-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
radiusOfInnerMostHit
could be removed from Track
#319
Comments
We (BH, JMC, FG) believe that this should be droped. (If really needed later, adding it is easy w/ schema evolution). |
This was quite useful information on DST files (no-hits) imo... |
Removing it for now, since it's mixing analysis and reconstruction level quantities too much. We have a similar discussion for other items, e.g. #322 |
Dear @farakiko Please open a new issue, and please don't screenshoot text, but give us the actual code as text so we don't have to potentially type things ourselves. Thanks, |
Thank you! Submitted the issue #384 |
The
Track
currently has a memberradiusOfInnerMostHit
, which could be removed, as it is technically easily computable from the attachedTrackerHit
s. The only / main(?) reason to keep it would be to keep this information around even if theTrackerHit
s are dropped (as is the case for example in DSTs for ILD).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: