Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

performance testing the include and map projection features #39

Open
kbilsted opened this issue Jul 2, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

performance testing the include and map projection features #39

kbilsted opened this issue Jul 2, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@kbilsted
Copy link
Owner

kbilsted commented Jul 2, 2015

With #17 We now have two ways of including only a sub-set of fields of a given type. Which is faster? or are both insignificant compared to the introspection and stringbuilding?

note use the feature/mapprojection branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant