pre :=
+      Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous ("p" ++ i_pre)
+    let p_name1 :=
+      Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous ("p" ++ i_str ++ "'")
+    let p_name2 :=
+      Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous ("p" ++ i_str)
+    if i ≤ 0 then
+      `(tactic|
+         (have $p_name1:ident : BitVec.toNat $var:ident ≤ $i_num:num := by
+            apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
+            simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, $p_pre:ident]
+          clear $p_pre:ident
+          have $p_name2:ident : BitVec.toNat $var:ident = $i_num:num := by
+            exact Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $p_name1:ident
+          clear $p_name1:ident))
+    else
+      let h_name :=
+        Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous ("h" ++ i_str)
+      let rest ← shrink (i - 1) N var
+      `(tactic|
+         (have $p_name1:ident : BitVec.toNat $var:ident ≤ $i_num:num := by
+            apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
+            simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, $p_pre:ident]
+          clear $p_pre:ident
+          have $p_name2:ident : BitVec.toNat $var:ident < $i_num:num := by
+            apply le_and_ne_implies_lt
+            · exact $h_name:ident
+            · simp only [$p_name1:ident]
+          clear $p_name1:ident
+          $rest:tactic))
+
+def enum_last_case (n : Nat) (var : Lean.Ident)
+  : Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM (Lean.TSyntax `tactic) := do
+  let shrink_tac ← shrink (2 ^ n) (2 ^ n) var
+  `(tactic|
+    (rw [← ne_eq, toNat_ne] at *
+     $shrink_tac:tactic
+     contradiction)
+    )
+
+partial def enum_cases_syntax (i : Nat) (n : Nat) (var : Lean.Ident)
+  : Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM (Lean.TSyntax `tactic) := do
+  if 2 ^ n ≤ i
+  then let last ← enum_last_case n var
+       `(tactic| $last:tactic)
+  else
+    let i_str := toString i
+    let h_name := Lean.mkIdent $ Lean.Name.mkStr Lean.Name.anonymous ("h" ++ i_str)
+    let i_num := Lean.Syntax.mkNumLit i_str
+    let n_num := Lean.Syntax.mkNumLit $ toString n
+    let rest ← enum_cases_syntax (i + 1) n var
+    `(tactic|
+       (by_cases $h_name:ident : $var:ident = (BitVec.ofNat $n_num:num $i_num:num)
+        · simp only [$h_name:ident]; decide
+        · $rest:tactic
+        done
+       )
+     )
+
+def enum_bv_fn (n : Lean.Syntax.NumLit) (var : Lean.Ident):
+  Lean.Elab.Tactic.TacticM Unit :=
+  Lean.Elab.Tactic.withMainContext do
+    Lean.Elab.Tactic.evalTactic (←
+      enum_cases_syntax 0 n.getNat var
+    )
+
+-- Establishing a theorem through enumeration of all values of a bit-vector
+-- Assumption: the theorem has only one free variable of type `BitVec n`
+elab "enum_bv" n:num var:ident : tactic => do
+  enum_bv_fn n var
+
+-- theorem example_lemma : carry_less_add = lookup_cla := by
+--   funext x
+--   enum_bv 2 x
+