Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I have ran your code, but the results are not good as yours. #26

Open
username123062 opened this issue Feb 13, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@username123062
Copy link

I have ran your code, but the results are not good as yours. So do you have some special skills to run the code? Thanks.

Instance segmentation + training dataset (0.5AP): mine 35.7, yours 37.7;
Semantic segmentation + training dataset (miou): mine 66.0, yours 66.5;

@xiaaoo-zz
Copy link

Same here, 35.7 for instance segmentation and 65.9 for semantic segmentation.

@username123062
Copy link
Author

username123062 commented Mar 5, 2020 via email

@jiwoon-ahn
Copy link
Owner

I think I misunderstood your question.
If you find it difficult to reproduce our results with DeepLab, try with one of the old versions of Detectron.
But, it seems the question is about the quality of your pseudo labels. You could try the entire process several times, and see if the gap continues.
I am afraid to say that I do not know exactly why this happens. Some succeeds, and some fails. Perhaps I made some glitches while refactoring the code?

@jakecastelli
Copy link

hi guys👋

@jiwoon-ahn thanks for the great work.

Have you tried to validate the results again lately? Any suggestions?
Cheers

@YB17
Copy link

YB17 commented Aug 8, 2022

@username123062 @xiaaoo hello friends, could you please share the hyperparameters for training the IRNet please? I tried the default parameters in run_sample.py, but the CAM is really poor and I have to lower the learning rate and increase epochs to reach a good convergence. For the IRNet the default parameters also won't work, as the displacement field can not be learned, which leads to very poor performance for the centroid clustering. It is a pity that the original paper didn't even mention the hyperparameters, and it seems that the authors have already abandoned answering the questions posted here. Thanks a lot!!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants