Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assamese #116

Open
scossu opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Assamese #116

scossu opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@scossu
Copy link
Collaborator

scossu commented Jul 18, 2024

Add Assamese support via Aksharamukha.

Note that AM has ALA-LC support for Assamese, but it does not show as 100% accurate from tests (see attached).

Assamese Romanization Testing.docx

@scossu scossu added the script label Jul 18, 2024
@scossu scossu self-assigned this Jul 18, 2024
@virtualvinodh
Copy link

virtualvinodh commented Nov 12, 2024

I had a look at the issue. It's because the ALA-LC table for Assamese doesn't include a 'v' but rather 'w'.

@virtualvinodh
Copy link

Aksharamukha tries to guess /y/ and /ẏ/ contextually by default. You'd have to disable it and enable strict transliteration by activating "Preserve source".

@scossu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

scossu commented Nov 12, 2024

Thanks for looking into this, Vinodh.

There is a way to set Aksharamukha options on a per-script basis in the configuration. Are you suggesting that I should turn "preserve source" on by default for the whole Assamese script (vs. leaving the option up to the user on a case-by-case basis)?

@scossu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

scossu commented Dec 25, 2024

Assamese is now available for LC transliteration in Aksharamukha and integrated in SS. However, the test samples attached in this ticket do not show how the expected transliteration should be. Hence, leaving open and on hold until we get more input (it has been solicited).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants