gpt-4o-zero-shot.json

{"test": [{"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam volunteers.\nThe shop sings beautifully.\nLiam volunteers.\nRules:\nWhen liam volunteers, we can conclude liam hikes mountains.\nGiven that liam volunteers, it follows that liam sings beautifully.\nGiven that henry volunteers, it follows that the book sings beautifully.\nGiven that liam volunteers, it follows that liam sings beautifully.\nIf liam volunteers, then henry volunteers.\nBased on liam sings beautifully, it is evident that henry volunteers.", "statement": "The book volunteers.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming liam volunteers, we can say liam hikes mountains, it follows that liam hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that liam volunteers, it follows that liam sings beautifully, we can see that liam sings beautifully.\nGiven that if liam volunteers, then henry volunteers, it is evident that henry volunteers.\nSince we know that based on henry volunteers, it is evident that the book sings beautifully, it follows that the book sings beautifully.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If liam volunteers, then henry volunteers., Given that henry volunteers, it follows that the book sings beautifully., the negation of The book volunteers.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy is a scientist.\nLucy is a scientist.\nThe mountain is fluffy.\nRules:\nWhen lucy is a scientist, we can conclude the mountain is fluffy.\nBased on the sky is fluffy, it is evident that the sky dances gracefully.\nAssuming the stadium is a scientist, we can say the sky dances gracefully.\nIf the stadium is a scientist, then the mountain is a scientist.\nWhen the stadium travels far, we can conclude the stadium is a scientist.\nWhen the mountain is fluffy, we can conclude the stadium is a scientist.", "statement": "The sky is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming lucy is a scientist, we can say the mountain is fluffy, it follows that the mountain is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of if the mountain is fluffy, then the stadium is a scientist, we deduce that the stadium is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the stadium is a scientist, we can say the sky dances gracefully, we can see that the sky dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the stadium is a scientist, we can conclude the mountain is a scientist, we can see that the mountain is a scientist.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the mountain is fluffy, we can conclude the stadium is a scientist., Based on the sky is fluffy, it is evident that the sky dances gracefully., The sky does not dance gracefully, The sky is not fluffy.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack makes pizza.\nThe cloud fishes in lakes.\nThe cloud makes pizza.\nRules:\nAssuming the cloud makes pizza, we can say the cloud is funny.\nAssuming the cloud fishes in lakes, we can say the cloud is funny.\nIf jack makes pizza, then the car makes pizza.\nAssuming the cloud makes pizza, we can say jack carries bags.\nIf the cloud makes pizza, then the cloud is funny.\nBased on the car carries bags, it is evident that jack makes pizza.\nAssuming the car makes pizza, we can say the car carries bags.\nBased on the car makes pizza, it is evident that the car carries bags.\nBased on the cloud makes pizza, it is evident that jack carries bags.\nAssuming the cloud makes pizza, we can say the car carries bags.", "statement": "Emma carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the cloud makes pizza, it follows that the cloud is funny, we can see that the cloud is funny.\nBecause assuming jack makes pizza, we can say the car makes pizza, we can conclude that the car makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of when the cloud makes pizza, we can conclude jack carries bags, we deduce that jack carries bags.\nSince we know that assuming the car makes pizza, we can say the car carries bags, it follows that the car carries bags.\nBecause based on the car makes pizza, it is evident that the car carries bags, we can conclude that the car carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the car carries bags, we can conclude jack makes pizza, we can see that jack makes pizza.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts relating to Emma carrying bags, Emma is not mentioned.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAlice takes pictures.\nThe zoo is interesting.\nLiam is interesting.\nRules:\nGiven that the zoo is interesting, it follows that the train takes pictures.\nIf alice takes pictures, then the train takes pictures.\nBased on alice takes pictures, it is evident that liam takes pictures.\nBased on the zoo is interesting, it is evident that alice is magical.\nAssuming liam is interesting, we can say the train takes pictures.\nWhen alice takes pictures, we can conclude the train takes pictures.\nBased on the zoo is fast, it is evident that the train takes pictures.\nIf the zoo is interesting, then the train takes pictures.\nIf the train is interesting, then liam takes pictures.\nAssuming liam takes pictures, we can say the train is interesting.", "statement": "The zoo is fast.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the zoo is interesting, it is evident that the train takes pictures, it is evident that the train takes pictures.\nSince we know that given that alice takes pictures, it follows that the train takes pictures, it follows that the train takes pictures.\nSince we know that given that alice takes pictures, it follows that liam takes pictures, it follows that liam takes pictures.\nBecause based on the zoo is interesting, it is evident that alice is magical, we can conclude that alice is magical.\nSince we know that assuming liam takes pictures, we can say the train is interesting, it follows that the train is interesting.\nBecause given that the train is interesting, it follows that liam takes pictures, we can conclude that liam takes pictures.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the zoo is interesting, based on the zoo is fast, it is evident that the train takes pictures, which does not necessarily imply the zoo is fast, the zoo is fast is not implied by any rule, the negation of the assertion\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry swims well.\nMike plays football.\nMike is happy.\nRules:\nIf mike is happy, then henry is happy.\nBased on mike is happy, it is evident that the city swims well.\nGiven that the sun is happy, it follows that mike plays football.\nWhen the city swims well, we can conclude henry is happy.\nGiven that the sun is happy, it follows that henry is happy.\nAssuming henry is happy, we can say henry is an engineer.\nGiven that the city swims well, it follows that the sun is happy.", "statement": "The sun plays football.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that mike is happy, it follows that henry is happy, we can see that henry is happy.\nBecause when mike is happy, we can conclude the city swims well, we can conclude that the city swims well.\nBecause when henry is happy, we can conclude henry is an engineer, we can conclude that henry is an engineer.\nSince we know that when the city swims well, we can conclude the sun is happy, it follows that the sun is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the sun is happy, it follows that mike plays football, we can see that mike plays football.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on mike is happy, it is evident that the city swims well, given that the city swims well, it follows that the sun is happy, given that the sun is happy, it follows that mike plays football, the sun plays football.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi is tall.\nJianzhi is tall.\nThe teacher draws maps.\nRules:\nGiven that jianzhi is tall, it follows that jianzhi draws maps.\nGiven that jianzhi is tall, it follows that the moon collects stamps.\nWhen the plane collects stamps, we can conclude jianzhi is tall.\nBased on the moon is tall, it is evident that the moon collects stamps.\nWhen the moon collects stamps, we can conclude jianzhi is tall.\nWhen the teacher draws maps, we can conclude the teacher is tall.\nAssuming the teacher is tall, we can say the plane collects stamps.", "statement": "The moon is tall.", "reasoning": "Given that if jianzhi is tall, then jianzhi draws maps, it is evident that jianzhi draws maps.\nGiven that based on jianzhi is tall, it is evident that the moon collects stamps, it is evident that the moon collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the teacher draws maps, we can say the teacher is tall, we can see that the teacher is tall.\nBecause assuming the teacher is tall, we can say the plane collects stamps, we can conclude that the plane collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the plane collects stamps, then jianzhi is tall, we can see that jianzhi is tall.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because When the teacher draws maps, we can conclude the teacher is tall., Assuming the teacher is tall, we can say the plane collects stamps., and When the plane collects stamps, we can conclude jianzhi is tall., we cannot conclude The moon is tall.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie dances gracefully.\nThe stadium plays instruments.\nThe stadium is a doctor.\nRules:\nWhen the stadium is a doctor, we can conclude the stadium dances gracefully.\nAssuming the stadium plays instruments, we can say the stadium dances gracefully.\nIf the bridge plays instruments, then the stadium dances gracefully.\nIf the stadium dances gracefully, then the bridge plays instruments.\nWhen charlie dances gracefully, we can conclude lucy is a doctor.", "statement": "The bridge writes stories.", "reasoning": "Given that when the stadium is a doctor, we can conclude the stadium dances gracefully, it is evident that the stadium dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium plays instruments, then the stadium dances gracefully, we can see that the stadium dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the stadium dances gracefully, it follows that the bridge plays instruments, we can see that the bridge plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when charlie dances gracefully, we can conclude lucy is a doctor, we can see that lucy is a doctor.\nSince we know that based on the bridge plays instruments, it is evident that the stadium dances gracefully, it follows that the stadium dances gracefully.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the stadium dances gracefully, then the bridge plays instruments, when charlie dances gracefully, we can conclude lucy is a doctor, the bridge writes stories is not supported by any rule or fact given, the bridge writes stories.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest collects stamps.\nThe computer is fast.\nThe garden paints pictures.\nRules:\nAssuming the forest collects stamps, we can say henry is fast.\nIf the forest collects stamps, then henry paints pictures.\nWhen the garden paints pictures, we can conclude the forest is fast.\nIf the forest plays instruments, then henry is fast.\nAssuming the garden is fast, we can say the forest plays instruments.\nIf the garden paints pictures, then the garden is fast.\nIf henry paints pictures, then the garden plays instruments.\nBased on the garden is fast, it is evident that the forest paints pictures.", "statement": "Henry collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the forest collects stamps, we can say henry is fast, it is evident that henry is fast.\nApplying the logic of given that the forest collects stamps, it follows that henry paints pictures, we deduce that henry paints pictures.\nBecause based on the garden paints pictures, it is evident that the forest is fast, we can conclude that the forest is fast.\nGiven that given that the garden paints pictures, it follows that the garden is fast, it is evident that the garden is fast.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when henry paints pictures, we can conclude the garden plays instruments, we can see that the garden plays instruments.\nBecause assuming the garden is fast, we can say the forest paints pictures, we can conclude that the forest paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of when the garden is fast, we can conclude the forest plays instruments, we deduce that the forest plays instruments.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the forest collects stamps, we can say henry is fast, if the forest collects stamps, then henry paints pictures, assuming the garden is fast, we can say the forest plays instruments, if the garden paints pictures, then the garden is fast, the forest collects stamps, the garden paints pictures, we cannot conclude that Henry collects stamps\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas does yoga.\nLucas does yoga.\nLucas is a chef.\nRules:\nIf lucas does yoga, then lucas hosts parties.\nIf the bakery hosts parties, then lucas hosts parties.\nWhen the bakery hosts parties, we can conclude the forest does yoga.\nAssuming lucas does yoga, we can say lucas hosts parties.\nAssuming lucas hosts parties, we can say the bakery hosts parties.\nAssuming lucas hosts parties, we can say the forest is interesting.", "statement": "The bakery does yoga.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when lucas does yoga, we can conclude lucas hosts parties, we deduce that lucas hosts parties.\nGiven that when lucas hosts parties, we can conclude the bakery hosts parties, it is evident that the bakery hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucas hosts parties, we can say the forest is interesting, we can see that the forest is interesting.\nApplying the logic of based on the bakery hosts parties, it is evident that the forest does yoga, we deduce that the forest does yoga.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming lucas does yoga, we can say lucas hosts parties, Assuming lucas hosts parties, we can say the bakery hosts parties, The bakery does yoga is not concluded from the given facts and rules\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop explores cities.\nThe sun jumps high.\nThe sun jumps high.\nRules:\nWhen the shop explores cities, we can conclude the shop jumps high.\nGiven that the shop runs marathons, it follows that the shop jumps high.\nAssuming the shop explores cities, we can say the shop runs marathons.\nBased on the shop jumps high, it is evident that the shop runs marathons.\nGiven that the shop jumps high, it follows that lucy explores cities.\nBased on the sun jumps high, it is evident that the shop jumps high.", "statement": "Lucy dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Because if the shop explores cities, then the shop jumps high, we can conclude that the shop jumps high.\nGiven that if the shop explores cities, then the shop runs marathons, it is evident that the shop runs marathons.\nBecause if the shop jumps high, then the shop runs marathons, we can conclude that the shop runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of when the shop jumps high, we can conclude lucy explores cities, we deduce that lucy explores cities.\nApplying the logic of assuming the shop runs marathons, we can say the shop jumps high, we deduce that the shop jumps high.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the shop explores cities, we can conclude the shop jumps high, based on the sun jumps high, it is evident that the shop jumps high, given that the shop jumps high, it follows that lucy explores cities, the assertion Lucy dances gracefully is not related and cannot be concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky fishes in lakes.\nThe sun fishes in lakes.\nCharlie is a chef.\nRules:\nIf the sun fishes in lakes, then the sun plays football.\nBased on the sun fishes in lakes, it is evident that the sun fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the sun fishes in lakes, we can say lucas fishes in lakes.\nBased on lucas fishes in lakes, it is evident that the sun is a chef.\nWhen the sun fishes in lakes, we can conclude lucas teaches math.\nGiven that the sky is a chef, it follows that lucas plays football.\nIf the sun fishes in lakes, then the sky is a chef.", "statement": "Lucas teaches math.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the sun fishes in lakes, it is evident that the sun plays football, we deduce that the sun plays football.\nGiven that assuming the sun fishes in lakes, we can say the sun fishes in lakes, it is evident that the sun fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that given that the sun fishes in lakes, it follows that lucas fishes in lakes, it follows that lucas fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that if lucas fishes in lakes, then the sun is a chef, it follows that the sun is a chef.\nBecause given that the sun fishes in lakes, it follows that the sky is a chef, we can conclude that the sky is a chef.\nApplying the logic of based on the sky is a chef, it is evident that lucas plays football, we deduce that lucas plays football.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the sun fishes in lakes, we can conclude lucas teaches math., Lucas teaches math.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University is a chef.\nAlice solves puzzles.\nThe musician is a chef.\nRules:\nIf alice solves puzzles, then the dog runs marathons.\nAssuming stanford university is a chef, we can say the musician solves puzzles.\nAssuming the musician is a chef, we can say alice grows plants.\nAssuming the musician is a chef, we can say stanford university grows plants.\nIf stanford university is a chef, then stanford university grows plants.\nAssuming the musician solves puzzles, we can say stanford university grows plants.\nWhen the dog is a chef, we can conclude the musician solves puzzles.\nAssuming stanford university is a chef, we can say the musician solves puzzles.\nIf the dog is a chef, then the musician runs marathons.\nGiven that the musician solves puzzles, it follows that the dog is a chef.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on alice solves puzzles, it is evident that the dog runs marathons, it follows that the dog runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the musician solves puzzles, we deduce that the musician solves puzzles.\nApplying the logic of given that the musician is a chef, it follows that alice grows plants, we deduce that alice grows plants.\nSince we know that when the musician is a chef, we can conclude stanford university grows plants, it follows that stanford university grows plants.\nGiven that given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the musician solves puzzles, it is evident that the musician solves puzzles.\nApplying the logic of based on the musician solves puzzles, it is evident that the dog is a chef, we deduce that the dog is a chef.\nGiven that when the dog is a chef, we can conclude the musician runs marathons, it is evident that the musician runs marathons.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"The provided facts and rules do not relate to the assertion about Chuan being handsome, thus no conclusion can be drawn from these facts and rules about the assertion.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery hikes mountains.\nThe bakery enjoys music.\nThe bakery jumps high.\nRules:\nAssuming the bakery jumps high, we can say emma sings beautifully.\nGiven that the bakery enjoys music, it follows that the bakery sings beautifully.\nIf the bakery enjoys music, then emma sings beautifully.\nAssuming emma jumps high, we can say emma sings beautifully.\nIf emma jumps high, then emma sings beautifully.\nBased on the bakery sings beautifully, it is evident that emma jumps high.\nBased on the bakery jumps high, it is evident that emma jumps high.\nAssuming emma jumps high, we can say the bakery sings beautifully.", "statement": "The plane sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the bakery jumps high, it is evident that emma sings beautifully, it follows that emma sings beautifully.\nBecause when the bakery enjoys music, we can conclude the bakery sings beautifully, we can conclude that the bakery sings beautifully.\nSince we know that assuming the bakery jumps high, we can say emma jumps high, it follows that emma jumps high.\nBecause given that emma jumps high, it follows that emma sings beautifully, we can conclude that emma sings beautifully.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"The provided facts and rules do not establish any connection between the plane and any of the conditions or conclusions related to singing beautifully. Therefore, there is no basis or rule to infer that the plane sings beautifully.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden hikes mountains.\nThe musician is a scientist.\nThe musician is a scientist.\nRules:\nBased on the musician is a scientist, it is evident that the tree draws maps.\nGiven that the tree plays football, it follows that the musician draws maps.\nIf the musician is a scientist, then the tree hikes mountains.\nIf the musician hikes mountains, then the car plays football.\nGiven that the tree hikes mountains, it follows that the musician hikes mountains.\nGiven that the car draws maps, it follows that the tree plays football.", "statement": "The musician draws maps.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the musician is a scientist, we can conclude the tree draws maps, we can see that the tree draws maps.\nSince we know that based on the musician is a scientist, it is evident that the tree hikes mountains, it follows that the tree hikes mountains.\nSince we know that based on the tree hikes mountains, it is evident that the musician hikes mountains, it follows that the musician hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of when the musician hikes mountains, we can conclude the car plays football, we deduce that the car plays football.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the musician is a scientist, then the tree hikes mountains, given that the tree hikes mountains, it follows that the musician hikes mountains, if the musician hikes mountains, then the car plays football, given that the car draws maps, it follows that the tree plays football, given that the tree plays football, it follows that the musician draws maps, the assertion is true.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack makes pizza.\nJack solves puzzles.\nThe stadium makes pizza.\nRules:\nWhen jack solves puzzles, we can conclude the pig makes pizza.\nWhen jack makes pizza, we can conclude the shop makes pizza.\nGiven that the stadium solves puzzles, it follows that the stadium is happy.\nIf the stadium makes pizza, then the stadium solves puzzles.\nGiven that the stadium is happy, it follows that jack solves puzzles.\nWhen the stadium solves puzzles, we can conclude the shop is happy.", "statement": "Jack hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if jack solves puzzles, then the pig makes pizza, we can see that the pig makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of if jack makes pizza, then the shop makes pizza, we deduce that the shop makes pizza.\nBecause when the stadium makes pizza, we can conclude the stadium solves puzzles, we can conclude that the stadium solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the stadium solves puzzles, it is evident that the shop is happy, we can see that the shop is happy.\nApplying the logic of based on the stadium solves puzzles, it is evident that the stadium is happy, we deduce that the stadium is happy.\nGiven that given that the stadium is happy, it follows that jack solves puzzles, it is evident that jack solves puzzles.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Jack solves puzzles, we can conclude the pig makes pizza.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie reads books.\nLucy explores cities.\nSophie travels far.\nRules:\nBased on lucy explores cities, it is evident that sophie reads books.\nWhen lucy explores cities, we can conclude sophie reads books.\nAssuming lucy explores cities, we can say sophie reads books.\nIf lucy explores cities, then emma travels far.\nGiven that sophie travels far, it follows that emma explores cities.\nGiven that lucy travels far, it follows that sophie travels far.\nAssuming emma travels far, we can say emma explores cities.\nIf sophie travels far, then emma reads books.\nIf lucy explores cities, then sophie travels far.", "statement": "The dog volunteers.", "reasoning": "Given that based on lucy explores cities, it is evident that sophie reads books, it is evident that sophie reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when lucy explores cities, we can conclude sophie reads books, we can see that sophie reads books.\nSince we know that when lucy explores cities, we can conclude emma travels far, it follows that emma travels far.\nBecause assuming sophie travels far, we can say emma explores cities, we can conclude that emma explores cities.\nBecause if lucy explores cities, then sophie travels far, we can conclude that sophie travels far.\nApplying the logic of based on sophie travels far, it is evident that emma reads books, we deduce that emma reads books.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts connecting the provided assertions or facts to 'The dog volunteers'. Therefore, a conclusion cannot be made about it.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud fishes in lakes.\nHenry is blue.\nThe cloud fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nBased on the cloud fishes in lakes, it is evident that the cloud is blue.\nBased on the cloud fishes in lakes, it is evident that jianzhi plays instruments.\nGiven that the cloud fishes in lakes, it follows that henry plays instruments.\nGiven that jianzhi is blue, it follows that jianzhi plays instruments.\nAssuming henry plays instruments, we can say jianzhi is blue.\nWhen the cloud fishes in lakes, we can conclude henry plays instruments.\nAssuming jianzhi plays instruments, we can say jianzhi plays instruments.\nIf jianzhi is blue, then henry is blue.", "statement": "Henry is a chef.", "reasoning": "Given that if the cloud fishes in lakes, then the cloud is blue, it is evident that the cloud is blue.\nGiven that assuming the cloud fishes in lakes, we can say jianzhi plays instruments, it is evident that jianzhi plays instruments.\nApplying the logic of given that the cloud fishes in lakes, it follows that henry plays instruments, we deduce that henry plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if henry plays instruments, then jianzhi is blue, we can see that jianzhi is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming jianzhi is blue, we can say henry is blue, we can see that henry is blue.\nGiven that assuming jianzhi is blue, we can say jianzhi plays instruments, it is evident that jianzhi plays instruments.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no applicable rules or facts related to being a chef, Henry is a chef is not supported by any evidence.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain is quiet.\nThe mountain is colorful.\nThe fountain does yoga.\nRules:\nBased on the fountain does yoga, it is evident that the cat does yoga.\nIf the cat makes pizza, then the mountain is colorful.\nAssuming the mountain is colorful, we can say mike is colorful.\nAssuming mike is colorful, we can say the cat makes pizza.\nGiven that mike makes pizza, it follows that the fountain makes pizza.", "statement": "Mike makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Given that if the fountain does yoga, then the cat does yoga, it is evident that the cat does yoga.\nGiven that if the mountain is colorful, then mike is colorful, it is evident that mike is colorful.\nBecause given that mike is colorful, it follows that the cat makes pizza, we can conclude that the cat makes pizza.\nBecause when the cat makes pizza, we can conclude the mountain is colorful, we can conclude that the mountain is colorful.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the mountain is colorful, we can say mike is colorful., Assuming mike is colorful, we can say the cat makes pizza., Given that mike makes pizza, it follows that the fountain makes pizza., the mountain is colorful, Mike makes pizza.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium hosts parties.\nThe dog is loud.\nThe dog takes pictures.\nRules:\nIf the dog takes pictures, then charlie collects stamps.\nIf the dog takes pictures, then the dog collects stamps.\nAssuming the dog takes pictures, we can say the stadium is loud.\nBased on the stadium hosts parties, it is evident that the dog takes pictures.\nGiven that the dog collects stamps, it follows that charlie hosts parties.\nWhen the dog takes pictures, we can conclude the dog collects stamps.\nGiven that the dog takes pictures, it follows that charlie collects stamps.\nWhen the dog is loud, we can conclude the dog takes pictures.\nWhen the dog collects stamps, we can conclude the dog collects stamps.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the dog takes pictures, we can conclude charlie collects stamps, we can see that charlie collects stamps.\nSince we know that when the dog takes pictures, we can conclude the dog collects stamps, it follows that the dog collects stamps.\nBecause based on the dog takes pictures, it is evident that the stadium is loud, we can conclude that the stadium is loud.\nSince we know that if the stadium hosts parties, then the dog takes pictures, it follows that the dog takes pictures.\nBecause when the dog takes pictures, we can conclude charlie collects stamps, we can conclude that charlie collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the dog collects stamps, then the dog collects stamps, we can see that the dog collects stamps.\nBecause given that the dog collects stamps, it follows that charlie hosts parties, we can conclude that charlie hosts parties.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva hosts parties.\nThe stadium hosts parties.\nAva is fast.\nRules:\nGiven that ava hosts parties, it follows that jianzhi goes to the hospital.\nGiven that ava hosts parties, it follows that sarah plays games.\nGiven that sarah is fast, it follows that the stadium goes to the hospital.\nBased on sarah plays games, it is evident that sarah is fast.\nBased on jianzhi goes to the hospital, it is evident that sarah plays games.\nGiven that the stadium hosts parties, it follows that ava plays games.", "statement": "Ava goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if ava hosts parties, then jianzhi goes to the hospital, it follows that jianzhi goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that if ava hosts parties, then sarah plays games, it follows that sarah plays games.\nApplying the logic of based on sarah plays games, it is evident that sarah is fast, we deduce that sarah is fast.\nSince we know that when the stadium hosts parties, we can conclude ava plays games, it follows that ava plays games.\nSince we know that if sarah is fast, then the stadium goes to the hospital, it follows that the stadium goes to the hospital.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because given that ava hosts parties, it follows that jianzhi goes to the hospital, based on jianzhi goes to the hospital, it is evident that sarah plays games, based on sarah plays games, it is evident that sarah is fast, given that sarah is fast, it follows that the stadium goes to the hospital, the assertion is false.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river paints pictures.\nThe river runs marathons.\nThe stadium runs marathons.\nRules:\nIf the stadium runs marathons, then the globe makes pizza.\nAssuming the stadium runs marathons, we can say sophie jumps high.\nGiven that sophie paints pictures, it follows that the globe makes pizza.\nGiven that the river runs marathons, it follows that sophie paints pictures.\nAssuming the river runs marathons, we can say sophie jumps high.\nIf sophie jumps high, then the river paints pictures.\nGiven that the river paints pictures, it follows that the river runs marathons.", "statement": "The globe runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the stadium runs marathons, it is evident that the globe makes pizza, we can see that the globe makes pizza.\nSince we know that assuming the stadium runs marathons, we can say sophie jumps high, it follows that sophie jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that sophie jumps high, it follows that the river paints pictures, we can see that the river paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the river paints pictures, we can conclude the river runs marathons, we can see that the river runs marathons.\nBecause when the river runs marathons, we can conclude sophie paints pictures, we can conclude that sophie paints pictures.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules linking the stadium running marathons or sophie painting pictures to the globe running marathons, the negation of the assertion follows\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium rides bikes.\nThe mountain is fluffy.\nThe mountain carries bags.\nRules:\nIf the stadium rides bikes, then the mountain enjoys music.\nGiven that the mountain is fluffy, it follows that the cloud enjoys music.\nIf the stadium rides bikes, then the cloud enjoys music.\nBased on the cloud rides bikes, it is evident that the mountain enjoys music.\nWhen the mountain is fluffy, we can conclude the ocean is fluffy.\nBased on the cloud rides bikes, it is evident that the mountain enjoys music.\nIf the mountain carries bags, then the mountain is fluffy.", "statement": "The cloud rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the stadium rides bikes, it is evident that the mountain enjoys music, it follows that the mountain enjoys music.\nBecause given that the mountain is fluffy, it follows that the cloud enjoys music, we can conclude that the cloud enjoys music.\nBecause given that the mountain carries bags, it follows that the mountain is fluffy, we can conclude that the mountain is fluffy.\nGiven that based on the mountain is fluffy, it is evident that the ocean is fluffy, it is evident that the ocean is fluffy.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the stadium rides bikes, then the cloud enjoys music, the stadium rides bikes, the mountain is fluffy, we can conclude the ocean is fluffy, the mountain carries bags, the mountain is fluffy, the cloud enjoys music does not imply the cloud rides bikes, the assertion is false.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie makes pizza.\nSophie makes pizza.\nThe wall reads books.\nRules:\nWhen sophie makes pizza, we can conclude sophie is an engineer.\nAssuming sophie makes pizza, we can say the wall is an engineer.\nBased on sophie reads books, it is evident that sophie is an engineer.\nAssuming the cloud is an engineer, we can say the wall is a chef.\nGiven that the wall is an engineer, it follows that sophie is an engineer.\nBased on the wall is an engineer, it is evident that the cloud is an engineer.\nIf sophie is an engineer, then sophie reads books.", "statement": "The moon is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when sophie makes pizza, we can conclude sophie is an engineer, we can see that sophie is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on sophie makes pizza, it is evident that the wall is an engineer, we can see that the wall is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the wall is an engineer, it is evident that the cloud is an engineer, we can see that the cloud is an engineer.\nGiven that assuming sophie is an engineer, we can say sophie reads books, it is evident that sophie reads books.\nGiven that assuming the cloud is an engineer, we can say the wall is a chef, it is evident that the wall is a chef.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There is no rule or fact connecting sophie, the wall, or the moon to the assertion that the moon is an engineer.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean jumps high.\nEthan carries bags.\nAlice carries bags.\nRules:\nBased on the ocean jumps high, it is evident that alice carries bags.\nWhen ethan carries bags, we can conclude alice jumps high.\nWhen alice carries bags, we can conclude alice carries bags.\nBased on ethan carries bags, it is evident that alice carries bags.\nIf lucas runs marathons, then alice runs marathons.\nWhen the ocean jumps high, we can conclude alice runs marathons.\nGiven that alice carries bags, it follows that lucas runs marathons.\nAssuming alice jumps high, we can say alice carries bags.\nWhen alice runs marathons, we can conclude alice runs marathons.", "statement": "Ethan writes stories.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the ocean jumps high, it follows that alice carries bags, we can see that alice carries bags.\nApplying the logic of assuming ethan carries bags, we can say alice jumps high, we deduce that alice jumps high.\nGiven that given that the ocean jumps high, it follows that alice runs marathons, it is evident that alice runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of based on alice carries bags, it is evident that lucas runs marathons, we deduce that lucas runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of given that lucas runs marathons, it follows that alice runs marathons, we deduce that alice runs marathons.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts provided indicating that Ethan writes stories.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry swims well.\nThe sandwich is a chef.\nHenry makes pizza.\nRules:\nBased on henry swims well, it is evident that the train is a chef.\nIf the sandwich is a chef, then the train is a chef.\nWhen henry swims well, we can conclude the car hosts parties.\nIf henry swims well, then the sandwich makes pizza.\nGiven that the car swims well, it follows that henry makes pizza.\nAssuming the sandwich is a chef, we can say the sandwich swims well.\nAssuming the sandwich makes pizza, we can say henry makes pizza.\nIf the car hosts parties, then the sandwich is a chef.\nGiven that henry makes pizza, it follows that the sandwich is a chef.", "statement": "The car swims well.", "reasoning": "Because when henry swims well, we can conclude the train is a chef, we can conclude that the train is a chef.\nApplying the logic of based on henry swims well, it is evident that the car hosts parties, we deduce that the car hosts parties.\nSince we know that assuming henry swims well, we can say the sandwich makes pizza, it follows that the sandwich makes pizza.\nGiven that given that the sandwich makes pizza, it follows that henry makes pizza, it is evident that henry makes pizza.\nGiven that if the car hosts parties, then the sandwich is a chef, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef.\nBecause when the sandwich is a chef, we can conclude the sandwich swims well, we can conclude that the sandwich swims well.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Henry swims well, it is evident that the train is a chef. If the sandwich is a chef, then the train is a chef. Given that henry makes pizza, it follows that the sandwich is a chef, {conclusion lacks premises}, The car swims well.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack is a scientist.\nLucy is a scientist.\nCharlie is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf charlie is fluffy, then charlie makes pizza.\nGiven that lucy is a scientist, it follows that jack makes pizza.\nIf charlie is fluffy, then charlie is fluffy.\nBased on charlie makes pizza, it is evident that lucy is a scientist.\nWhen lucy is a scientist, we can conclude lucy plays instruments.", "statement": "Jack plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that charlie is fluffy, it follows that charlie makes pizza, it follows that charlie makes pizza.\nBecause based on charlie is fluffy, it is evident that charlie is fluffy, we can conclude that charlie is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of if charlie makes pizza, then lucy is a scientist, we deduce that lucy is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of assuming lucy is a scientist, we can say lucy plays instruments, we deduce that lucy plays instruments.\nGiven that when lucy is a scientist, we can conclude jack makes pizza, it is evident that jack makes pizza.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that lucy is a scientist, it follows that jack makes pizza, when lucy is a scientist, we can conclude lucy plays instruments, Jack plays instruments.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river paints pictures.\nThe river is a doctor.\nThe plane paints pictures.\nRules:\nAssuming the plane paints pictures, we can say the plane is a doctor.\nIf the plane paints pictures, then the garden sings beautifully.\nIf the river is a doctor, then the plane explores cities.\nWhen the playground is a doctor, we can conclude the playground sings beautifully.\nWhen the river explores cities, we can conclude the playground sings beautifully.\nWhen the plane is a doctor, we can conclude the playground is a doctor.", "statement": "The river explores cities.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the plane paints pictures, it follows that the plane is a doctor, we deduce that the plane is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of based on the plane paints pictures, it is evident that the garden sings beautifully, we deduce that the garden sings beautifully.\nBecause based on the river is a doctor, it is evident that the plane explores cities, we can conclude that the plane explores cities.\nBecause assuming the plane is a doctor, we can say the playground is a doctor, we can conclude that the playground is a doctor.\nSince we know that given that the playground is a doctor, it follows that the playground sings beautifully, it follows that the playground sings beautifully.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the river is a doctor, then the plane explores cities, The river is a doctor, we can conclude The river explores cities.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig sings beautifully.\nThe stadium is a chef.\nThe stadium goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nBased on the stadium goes to the hospital, it is evident that the pig goes to the hospital.\nGiven that ava cooks well, it follows that the pig sings beautifully.\nAssuming ava cooks well, we can say the pig sings beautifully.\nBased on the musician sings beautifully, it is evident that ava cooks well.\nWhen the stadium goes to the hospital, we can conclude ava cooks well.\nGiven that ava cooks well, it follows that the musician cooks well.", "statement": "The pig is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the stadium goes to the hospital, we can conclude the pig goes to the hospital, we deduce that the pig goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that given that the stadium goes to the hospital, it follows that ava cooks well, it follows that ava cooks well.\nGiven that if ava cooks well, then the musician cooks well, it is evident that the musician cooks well.\nBecause given that ava cooks well, it follows that the pig sings beautifully, we can conclude that the pig sings beautifully.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting the fact that 'ava cooks well' or 'the pig sings beautifully' or 'the stadium goes to the hospital' to the assertion that 'the pig is a chef', the negation of the assertion holds.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean collects stamps.\nThe phone collects stamps.\nThe teacher is fluffy.\nRules:\nAssuming the teacher is fluffy, we can say the house explores cities.\nAssuming the teacher is fluffy, we can say the ocean is fluffy.\nWhen the teacher is fluffy, we can conclude the ocean is fluffy.\nIf the phone collects stamps, then the house is fluffy.\nIf the phone collects stamps, then the teacher collects stamps.\nBased on the phone explores cities, it is evident that the phone is fluffy.\nGiven that the phone is fluffy, it follows that the ocean collects stamps.\nAssuming the ocean collects stamps, we can say the house is fluffy.\nAssuming the house is fluffy, we can say the phone explores cities.\nIf the teacher collects stamps, then the house explores cities.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the teacher is fluffy, it is evident that the house explores cities, we deduce that the house explores cities.\nBecause based on the teacher is fluffy, it is evident that the ocean is fluffy, we can conclude that the ocean is fluffy.\nBecause if the phone collects stamps, then the house is fluffy, we can conclude that the house is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of based on the phone collects stamps, it is evident that the teacher collects stamps, we deduce that the teacher collects stamps.\nGiven that when the ocean collects stamps, we can conclude the house is fluffy, it is evident that the house is fluffy.\nBecause given that the house is fluffy, it follows that the phone explores cities, we can conclude that the phone explores cities.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the phone explores cities, it is evident that the phone is fluffy, we can see that the phone is fluffy.\nSince we know that given that the phone is fluffy, it follows that the ocean collects stamps, it follows that the ocean collects stamps.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts related to Chuan being handsome.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is friendly.\nThe sky writes stories.\nThe computer is friendly.\nRules:\nGiven that the sky is friendly, it follows that the sky runs quickly.\nBased on the sky writes stories, it is evident that the sky is friendly.\nGiven that the festival is friendly, it follows that the sky dances gracefully.\nIf the sky runs quickly, then the festival dances gracefully.\nIf the sky is friendly, then the festival is friendly.\nBased on the sky runs quickly, it is evident that the festival dances gracefully.", "statement": "The computer runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Because based on the sky is friendly, it is evident that the sky runs quickly, we can conclude that the sky runs quickly.\nBecause when the sky writes stories, we can conclude the sky is friendly, we can conclude that the sky is friendly.\nSince we know that given that the sky runs quickly, it follows that the festival dances gracefully, it follows that the festival dances gracefully.\nSince we know that based on the sky is friendly, it is evident that the festival is friendly, it follows that the festival is friendly.\nApplying the logic of given that the festival is friendly, it follows that the sky dances gracefully, we deduce that the sky dances gracefully.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting the computer being friendly to the computer runs quickly, and also no facts or rules provided about the computer running quickly, the negation of the assertion is evident.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone teaches math.\nThe pig takes pictures.\nSophie teaches math.\nRules:\nWhen sophie teaches math, we can conclude the phone takes pictures.\nAssuming the phone teaches math, we can say the phone teaches math.\nIf sophie teaches math, then the phone takes pictures.\nAssuming the phone teaches math, we can say the pig takes pictures.\nBased on the phone takes pictures, it is evident that the pig teaches math.\nGiven that the pig teaches math, it follows that the phone takes pictures.\nIf the pig teaches math, then the phone teaches math.", "statement": "The pig is friendly.", "reasoning": "Given that given that sophie teaches math, it follows that the phone takes pictures, it is evident that the phone takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of given that the phone teaches math, it follows that the phone teaches math, we deduce that the phone teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the phone takes pictures, then the pig teaches math, we can see that the pig teaches math.\nApplying the logic of when the pig teaches math, we can conclude the phone teaches math, we deduce that the phone teaches math.\nSince we know that assuming the phone teaches math, we can say the pig takes pictures, it follows that the pig takes pictures.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts that relate to the pig being friendly, the pig is not known to be friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat collects stamps.\nThe bakery enjoys music.\nThe wall enjoys music.\nRules:\nAssuming the wall enjoys music, we can say the bakery solves puzzles.\nIf the wall enjoys music, then the bakery solves puzzles.\nGiven that the wall enjoys music, it follows that the bakery solves puzzles.\nAssuming the cat is blue, we can say the bakery solves puzzles.\nIf the wall collects stamps, then the bakery solves puzzles.\nWhen the bakery solves puzzles, we can conclude the cat is blue.\nIf the cat collects stamps, then the bakery solves puzzles.", "statement": "The wall collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Because based on the wall enjoys music, it is evident that the bakery solves puzzles, we can conclude that the bakery solves puzzles.\nGiven that if the wall enjoys music, then the bakery solves puzzles, it is evident that the bakery solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the cat collects stamps, we can conclude the bakery solves puzzles, we can see that the bakery solves puzzles.\nSince we know that given that the bakery solves puzzles, it follows that the cat is blue, it follows that the cat is blue.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the cat collects stamps, then the bakery solves puzzles, When the bakery solves puzzles, we can conclude the cat is blue, Assuming the cat is blue, we can say the bakery solves puzzles, The wall enjoys music, If the wall enjoys music, then the bakery solves puzzles, If the wall collects stamps, then the bakery solves puzzles, The wall collects stamps\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas carries bags.\nThe sky carries bags.\nLucas makes pizza.\nRules:\nGiven that lucas makes pizza, it follows that chuan makes pizza.\nAssuming the sky carries bags, we can say the sky fishes in lakes.\nBased on the sky fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan carries bags.\nGiven that lucas makes pizza, it follows that lucas fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the sky writes stories, it follows that lucas fishes in lakes.\nIf lucas carries bags, then lucas makes pizza.", "statement": "The sandwich carries bags.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when lucas makes pizza, we can conclude chuan makes pizza, it follows that chuan makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of based on the sky carries bags, it is evident that the sky fishes in lakes, we deduce that the sky fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the sky fishes in lakes, it follows that chuan carries bags, we can see that chuan carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucas carries bags, we can say lucas makes pizza, we can see that lucas makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucas makes pizza, we can say lucas fishes in lakes, we can see that lucas fishes in lakes.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the sky carries bags, we can say the sky fishes in lakes, based on the sky fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan carries bags, the sandwich carries bags does not follow from any of the rules or facts, the sandwich carries bags is not mentioned as a fact nor is it a conclusion of the rules\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry is fluffy.\nThe computer is fluffy.\nHenry teaches math.\nRules:\nBased on the computer is fluffy, it is evident that the fountain is fluffy.\nGiven that the computer is fluffy, it follows that henry plays football.\nBased on henry is fluffy, it is evident that the computer is fluffy.\nIf the fountain is fluffy, then the computer is fluffy.\nIf the fountain teaches math, then henry plays football.\nIf the computer is fluffy, then the fountain teaches math.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because based on the computer is fluffy, it is evident that the fountain is fluffy, we can conclude that the fountain is fluffy.\nGiven that if the computer is fluffy, then henry plays football, it is evident that henry plays football.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming henry is fluffy, we can say the computer is fluffy, we can see that the computer is fluffy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the fountain is fluffy, we can conclude the computer is fluffy, we can see that the computer is fluffy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the computer is fluffy, we can conclude the fountain teaches math, we can see that the fountain teaches math.\nBecause if the fountain teaches math, then henry plays football, we can conclude that henry plays football.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion has no correlation to any of the provided facts and rules, it is not supported by any logical conclusions from them.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin is quiet.\nThe mountain is quiet.\nThe city is quiet.\nRules:\nIf the pumpkin is quiet, then the pumpkin plays games.\nAssuming the mountain is quiet, we can say the mountain paints pictures.\nAssuming the pumpkin is quiet, we can say the city is quiet.\nBased on the city is quiet, it is evident that ethan is fast.\nAssuming the pumpkin is quiet, we can say ethan is fast.\nWhen ethan is fast, we can conclude the pumpkin plays games.\nGiven that the mountain is quiet, it follows that the city is quiet.\nBased on the city is quiet, it is evident that the city is fast.\nAssuming the pumpkin plays games, we can say the city is quiet.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that if the pumpkin is quiet, then the pumpkin plays games, it is evident that the pumpkin plays games.\nGiven that assuming the mountain is quiet, we can say the mountain paints pictures, it is evident that the mountain paints pictures.\nBecause based on the pumpkin is quiet, it is evident that the city is quiet, we can conclude that the city is quiet.\nSince we know that when the city is quiet, we can conclude ethan is fast, it follows that ethan is fast.\nGiven that if the pumpkin plays games, then the city is quiet, it is evident that the city is quiet.\nSince we know that given that the city is quiet, it follows that the city is fast, it follows that the city is fast.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion is not addressed by any rule or fact, the negation of the Assertion Chuan is handsome.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah is magical.\nSarah sings beautifully.\nThe car sings beautifully.\nRules:\nIf the car sings beautifully, then sarah does yoga.\nAssuming sarah sings beautifully, we can say the teacher is magical.\nBased on sarah sings beautifully, it is evident that sarah sings beautifully.\nBased on sarah is magical, it is evident that sarah does yoga.\nBased on the car sings beautifully, it is evident that sarah does yoga.\nAssuming the festival is blue, we can say the teacher is blue.\nAssuming sarah is blue, we can say the teacher is blue.\nIf sarah does yoga, then sarah is blue.\nWhen sarah sings beautifully, we can conclude sarah is blue.", "statement": "The festival sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the car sings beautifully, we can conclude sarah does yoga, it follows that sarah does yoga.\nApplying the logic of if sarah sings beautifully, then the teacher is magical, we deduce that the teacher is magical.\nSince we know that based on sarah sings beautifully, it is evident that sarah sings beautifully, it follows that sarah sings beautifully.\nGiven that if sarah does yoga, then sarah is blue, it is evident that sarah is blue.\nBecause when sarah is blue, we can conclude the teacher is blue, we can conclude that the teacher is blue.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on sarah sings beautifully, it is evident that sarah sings beautifully, sarah sings beautifully. Because assuming sarah sings beautifully, we can say the teacher is magical, the teacher is magical. The assertion the festival sings beautifully or its negation is not based on the provided facts and rules, as no rule connects the festival to singing beautifully.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is magical.\nThe sun plays games.\nLucas fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nAssuming the sun plays games, we can say lucas is magical.\nAssuming the city is magical, we can say the city fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the city is magical, it follows that the city fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the city is magical, we can say the city fishes in lakes.\nWhen the sun plays games, we can conclude the city fishes in lakes.\nIf lucas plays games, then the city fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the sun plays games, we can say the sun fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the city fishes in lakes, we can say lucas is magical.\nAssuming lucas plays games, we can say lucas is magical.\nWhen the city fishes in lakes, we can conclude the sun plays games.", "statement": "Lucas plays games.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the sun plays games, it follows that lucas is magical, it is evident that lucas is magical.\nApplying the logic of if the city is magical, then the city fishes in lakes, we deduce that the city fishes in lakes.\nGiven that given that the city is magical, it follows that the city fishes in lakes, it is evident that the city fishes in lakes.\nGiven that assuming the city fishes in lakes, we can say the sun plays games, it is evident that the sun plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the sun plays games, it is evident that the sun fishes in lakes, we can see that the sun fishes in lakes.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Assuming the sun plays games, we can say lucas is magical., Assumption: Lucas plays games\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe computer is interesting.\nThe shop is interesting.\nThe cloud is magical.\nRules:\nWhen the shop is interesting, we can conclude the cloud runs marathons.\nGiven that the cloud is magical, it follows that sarah is a chef.\nIf the shop is interesting, then sarah is a chef.\nAssuming the shop is interesting, we can say sarah is a chef.\nBased on the computer is a chef, it is evident that the shop runs marathons.\nWhen the shop is interesting, we can conclude the computer is a chef.", "statement": "The cloud is a chef.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the shop is interesting, it is evident that the cloud runs marathons, it follows that the cloud runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the cloud is magical, then sarah is a chef, we can see that sarah is a chef.\nApplying the logic of when the shop is interesting, we can conclude the computer is a chef, we deduce that the computer is a chef.\nGiven that when the computer is a chef, we can conclude the shop runs marathons, it is evident that the shop runs marathons.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when the shop is interesting, we can conclude the computer is a chef, based on the computer is a chef, it is evident that the shop runs marathons, the shop is interesting, the computer is interesting, the cloud is magical, given that the cloud is magical, it follows that sarah is a chef, if the shop is interesting, then sarah is a chef, the cloud is a chef\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry plays instruments.\nThe house does yoga.\nThe house plays instruments.\nRules:\nAssuming the house does yoga, we can say the house does yoga.\nAssuming the house plays instruments, we can say henry plays instruments.\nIf the house does yoga, then henry plays instruments.\nWhen henry plays instruments, we can conclude henry plays games.\nBased on the house does yoga, it is evident that henry plays games.\nWhen henry plays instruments, we can conclude henry plays games.\nIf henry plays instruments, then henry plays games.\nWhen the house does yoga, we can conclude henry plays games.\nIf the house does yoga, then henry plays instruments.\nIf henry plays instruments, then henry plays instruments.", "statement": "The artist plays games.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the house does yoga, it follows that the house does yoga, we deduce that the house does yoga.\nBecause assuming the house plays instruments, we can say henry plays instruments, we can conclude that henry plays instruments.\nBecause assuming henry plays instruments, we can say henry plays games, we can conclude that henry plays games.\nSince we know that when the house does yoga, we can conclude henry plays instruments, it follows that henry plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if henry plays instruments, then henry plays games, we can see that henry plays games.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the house does yoga, then henry plays instruments, when henry plays instruments, we can conclude henry plays games, based on the house does yoga, it is evident that henry plays games, the artist plays games.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig rides bikes.\nThe computer rides bikes.\nThe computer is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf the computer rides bikes, then the pig is tall.\nBased on the computer rides bikes, it is evident that the pig is tall.\nGiven that the computer rides bikes, it follows that the pig is tall.\nWhen the computer is quiet, we can conclude the plane is quiet.\nIf the computer is fluffy, then the book rides bikes.\nWhen the computer is fluffy, we can conclude the computer is quiet.", "statement": "The computer is tall.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the computer rides bikes, we can conclude the pig is tall, it follows that the pig is tall.\nApplying the logic of given that the computer is fluffy, it follows that the book rides bikes, we deduce that the book rides bikes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the computer is fluffy, we can conclude the computer is quiet, we can see that the computer is quiet.\nApplying the logic of when the computer is quiet, we can conclude the plane is quiet, we deduce that the plane is quiet.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the computer is fluffy, we can conclude the computer is quiet, when the computer is quiet, we can conclude the plane is quiet, the computer is not tall\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud volunteers.\nHenry goes to the hospital.\nThe dog goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nBased on the dog goes to the hospital, it is evident that the dog goes to the hospital.\nBased on henry goes to the hospital, it is evident that henry volunteers.\nBased on henry goes to the hospital, it is evident that henry becomes famous.\nIf henry goes to the hospital, then the dog goes to the hospital.\nAssuming ava volunteers, we can say the cloud goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the cloud volunteers, it follows that ava becomes famous.\nIf ava is an artist, then henry volunteers.\nAssuming henry goes to the hospital, we can say ava is an artist.", "statement": "Ava volunteers.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the dog goes to the hospital, we can say the dog goes to the hospital, we can conclude that the dog goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that assuming henry goes to the hospital, we can say henry volunteers, it follows that henry volunteers.\nApplying the logic of given that henry goes to the hospital, it follows that henry becomes famous, we deduce that henry becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the cloud volunteers, we can conclude ava becomes famous, we can see that ava becomes famous.\nGiven that given that henry goes to the hospital, it follows that ava is an artist, it is evident that ava is an artist.\nGiven that when ava is an artist, we can conclude henry volunteers, it is evident that henry volunteers.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming henry goes to the hospital, we can say ava is an artist, If ava is an artist, then henry volunteers, Based on henry goes to the hospital, it is evident that henry volunteers, the negation of Ava volunteers\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery is magical.\nThe plane reads books.\nThe ocean fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nWhen the bakery is magical, we can conclude the ocean reads books.\nGiven that james is magical, it follows that the bakery fishes in lakes.\nIf the ocean reads books, then the plane cooks well.\nGiven that the plane cooks well, it follows that james reads books.\nIf the ocean reads books, then james is magical.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the bakery is magical, we can conclude the ocean reads books, we deduce that the ocean reads books.\nApplying the logic of when the ocean reads books, we can conclude the plane cooks well, we deduce that the plane cooks well.\nApplying the logic of assuming the plane cooks well, we can say james reads books, we deduce that james reads books.\nBecause if the ocean reads books, then james is magical, we can conclude that james is magical.\nSince we know that assuming james is magical, we can say the bakery fishes in lakes, it follows that the bakery fishes in lakes.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the bakery is magical, we can conclude the ocean reads books., If the ocean reads books, then the plane cooks well., Given that the plane cooks well, it follows that james reads books., If the ocean reads books, then james is magical., {no connection to Chuan being handsome}, the assertion Chuan is handsome is not supported by the facts or rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river enjoys music.\nThe moon enjoys music.\nAlice solves puzzles.\nRules:\nBased on the moon enjoys music, it is evident that the river is magical.\nWhen the river enjoys music, we can conclude lucy enjoys music.\nIf the river enjoys music, then lucy enjoys music.\nGiven that the river enjoys music, it follows that the moon is a chef.\nIf alice solves puzzles, then lucy enjoys music.\nAssuming lucy is a chef, we can say the river solves puzzles.\nBased on lucy is magical, it is evident that the moon is a chef.\nWhen the river solves puzzles, we can conclude the river is magical.\nIf alice solves puzzles, then lucy is a chef.", "statement": "Lucy is magical.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the moon enjoys music, we can conclude the river is magical, we can see that the river is magical.\nSince we know that based on the river enjoys music, it is evident that lucy enjoys music, it follows that lucy enjoys music.\nBecause given that the river enjoys music, it follows that the moon is a chef, we can conclude that the moon is a chef.\nSince we know that if alice solves puzzles, then lucy is a chef, it follows that lucy is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if lucy is a chef, then the river solves puzzles, we can see that the river solves puzzles.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Alice solves puzzles, If alice solves puzzles, then lucy enjoys music, If alice solves puzzles, then lucy is a chef, Based on lucy is magical, it is evident that the moon is a chef, Lucy is magical\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam plays games.\nThe garden is a chef.\nLucy collects stamps.\nRules:\nWhen lucy collects stamps, we can conclude the garden plays games.\nAssuming lucy collects stamps, we can say liam plays games.\nAssuming the garden is a chef, we can say liam plays games.\nGiven that the garden is a chef, it follows that the garden plays games.\nBased on liam plays games, it is evident that the garden is a chef.\nGiven that liam plays games, it follows that the garden is a chef.\nIf the garden is a chef, then the garden is a chef.\nWhen lucy collects stamps, we can conclude liam plays games.", "statement": "Liam plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Because given that lucy collects stamps, it follows that the garden plays games, we can conclude that the garden plays games.\nBecause based on lucy collects stamps, it is evident that liam plays games, we can conclude that liam plays games.\nGiven that assuming liam plays games, we can say the garden is a chef, it is evident that the garden is a chef.\nGiven that based on lucy collects stamps, it is evident that liam plays games, it is evident that liam plays games.\nGiven that when liam plays games, we can conclude the garden is a chef, it is evident that the garden is a chef.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"No rule directly or indirectly relates Liam playing games to playing instruments.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma volunteers.\nThe bridge hikes mountains.\nThe bridge volunteers.\nRules:\nIf emma volunteers, then emma writes stories.\nWhen emma volunteers, we can conclude the bakery is an artist.\nBased on the bridge writes stories, it is evident that emma writes stories.\nBased on the bridge volunteers, it is evident that the bridge writes stories.\nWhen the bridge writes stories, we can conclude emma is an artist.\nBased on the bridge writes stories, it is evident that emma hikes mountains.\nWhen the bridge volunteers, we can conclude the bridge writes stories.", "statement": "Stanford University writes stories.", "reasoning": "Because when emma volunteers, we can conclude emma writes stories, we can conclude that emma writes stories.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if emma volunteers, then the bakery is an artist, we can see that the bakery is an artist.\nSince we know that when the bridge volunteers, we can conclude the bridge writes stories, it follows that the bridge writes stories.\nSince we know that when the bridge writes stories, we can conclude emma is an artist, it follows that emma is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge writes stories, it is evident that emma hikes mountains, we can see that emma hikes mountains.\nGiven that if the bridge writes stories, then emma writes stories, it is evident that emma writes stories.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because when the bridge volunteers, we can conclude the bridge writes stories, based on the bridge writes stories, it is evident that emma writes stories, the assertion Stanford University writes stories is not supported by any applicable rule, Stanford University is not mentioned in the premises nor inferences, the assertion Stanford University writes stories is not substantiated by any provided conditions or inferences given.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall draws maps.\nThe wall jumps high.\nChuan jumps high.\nRules:\nBased on the wall jumps high, it is evident that the wall is a chef.\nBased on the wall draws maps, it is evident that chuan draws maps.\nBased on the wall jumps high, it is evident that the wall is a chef.\nAssuming the wall jumps high, we can say the wall is a chef.\nAssuming the wall is a chef, we can say chuan draws maps.\nGiven that the wall jumps high, it follows that chuan draws maps.\nAssuming the wall jumps high, we can say chuan draws maps.\nGiven that chuan jumps high, it follows that the wall jumps high.", "statement": "The train jumps high.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the wall jumps high, we can conclude the wall is a chef, we deduce that the wall is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the wall draws maps, it is evident that chuan draws maps, we can see that chuan draws maps.\nApplying the logic of if chuan jumps high, then the wall jumps high, we deduce that the wall jumps high.\nSince we know that when the wall jumps high, we can conclude chuan draws maps, it follows that chuan draws maps.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the facts and given rules do not provide any information about the train jumping high, there is no basis to conclude that the train jumps high.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car volunteers.\nThe car jumps high.\nThe tree paints pictures.\nRules:\nGiven that the car volunteers, it follows that the sun jumps high.\nWhen the moon paints pictures, we can conclude the tree jumps high.\nBased on the tree jumps high, it is evident that the sun jumps high.\nGiven that the sun jumps high, it follows that the moon paints pictures.\nGiven that the tree paints pictures, it follows that the sun jumps high.", "statement": "The moon is fast.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the car volunteers, we can say the sun jumps high, we can see that the sun jumps high.\nGiven that assuming the sun jumps high, we can say the moon paints pictures, it is evident that the moon paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the moon paints pictures, we can say the tree jumps high, we can see that the tree jumps high.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there is no rule connecting the facts with 'the moon is fast', the negation of 'The moon is fast'\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud goes to the hospital.\nThe city is friendly.\nCharlie is friendly.\nRules:\nAssuming charlie is friendly, we can say charlie is friendly.\nWhen the cloud goes to the hospital, we can conclude charlie is a scientist.\nAssuming the cloud goes to the hospital, we can say the artist does yoga.\nAssuming charlie goes to the hospital, we can say the city does yoga.\nBased on the cloud goes to the hospital, it is evident that charlie is friendly.\nGiven that the cloud goes to the hospital, it follows that charlie goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the city is a scientist, it follows that the artist does yoga.", "statement": "The city goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if charlie is friendly, then charlie is friendly, it follows that charlie is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the cloud goes to the hospital, we can say charlie is a scientist, we can see that charlie is a scientist.\nBecause given that the cloud goes to the hospital, it follows that the artist does yoga, we can conclude that the artist does yoga.\nSince we know that given that the cloud goes to the hospital, it follows that charlie goes to the hospital, it follows that charlie goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when charlie goes to the hospital, we can conclude the city does yoga, we can see that the city does yoga.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the cloud goes to the hospital, it follows that charlie goes to the hospital., Assuming charlie goes to the hospital, we can say the city does yoga., The city is friendly., The city does not go to the hospital., The city goes to the hospital\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge hikes mountains.\nThe bridge is a chef.\nThe bridge is a chef.\nRules:\nGiven that the bridge is a chef, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains.\nGiven that the bridge is a chef, it follows that emma is a chef.\nIf the cloud teaches math, then the cloud is a chef.\nIf the bridge is a chef, then the cloud teaches math.\nAssuming the cat reads books, we can say emma is a chef.\nIf the cat reads books, then the bridge hikes mountains.", "statement": "Emma reads books.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the bridge is a chef, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains, we deduce that the bridge hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the bridge is a chef, it follows that emma is a chef, we can see that emma is a chef.\nGiven that based on the bridge is a chef, it is evident that the cloud teaches math, it is evident that the cloud teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the cloud teaches math, we can say the cloud is a chef, we can see that the cloud is a chef.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that the bridge is a chef, it follows that emma is a chef, the assertion 'Emma reads books' cannot be concluded from the provided facts and rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest collects stamps.\nThe wall sings beautifully.\nThe cloud carries bags.\nRules:\nAssuming the forest collects stamps, we can say the wall does yoga.\nGiven that the wall sings beautifully, it follows that the wall collects stamps.\nAssuming the wall does yoga, we can say the wall carries bags.\nWhen the wall sings beautifully, we can conclude the wall sings beautifully.\nBased on the wall carries bags, it is evident that the wall carries bags.\nAssuming the wall carries bags, we can say the forest carries bags.", "statement": "The zoo collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the forest collects stamps, it follows that the wall does yoga, it follows that the wall does yoga.\nSince we know that if the wall does yoga, then the wall carries bags, it follows that the wall carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the wall sings beautifully, we can conclude the wall sings beautifully, we can see that the wall sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the wall carries bags, it is evident that the wall carries bags, we can see that the wall carries bags.\nApplying the logic of given that the wall carries bags, it follows that the forest carries bags, we deduce that the forest carries bags.\nSince we know that assuming the wall sings beautifully, we can say the wall collects stamps, it follows that the wall collects stamps.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the facts and rules only pertain to the forest, wall, and cloud, there is no information about the zoo, The zoo collects stamps.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book is blue.\nThe fountain hosts parties.\nThe sky hosts parties.\nRules:\nBased on the fountain hosts parties, it is evident that mike solves puzzles.\nAssuming the book is blue, we can say the sky dances gracefully.\nGiven that the sky hosts parties, it follows that the sky dances gracefully.\nBased on the fountain hosts parties, it is evident that the book hosts parties.\nGiven that the book dances gracefully, it follows that mike is blue.\nGiven that mike is blue, it follows that the fountain hosts parties.\nGiven that the sky dances gracefully, it follows that the book hosts parties.\nIf the fountain hosts parties, then the book dances gracefully.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that if the fountain hosts parties, then mike solves puzzles, it is evident that mike solves puzzles.\nSince we know that assuming the book is blue, we can say the sky dances gracefully, it follows that the sky dances gracefully.\nBecause when the fountain hosts parties, we can conclude the book hosts parties, we can conclude that the book hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the fountain hosts parties, it follows that the book dances gracefully, we can see that the book dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the book dances gracefully, it is evident that mike is blue, we can see that mike is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming mike is blue, we can say the fountain hosts parties, we can see that the fountain hosts parties.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"The provided rules and facts do not establish any connection between the situation and the assertion that Chuan is handsome. Therefore, there is no basis in these rules to conclude that Chuan is handsome.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree is interesting.\nThe ocean is tall.\nThe tree draws maps.\nRules:\nAssuming the ocean is tall, we can say the ocean is interesting.\nWhen the tree draws maps, we can conclude the musician is tall.\nIf the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall.\nBased on the ocean is tall, it is evident that the ocean is tall.\nAssuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting.\nWhen the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books.\nWhen the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting.\nWhen the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting.", "statement": "The musician is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the ocean is tall, it is evident that the ocean is interesting, we can see that the ocean is interesting.\nSince we know that when the tree draws maps, we can conclude the musician is tall, it follows that the musician is tall.\nApplying the logic of when the tree is interesting, we can conclude the ocean is tall, we deduce that the ocean is tall.\nBecause when the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books, we can conclude that the tree reads books.\nSince we know that if the ocean is interesting, then the tree is interesting, it follows that the tree is interesting.\nSince we know that if the tree reads books, then the ocean is interesting, it follows that the ocean is interesting.", "depth": 3, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When the tree draws maps, we can conclude the musician is tall., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., If the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., If the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall., Based on the ocean is tall, it is evident that the ocean is tall., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., If the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., If the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., If the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall., When the ocean is tall, we can conclude the tree reads books., Assuming the tree reads books, we can say the ocean is interesting., When the musician is tall, we can conclude the ocean is interesting., When the ocean is interesting, we can conclude the tree is interesting., If the tree is interesting, then the ocean is tall., \",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack is a scientist.\nJack creates art.\nEthan becomes famous.\nRules:\nAssuming jack is a scientist, we can say jack becomes famous.\nBased on ethan is a scientist, it is evident that the pig creates art.\nGiven that jack is funny, it follows that ethan is a scientist.\nIf jack becomes famous, then ethan is a scientist.\nIf ethan becomes famous, then jack is funny.\nAssuming the pig creates art, we can say jack becomes famous.", "statement": "The pig creates art.", "reasoning": "Because when ethan becomes famous, we can conclude jack is funny, we can conclude that jack is funny.\nBecause assuming jack is funny, we can say ethan is a scientist, we can conclude that ethan is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if ethan is a scientist, then the pig creates art, we can see that the pig creates art.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Ethan becomes famous, If ethan becomes famous, then jack is funny., Given that jack is funny, it follows that ethan is a scientist., Based on ethan is a scientist, it is evident that the pig creates art., The pig creates art.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is friendly.\nThe stadium is friendly.\nThe stadium is blue.\nRules:\nGiven that the stadium is blue, it follows that the wall is blue.\nGiven that the stadium is blue, it follows that the wall fishes in lakes.\nBased on the wall fishes in lakes, it is evident that the stadium is blue.\nIf the house is friendly, then the wall fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the wall fishes in lakes, we can say the wall fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The wall fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the house is friendly, we can say the wall fishes in lakes, we deduce that the wall fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the wall fishes in lakes, it follows that the stadium is blue, we can see that the stadium is blue.\nBecause when the stadium is blue, we can conclude the wall fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the wall fishes in lakes.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the house is friendly, then the wall fishes in lakes, The house is friendly, The wall fishes in lakes\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river travels far.\nThe river carries bags.\nMike is magical.\nRules:\nGiven that mike is magical, it follows that the river carries bags.\nGiven that the river carries bags, it follows that mike travels far.\nWhen mike is magical, we can conclude the river carries bags.\nIf mike is magical, then jack is magical.\nAssuming the river travels far, we can say mike is magical.\nBased on the river jumps high, it is evident that mike is magical.\nWhen the river carries bags, we can conclude the river travels far.\nIf the river jumps high, then the river travels far.", "statement": "Jack is magical.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the river carries bags, we can conclude the river travels far, it follows that the river travels far.\nApplying the logic of given that the river travels far, it follows that mike is magical, we deduce that mike is magical.\nApplying the logic of based on mike is magical, it is evident that jack is magical, we deduce that jack is magical.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Mike is magical, it follows that Jack is magical, Jack is magical\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is friendly.\nThe cloud fishes in lakes.\nThe city is blue.\nRules:\nWhen the city is blue, we can conclude the globe is friendly.\nIf the city is blue, then the cloud is friendly.\nWhen the city writes stories, we can conclude the cloud is friendly.\nAssuming the city writes stories, we can say the city is blue.\nIf the cloud fishes in lakes, then the city writes stories.", "statement": "The cloud is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the cloud fishes in lakes, it is evident that the city writes stories, we deduce that the city writes stories.\nApplying the logic of given that the city writes stories, it follows that the city is blue, we deduce that the city is blue.\nSince we know that assuming the city is blue, we can say the cloud is friendly, it follows that the cloud is friendly.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the cloud fishes in lakes, then the city writes stories, Assuming the city writes stories, we can say the city is blue, If the city is blue, then the cloud is friendly, The cloud is friendly\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river makes pizza.\nThe shop goes to the hospital.\nThe river goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf the river goes to the hospital, then the river makes pizza.\nWhen the shop goes to the hospital, we can conclude the musician carries bags.\nAssuming the river makes pizza, we can say the forest is friendly.\nAssuming the river goes to the hospital, we can say the river makes pizza.\nWhen the river makes pizza, we can conclude the forest is friendly.\nWhen the musician goes to the hospital, we can conclude the river goes to the hospital.\nBased on the river is friendly, it is evident that the musician goes to the hospital.\nWhen the river makes pizza, we can conclude the river is friendly.\nIf the river is friendly, then the river makes pizza.", "statement": "The river goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the river makes pizza, it follows that the river is friendly, it is evident that the river is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the river is friendly, then the musician goes to the hospital, we can see that the musician goes to the hospital.\nApplying the logic of if the musician goes to the hospital, then the river goes to the hospital, we deduce that the river goes to the hospital.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the river goes to the hospital, we can say the river makes pizza; If the river goes to the hospital, then the river makes pizza; The river makes pizza, The river goes to the hospital.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician hosts parties.\nThe ocean is quiet.\nJack runs quickly.\nRules:\nWhen jack runs quickly, we can conclude the dog is quiet.\nIf the musician hosts parties, then the ocean grows plants.\nAssuming the ocean hosts parties, we can say the musician hosts parties.\nGiven that the musician hosts parties, it follows that the dog is quiet.\nWhen the musician hosts parties, we can conclude the ocean hosts parties.\nWhen the ocean is quiet, we can conclude the musician is quiet.", "statement": "The ocean grows plants.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the musician hosts parties, we can say the ocean hosts parties, we deduce that the ocean hosts parties.\nGiven that given that the ocean hosts parties, it follows that the musician hosts parties, it is evident that the musician hosts parties.\nBecause based on the musician hosts parties, it is evident that the ocean grows plants, we can conclude that the ocean grows plants.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the musician hosts parties, then the ocean grows plants., The musician hosts parties., The ocean grows plants.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist is loud.\nAva travels far.\nAva is loud.\nRules:\nWhen the artist is loud, we can conclude the playground collects stamps.\nGiven that the artist writes stories, it follows that the playground writes stories.\nIf the house is loud, then the artist writes stories.\nWhen ava travels far, we can conclude the house is loud.\nIf ava travels far, then the artist writes stories.\nAssuming the house is loud, we can say the house collects stamps.", "statement": "The playground writes stories.", "reasoning": "Given that given that ava travels far, it follows that the house is loud, it is evident that the house is loud.\nApplying the logic of given that the house is loud, it follows that the artist writes stories, we deduce that the artist writes stories.\nGiven that when the artist writes stories, we can conclude the playground writes stories, it is evident that the playground writes stories.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When ava travels far, we can conclude the house is loud., If the house is loud, then the artist writes stories., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the playground writes stories., The playground writes stories.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is friendly.\nThe teacher is a chef.\nThe bridge is fluffy.\nRules:\nAssuming the teacher is a chef, we can say sarah writes stories.\nBased on the teacher is fluffy, it is evident that the moon writes stories.\nBased on the moon is fluffy, it is evident that the moon writes stories.\nBased on the teacher is fluffy, it is evident that the teacher is fluffy.\nGiven that the moon is fluffy, it follows that the teacher is friendly.\nBased on the teacher is friendly, it is evident that the teacher is fluffy.", "statement": "The moon writes stories.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the teacher is friendly, we can say the teacher is fluffy, it follows that the teacher is fluffy.\nBecause given that the teacher is fluffy, it follows that the teacher is fluffy, we can conclude that the teacher is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of when the teacher is fluffy, we can conclude the moon writes stories, we deduce that the moon writes stories.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the teacher is friendly, it is evident that the teacher is fluffy, Based on the moon is fluffy, it is evident that the moon writes stories, The moon writes stories\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house volunteers.\nThe cat is funny.\nThe house runs quickly.\nRules:\nBased on the house runs quickly, it is evident that the cat runs quickly.\nIf the cat is funny, then the garden runs quickly.\nIf the cat is funny, then the cat runs quickly.\nAssuming the house draws maps, we can say the teacher draws maps.\nAssuming the teacher is funny, we can say the house draws maps.\nGiven that the cat is funny, it follows that the teacher is funny.", "statement": "The teacher draws maps.", "reasoning": "Because if the cat is funny, then the teacher is funny, we can conclude that the teacher is funny.\nGiven that based on the teacher is funny, it is evident that the house draws maps, it is evident that the house draws maps.\nSince we know that assuming the house draws maps, we can say the teacher draws maps, it follows that the teacher draws maps.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the cat is funny, it follows that the teacher is funny, Assuming the teacher is funny, we can say the house draws maps, Assuming the house draws maps, we can say the teacher draws maps, The teacher draws maps.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city travels far.\nStanford University is interesting.\nThe house travels far.\nRules:\nIf stanford university is interesting, then the house creates art.\nBased on the house travels far, it is evident that the house creates art.\nGiven that the house travels far, it follows that the house creates art.\nBased on the chef is fluffy, it is evident that the chef is fluffy.\nWhen the house travels far, we can conclude the chef is fluffy.\nAssuming the city is fluffy, we can say the chef is fluffy.\nAssuming the house is interesting, we can say the chef is fluffy.\nIf the house travels far, then the city is fluffy.", "statement": "The chef is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the house travels far, it follows that the city is fluffy, it is evident that the city is fluffy.\nSince we know that given that the city is fluffy, it follows that the chef is fluffy, it follows that the chef is fluffy.\nGiven that based on the chef is fluffy, it is evident that the chef is fluffy, it is evident that the chef is fluffy.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when the house travels far, we can conclude the chef is fluffy, the house travels far, the chef is fluffy.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is friendly.\nThe sky paints pictures.\nThe sky is friendly.\nRules:\nIf the sky is friendly, then the book paints pictures.\nBased on the sky paints pictures, it is evident that lucas writes stories.\nWhen jianzhi writes stories, we can conclude the sky writes stories.\nIf jianzhi writes stories, then lucas paints pictures.\nGiven that the book writes stories, it follows that the sky writes stories.\nIf lucas paints pictures, then jianzhi writes stories.\nAssuming the sky is friendly, we can say lucas paints pictures.", "statement": "The sky writes stories.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the sky is friendly, it is evident that lucas paints pictures, it is evident that lucas paints pictures.\nGiven that based on lucas paints pictures, it is evident that jianzhi writes stories, it is evident that jianzhi writes stories.\nGiven that given that jianzhi writes stories, it follows that the sky writes stories, it is evident that the sky writes stories.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when jianzhi writes stories, we can conclude the sky writes stories, if lucas paints pictures, then jianzhi writes stories, assuming the sky is friendly, we can say lucas paints pictures, the book writes stories, it follows that the sky writes stories, the sky is friendly, the sky writes stories\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician runs quickly.\nThe musician runs quickly.\nThe teacher draws maps.\nRules:\nAssuming the musician runs quickly, we can say sarah draws maps.\nWhen the musician runs quickly, we can conclude the musician draws maps.\nBased on the teacher draws maps, it is evident that sarah runs quickly.\nGiven that sarah runs quickly, it follows that the teacher draws maps.\nGiven that the teacher draws maps, it follows that sarah runs quickly.\nBased on sarah draws maps, it is evident that the sandwich draws maps.\nBased on sarah runs quickly, it is evident that the teacher draws maps.", "statement": "The teacher draws maps.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the teacher draws maps, it follows that sarah runs quickly, we can see that sarah runs quickly.\nBecause assuming sarah runs quickly, we can say the teacher draws maps, we can conclude that the teacher draws maps.\nGiven that given that the teacher draws maps, it follows that sarah runs quickly, it is evident that sarah runs quickly.\nBecause assuming sarah runs quickly, we can say the teacher draws maps, we can conclude that the teacher draws maps.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The teacher draws maps, {conclusion}\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden reads books.\nThe ocean is tall.\nThe garden is tall.\nRules:\nGiven that the garden reads books, it follows that the ocean is tall.\nGiven that the garden is tall, it follows that the garden is a doctor.\nIf the garden is tall, then the garden is a doctor.\nIf sarah reads books, then jack is friendly.\nAssuming the ocean is a doctor, we can say sarah reads books.\nAssuming the ocean is tall, we can say the ocean is a doctor.\nBased on the ocean is a doctor, it is evident that the ocean is tall.", "statement": "Jack is friendly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the ocean is tall, it is evident that the ocean is a doctor, it follows that the ocean is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming the ocean is a doctor, we can say sarah reads books, we deduce that sarah reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if sarah reads books, then jack is friendly, we can see that jack is friendly.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sarah reads books, if sarah reads books, then jack is friendly, Jack is friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain plays football.\nCharlie sings beautifully.\nThe sandwich plays football.\nRules:\nIf the mountain plays football, then jack takes pictures.\nGiven that the sandwich plays instruments, it follows that the mountain takes pictures.\nBased on the sandwich plays instruments, it is evident that the sandwich plays instruments.\nGiven that the mountain plays football, it follows that charlie takes pictures.\nBased on charlie takes pictures, it is evident that the sandwich plays instruments.", "statement": "The mountain takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the mountain plays football, it follows that charlie takes pictures, we can see that charlie takes pictures.\nBecause assuming charlie takes pictures, we can say the sandwich plays instruments, we can conclude that the sandwich plays instruments.\nGiven that given that the sandwich plays instruments, it follows that the sandwich plays instruments, it is evident that the sandwich plays instruments.\nApplying the logic of if the sandwich plays instruments, then the mountain takes pictures, we deduce that the mountain takes pictures.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the sandwich plays instruments, it follows that the mountain takes pictures., Based on charlie takes pictures, it is evident that the sandwich plays instruments., Given that the mountain plays football, it follows that charlie takes pictures., The mountain plays football., The mountain takes pictures.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is colorful.\nThe river hosts parties.\nThe river hikes mountains.\nRules:\nGiven that the river hosts parties, it follows that the house runs marathons.\nBased on the river runs marathons, it is evident that the river hosts parties.\nBased on the river hosts parties, it is evident that the house hikes mountains.\nIf the house hikes mountains, then the city hosts parties.\nBased on the city hosts parties, it is evident that the river runs marathons.\nBased on the house runs marathons, it is evident that the city hosts parties.", "statement": "The river hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the river hosts parties, we can conclude the house runs marathons, it follows that the house runs marathons.\nSince we know that when the house runs marathons, we can conclude the city hosts parties, it follows that the city hosts parties.\nBecause based on the city hosts parties, it is evident that the river runs marathons, we can conclude that the river runs marathons.\nBecause given that the river runs marathons, it follows that the river hosts parties, we can conclude that the river hosts parties.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the river hosts parties, it follows that the house runs marathons, ... , the assertion is true\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack goes to the hospital.\nThe garden creates art.\nThe festival goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf the festival goes to the hospital, then jack goes to the hospital.\nWhen the city hikes mountains, we can conclude the garden hikes mountains.\nBased on the festival runs marathons, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains.\nWhen the city hikes mountains, we can conclude the garden hikes mountains.\nWhen jack goes to the hospital, we can conclude the festival runs marathons.\nBased on the garden hikes mountains, it is evident that the city hikes mountains.", "statement": "The garden hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Given that if the festival goes to the hospital, then jack goes to the hospital, it is evident that jack goes to the hospital.\nGiven that if jack goes to the hospital, then the festival runs marathons, it is evident that the festival runs marathons.\nBecause given that the festival runs marathons, it follows that the garden hikes mountains, we can conclude that the garden hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the garden hikes mountains, then the city hikes mountains, we can see that the city hikes mountains.\nGiven that based on the city hikes mountains, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when Jack goes to the hospital, we can conclude the festival runs marathons, based on the festival runs marathons, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains, the conclusion is the garden hikes mountains.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich makes pizza.\nEmma runs marathons.\nEmma goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nGiven that emma goes to the hospital, it follows that the mountain makes pizza.\nAssuming emma runs marathons, we can say the mountain runs marathons.\nIf the sandwich makes pizza, then emma makes pizza.\nBased on emma runs marathons, it is evident that the sandwich reads books.\nIf emma makes pizza, then the sandwich reads books.\nWhen emma runs marathons, we can conclude emma runs marathons.\nWhen the sandwich makes pizza, we can conclude emma runs marathons.\nBased on the mountain makes pizza, it is evident that emma makes pizza.", "statement": "The sandwich reads books.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the sandwich makes pizza, it is evident that emma runs marathons, it is evident that emma runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of assuming emma runs marathons, we can say emma runs marathons, we deduce that emma runs marathons.\nSince we know that based on emma runs marathons, it is evident that the sandwich reads books, it follows that the sandwich reads books.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the sandwich makes pizza, if the sandwich makes pizza, then emma makes pizza, if emma makes pizza, then the sandwich reads books, the sandwich reads books.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden is interesting.\nThe garden runs quickly.\nThe teacher is interesting.\nRules:\nGiven that the garden runs quickly, it follows that the train runs quickly.\nWhen the teacher is interesting, we can conclude ava runs quickly.\nGiven that ava is friendly, it follows that the garden is friendly.\nGiven that the teacher is interesting, it follows that the garden runs quickly.\nAssuming the train is happy, we can say ava is friendly.\nBased on the garden is interesting, it is evident that the train is happy.\nAssuming ava is happy, we can say the train runs quickly.", "statement": "The garden is friendly.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the garden is interesting, it follows that the train is happy, it is evident that the train is happy.\nApplying the logic of given that the train is happy, it follows that ava is friendly, we deduce that ava is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava is friendly, it follows that the garden is friendly, we can see that the garden is friendly.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the teacher is interesting, it follows that the garden runs quickly, and based on the garden is interesting, it is evident that the train is happy, assuming the train is happy, we can say ava is friendly, given that ava is friendly, it follows that the garden is friendly, the garden is friendly\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car is magical.\nThe moon is magical.\nJames is magical.\nRules:\nIf james is magical, then james is an engineer.\nAssuming the moon is interesting, we can say the moon is interesting.\nGiven that the moon is interesting, it follows that the car fishes in lakes.\nWhen the moon is interesting, we can conclude the moon is interesting.\nAssuming the moon is magical, we can say james is interesting.\nIf the car is magical, then the moon is interesting.", "statement": "The moon is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the car is magical, then the moon is interesting, we deduce that the moon is interesting.\nBecause given that the moon is interesting, it follows that the moon is interesting, we can conclude that the moon is interesting.\nSince we know that when the moon is interesting, we can conclude the moon is interesting, it follows that the moon is interesting.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the car is magical, If the car is magical, then the moon is interesting, The moon is interesting.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge is loud.\nThe chef is a doctor.\nThe plane is a doctor.\nRules:\nBased on the chef is a doctor, it is evident that the bridge is colorful.\nIf the chef is a doctor, then the plane is loud.\nIf the chef is a doctor, then the plane paints pictures.\nWhen the chef is colorful, we can conclude ethan is loud.\nAssuming the chef is loud, we can say the chef is colorful.\nAssuming the plane paints pictures, we can say the chef is loud.\nWhen the bridge is colorful, we can conclude ethan is a doctor.", "statement": "Ethan is loud.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the chef is a doctor, then the plane paints pictures, it follows that the plane paints pictures.\nSince we know that assuming the plane paints pictures, we can say the chef is loud, it follows that the chef is loud.\nBecause given that the chef is loud, it follows that the chef is colorful, we can conclude that the chef is colorful.\nGiven that assuming the chef is colorful, we can say ethan is loud, it is evident that ethan is loud.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the chef is a doctor, it is evident that the bridge is colorful, when the bridge is colorful, we can conclude ethan is a doctor, if the chef is a doctor, then the plane paints pictures, assuming the plane paints pictures, we can say the chef is loud, assuming the chef is loud, we can say the chef is colorful, when the chef is colorful, we can conclude ethan is loud, Ethan is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge is a scientist.\nThe car dances gracefully.\nThe car fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nWhen the car fishes in lakes, we can conclude the chef fishes in lakes.\nWhen the bridge dances gracefully, we can conclude the bridge is a scientist.\nBased on the city is a scientist, it is evident that the bridge dances gracefully.\nBased on the bridge is a scientist, it is evident that the city is a scientist.\nIf the bridge is a scientist, then the city is a scientist.\nAssuming the city is a scientist, we can say the city dances gracefully.", "statement": "The bridge is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Because if the bridge is a scientist, then the city is a scientist, we can conclude that the city is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the city is a scientist, we can say the bridge dances gracefully, we can see that the bridge dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of based on the bridge dances gracefully, it is evident that the bridge is a scientist, we deduce that the bridge is a scientist.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the bridge is a scientist, then the city is a scientist, The bridge is a scientist, The bridge is a scientist\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas travels far.\nLucas is colorful.\nThe fountain is colorful.\nRules:\nBased on lucas travels far, it is evident that lucas travels far.\nWhen lucas travels far, we can conclude lucas travels far.\nAssuming the mountain goes to the hospital, we can say the fountain is magical.\nWhen lucas travels far, we can conclude the fountain goes to the hospital.\nBased on the shop travels far, it is evident that the mountain goes to the hospital.\nBased on the shop travels far, it is evident that the mountain goes to the hospital.\nBased on lucas travels far, it is evident that the shop travels far.", "statement": "The fountain is magical.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming lucas travels far, we can say lucas travels far, it follows that lucas travels far.\nGiven that given that lucas travels far, it follows that the shop travels far, it is evident that the shop travels far.\nGiven that when the shop travels far, we can conclude the mountain goes to the hospital, it is evident that the mountain goes to the hospital.\nGiven that assuming the mountain goes to the hospital, we can say the fountain is magical, it is evident that the fountain is magical.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When lucas travels far, we can conclude the fountain goes to the hospital.; Assuming the mountain goes to the hospital, we can say the fountain is magical.; The fountain is magical.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas is interesting.\nEthan goes to the hospital.\nLucas travels far.\nRules:\nGiven that lucas is interesting, it follows that sarah goes to the hospital.\nGiven that lucas travels far, it follows that sarah goes to the hospital.\nIf lucas goes to the hospital, then sarah goes to the hospital.\nIf ethan is fast, then the wall is fast.\nIf the wall is fast, then lucas goes to the hospital.\nIf ethan goes to the hospital, then the wall is fast.", "statement": "Sarah goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if ethan goes to the hospital, then the wall is fast, it follows that the wall is fast.\nBecause assuming the wall is fast, we can say lucas goes to the hospital, we can conclude that lucas goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when lucas goes to the hospital, we can conclude sarah goes to the hospital, we can see that sarah goes to the hospital.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that lucas is interesting, it follows that sarah goes to the hospital, Sarah goes to the hospital\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia explores cities.\nThe fountain rides bikes.\nThe fountain cooks well.\nRules:\nWhen the fountain cooks well, we can conclude mia rides bikes.\nGiven that the fountain rides bikes, it follows that the bakery explores cities.\nAssuming mia explores cities, we can say the fountain explores cities.\nGiven that lucy is fast, it follows that mia rides bikes.\nGiven that the fountain rides bikes, it follows that lucy is fast.\nBased on the fountain explores cities, it is evident that the fountain rides bikes.\nGiven that the fountain rides bikes, it follows that the fountain explores cities.\nGiven that mia rides bikes, it follows that the fountain explores cities.", "statement": "Lucy is fast.", "reasoning": "Because if the fountain rides bikes, then the fountain explores cities, we can conclude that the fountain explores cities.\nBecause based on the fountain explores cities, it is evident that the fountain rides bikes, we can conclude that the fountain rides bikes.\nGiven that if the fountain rides bikes, then lucy is fast, it is evident that lucy is fast.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the fountain rides bikes, it follows that lucy is fast, Lucy is fast.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house solves puzzles.\nThe house is colorful.\nThe house collects stamps.\nRules:\nGiven that the house collects stamps, it follows that the house is colorful.\nBased on the house solves puzzles, it is evident that the house is colorful.\nIf the house solves puzzles, then the house plays instruments.\nIf the computer plays instruments, then the house solves puzzles.\nWhen the festival collects stamps, we can conclude the house is colorful.\nIf the stadium solves puzzles, then the computer plays instruments.\nWhen the house solves puzzles, we can conclude the stadium solves puzzles.", "statement": "The house solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the house solves puzzles, we can say the stadium solves puzzles, it is evident that the stadium solves puzzles.\nBecause if the stadium solves puzzles, then the computer plays instruments, we can conclude that the computer plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the computer plays instruments, we can conclude the house solves puzzles, we can see that the house solves puzzles.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the house collects stamps, it follows that the house is colorful, Based on the house solves puzzles, it is evident that the house is colorful, If the house solves puzzles, then the house plays instruments, When the house solves puzzles, we can conclude the stadium solves puzzles, The house solves puzzles\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean plays instruments.\nJianzhi is blue.\nThe forest is blue.\nRules:\nBased on jianzhi is blue, it is evident that mike cooks well.\nIf the ocean plays instruments, then mike cooks well.\nAssuming the forest is blue, we can say the forest is friendly.\nGiven that jianzhi is blue, it follows that jianzhi is friendly.\nIf mike is friendly, then mike is blue.\nAssuming the forest is blue, we can say mike is friendly.\nIf mike cooks well, then the forest is blue.\nWhen jianzhi is friendly, we can conclude the forest is blue.\nBased on the forest is blue, it is evident that the forest is friendly.", "statement": "Mike is blue.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming jianzhi is blue, we can say mike cooks well, we deduce that mike cooks well.\nGiven that assuming mike cooks well, we can say the forest is blue, it is evident that the forest is blue.\nApplying the logic of given that the forest is blue, it follows that mike is friendly, we deduce that mike is friendly.\nApplying the logic of if mike is friendly, then mike is blue, we deduce that mike is blue.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on jianzhi is blue, it is evident that mike cooks well, If mike cooks well, then the forest is blue, Assuming the forest is blue, we can say mike is friendly, If mike is friendly, then mike is blue, Mike is blue.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery is colorful.\nThe bakery is fluffy.\nThe moon is colorful.\nRules:\nGiven that the moon is colorful, it follows that the bakery is fluffy.\nGiven that the moon is colorful, it follows that the moon is blue.\nBased on the bakery is colorful, it is evident that the bakery is blue.\nGiven that the moon is colorful, it follows that the computer is blue.\nAssuming the bakery goes to the hospital, we can say the moon is colorful.\nAssuming the moon is colorful, we can say the bakery is fluffy.\nBased on the computer is blue, it is evident that the moon is fluffy.\nAssuming the bakery is colorful, we can say the bakery goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The computer is blue.", "reasoning": "Given that if the bakery is colorful, then the bakery goes to the hospital, it is evident that the bakery goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that based on the bakery goes to the hospital, it is evident that the moon is colorful, it follows that the moon is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the moon is colorful, it follows that the computer is blue, we can see that the computer is blue.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Given that the moon is colorful, it follows that the computer is blue, the computer is blue\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop draws maps.\nThe shop draws maps.\nThe dog volunteers.\nRules:\nWhen the shop draws maps, we can conclude the shop draws maps.\nWhen lucas draws maps, we can conclude henry draws maps.\nAssuming the shop carries bags, we can say lucas carries bags.\nBased on henry creates art, it is evident that the shop carries bags.\nIf the dog volunteers, then henry creates art.\nIf lucas draws maps, then henry draws maps.", "statement": "Lucas carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the dog volunteers, it follows that henry creates art, we deduce that henry creates art.\nApplying the logic of given that henry creates art, it follows that the shop carries bags, we deduce that the shop carries bags.\nSince we know that based on the shop carries bags, it is evident that lucas carries bags, it follows that lucas carries bags.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the dog volunteers, then henry creates art, based on henry creates art, it is evident that the shop carries bags, assuming the shop carries bags, we can say lucas carries bags, Lucas carries bags.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain cooks well.\nThe mountain cooks well.\nThe mountain teaches math.\nRules:\nIf the mountain teaches math, then the bridge cooks well.\nGiven that the mountain cooks well, it follows that mike cooks well.\nBased on the tree teaches math, it is evident that mike cooks well.\nIf the tree cooks well, then the bridge teaches math.\nWhen the tree cooks well, we can conclude the tree cooks well.\nWhen the bridge teaches math, we can conclude the mountain cooks well.\nAssuming the mountain cooks well, we can say the tree cooks well.", "statement": "The bridge teaches math.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the mountain cooks well, it follows that the tree cooks well, it is evident that the tree cooks well.\nApplying the logic of assuming the tree cooks well, we can say the tree cooks well, we deduce that the tree cooks well.\nApplying the logic of given that the tree cooks well, it follows that the bridge teaches math, we deduce that the bridge teaches math.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the mountain teaches math, then the bridge cooks well, Assuming the mountain cooks well, we can say the tree cooks well, The mountain teaches math, the bridge teaches math\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book goes to the hospital.\nThe book goes to the hospital.\nThe book is colorful.\nRules:\nWhen the book goes to the hospital, we can conclude the playground dances gracefully.\nBased on the playground is colorful, it is evident that the book is an engineer.\nIf the book goes to the hospital, then the book is an engineer.\nGiven that the playground is an engineer, it follows that the playground is colorful.\nBased on the playground is colorful, it is evident that the book goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the playground dances gracefully, we can say the playground is an engineer.", "statement": "The book is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the book goes to the hospital, we can say the playground dances gracefully, we can see that the playground dances gracefully.\nBecause assuming the playground dances gracefully, we can say the playground is an engineer, we can conclude that the playground is an engineer.\nSince we know that when the playground is an engineer, we can conclude the playground is colorful, it follows that the playground is colorful.\nGiven that based on the playground is colorful, it is evident that the book is an engineer, it is evident that the book is an engineer.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the book goes to the hospital, then the book is an engineer, The book goes to the hospital, The book is an engineer\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone is magical.\nMia reads books.\nThe pumpkin reads books.\nRules:\nWhen mia reads books, we can conclude the phone is magical.\nWhen the globe is colorful, we can conclude the globe is an engineer.\nWhen mia reads books, we can conclude the globe is colorful.\nBased on the phone is magical, it is evident that mia reads books.\nIf the globe is colorful, then the phone is magical.\nBased on the phone is an engineer, it is evident that mia is magical.", "statement": "The globe is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the phone is magical, then mia reads books, we can see that mia reads books.\nGiven that based on mia reads books, it is evident that the globe is colorful, it is evident that the globe is colorful.\nSince we know that based on the globe is colorful, it is evident that the globe is an engineer, it follows that the globe is an engineer.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When mia reads books, we can conclude the globe is colorful., When the globe is colorful, we can conclude the globe is an engineer., The pumpkin reads books., The phone is magical., Mia reads books., based on the phone is magical, it is evident that mia reads books., If the globe is colorful, then the phone is magical., Based on the phone is an engineer, it is evident that mia is magical., we can conclude The globe is colorful., we can conclude The globe is an engineer.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car sings beautifully.\nThe car sings beautifully.\nThe car explores cities.\nRules:\nBased on the car explores cities, it is evident that the car travels far.\nIf the plane goes to the hospital, then the car travels far.\nIf the car sings beautifully, then the garden travels far.\nBased on the car explores cities, it is evident that the musician explores cities.\nGiven that the plane sings beautifully, it follows that the car explores cities.\nIf the car explores cities, then the plane sings beautifully.", "statement": "The musician explores cities.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the car explores cities, it is evident that the plane sings beautifully, we can see that the plane sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of if the plane sings beautifully, then the car explores cities, we deduce that the car explores cities.\nApplying the logic of when the car explores cities, we can conclude the musician explores cities, we deduce that the musician explores cities.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Based on the car explores cities, it is evident that the musician explores cities, The musician explores cities.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva takes pictures.\nThe ocean makes pizza.\nThe ocean takes pictures.\nRules:\nGiven that the ocean makes pizza, it follows that the ocean takes pictures.\nWhen the ocean makes pizza, we can conclude the festival takes pictures.\nGiven that ava takes pictures, it follows that ava hikes mountains.\nAssuming the ocean makes pizza, we can say the ocean hikes mountains.\nGiven that the ocean takes pictures, it follows that the festival hikes mountains.\nAssuming the ocean hikes mountains, we can say the ocean takes pictures.\nBased on the ocean jumps high, it is evident that the ocean takes pictures.\nGiven that ava hikes mountains, it follows that the ocean jumps high.\nWhen the ocean hikes mountains, we can conclude the ocean takes pictures.", "statement": "The festival hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming ava takes pictures, we can say ava hikes mountains, we can see that ava hikes mountains.\nSince we know that if ava hikes mountains, then the ocean jumps high, it follows that the ocean jumps high.\nGiven that when the ocean jumps high, we can conclude the ocean takes pictures, it is evident that the ocean takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of assuming the ocean takes pictures, we can say the festival hikes mountains, we deduce that the festival hikes mountains.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the ocean makes pizza, it follows that the ocean takes pictures. Given that the ocean takes pictures, it follows that the festival hikes mountains, the festival hikes mountains.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike plays games.\nMike is magical.\nThe house plays games.\nRules:\nAssuming mike plays games, we can say mike is quiet.\nGiven that the house plays games, it follows that stanford university plays games.\nWhen the house volunteers, we can conclude liam is quiet.\nGiven that stanford university plays games, it follows that the house volunteers.\nBased on the house plays games, it is evident that stanford university plays games.\nBased on the house volunteers, it is evident that mike is quiet.", "statement": "Liam is quiet.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the house plays games, we can say stanford university plays games, it follows that stanford university plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when stanford university plays games, we can conclude the house volunteers, we can see that the house volunteers.\nSince we know that when the house volunteers, we can conclude liam is quiet, it follows that liam is quiet.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the house plays games, it follows that stanford university plays games., Given that stanford university plays games, it follows that the house volunteers., When the house volunteers, we can conclude liam is quiet., Liam is quiet.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin reads books.\nAlice is a scientist.\nSarah reads books.\nRules:\nAssuming sarah reads books, we can say sarah hosts parties.\nIf the pumpkin hosts parties, then alice reads books.\nGiven that the pumpkin reads books, it follows that sarah plays football.\nAssuming the pumpkin hosts parties, we can say the pumpkin reads books.\nAssuming sarah hosts parties, we can say the pumpkin hosts parties.", "statement": "Sarah plays football.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on sarah reads books, it is evident that sarah hosts parties, we deduce that sarah hosts parties.\nBecause if sarah hosts parties, then the pumpkin hosts parties, we can conclude that the pumpkin hosts parties.\nBecause based on the pumpkin hosts parties, it is evident that the pumpkin reads books, we can conclude that the pumpkin reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the pumpkin reads books, then sarah plays football, we can see that sarah plays football.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the pumpkin reads books, it follows that sarah plays football, Sarah plays football\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack reads books.\nThe wall solves puzzles.\nJack reads books.\nRules:\nBased on jack reads books, it is evident that the wall plays football.\nIf jack reads books, then jack plays football.\nGiven that jack reads books, it follows that the river reads books.\nWhen jack reads books, we can conclude the river reads books.\nGiven that the phone plays football, it follows that the phone plays football.\nIf the river is a scientist, then the phone plays football.\nWhen jack reads books, we can conclude the river is a scientist.\nGiven that jack plays football, it follows that the wall plays football.\nGiven that the phone plays football, it follows that the river reads books.", "statement": "The phone plays football.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that jack reads books, it follows that the river is a scientist, it follows that the river is a scientist.\nSince we know that based on the river is a scientist, it is evident that the phone plays football, it follows that the phone plays football.\nGiven that based on the phone plays football, it is evident that the phone plays football, it is evident that the phone plays football.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When jack reads books, we can conclude the river is a scientist. If the river is a scientist, then the phone plays football. The phone plays football.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames fishes in lakes.\nThe house is happy.\nJames is happy.\nRules:\nAssuming james fishes in lakes, we can say the house cooks well.\nBased on the house is happy, it is evident that james hikes mountains.\nWhen the house is happy, we can conclude the wall hikes mountains.\nAssuming sophie hikes mountains, we can say sophie fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the house fishes in lakes, we can say james hikes mountains.\nBased on james hikes mountains, it is evident that sophie hikes mountains.\nBased on sophie hikes mountains, it is evident that james hikes mountains.\nAssuming the house is happy, we can say james hikes mountains.", "statement": "Sophie fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the house is happy, it follows that james hikes mountains, we can see that james hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming james hikes mountains, we can say sophie hikes mountains, we can see that sophie hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of if sophie hikes mountains, then sophie fishes in lakes, we deduce that sophie fishes in lakes.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on the house is happy, it is evident that james hikes mountains. Based on james hikes mountains, it is evident that sophie hikes mountains. Assuming sophie hikes mountains, we can say sophie fishes in lakes. Therefore, Sophie fishes in lakes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree swims well.\nChuan is a scientist.\nThe festival runs marathons.\nRules:\nWhen the tree swims well, we can conclude the festival swims well.\nWhen the festival runs marathons, we can conclude the phone swims well.\nWhen the tree swims well, we can conclude the festival swims well.\nGiven that chuan is a scientist, it follows that the festival is colorful.\nGiven that the tree is a scientist, it follows that the phone is colorful.\nGiven that chuan swims well, it follows that the tree is a scientist.\nIf the festival swims well, then chuan swims well.\nWhen chuan is a scientist, we can conclude chuan swims well.", "statement": "The phone is colorful.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the tree swims well, it follows that the festival swims well, we can see that the festival swims well.\nGiven that assuming the festival swims well, we can say chuan swims well, it is evident that chuan swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that chuan swims well, it follows that the tree is a scientist, we can see that the tree is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the tree is a scientist, then the phone is colorful, we can see that the phone is colorful.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the tree swims well, we can conclude the festival swims well, If the festival swims well, then chuan swims well, When chuan is a scientist, we can conclude chuan swims well, Given that the tree is a scientist, it follows that the phone is colorful, The phone is colorful\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician takes pictures.\nThe train is tall.\nThe musician is tall.\nRules:\nIf the musician is tall, then liam jumps high.\nGiven that liam jumps high, it follows that stanford university creates art.\nWhen liam is tall, we can conclude liam jumps high.\nGiven that the train creates art, it follows that stanford university creates art.\nAssuming the train is tall, we can say liam is tall.", "statement": "Stanford University creates art.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the train is tall, it is evident that liam is tall, it is evident that liam is tall.\nSince we know that based on liam is tall, it is evident that liam jumps high, it follows that liam jumps high.\nApplying the logic of given that liam jumps high, it follows that stanford university creates art, we deduce that stanford university creates art.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the musician is tall, then liam jumps high, Given that liam jumps high, it follows that stanford university creates art, Stanford University creates art\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book is magical.\nThe teacher goes to the hospital.\nThe teacher dances gracefully.\nRules:\nIf the book is magical, then the zoo is magical.\nAssuming the book goes to the hospital, we can say the zoo goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the book dances gracefully, we can say the book takes pictures.\nBased on the book dances gracefully, it is evident that the book goes to the hospital.\nIf the teacher goes to the hospital, then the book dances gracefully.", "statement": "The zoo goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the teacher goes to the hospital, then the book dances gracefully, we deduce that the book dances gracefully.\nGiven that based on the book dances gracefully, it is evident that the book goes to the hospital, it is evident that the book goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that assuming the book goes to the hospital, we can say the zoo goes to the hospital, it follows that the zoo goes to the hospital.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the teacher goes to the hospital, then the book dances gracefully, Based on the book dances gracefully, it is evident that the book goes to the hospital, Assuming the book goes to the hospital, we can say the zoo goes to the hospital, The zoo goes to the hospital\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe cooks well.\nStanford University is interesting.\nAlice cooks well.\nRules:\nWhen alice cooks well, we can conclude the globe is fluffy.\nIf the globe cooks well, then the forest is fluffy.\nBased on the forest is interesting, it is evident that the globe cooks well.\nIf alice cooks well, then alice cooks well.\nWhen stanford university is interesting, we can conclude the forest is interesting.\nWhen the forest is interesting, we can conclude the globe jumps high.", "statement": "The forest is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on stanford university is interesting, it is evident that the forest is interesting, we deduce that the forest is interesting.\nGiven that based on the forest is interesting, it is evident that the globe cooks well, it is evident that the globe cooks well.\nApplying the logic of given that the globe cooks well, it follows that the forest is fluffy, we deduce that the forest is fluffy.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the globe cooks well, then the forest is fluffy, The globe cooks well, The forest is fluffy\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge grows plants.\nThe cloud is a doctor.\nThe cloud is funny.\nRules:\nBased on the cloud is funny, it is evident that the computer is a doctor.\nAssuming the bridge grows plants, we can say the bridge is funny.\nIf the cloud is funny, then the computer is a doctor.\nGiven that the cloud is funny, it follows that the cloud is a doctor.\nAssuming the shop grows plants, we can say the computer grows plants.\nAssuming the shop is funny, we can say the shop grows plants.\nAssuming the shop is funny, we can say the shop grows plants.\nGiven that the computer is a doctor, it follows that the shop is funny.", "statement": "The computer grows plants.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the cloud is funny, we can conclude the computer is a doctor, it follows that the computer is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the computer is a doctor, it follows that the shop is funny, we can see that the shop is funny.\nBecause given that the shop is funny, it follows that the shop grows plants, we can conclude that the shop grows plants.\nGiven that based on the shop grows plants, it is evident that the computer grows plants, it is evident that the computer grows plants.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because assuming the shop grows plants, we can say the computer grows plants, the computer is not proven to grow plants\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium dances gracefully.\nThe fountain dances gracefully.\nThe garden dances gracefully.\nRules:\nAssuming the garden dances gracefully, we can say lucy dances gracefully.\nBased on the fountain dances gracefully, it is evident that the fountain is friendly.\nIf the fountain dances gracefully, then the fountain is friendly.\nBased on the fountain is friendly, it is evident that the fountain runs quickly.\nGiven that lucy runs quickly, it follows that the fountain is friendly.\nBased on the stadium dances gracefully, it is evident that lucy is colorful.\nAssuming lucy is colorful, we can say lucy runs quickly.", "statement": "The fountain runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium dances gracefully, then lucy is colorful, we can see that lucy is colorful.\nGiven that when lucy is colorful, we can conclude lucy runs quickly, it is evident that lucy runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of assuming lucy runs quickly, we can say the fountain is friendly, we deduce that the fountain is friendly.\nGiven that assuming the fountain is friendly, we can say the fountain runs quickly, it is evident that the fountain runs quickly.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the fountain dances gracefully, it is evident that the fountain is friendly. Based on the fountain is friendly, it is evident that the fountain runs quickly. The conclusion is that the fountain runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train writes stories.\nThe dog writes stories.\nThe festival writes stories.\nRules:\nBased on the dog writes stories, it is evident that the festival writes stories.\nBased on the festival writes stories, it is evident that the dog is colorful.\nBased on the train writes stories, it is evident that the festival writes stories.\nWhen the train writes stories, we can conclude the dog is colorful.\nWhen the festival writes stories, we can conclude the train travels far.\nWhen the dog travels far, we can conclude the train creates art.\nIf the dog travels far, then the train creates art.\nBased on the train creates art, it is evident that the dog travels far.\nIf the dog writes stories, then the train creates art.", "statement": "The train creates art.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the dog writes stories, then the train creates art, we can see that the train creates art.\nGiven that if the train creates art, then the dog travels far, it is evident that the dog travels far.\nGiven that when the dog travels far, we can conclude the train creates art, it is evident that the train creates art.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the dog writes stories, then the train creates art, The train creates art\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist is an artist.\nThe artist plays football.\nThe bridge plays football.\nRules:\nWhen the artist plays football, we can conclude the artist plays football.\nIf the artist is an artist, then the artist is an artist.\nBased on the bridge is an artist, it is evident that lucas is an artist.\nAssuming the artist plays football, we can say lucas collects stamps.\nAssuming the artist is an artist, we can say the artist plays football.\nGiven that lucas collects stamps, it follows that the bridge is an artist.", "statement": "Lucas is an artist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the artist is an artist, we can conclude the artist plays football, it follows that the artist plays football.\nBecause if the artist plays football, then lucas collects stamps, we can conclude that lucas collects stamps.\nBecause assuming lucas collects stamps, we can say the bridge is an artist, we can conclude that the bridge is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the bridge is an artist, then lucas is an artist, we can see that lucas is an artist.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the artist plays football, we can say lucas collects stamps., Given that lucas collects stamps, it follows that the bridge is an artist., Based on the bridge is an artist, it is evident that lucas is an artist., Lucas is an artist.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun is loud.\nJack is loud.\nCharlie sings beautifully.\nRules:\nWhen the sun is loud, we can conclude the shop sings beautifully.\nAssuming jack sings beautifully, we can say jack grows plants.\nBased on the shop grows plants, it is evident that jack grows plants.\nAssuming the shop sings beautifully, we can say the shop grows plants.\nGiven that the shop sings beautifully, it follows that the shop sings beautifully.\nBased on charlie sings beautifully, it is evident that the shop sings beautifully.", "statement": "Jack grows plants.", "reasoning": "Because when the sun is loud, we can conclude the shop sings beautifully, we can conclude that the shop sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of when the shop sings beautifully, we can conclude the shop sings beautifully, we deduce that the shop sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the shop sings beautifully, it follows that the shop grows plants, we can see that the shop grows plants.\nGiven that if the shop grows plants, then jack grows plants, it is evident that jack grows plants.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Charlie sings beautifully, Based on charlie sings beautifully, it is evident that the shop sings beautifully, Assuming the shop sings beautifully, we can say the shop grows plants, Based on the shop grows plants, it is evident that jack grows plants, Jack grows plants.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University is a chef.\nThe zoo grows plants.\nThe zoo is a chef.\nRules:\nAssuming the zoo is a chef, we can say the zoo grows plants.\nBased on the festival makes pizza, it is evident that the festival makes pizza.\nGiven that the zoo is a chef, it follows that the festival makes pizza.\nWhen the zoo is a chef, we can conclude stanford university is colorful.\nBased on stanford university is colorful, it is evident that the zoo is a chef.\nBased on the festival makes pizza, it is evident that the zoo grows plants.", "statement": "The festival makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Because if the zoo is a chef, then stanford university is colorful, we can conclude that stanford university is colorful.\nGiven that if stanford university is colorful, then the zoo is a chef, it is evident that the zoo is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the zoo is a chef, we can conclude the festival makes pizza, we can see that the festival makes pizza.\nGiven that given that the festival makes pizza, it follows that the festival makes pizza, it is evident that the festival makes pizza.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Given that the zoo is a chef, it follows that the festival makes pizza, ..., The festival makes pizza\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium is loud.\nThe cat is an engineer.\nThe cat is loud.\nRules:\nAssuming the stadium is loud, we can say the cat creates art.\nBased on the cat is an engineer, it is evident that the mountain creates art.\nGiven that the cat is an engineer, it follows that the cat creates art.\nBased on the stadium is loud, it is evident that the mountain fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the stadium creates art, we can say the cat is loud.\nAssuming the stadium fishes in lakes, we can say the house is loud.\nGiven that the cat is an engineer, it follows that the mountain is an engineer.\nAssuming the stadium is loud, we can say the stadium fishes in lakes.\nWhen the house is loud, we can conclude the stadium creates art.", "statement": "The cat is loud.", "reasoning": "Because based on the stadium is loud, it is evident that the stadium fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the stadium fishes in lakes.\nGiven that given that the stadium fishes in lakes, it follows that the house is loud, it is evident that the house is loud.\nSince we know that when the house is loud, we can conclude the stadium creates art, it follows that the stadium creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium creates art, then the cat is loud, we can see that the cat is loud.", "depth": 3, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the stadium is loud, we can say the stadium fishes in lakes., Assuming the stadium fishes in lakes, we can say the house is loud., When the house is loud, we can conclude the stadium creates art., Assuming the stadium creates art, we can say the cat is loud., The cat is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy is fluffy.\nEmma is fluffy.\nEmma is happy.\nRules:\nBased on lucy is fluffy, it is evident that lucy is fluffy.\nBased on lucy is fluffy, it is evident that lucy is happy.\nAssuming lucy is fluffy, we can say lucas is happy.\nGiven that emma is happy, it follows that sophie is happy.\nGiven that lucas is fluffy, it follows that emma paints pictures.\nIf emma is fluffy, then sophie is happy.\nAssuming emma is happy, we can say lucas is happy.\nIf sophie is happy, then lucy is happy.", "statement": "Emma paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that lucy is fluffy, it follows that lucy is fluffy, we deduce that lucy is fluffy.\nGiven that based on lucy is fluffy, it is evident that lucy is happy, it is evident that lucy is happy.\nSince we know that given that lucy is fluffy, it follows that lucas is happy, it follows that lucas is happy.\nSince we know that given that emma is happy, it follows that sophie is happy, it follows that sophie is happy.\nSince we know that when emma is happy, we can conclude lucas is happy, it follows that lucas is happy.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because given that lucas is fluffy, it follows that emma paints pictures, the assertion is false.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house reads books.\nThe house enjoys music.\nThe train jumps high.\nRules:\nAssuming the house reads books, we can say the house is a chef.\nGiven that the train jumps high, it follows that the train reads books.\nWhen the house enjoys music, we can conclude the train reads books.\nAssuming the house reads books, we can say the house is a chef.\nWhen the river jumps high, we can conclude the river reads books.\nAssuming the house reads books, we can say the river is a chef.\nIf the house is a chef, then the ocean jumps high.\nGiven that the house is a chef, it follows that the river reads books.", "statement": "The river jumps high.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the house reads books, we can say the house is a chef, it is evident that the house is a chef.\nBecause assuming the train jumps high, we can say the train reads books, we can conclude that the train reads books.\nSince we know that based on the house reads books, it is evident that the house is a chef, it follows that the house is a chef.\nGiven that when the house reads books, we can conclude the river is a chef, it is evident that the river is a chef.\nApplying the logic of if the house is a chef, then the ocean jumps high, we deduce that the ocean jumps high.\nBecause given that the house is a chef, it follows that the river reads books, we can conclude that the river reads books.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the house reads books, we can say the house is a chef, given that the house is a chef, it follows that the river reads books, the river jumps high cannot be concluded from it or from the other given facts or rules, the river jumps high\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean is an engineer.\nLiam is an engineer.\nLiam is an engineer.\nRules:\nBased on the ocean is an engineer, it is evident that lucas is an engineer.\nGiven that liam is an engineer, it follows that the computer is loud.\nIf liam is an engineer, then lucas is loud.\nBased on the ocean is an engineer, it is evident that the ocean is an engineer.\nBased on lucas is loud, it is evident that the computer is colorful.\nAssuming liam is loud, we can say lucas is an engineer.\nGiven that liam is an engineer, it follows that lucas is loud.\nGiven that the computer is colorful, it follows that lucas is an engineer.\nAssuming liam is an engineer, we can say the ocean is loud.", "statement": "Liam is loud.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the ocean is an engineer, we can conclude lucas is an engineer, we can see that lucas is an engineer.\nBecause when liam is an engineer, we can conclude the computer is loud, we can conclude that the computer is loud.\nApplying the logic of given that liam is an engineer, it follows that lucas is loud, we deduce that lucas is loud.\nSince we know that when the ocean is an engineer, we can conclude the ocean is an engineer, it follows that the ocean is an engineer.\nBecause if lucas is loud, then the computer is colorful, we can conclude that the computer is colorful.\nGiven that assuming liam is an engineer, we can say the ocean is loud, it is evident that the ocean is loud.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that liam is an engineer, it follows that lucas is loud, Based on lucas is loud, it is evident that the computer is colorful, Given that the computer is colorful, it follows that lucas is an engineer, Assuming liam is loud, we can say lucas is an engineer, the computer is colorful implies lucas is an engineer, Lucas being loud and colorful implies Liam is loud, Assuming liam is an engineer, we can say the ocean is loud, Given that liam is an engineer, it follows that the computer is loud, If liam is an engineer, then lucas is loud, Liam is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car is colorful.\nThe shop is colorful.\nThe car volunteers.\nRules:\nWhen the shop is colorful, we can conclude the teacher is colorful.\nWhen the shop is colorful, we can conclude the teacher volunteers.\nWhen the artist is colorful, we can conclude the teacher travels far.\nAssuming the shop is colorful, we can say the teacher travels far.\nWhen the car volunteers, we can conclude the car swims well.\nGiven that the teacher is colorful, it follows that the teacher volunteers.", "statement": "The artist is colorful.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the shop is colorful, then the teacher is colorful, we deduce that the teacher is colorful.\nBecause given that the shop is colorful, it follows that the teacher volunteers, we can conclude that the teacher volunteers.\nBecause if the shop is colorful, then the teacher travels far, we can conclude that the teacher travels far.\nGiven that if the car volunteers, then the car swims well, it is evident that the car swims well.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the shop is colorful, we can conclude the teacher is colorful, Given that the teacher is colorful, it follows that the teacher volunteers, the teacher travels far, but not necessarily the artist, The artist is colorful can also be negated by the absence of relevant rules, The artist is colorful\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University grows plants.\nThe garden is interesting.\nThe ocean grows plants.\nRules:\nBased on the garden is interesting, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains.\nWhen the garden is interesting, we can conclude ethan hikes mountains.\nAssuming stanford university grows plants, we can say the ocean carries bags.\nGiven that ethan hikes mountains, it follows that the garden hikes mountains.\nBased on the garden grows plants, it is evident that the ocean grows plants.\nGiven that the garden is interesting, it follows that the garden grows plants.\nAssuming stanford university grows plants, we can say the ocean grows plants.\nBased on the ocean grows plants, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains.", "statement": "Stanford University is interesting.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the garden is interesting, it follows that the garden hikes mountains, it follows that the garden hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of if the garden is interesting, then ethan hikes mountains, we deduce that ethan hikes mountains.\nSince we know that assuming stanford university grows plants, we can say the ocean carries bags, it follows that the ocean carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the garden is interesting, it follows that the garden grows plants, we can see that the garden grows plants.\nApplying the logic of if stanford university grows plants, then the ocean grows plants, we deduce that the ocean grows plants.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because assuming stanford university grows plants, we can say the ocean grows plants, based on the ocean grows plants, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains, based on the garden is interesting, it is evident that the garden hikes mountains, the negation of Stanford University is interesting\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe plane creates art.\nJack is tall.\nThe tree dances gracefully.\nRules:\nGiven that the tree dances gracefully, it follows that the plane plays instruments.\nGiven that the plane creates art, it follows that the bridge is tall.\nBased on the tree dances gracefully, it is evident that the plane creates art.\nBased on jack is tall, it is evident that the bridge is tall.\nGiven that the plane creates art, it follows that the plane plays instruments.\nGiven that jack is tall, it follows that the plane creates art.\nGiven that the bridge dances gracefully, it follows that the bridge plays instruments.\nGiven that the plane plays instruments, it follows that the plane plays instruments.\nGiven that the tree dances gracefully, it follows that the plane plays instruments.", "statement": "The bridge dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Because based on the tree dances gracefully, it is evident that the plane plays instruments, we can conclude that the plane plays instruments.\nBecause based on the plane creates art, it is evident that the bridge is tall, we can conclude that the bridge is tall.\nGiven that assuming the tree dances gracefully, we can say the plane creates art, it is evident that the plane creates art.\nBecause if the tree dances gracefully, then the plane plays instruments, we can conclude that the plane plays instruments.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because given that the tree dances gracefully, it follows that the plane plays instruments, given that the plane creates art, it follows that the bridge is tall, based on the tree dances gracefully, it is evident that the plane creates art, the tree dances gracefully, it is evident that the bridge is tall, the bridge is not stated to dance gracefully. Hence, the bridge dances gracefully is not evident.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma is interesting.\nEmma rides bikes.\nEmma runs marathons.\nRules:\nBased on emma is interesting, it is evident that emma jumps high.\nAssuming emma is interesting, we can say sophie is interesting.\nIf emma runs marathons, then emma is interesting.\nWhen emma is interesting, we can conclude emma is interesting.\nBased on emma runs marathons, it is evident that emma is interesting.\nIf sophie runs marathons, then emma jumps high.\nBased on emma runs marathons, it is evident that sophie rides bikes.\nAssuming sophie rides bikes, we can say sophie rides bikes.\nGiven that emma runs marathons, it follows that emma jumps high.", "statement": "The zoo is interesting.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if emma is interesting, then emma jumps high, it follows that emma jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when emma is interesting, we can conclude sophie is interesting, we can see that sophie is interesting.\nBecause given that emma runs marathons, it follows that emma is interesting, we can conclude that emma is interesting.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if emma runs marathons, then sophie rides bikes, we can see that sophie rides bikes.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules or facts mention or relate to the zoo, the zoo is not necessarily interesting\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book is tall.\nThe book runs marathons.\nThe chef swims well.\nRules:\nBased on the book is tall, it is evident that the river runs marathons.\nGiven that the chef swims well, it follows that the river runs marathons.\nWhen the book is tall, we can conclude the book runs marathons.\nBased on the book is tall, it is evident that the book runs marathons.\nWhen the chef swims well, we can conclude the book runs marathons.\nAssuming the book is tall, we can say the book runs marathons.\nGiven that the book is tall, it follows that the chef is tall.\nBased on the book is tall, it is evident that the river runs marathons.\nIf the book runs marathons, then the chef is tall.", "statement": "The cat is tall.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the book is tall, we can say the river runs marathons, it follows that the river runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the book is tall, then the book runs marathons, we can see that the book runs marathons.\nBecause assuming the chef swims well, we can say the book runs marathons, we can conclude that the book runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the book runs marathons, we can conclude the chef is tall, we can see that the chef is tall.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"None of the provided rules lead to any conclusion about the cat being tall or not. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the cat is tall based on provided facts and rules.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree reads books.\nChuan reads books.\nChuan enjoys music.\nRules:\nWhen chuan enjoys music, we can conclude charlie enjoys music.\nIf chuan enjoys music, then chuan reads books.\nIf charlie enjoys music, then james is interesting.\nAssuming charlie enjoys music, we can say james is interesting.\nGiven that charlie enjoys music, it follows that chuan enjoys music.", "statement": "The tree is interesting.", "reasoning": "Because given that chuan enjoys music, it follows that charlie enjoys music, we can conclude that charlie enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if chuan enjoys music, then chuan reads books, we can see that chuan reads books.\nBecause assuming charlie enjoys music, we can say chuan enjoys music, we can conclude that chuan enjoys music.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"There are no rules that link the tree to being interesting.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam is a doctor.\nJames reads books.\nLiam is a doctor.\nRules:\nBased on liam is a doctor, it is evident that the plane is a doctor.\nGiven that liam is a doctor, it follows that liam is colorful.\nWhen liam is a doctor, we can conclude liam is colorful.\nAssuming liam is a doctor, we can say the plane reads books.\nWhen liam is colorful, we can conclude liam makes pizza.\nGiven that liam is colorful, it follows that liam is colorful.\nBased on liam is colorful, it is evident that liam is colorful.\nWhen liam reads books, we can conclude liam is colorful.", "statement": "Liam makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming liam is a doctor, we can say the plane is a doctor, it follows that the plane is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of when liam is a doctor, we can conclude liam is colorful, we deduce that liam is colorful.\nSince we know that given that liam is a doctor, it follows that the plane reads books, it follows that the plane reads books.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Liam is a doctor, it follows that Liam is colorful. When Liam is colorful, we can conclude Liam makes pizza, Liam makes pizza\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall becomes famous.\nThe wall creates art.\nThe sun becomes famous.\nRules:\nBased on the sun becomes famous, it is evident that the wall sings beautifully.\nGiven that the sun becomes famous, it follows that ava becomes famous.\nIf the sun becomes famous, then ava sings beautifully.\nGiven that ava sings beautifully, it follows that the wall sings beautifully.\nIf ava becomes famous, then ava becomes famous.\nIf the sun becomes famous, then ava becomes famous.\nWhen the wall sings beautifully, we can conclude ava becomes famous.", "statement": "The wall is happy.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the sun becomes famous, it is evident that the wall sings beautifully, it is evident that the wall sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of assuming the sun becomes famous, we can say ava becomes famous, we deduce that ava becomes famous.\nGiven that if the sun becomes famous, then ava sings beautifully, it is evident that ava sings beautifully.\nGiven that when the wall sings beautifully, we can conclude ava becomes famous, it is evident that ava becomes famous.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the provided rules and facts do not lead to a conclusion about the wall being happy, the wall is not necessarily happy.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas is friendly.\nJack is friendly.\nThe pumpkin does yoga.\nRules:\nBased on lucas is friendly, it is evident that lucas is happy.\nWhen jack is friendly, we can conclude the cloud is happy.\nWhen lucas is friendly, we can conclude lucas is happy.\nWhen jack is friendly, we can conclude the cloud is quiet.\nIf the pumpkin does yoga, then the cloud is quiet.\nGiven that lucas does yoga, it follows that the cloud is quiet.\nIf the cloud does yoga, then the cloud is quiet.\nWhen lucas is friendly, we can conclude lucas does yoga.\nGiven that the pumpkin is friendly, it follows that the cloud is happy.", "statement": "The cloud does yoga.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when lucas is friendly, we can conclude lucas is happy, we deduce that lucas is happy.\nGiven that given that jack is friendly, it follows that the cloud is happy, it is evident that the cloud is happy.\nApplying the logic of when jack is friendly, we can conclude the cloud is quiet, we deduce that the cloud is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the pumpkin does yoga, we can say the cloud is quiet, we can see that the cloud is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on lucas is friendly, it is evident that lucas does yoga, we can see that lucas does yoga.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because if the pumpkin does yoga, then the cloud is quiet, the pumpkin does yoga, ..., the negation of the assertion\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia writes stories.\nMia hikes mountains.\nThe teacher draws maps.\nRules:\nGiven that mia hikes mountains, it follows that chuan draws maps.\nBased on the teacher draws maps, it is evident that emma writes stories.\nBased on the teacher draws maps, it is evident that the teacher hikes mountains.\nGiven that chuan draws maps, it follows that the teacher writes stories.\nWhen mia writes stories, we can conclude the teacher hikes mountains.\nBased on mia writes stories, it is evident that emma writes stories.\nAssuming the teacher writes stories, we can say the teacher hikes mountains.\nGiven that mia hikes mountains, it follows that emma writes stories.", "statement": "Mia carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on mia hikes mountains, it is evident that chuan draws maps, we can see that chuan draws maps.\nGiven that assuming the teacher draws maps, we can say emma writes stories, it is evident that emma writes stories.\nApplying the logic of assuming the teacher draws maps, we can say the teacher hikes mountains, we deduce that the teacher hikes mountains.\nGiven that if chuan draws maps, then the teacher writes stories, it is evident that the teacher writes stories.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because there is no rule or fact that states or implies that Mia carries bags, the assertion Mia carries bags is negation\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden travels far.\nSophie is happy.\nThe garden is happy.\nRules:\nIf sophie is happy, then sophie travels far.\nBased on sophie travels far, it is evident that sophie travels far.\nAssuming sophie is happy, we can say sophie travels far.\nAssuming sophie is happy, we can say the garden is interesting.\nWhen sophie travels far, we can conclude the garden is interesting.", "statement": "Charlie is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when sophie is happy, we can conclude sophie travels far, we can see that sophie travels far.\nBecause given that sophie is happy, it follows that the garden is interesting, we can conclude that the garden is interesting.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts stating that Charlie is interesting or related to anyone or anything that is, Charlie is not interesting\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud explores cities.\nThe cloud makes pizza.\nThe garden explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that the cloud explores cities, it follows that the garden explores cities.\nGiven that the garden explores cities, it follows that the garden explores cities.\nBased on the cloud makes pizza, it is evident that the cloud reads books.\nAssuming the cloud explores cities, we can say the cloud reads books.\nAssuming the garden explores cities, we can say alice makes pizza.\nGiven that the garden hikes mountains, it follows that the cloud reads books.\nIf the cloud makes pizza, then alice makes pizza.\nAssuming the garden explores cities, we can say the cloud reads books.\nIf the cloud explores cities, then the garden explores cities.\nAssuming the garden hikes mountains, we can say alice makes pizza.", "statement": "The garden hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the cloud explores cities, it follows that the garden explores cities, it is evident that the garden explores cities.\nApplying the logic of assuming the cloud makes pizza, we can say the cloud reads books, we deduce that the cloud reads books.\nApplying the logic of assuming the garden explores cities, we can say alice makes pizza, we deduce that alice makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the garden explores cities, we can say the cloud reads books, we can see that the cloud reads books.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the cloud explores cities, it follows that the garden explores cities., Assuming the garden explores cities, we can say alice makes pizza., If the cloud makes pizza, then alice makes pizza., Based on the cloud makes pizza, it is evident that the cloud reads books., Assuming the garden hikes mountains, we can say alice makes pizza., Given that the garden hikes mountains, it follows that the cloud reads books., The garden hikes mountains.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah paints pictures.\nThe phone hosts parties.\nSarah hosts parties.\nRules:\nGiven that sarah hosts parties, it follows that the phone hosts parties.\nBased on sarah hosts parties, it is evident that sarah swims well.\nBased on sarah hosts parties, it is evident that the wall hosts parties.\nGiven that the phone swims well, it follows that the sun hosts parties.\nWhen the sun swims well, we can conclude sarah swims well.\nBased on the wall hosts parties, it is evident that sarah swims well.\nGiven that sarah paints pictures, it follows that the sun swims well.\nAssuming the phone hosts parties, we can say the wall hosts parties.", "statement": "The phone swims well.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming sarah hosts parties, we can say the phone hosts parties, we deduce that the phone hosts parties.\nSince we know that given that sarah hosts parties, it follows that sarah swims well, it follows that sarah swims well.\nBecause assuming sarah hosts parties, we can say the wall hosts parties, we can conclude that the wall hosts parties.\nBecause based on the wall hosts parties, it is evident that sarah swims well, we can conclude that sarah swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when sarah paints pictures, we can conclude the sun swims well, we can see that the sun swims well.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Assuming the phone hosts parties, we can say the wall hosts parties., Based on the wall hosts parties, it is evident that sarah swims well., Based on sarah hosts parties, it is evident that sarah swims well., Given that sarah paints pictures, it follows that the sun swims well., When the sun swims well, we can conclude sarah swims well., Given that the phone swims well, it follows that the sun hosts parties., Based on the wall hosts parties, it is evident that sarah swims well., It is evident that sarah swims well., The assertion follows.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam is an artist.\nLiam is an artist.\nHenry fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nAssuming liam is an artist, we can say liam is interesting.\nGiven that liam is an artist, it follows that the pumpkin is interesting.\nGiven that liam is an artist, it follows that the pumpkin cooks well.\nBased on henry fishes in lakes, it is evident that the train is an artist.\nBased on liam is an artist, it is evident that the pumpkin fishes in lakes.\nAssuming liam is interesting, we can say the pumpkin cooks well.\nBased on liam is an artist, it is evident that the train is an artist.\nAssuming liam is an artist, we can say the pumpkin is an artist.\nWhen liam is an artist, we can conclude the train is an artist.\nAssuming the pumpkin cooks well, we can say liam is interesting.", "statement": "Liam cooks well.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming liam is an artist, we can say liam is interesting, we can see that liam is interesting.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that liam is an artist, it follows that the pumpkin is interesting, we can see that the pumpkin is interesting.\nGiven that given that liam is an artist, it follows that the pumpkin cooks well, it is evident that the pumpkin cooks well.\nApplying the logic of if henry fishes in lakes, then the train is an artist, we deduce that the train is an artist.\nBecause given that liam is an artist, it follows that the pumpkin fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the pumpkin fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of given that liam is an artist, it follows that the pumpkin is an artist, we deduce that the pumpkin is an artist.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There is no rule connecting 'Liam is an artist' with 'Liam cooks well'. Therefore, none of the rules lead to the conclusion that 'Liam cooks well'. Thus, the assertion 'Liam cooks well' cannot be concluded from the given facts and rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree writes stories.\nStanford University writes stories.\nThe pig collects stamps.\nRules:\nIf the pig collects stamps, then the pig collects stamps.\nGiven that the pig collects stamps, it follows that the tree is happy.\nIf the tree writes stories, then stanford university collects stamps.\nWhen the tree writes stories, we can conclude the tree is a scientist.\nWhen the pig is a scientist, we can conclude the pig is a scientist.\nAssuming the pig is a scientist, we can say stanford university writes stories.\nGiven that stanford university is a scientist, it follows that stanford university writes stories.\nGiven that the pig collects stamps, it follows that stanford university writes stories.", "statement": "Stanford University is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the pig collects stamps, it is evident that the pig collects stamps, it follows that the pig collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the pig collects stamps, we can conclude the tree is happy, we can see that the tree is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the tree writes stories, we can say stanford university collects stamps, we can see that stanford university collects stamps.\nSince we know that given that the tree writes stories, it follows that the tree is a scientist, it follows that the tree is a scientist.\nSince we know that based on the pig collects stamps, it is evident that stanford university writes stories, it follows that stanford university writes stories.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Given that the pig collects stamps, it follows that stanford university writes stories., Given that stanford university is a scientist, it follows that stanford university writes stories., Stanford University writes stories., Given that stanford university is a scientist, it follows that stanford university writes stories.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain is happy.\nThe pig is friendly.\nThe mountain is friendly.\nRules:\nBased on the pig is friendly, it is evident that the tree runs quickly.\nAssuming the tree runs quickly, we can say the tree explores cities.\nIf the pig explores cities, then the tree explores cities.\nWhen the pig explores cities, we can conclude the pig runs quickly.\nGiven that the tree explores cities, it follows that the tree runs quickly.\nWhen the tree explores cities, we can conclude the tree is friendly.", "statement": "The pig explores cities.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the pig is friendly, it is evident that the tree runs quickly, it follows that the tree runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the tree runs quickly, then the tree explores cities, we can see that the tree explores cities.\nGiven that when the tree explores cities, we can conclude the tree is friendly, it is evident that the tree is friendly.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the pig explores cities, then the tree explores cities, when the pig explores cities, we can conclude the pig runs quickly, the assertion negation\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe creates art.\nThe globe teaches math.\nJianzhi creates art.\nRules:\nWhen the globe creates art, we can conclude the globe carries bags.\nBased on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the globe fishes in lakes.\nGiven that jianzhi creates art, it follows that the globe teaches math.\nBased on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the zoo teaches math.\nGiven that the zoo teaches math, it follows that henry fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the globe creates art, we can say henry fishes in lakes.\nIf the globe teaches math, then henry teaches math.\nWhen the globe creates art, we can conclude the globe fishes in lakes.", "statement": "Jianzhi teaches math.", "reasoning": "Because when the globe creates art, we can conclude the globe carries bags, we can conclude that the globe carries bags.\nSince we know that if jianzhi creates art, then the globe fishes in lakes, it follows that the globe fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that assuming jianzhi creates art, we can say the globe teaches math, it follows that the globe teaches math.\nApplying the logic of assuming jianzhi creates art, we can say the zoo teaches math, we deduce that the zoo teaches math.\nGiven that when the zoo teaches math, we can conclude henry fishes in lakes, it is evident that henry fishes in lakes.\nBecause assuming the globe teaches math, we can say henry teaches math, we can conclude that henry teaches math.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the globe fishes in lakes, Based on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the zoo teaches math, Given that the zoo teaches math, it follows that henry fishes in lakes, Given that jianzhi creates art, it follows that the globe teaches math, Jianzhi teaches math is not mentioned in the rules, nor follows from these facts, the negation of Jianzhi teaches math\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house jumps high.\nLiam reads books.\nThe house is colorful.\nRules:\nIf the house jumps high, then sarah jumps high.\nIf the house jumps high, then liam jumps high.\nBased on sarah swims well, it is evident that liam jumps high.\nGiven that sarah is colorful, it follows that liam reads books.\nGiven that the house jumps high, it follows that liam jumps high.\nIf liam jumps high, then liam reads books.", "statement": "Sarah swims well.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the house jumps high, then sarah jumps high, we deduce that sarah jumps high.\nSince we know that assuming the house jumps high, we can say liam jumps high, it follows that liam jumps high.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the house jumps high, then liam jumps high, based on sarah swims well, it is evident that liam jumps high, sarah swims well\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is interesting.\nThe musician is fast.\nLucy is fast.\nRules:\nIf the sky is interesting, then lucy is fast.\nGiven that the musician is fast, it follows that lucy collects stamps.\nGiven that the musician is fast, it follows that lucy collects stamps.\nAssuming the sky is interesting, we can say lucy is fast.\nGiven that lucy is fast, it follows that the sky is fast.\nGiven that the sky is interesting, it follows that the musician collects stamps.\nAssuming lucy collects stamps, we can say lucy jumps high.\nBased on lucy is fast, it is evident that ava is interesting.\nBased on the musician is fast, it is evident that ava is interesting.", "statement": "Lucy jumps high.", "reasoning": "Given that if the sky is interesting, then lucy is fast, it is evident that lucy is fast.\nSince we know that given that the musician is fast, it follows that lucy collects stamps, it follows that lucy collects stamps.\nBecause based on lucy is fast, it is evident that the sky is fast, we can conclude that the sky is fast.\nApplying the logic of if the sky is interesting, then the musician collects stamps, we deduce that the musician collects stamps.\nBecause when lucy is fast, we can conclude ava is interesting, we can conclude that ava is interesting.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the musician is fast, it follows that lucy collects stamps., Assuming lucy collects stamps, we can say lucy jumps high., Lucy jumps high.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe plane is fast.\nThe garden is funny.\nThe garden reads books.\nRules:\nAssuming the garden reads books, we can say the cat is fast.\nIf the garden is funny, then the cat is fast.\nBased on the garden is funny, it is evident that the cat is fast.\nAssuming the garden is funny, we can say the cat is fast.\nIf the garden reads books, then the cat swims well.\nBased on the cat is fast, it is evident that the cat swims well.\nIf the cat is fast, then the garden is fast.\nBased on the garden reads books, it is evident that the city is fast.\nAssuming the plane is fast, we can say the cat is fast.\nIf the cat is fast, then the city is fast.", "statement": "The cat reads books.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the garden reads books, it is evident that the cat is fast, we can see that the cat is fast.\nBecause if the garden reads books, then the cat swims well, we can conclude that the cat swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the garden reads books, it is evident that the city is fast, we can see that the city is fast.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because assuming the garden reads books, we can say the cat is fast, if the garden is funny, then the cat is fast, based on the garden is funny, it is evident that the cat is fast, assuming the garden is funny, we can say the cat is fast, if the garden reads books, then the cat swims well, based on the cat is fast, it is evident that the cat swims well, if the cat is fast, then the garden is fast, based on the garden reads books, it is evident that the city is fast, assuming the plane is fast, we can say the cat is fast, if the cat is fast, then the city is fast, the cat reads books is not mentioned in the facts or deduced.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train solves puzzles.\nThe teacher is a chef.\nThe train creates art.\nRules:\nIf the train solves puzzles, then the train is magical.\nBased on the train solves puzzles, it is evident that the train is magical.\nAssuming the teacher is a chef, we can say the pumpkin is a chef.\nAssuming sophie solves puzzles, we can say the teacher is a chef.\nAssuming the teacher is a chef, we can say the teacher is a chef.\nAssuming sophie creates art, we can say the pumpkin is magical.\nBased on the pumpkin is a chef, it is evident that the pumpkin is magical.\nGiven that the teacher is a chef, it follows that the train is a chef.", "statement": "Sophie creates art.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the train solves puzzles, it is evident that the train is magical, we deduce that the train is magical.\nBecause given that the teacher is a chef, it follows that the pumpkin is a chef, we can conclude that the pumpkin is a chef.\nBecause based on the teacher is a chef, it is evident that the teacher is a chef, we can conclude that the teacher is a chef.\nBecause assuming the pumpkin is a chef, we can say the pumpkin is magical, we can conclude that the pumpkin is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the teacher is a chef, then the train is a chef, we can see that the train is a chef.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because there are no direct rules or facts connecting Sophie to the action of creating art, Sophie creates art.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah takes pictures.\nThe moon makes pizza.\nHenry swims well.\nRules:\nBased on the moon makes pizza, it is evident that the moon swims well.\nAssuming sarah takes pictures, we can say sarah takes pictures.\nBased on henry swims well, it is evident that sarah takes pictures.\nWhen sarah takes pictures, we can conclude sarah takes pictures.\nBased on henry swims well, it is evident that sarah takes pictures.\nAssuming henry swims well, we can say sarah takes pictures.", "statement": "The moon is friendly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the moon makes pizza, it follows that the moon swims well, it follows that the moon swims well.\nSince we know that assuming sarah takes pictures, we can say sarah takes pictures, it follows that sarah takes pictures.\nGiven that when sarah takes pictures, we can conclude sarah takes pictures, it is evident that sarah takes pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts connecting the given facts to the assertion 'The moon is friendly', the negation of the assertion is supported\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe plane does yoga.\nLucas does yoga.\nThe plane cooks well.\nRules:\nBased on the plane does yoga, it is evident that mia jumps high.\nGiven that lucas reads books, it follows that lucas does yoga.\nGiven that mia cooks well, it follows that lucas does yoga.\nGiven that mia does yoga, it follows that mia cooks well.\nGiven that lucas does yoga, it follows that the city does yoga.", "statement": "Mia does yoga.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the plane does yoga, then mia jumps high, it follows that mia jumps high.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the plane does yoga, it is evident that mia jumps high, the assertion Mia does yoga is false\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig volunteers.\nSophie volunteers.\nThe globe teaches math.\nRules:\nGiven that sophie volunteers, it follows that ethan sings beautifully.\nWhen the pig teaches math, we can conclude ethan sings beautifully.\nWhen the pig volunteers, we can conclude the pig sings beautifully.\nGiven that the globe teaches math, it follows that ethan teaches math.\nWhen sophie volunteers, we can conclude the pig teaches math.", "statement": "Sophie runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming sophie volunteers, we can say ethan sings beautifully, it follows that ethan sings beautifully.\nBecause assuming the pig volunteers, we can say the pig sings beautifully, we can conclude that the pig sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of given that the globe teaches math, it follows that ethan teaches math, we deduce that ethan teaches math.\nApplying the logic of assuming sophie volunteers, we can say the pig teaches math, we deduce that the pig teaches math.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because sophie volunteers, {Given that sophie volunteers, it follows that ethan sings beautifully}, the globe teaches math, {Given that the globe teaches math, it follows that ethan teaches math}, sophie volunteers, {When sophie volunteers, we can conclude the pig teaches math}, the pig volunteers, {When the pig volunteers, we can conclude the pig sings beautifully}, sophie volunteers, {Sophie runs marathons is not a conclusion from any of the given rules}, Sophie runs marathons is not a conclusion from any of the given rules\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium swims well.\nThe wall swims well.\nThe wall runs marathons.\nRules:\nGiven that the wall runs marathons, it follows that the wall is an artist.\nWhen the wall runs marathons, we can conclude the wall is an artist.\nWhen the wall runs marathons, we can conclude emma is an artist.\nAssuming emma is an artist, we can say the car plays football.\nBased on emma is an artist, it is evident that the car plays football.\nGiven that the stadium swims well, it follows that the wall is an artist.\nBased on emma is an artist, it is evident that the stadium runs marathons.", "statement": "The stadium runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the wall runs marathons, it follows that the wall is an artist, we can see that the wall is an artist.\nApplying the logic of if the wall runs marathons, then emma is an artist, we deduce that emma is an artist.\nGiven that given that emma is an artist, it follows that the car plays football, it is evident that the car plays football.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on emma is an artist, it is evident that the stadium runs marathons.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames carries bags.\nThe river paints pictures.\nThe river paints pictures.\nRules:\nGiven that the river paints pictures, it follows that the phone carries bags.\nIf the river paints pictures, then mike grows plants.\nWhen the river paints pictures, we can conclude the river paints pictures.\nWhen the river paints pictures, we can conclude the river grows plants.\nGiven that james carries bags, it follows that the river carries bags.\nBased on the river paints pictures, it is evident that the phone grows plants.\nAssuming the river paints pictures, we can say james paints pictures.\nBased on the phone grows plants, it is evident that the river carries bags.\nAssuming the river paints pictures, we can say james paints pictures.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the river paints pictures, then the phone carries bags, we can see that the phone carries bags.\nSince we know that if the river paints pictures, then mike grows plants, it follows that mike grows plants.\nGiven that given that the river paints pictures, it follows that the river paints pictures, it is evident that the river paints pictures.\nGiven that based on the river paints pictures, it is evident that the river grows plants, it is evident that the river grows plants.\nGiven that if james carries bags, then the river carries bags, it is evident that the river carries bags.\nSince we know that when the river paints pictures, we can conclude the phone grows plants, it follows that the phone grows plants.\nSince we know that when the river paints pictures, we can conclude james paints pictures, it follows that james paints pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts related to Chuan being handsome.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames carries bags.\nStanford University carries bags.\nThe bakery plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf james carries bags, then the bakery plays instruments.\nAssuming james carries bags, we can say the sky swims well.\nIf stanford university carries bags, then the bakery swims well.\nGiven that stanford university carries bags, it follows that the sky swims well.\nGiven that the sky plays instruments, it follows that james plays instruments.\nAssuming james carries bags, we can say stanford university rides bikes.\nWhen stanford university rides bikes, we can conclude the bakery plays instruments.", "statement": "James plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if james carries bags, then the bakery plays instruments, it follows that the bakery plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that james carries bags, it follows that the sky swims well, we can see that the sky swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when stanford university carries bags, we can conclude the bakery swims well, we can see that the bakery swims well.\nBecause based on james carries bags, it is evident that stanford university rides bikes, we can conclude that stanford university rides bikes.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the sky plays instruments, it follows that james plays instruments, Assuming james carries bags, we can say the sky swims well, Given that stanford university carries bags, it follows that the sky swims well, the conclusion is that James plays instruments.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry teaches math.\nChuan writes stories.\nThe garden teaches math.\nRules:\nBased on henry teaches math, it is evident that chuan teaches math.\nBased on the garden teaches math, it is evident that the garden runs quickly.\nAssuming henry jumps high, we can say the garden jumps high.\nWhen chuan writes stories, we can conclude henry jumps high.\nBased on chuan jumps high, it is evident that chuan teaches math.\nAssuming chuan teaches math, we can say the garden runs quickly.\nBased on the garden runs quickly, it is evident that the garden jumps high.", "statement": "Chuan jumps high.", "reasoning": "Because assuming henry teaches math, we can say chuan teaches math, we can conclude that chuan teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the garden teaches math, we can conclude the garden runs quickly, we can see that the garden runs quickly.\nBecause based on chuan teaches math, it is evident that the garden runs quickly, we can conclude that the garden runs quickly.\nGiven that when the garden runs quickly, we can conclude the garden jumps high, it is evident that the garden jumps high.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When chuan writes stories, we can conclude henry jumps high., Assuming henry jumps high, we can say the garden jumps high., Based on the garden jumps high, it is evident that the garden runs quickly., Assuming chuan teaches math, we can say the garden runs quickly., Based on chuan jumps high, it is evident that chuan teaches math., henry teaches math implies chuan teaches math., Chuan writes stories implies henry jumps high., Chuan jumps high implies chuan teaches math implies garden runs quickly., Chuan jumps high.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie is fluffy.\nEthan runs quickly.\nThe pumpkin is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf ethan runs quickly, then charlie is fluffy.\nWhen ethan runs quickly, we can conclude charlie runs quickly.\nGiven that the pumpkin is fluffy, it follows that the pumpkin is fluffy.\nIf the fountain is happy, then charlie runs quickly.\nAssuming the pumpkin is fluffy, we can say ethan is happy.\nGiven that ethan runs quickly, it follows that charlie is fluffy.\nBased on ethan is happy, it is evident that charlie runs quickly.\nIf charlie runs quickly, then ethan is happy.", "statement": "The fountain is happy.", "reasoning": "Because assuming ethan runs quickly, we can say charlie is fluffy, we can conclude that charlie is fluffy.\nGiven that based on ethan runs quickly, it is evident that charlie runs quickly, it is evident that charlie runs quickly.\nGiven that given that the pumpkin is fluffy, it follows that the pumpkin is fluffy, it is evident that the pumpkin is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of when the pumpkin is fluffy, we can conclude ethan is happy, we deduce that ethan is happy.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when ethan runs quickly, we can conclude charlie runs quickly, if charlie runs quickly, then ethan is happy, based on ethan is happy, it is evident that charlie runs quickly, if the fountain is happy, then charlie runs quickly, the fountain is not happy.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician becomes famous.\nThe train becomes famous.\nHenry does yoga.\nRules:\nBased on henry does yoga, it is evident that the train is quiet.\nAssuming the musician becomes famous, we can say the train is quiet.\nBased on the musician does yoga, it is evident that mia becomes famous.\nGiven that the musician becomes famous, it follows that the musician becomes famous.\nWhen henry becomes famous, we can conclude mia becomes famous.\nWhen mia becomes famous, we can conclude the musician does yoga.", "statement": "Mia becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if henry does yoga, then the train is quiet, we deduce that the train is quiet.\nBecause based on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that the musician becomes famous, we can conclude that the musician becomes famous.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Assuming the musician becomes famous, we can say the train is quiet., Based on the musician does yoga, it is evident that mia becomes famous., Given that the musician becomes famous, it follows that the musician becomes famous., Mia becomes famous.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book reads books.\nMike reads books.\nThe book plays football.\nRules:\nAssuming the book reads books, we can say jianzhi plays football.\nBased on the musician reads books, it is evident that jianzhi plays football.\nIf jianzhi plays football, then the musician collects stamps.\nAssuming mike is fast, we can say jianzhi collects stamps.\nAssuming jianzhi collects stamps, we can say mike is fast.\nAssuming jianzhi plays football, we can say the musician is fast.", "statement": "The musician reads books.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the book reads books, then jianzhi plays football, we deduce that jianzhi plays football.\nSince we know that based on jianzhi plays football, it is evident that the musician collects stamps, it follows that the musician collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if jianzhi plays football, then the musician is fast, we can see that the musician is fast.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the book reads books, we can say jianzhi plays football, based on the musician reads books, it is evident that jianzhi plays football, the musician reads books\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah goes to the hospital.\nJames does yoga.\nJames goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf sarah goes to the hospital, then james goes to the hospital.\nWhen james does yoga, we can conclude james is tall.\nGiven that sarah goes to the hospital, it follows that james is colorful.\nAssuming james goes to the hospital, we can say james is colorful.\nAssuming sarah goes to the hospital, we can say sarah does yoga.\nAssuming sarah is colorful, we can say james goes to the hospital.\nAssuming sarah does yoga, we can say sarah is colorful.\nIf james goes to the hospital, then sarah does yoga.\nGiven that james is colorful, it follows that james goes to the hospital.", "statement": "Stanford University is colorful.", "reasoning": "Because based on sarah goes to the hospital, it is evident that james goes to the hospital, we can conclude that james goes to the hospital.\nGiven that assuming james does yoga, we can say james is tall, it is evident that james is tall.\nSince we know that given that sarah goes to the hospital, it follows that james is colorful, it follows that james is colorful.\nSince we know that assuming sarah goes to the hospital, we can say sarah does yoga, it follows that sarah does yoga.\nSince we know that when sarah does yoga, we can conclude sarah is colorful, it follows that sarah is colorful.\nSince we know that if james is colorful, then james goes to the hospital, it follows that james goes to the hospital.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"The assertion Stanford University is colorful does not follow from any of the given facts or rules. None of the provided rules or facts mention Stanford University.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry hikes mountains.\nHenry plays games.\nThe teacher is quiet.\nRules:\nAssuming the teacher is quiet, we can say ethan hikes mountains.\nBased on the teacher is quiet, it is evident that the city is quiet.\nAssuming henry hikes mountains, we can say henry hikes mountains.\nBased on henry plays games, it is evident that the city is quiet.\nBased on ethan is quiet, it is evident that the teacher volunteers.\nBased on henry plays games, it is evident that the teacher volunteers.", "statement": "Ethan is quiet.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the teacher is quiet, it follows that ethan hikes mountains, it follows that ethan hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the teacher is quiet, we can say the city is quiet, we can see that the city is quiet.\nApplying the logic of if henry hikes mountains, then henry hikes mountains, we deduce that henry hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of based on henry plays games, it is evident that the teacher volunteers, we deduce that the teacher volunteers.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on henry plays games, it is evident that the city is quiet, and based on the teacher is quiet, it is evident that the city is quiet, therefore ethan is quiet does not follow from the given rules or facts.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain grows plants.\nMike grows plants.\nChuan is blue.\nRules:\nIf chuan is blue, then mike is blue.\nBased on the fountain grows plants, it is evident that chuan enjoys music.\nGiven that mike grows plants, it follows that mike is blue.\nGiven that the chef grows plants, it follows that chuan enjoys music.\nAssuming mike grows plants, we can say mike is happy.\nGiven that the fountain grows plants, it follows that chuan enjoys music.\nIf the chef grows plants, then the fountain is blue.\nIf chuan enjoys music, then the chef grows plants.", "statement": "The chef grows plants.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that chuan is blue, it follows that mike is blue, it follows that mike is blue.\nApplying the logic of based on the fountain grows plants, it is evident that chuan enjoys music, we deduce that chuan enjoys music.\nBecause assuming mike grows plants, we can say mike is happy, we can conclude that mike is happy.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the fountain grows plants, it follows that chuan enjoys music. If chuan enjoys music, then the chef grows plants, the chef grows plants.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden becomes famous.\nThe festival reads books.\nThe musician becomes famous.\nRules:\nWhen the festival reads books, we can conclude the festival swims well.\nGiven that the musician becomes famous, it follows that lucy swims well.\nAssuming the musician becomes famous, we can say the festival swims well.\nIf the garden becomes famous, then lucy reads books.\nBased on lucy swims well, it is evident that the musician swims well.\nWhen the festival swims well, we can conclude the musician becomes famous.\nWhen the festival reads books, we can conclude lucy swims well.\nAssuming the festival reads books, we can say the musician becomes famous.\nWhen lucy swims well, we can conclude the musician swims well.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the festival reads books, we can conclude the festival swims well, we deduce that the festival swims well.\nSince we know that based on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that lucy swims well, it follows that lucy swims well.\nBecause given that the musician becomes famous, it follows that the festival swims well, we can conclude that the festival swims well.\nApplying the logic of when the garden becomes famous, we can conclude lucy reads books, we deduce that lucy reads books.\nGiven that given that lucy swims well, it follows that the musician swims well, it is evident that the musician swims well.\nBecause when the festival swims well, we can conclude the musician becomes famous, we can conclude that the musician becomes famous.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion 'Chuan is handsome' is not connected to any of the provided facts or rules, Chuan is handsome is unrelated to the given scenario.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy fishes in lakes.\nThe bakery swims well.\nSarah fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nBased on lucy fishes in lakes, it is evident that lucy swims well.\nWhen the bakery swims well, we can conclude the cloud fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the bakery swims well, we can say lucy swims well.\nIf the bakery swims well, then sarah swims well.\nAssuming sarah fishes in lakes, we can say the bakery fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the bakery is funny, it follows that sarah swims well.\nGiven that the bakery fishes in lakes, it follows that lucy swims well.\nBased on sarah fishes in lakes, it is evident that lucy swims well.\nGiven that the cloud is funny, it follows that the cloud fishes in lakes.\nGiven that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that the cloud fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The cloud is funny.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when lucy fishes in lakes, we can conclude lucy swims well, it follows that lucy swims well.\nGiven that assuming the bakery swims well, we can say the cloud fishes in lakes, it is evident that the cloud fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of when the bakery swims well, we can conclude sarah swims well, we deduce that sarah swims well.\nGiven that assuming sarah fishes in lakes, we can say the bakery fishes in lakes, it is evident that the bakery fishes in lakes.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sarah fishes in lakes, we can say the bakery fishes in lakes. When the bakery fishes in lakes, it follows that Lucy swims well. Given that Sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that the cloud fishes in lakes. When the bakery swims well, we can conclude the cloud fishes in lakes, therefore the cloud is funny.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is loud.\nLucas is loud.\nThe stadium is loud.\nRules:\nWhen lucas is loud, we can conclude the house draws maps.\nBased on lucas draws maps, it is evident that lucas grows plants.\nBased on lucas grows plants, it is evident that the stadium draws maps.\nGiven that the house is loud, it follows that the house draws maps.\nWhen the house is loud, we can conclude the house draws maps.\nAssuming the stadium grows plants, we can say the stadium draws maps.", "statement": "Lucas grows plants.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if lucas is loud, then the house draws maps, we can see that the house draws maps.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Lucas is loud, when Lucas is loud, we can conclude the house draws maps, based on Lucas draws maps, it is evident that Lucas grows plants; Lucas grows plants\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo is colorful.\nThe mountain reads books.\nThe computer reads books.\nRules:\nBased on the computer reads books, it is evident that the car is happy.\nBased on the computer reads books, it is evident that the zoo is colorful.\nBased on the mountain reads books, it is evident that the zoo reads books.\nAssuming the computer reads books, we can say the car is happy.\nBased on the car is happy, it is evident that the car is happy.\nIf the zoo reads books, then the car is an engineer.\nWhen the computer reads books, we can conclude the car is happy.\nAssuming the zoo is an engineer, we can say the car is happy.\nIf the mountain is an engineer, then the zoo reads books.", "statement": "The zoo is happy.", "reasoning": "Because given that the computer reads books, it follows that the car is happy, we can conclude that the car is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the computer reads books, then the zoo is colorful, we can see that the zoo is colorful.\nSince we know that assuming the mountain reads books, we can say the zoo reads books, it follows that the zoo reads books.\nBecause given that the computer reads books, it follows that the car is happy, we can conclude that the car is happy.\nSince we know that if the zoo reads books, then the car is an engineer, it follows that the car is an engineer.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the mountain reads books, Based on the mountain reads books, it is evident that the zoo reads books, If the zoo reads books, then the car is an engineer, Assuming the zoo is an engineer, we can say the car is happy, Based on the car is happy, it is evident that the car is happy, Assuming the zoo is an engineer, we can say the car is happy, Given the information, we cannot conclude anything about the zoo being happy\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden volunteers.\nJames is an engineer.\nThe chef is an engineer.\nRules:\nBased on the chef is an engineer, it is evident that the garden volunteers.\nWhen james is an engineer, we can conclude the garden volunteers.\nBased on the chef is an engineer, it is evident that james is an engineer.\nBased on the garden volunteers, it is evident that the garden volunteers.\nIf the chef is an engineer, then the plane is an engineer.\nGiven that the chef is an engineer, it follows that the plane travels far.", "statement": "The plane travels far.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the chef is an engineer, it is evident that the garden volunteers, we deduce that the garden volunteers.", "depth": 2, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the chef is an engineer, it follows that the plane travels far, the plane travels far\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig grows plants.\nThe ocean grows plants.\nThe ocean dances gracefully.\nRules:\nGiven that the ocean dances gracefully, it follows that jianzhi fishes in lakes.\nBased on the ocean dances gracefully, it is evident that jianzhi fishes in lakes.\nWhen the ocean dances gracefully, we can conclude the ocean grows plants.\nIf the ocean grows plants, then the ocean creates art.\nIf the ocean dances gracefully, then jianzhi fishes in lakes.\nIf the pig grows plants, then the ocean creates art.\nGiven that the ocean grows plants, it follows that the ocean creates art.\nIf the pig dances gracefully, then the ocean creates art.\nIf jianzhi fishes in lakes, then the ocean grows plants.\nWhen jianzhi grows plants, we can conclude the ocean creates art.", "statement": "The ocean creates art.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the ocean dances gracefully, it follows that jianzhi fishes in lakes, we deduce that jianzhi fishes in lakes.\nBecause if jianzhi fishes in lakes, then the ocean grows plants, we can conclude that the ocean grows plants.\nBecause based on the ocean grows plants, it is evident that the ocean creates art, we can conclude that the ocean creates art.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the ocean grows plants, then the ocean creates art, Given that the ocean grows plants, it follows that the ocean creates art, The ocean grows plants, The ocean creates art.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist runs marathons.\nThe teacher explores cities.\nThe teacher runs marathons.\nRules:\nGiven that the artist runs marathons, it follows that the artist explores cities.\nIf the teacher runs marathons, then sarah runs marathons.\nBased on the teacher explores cities, it is evident that the artist explores cities.\nAssuming the artist runs marathons, we can say the artist explores cities.\nIf the artist runs marathons, then the artist is happy.\nIf the artist runs marathons, then the artist explores cities.\nGiven that the teacher explores cities, it follows that the artist explores cities.\nWhen the artist runs marathons, we can conclude sarah runs marathons.\nAssuming sarah runs marathons, we can say the artist runs marathons.", "statement": "The artist is happy.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the teacher runs marathons, it is evident that sarah runs marathons, we can see that sarah runs marathons.\nBecause given that sarah runs marathons, it follows that the artist runs marathons, we can conclude that the artist runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of if the artist runs marathons, then the artist is happy, we deduce that the artist is happy.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the artist runs marathons, If the artist runs marathons, then the artist is happy, The artist is happy.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig volunteers.\nThe sky is a scientist.\nThe sky is tall.\nRules:\nBased on the sky is a scientist, it is evident that the sun is a chef.\nWhen the sky is tall, we can conclude the sun volunteers.\nGiven that the sky is a scientist, it follows that the sun is a scientist.\nAssuming the sun is a chef, we can say the sun is a scientist.\nIf the sky is a scientist, then the sun is a chef.\nGiven that the sun volunteers, it follows that the river is tall.\nBased on the sun is a chef, it is evident that the sky is a scientist.", "statement": "The sun is a chef.", "reasoning": "Given that when the sky is a scientist, we can conclude the sun is a chef, it is evident that the sun is a chef.\nBecause if the sun is a chef, then the sky is a scientist, we can conclude that the sky is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the sky is a scientist, it is evident that the sun is a chef, we can see that the sun is a chef.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"If the sky is a scientist, then the sun is a chef, The sky is a scientist, The sun is a chef\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician is loud.\nThe mountain is colorful.\nThe musician is magical.\nRules:\nBased on the musician is magical, it is evident that mike is colorful.\nAssuming the musician is loud, we can say mike is colorful.\nAssuming the mountain is loud, we can say mike is colorful.\nIf the musician is magical, then the mountain plays football.\nBased on mike is colorful, it is evident that the mountain is loud.\nWhen the mountain plays football, we can conclude the mountain is loud.\nBased on mike is colorful, it is evident that the mountain is loud.", "statement": "Mike is colorful.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the musician is magical, we can conclude mike is colorful, it follows that mike is colorful.\nApplying the logic of assuming mike is colorful, we can say the mountain is loud, we deduce that the mountain is loud.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the mountain is loud, then mike is colorful, we can see that mike is colorful.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the musician is magical, it is evident that mike is colorful, assuming the musician is loud, we can say mike is colorful, the assertion is true\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival is tall.\nThe forest is a scientist.\nThe shop runs marathons.\nRules:\nAssuming the shop runs marathons, we can say the zoo travels far.\nAssuming the forest is a scientist, we can say the forest travels far.\nBased on the festival is tall, it is evident that the forest is a scientist.\nAssuming the forest is a scientist, we can say the festival travels far.\nBased on the festival travels far, it is evident that the festival is tall.\nWhen the festival is tall, we can conclude the forest travels far.\nWhen the forest travels far, we can conclude the festival travels far.\nWhen the forest travels far, we can conclude the festival travels far.", "statement": "The festival is tall.", "reasoning": "Given that when the forest is a scientist, we can conclude the forest travels far, it is evident that the forest travels far.\nGiven that if the forest travels far, then the festival travels far, it is evident that the festival travels far.\nApplying the logic of when the festival travels far, we can conclude the festival is tall, we deduce that the festival is tall.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the festival travels far, it is evident that the festival is tall, assuming the forest is a scientist, we can say the festival travels far, based on the festival is tall, it is evident that the forest is a scientist, the festival is tall\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall is a scientist.\nEthan is a scientist.\nThe cloud swims well.\nRules:\nIf the wall is a scientist, then the fountain is a scientist.\nBased on the cloud swims well, it is evident that the cloud swims well.\nAssuming the wall is a scientist, we can say ethan is a scientist.\nIf the wall is a scientist, then the fountain swims well.\nGiven that the fountain collects stamps, it follows that the fountain is a scientist.\nWhen the fountain swims well, we can conclude the fountain collects stamps.\nAssuming the fountain collects stamps, we can say ethan is a scientist.\nIf the fountain collects stamps, then the fountain collects stamps.\nIf the cloud swims well, then the fountain swims well.", "statement": "The fountain is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the wall is a scientist, it is evident that the fountain swims well, it follows that the fountain swims well.\nBecause if the fountain swims well, then the fountain collects stamps, we can conclude that the fountain collects stamps.\nApplying the logic of assuming the fountain collects stamps, we can say the fountain is a scientist, we deduce that the fountain is a scientist.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the wall is a scientist, then the fountain is a scientist, The wall is a scientist, The fountain is a scientist\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud hikes mountains.\nThe cloud is interesting.\nThe book sings beautifully.\nRules:\nBased on the book sings beautifully, it is evident that the bakery hikes mountains.\nGiven that the cloud is interesting, it follows that the book sings beautifully.\nAssuming the book sings beautifully, we can say the cloud is an engineer.\nWhen the cloud is interesting, we can conclude the bakery sings beautifully.\nGiven that the book hikes mountains, it follows that the bakery hikes mountains.\nWhen the cloud sings beautifully, we can conclude the house sings beautifully.\nGiven that the book sings beautifully, it follows that the bakery sings beautifully.\nGiven that the bakery sings beautifully, it follows that the cloud sings beautifully.\nWhen the cloud hikes mountains, we can conclude the book hikes mountains.", "statement": "The house sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Given that if the cloud is interesting, then the bakery sings beautifully, it is evident that the bakery sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the bakery sings beautifully, it is evident that the cloud sings beautifully, we can see that the cloud sings beautifully.\nBecause if the cloud sings beautifully, then the house sings beautifully, we can conclude that the house sings beautifully.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the book sings beautifully, it follows that the bakery sings beautifully., Given that the bakery sings beautifully, it follows that the cloud sings beautifully., When the cloud sings beautifully, we can conclude the house sings beautifully., The house sings beautifully.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry writes stories.\nThe chef is fast.\nThe moon writes stories.\nRules:\nBased on the moon writes stories, it is evident that the river is fast.\nGiven that henry writes stories, it follows that the river is fast.\nIf the chef is fast, then the chef is fast.\nBased on the moon writes stories, it is evident that the river is fast.\nBased on the river hikes mountains, it is evident that the river is fast.\nGiven that the river writes stories, it follows that henry is fast.\nGiven that the river is fast, it follows that the river writes stories.\nIf the chef is fast, then the chef is fast.", "statement": "Henry is fast.", "reasoning": "Because based on the moon writes stories, it is evident that the river is fast, we can conclude that the river is fast.\nApplying the logic of given that the river is fast, it follows that the river writes stories, we deduce that the river writes stories.\nSince we know that based on the river writes stories, it is evident that henry is fast, it follows that henry is fast.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that Henry writes stories, it follows that the river is fast. Given that the river is fast, it follows that the river writes stories. Given that the river writes stories, it follows that Henry is fast.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames creates art.\nThe sandwich creates art.\nHenry explores cities.\nRules:\nBased on james creates art, it is evident that the house creates art.\nAssuming the sandwich creates art, we can say the sandwich takes pictures.\nWhen james creates art, we can conclude james is an artist.\nWhen james creates art, we can conclude the sandwich explores cities.\nAssuming james takes pictures, we can say henry creates art.\nBased on james is an artist, it is evident that james takes pictures.\nAssuming james is an artist, we can say james takes pictures.\nGiven that james creates art, it follows that the sandwich explores cities.", "statement": "Henry creates art.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if james creates art, then james is an artist, we deduce that james is an artist.\nApplying the logic of given that james is an artist, it follows that james takes pictures, we deduce that james takes pictures.\nGiven that given that james takes pictures, it follows that henry creates art, it is evident that henry creates art.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When james creates art, we can conclude james is an artist., Based on james is an artist, it is evident that james takes pictures., Assuming james takes pictures, we can say henry creates art., Henry creates art.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi runs quickly.\nJianzhi does yoga.\nMike plays games.\nRules:\nGiven that jianzhi runs quickly, it follows that the city runs quickly.\nWhen mike plays games, we can conclude mike runs quickly.\nBased on jianzhi swims well, it is evident that mike does yoga.\nBased on jianzhi does yoga, it is evident that jianzhi swims well.\nWhen mike does yoga, we can conclude mike does yoga.\nIf the city runs quickly, then the city runs quickly.\nBased on jianzhi swims well, it is evident that mike does yoga.", "statement": "Mike does yoga.", "reasoning": "Given that based on jianzhi does yoga, it is evident that jianzhi swims well, it is evident that jianzhi swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on jianzhi swims well, it is evident that mike does yoga, we can see that mike does yoga.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on jianzhi does yoga, it is evident that jianzhi swims well, Based on jianzhi swims well, it is evident that mike does yoga, Mike does yoga.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University enjoys music.\nMike plays games.\nThe book is a doctor.\nRules:\nGiven that mike plays games, it follows that the book enjoys music.\nIf stanford university enjoys music, then the book enjoys music.\nIf mike plays games, then the book enjoys music.\nBased on mike plays games, it is evident that stanford university enjoys music.\nBased on mike plays games, it is evident that mike is magical.\nAssuming the book enjoys music, we can say mike plays games.\nIf mike enjoys music, then the book enjoys music.\nIf mike plays games, then the book enjoys music.", "statement": "Mike is magical.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when stanford university enjoys music, we can conclude the book enjoys music, we deduce that the book enjoys music.\nGiven that when the book enjoys music, we can conclude mike plays games, it is evident that mike plays games.\nSince we know that when mike plays games, we can conclude mike is magical, it follows that mike is magical.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Mike plays games, Based on mike plays games, it is evident that mike is magical., Mike is magical.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery plays games.\nThe bakery is an engineer.\nThe bakery plays games.\nRules:\nIf the bakery plays games, then the bakery is a doctor.\nBased on the bakery plays games, it is evident that the plane is a doctor.\nGiven that the bakery is fast, it follows that the computer is fast.\nBased on the sun plays games, it is evident that the bakery is fast.\nGiven that the sun plays games, it follows that the computer is fast.\nAssuming the plane is a doctor, we can say the bakery is fast.", "statement": "The computer is fast.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the bakery plays games, it is evident that the plane is a doctor, it is evident that the plane is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming the plane is a doctor, we can say the bakery is fast, we deduce that the bakery is fast.\nBecause based on the bakery is fast, it is evident that the computer is fast, we can conclude that the computer is fast.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the bakery is fast, it follows that the computer is fast, Based on the bakery plays games, it is evident that the plane is a doctor, Assuming the plane is a doctor, we can say the bakery is fast, The computer is fast.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain is interesting.\nThe book is fast.\nThe fountain swims well.\nRules:\nWhen the book is fast, we can conclude the book cooks well.\nAssuming the book is fast, we can say the cat is interesting.\nWhen the bakery swims well, we can conclude the bakery cooks well.\nAssuming the book is fast, we can say the bakery swims well.\nGiven that the bakery is interesting, it follows that the bakery cooks well.\nWhen the cat is interesting, we can conclude the bakery cooks well.", "statement": "The bakery cooks well.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the book is fast, then the bakery swims well, we deduce that the bakery swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the bakery swims well, then the bakery cooks well, we can see that the bakery cooks well.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the book is fast, we can say the cat is interesting., When the cat is interesting, we can conclude the bakery cooks well., The bakery cooks well.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike paints pictures.\nHenry reads books.\nThe shop takes pictures.\nRules:\nWhen the shop takes pictures, we can conclude mike paints pictures.\nBased on henry reads books, it is evident that mike draws maps.\nAssuming ethan takes pictures, we can say the shop draws maps.\nBased on mike paints pictures, it is evident that ethan takes pictures.\nAssuming henry reads books, we can say the shop draws maps.\nWhen mike draws maps, we can conclude mike reads books.", "statement": "The shop draws maps.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the shop takes pictures, we can say mike paints pictures, it is evident that mike paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that mike paints pictures, it follows that ethan takes pictures, we can see that ethan takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of given that ethan takes pictures, it follows that the shop draws maps, we deduce that the shop draws maps.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Henry reads books, assuming henry reads books, we can say the shop draws maps, the shop draws maps\", \n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie takes pictures.\nStanford University takes pictures.\nLucas does yoga.\nRules:\nAssuming stanford university takes pictures, we can say sophie takes pictures.\nGiven that the computer sings beautifully, it follows that the computer takes pictures.\nIf sophie takes pictures, then lucas solves puzzles.\nBased on the computer sings beautifully, it is evident that the computer takes pictures.\nBased on sophie takes pictures, it is evident that the computer sings beautifully.\nBased on lucas solves puzzles, it is evident that sophie takes pictures.", "statement": "The computer takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming sophie takes pictures, we can say the computer sings beautifully, we can see that the computer sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the computer sings beautifully, then the computer takes pictures, we can see that the computer takes pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the computer sings beautifully, it follows that the computer takes pictures, Based on sophie takes pictures, it is evident that the computer sings beautifully, Sophie takes pictures, The computer takes pictures\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe grows plants.\nThe globe is loud.\nThe sun is friendly.\nRules:\nBased on the globe is loud, it is evident that jack grows plants.\nWhen the globe is loud, we can conclude jack is loud.\nBased on the globe is loud, it is evident that the globe is loud.\nAssuming the globe grows plants, we can say james is friendly.\nIf jack is loud, then the globe grows plants.\nWhen jack grows plants, we can conclude james is friendly.\nAssuming the sun is friendly, we can say the globe is loud.", "statement": "James is friendly.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the globe is loud, we can say jack is loud, we can conclude that jack is loud.\nApplying the logic of assuming jack is loud, we can say the globe grows plants, we deduce that the globe grows plants.\nGiven that when the globe grows plants, we can conclude james is friendly, it is evident that james is friendly.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the globe grows plants, Assuming the globe grows plants, we can say james is friendly, James is friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean is happy.\nAva teaches math.\nJack is happy.\nRules:\nBased on the ocean is happy, it is evident that the artist teaches math.\nWhen the ocean is happy, we can conclude ava is magical.\nBased on the ocean is happy, it is evident that the artist teaches math.\nGiven that ava teaches math, it follows that the artist teaches math.\nBased on jack is a scientist, it is evident that the artist is magical.\nWhen jack is a scientist, we can conclude the artist is magical.\nBased on ava is a scientist, it is evident that jack is happy.\nBased on the artist is magical, it is evident that jack is a scientist.\nAssuming the ocean is happy, we can say jack is a scientist.", "statement": "The artist is magical.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the ocean is happy, it is evident that jack is a scientist, it follows that jack is a scientist.\nBecause based on jack is a scientist, it is evident that the artist is magical, we can conclude that the artist is magical.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"When the ocean is happy, we can conclude ava is magical, assuming the ocean is happy, we can say jack is a scientist, based on the artist is magical, it is evident that jack is a scientist, the artist is magical.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva jumps high.\nCharlie is friendly.\nCharlie collects stamps.\nRules:\nIf ava jumps high, then charlie jumps high.\nBased on charlie jumps high, it is evident that charlie collects stamps.\nGiven that the pig collects stamps, it follows that charlie collects stamps.\nWhen charlie collects stamps, we can conclude charlie runs marathons.\nAssuming charlie collects stamps, we can say the pig collects stamps.", "statement": "Charlie collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Because assuming charlie collects stamps, we can say the pig collects stamps, we can conclude that the pig collects stamps.\nGiven that when the pig collects stamps, we can conclude charlie collects stamps, it is evident that charlie collects stamps.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when charlie collects stamps, we can conclude charlie runs marathons, the assertion Charlie collects stamps.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud is a chef.\nChuan is a chef.\nThe cloud is a chef.\nRules:\nGiven that chuan is a chef, it follows that mike dances gracefully.\nWhen the cloud is a chef, we can conclude chuan dances gracefully.\nWhen the playground volunteers, we can conclude mike is a chef.\nWhen chuan dances gracefully, we can conclude the cloud dances gracefully.\nWhen chuan is a chef, we can conclude the playground volunteers.\nBased on chuan is a chef, it is evident that mike volunteers.\nAssuming chuan dances gracefully, we can say mike dances gracefully.", "statement": "Mike is a chef.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that chuan is a chef, it follows that the playground volunteers, it follows that the playground volunteers.\nGiven that assuming the playground volunteers, we can say mike is a chef, it is evident that mike is a chef.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When chuan is a chef, we can conclude the playground volunteers., When the playground volunteers, we can conclude mike is a chef., Mike is a chef.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo jumps high.\nThe cat plays instruments.\nThe cat plays instruments.\nRules:\nBased on the zoo jumps high, it is evident that the zoo is magical.\nGiven that the cat plays instruments, it follows that the chef jumps high.\nIf the zoo cooks well, then the cat plays instruments.\nWhen the zoo is magical, we can conclude the zoo cooks well.\nWhen the zoo jumps high, we can conclude the globe cooks well.\nWhen the globe cooks well, we can conclude the zoo cooks well.", "statement": "The cat plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the zoo jumps high, we can say the zoo is magical, we can see that the zoo is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the zoo is magical, then the zoo cooks well, we can see that the zoo cooks well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the zoo cooks well, then the cat plays instruments, we can see that the cat plays instruments.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the cat plays instruments, the cat plays instruments.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo grows plants.\nJack grows plants.\nJack grows plants.\nRules:\nWhen the zoo grows plants, we can conclude the sandwich plays games.\nAssuming the zoo grows plants, we can say the zoo plays games.\nGiven that jack grows plants, it follows that the zoo plays games.\nIf the zoo grows plants, then the zoo plays games.\nWhen the zoo grows plants, we can conclude chuan plays games.\nAssuming chuan plays games, we can say chuan is quiet.\nAssuming chuan grows plants, we can say the zoo plays games.\nAssuming chuan is an engineer, we can say the zoo plays games.\nBased on the sandwich plays games, it is evident that chuan plays games.\nIf chuan plays games, then the sandwich plays games.", "statement": "Chuan is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the zoo grows plants, we can say the sandwich plays games, we deduce that the sandwich plays games.\nSince we know that if the sandwich plays games, then chuan plays games, it follows that chuan plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that chuan plays games, it follows that chuan is quiet, we can see that chuan is quiet.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the zoo grows plants, when the zoo grows plants, we can conclude chuan plays games, assuming chuan plays games, we can say chuan is quiet, Chuan is quiet.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University solves puzzles.\nThe playground solves puzzles.\nThe playground carries bags.\nRules:\nIf stanford university solves puzzles, then the house dances gracefully.\nAssuming the house solves puzzles, we can say jianzhi is a scientist.\nGiven that jianzhi is a scientist, it follows that stanford university carries bags.\nAssuming the playground solves puzzles, we can say jianzhi dances gracefully.\nIf the house carries bags, then stanford university dances gracefully.\nWhen the house dances gracefully, we can conclude jianzhi is a scientist.", "statement": "Stanford University carries bags.", "reasoning": "Because when stanford university solves puzzles, we can conclude the house dances gracefully, we can conclude that the house dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of based on the house dances gracefully, it is evident that jianzhi is a scientist, we deduce that jianzhi is a scientist.\nBecause given that jianzhi is a scientist, it follows that stanford university carries bags, we can conclude that stanford university carries bags.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Stanford University solves puzzles, then the house dances gracefully. When the house dances gracefully, we can conclude jianzhi is a scientist. Given that jianzhi is a scientist, it follows that stanford university carries bags, Stanford University carries bags.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe creates art.\nThe globe creates art.\nThe globe creates art.\nRules:\nGiven that the globe creates art, it follows that the cloud creates art.\nWhen the globe creates art, we can conclude the playground is loud.\nGiven that jack creates art, it follows that the cloud creates art.\nIf the globe creates art, then jack creates art.\nAssuming the cloud becomes famous, we can say the playground is loud.\nIf the globe goes to the hospital, then jack is loud.", "statement": "The cloud creates art.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the globe creates art, we can conclude jack creates art, we can see that jack creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that jack creates art, it follows that the cloud creates art, we can see that the cloud creates art.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the globe creates art, it follows that the cloud creates art, The cloud creates art.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean paints pictures.\nThe artist grows plants.\nThe phone is happy.\nRules:\nIf the ocean paints pictures, then the zoo enjoys music.\nBased on the phone is happy, it is evident that the artist is happy.\nWhen the ocean paints pictures, we can conclude the zoo is happy.\nAssuming the artist grows plants, we can say the zoo enjoys music.\nGiven that the phone paints pictures, it follows that the ocean is happy.\nAssuming the zoo grows plants, we can say the zoo paints pictures.\nAssuming the artist grows plants, we can say the zoo grows plants.\nWhen the zoo paints pictures, we can conclude the zoo grows plants.\nBased on the phone paints pictures, it is evident that the zoo is happy.", "statement": "The zoo paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the artist grows plants, then the zoo grows plants, we deduce that the zoo grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the zoo grows plants, we can conclude the zoo paints pictures, we can see that the zoo paints pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because assuming the artist grows plants, we can say the zoo grows plants, and when the zoo grows plants, we can say the zoo paints pictures, the zoo paints pictures.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah paints pictures.\nThe moon paints pictures.\nThe cloud explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that the cloud explores cities, it follows that the cloud explores cities.\nAssuming sarah paints pictures, we can say the moon explores cities.\nIf the cloud explores cities, then sarah enjoys music.\nGiven that the cloud explores cities, it follows that sarah enjoys music.\nGiven that the moon paints pictures, it follows that sarah takes pictures.\nIf the bridge enjoys music, then the bridge takes pictures.\nWhen the cloud takes pictures, we can conclude the moon explores cities.\nIf the moon explores cities, then the bridge enjoys music.\nGiven that sarah enjoys music, it follows that sarah takes pictures.\nBased on the cloud explores cities, it is evident that sarah takes pictures.", "statement": "The bridge takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that sarah paints pictures, it follows that the moon explores cities, we can see that the moon explores cities.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the moon explores cities, we can conclude the bridge enjoys music, we can see that the bridge enjoys music.\nBecause based on the bridge enjoys music, it is evident that the bridge takes pictures, we can conclude that the bridge takes pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"If the cloud explores cities, then sarah enjoys music. Given that the cloud explores cities, it follows that sarah enjoys music. Given that sarah enjoys music, it follows that sarah takes pictures. Given that the moon paints pictures, it follows that sarah takes pictures. If the moon explores cities, then the bridge enjoys music. If the bridge enjoys music, then the bridge takes pictures. Based on the cloud explores cities, it is evident that sarah takes pictures.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie volunteers.\nThe stadium creates art.\nThe shop creates art.\nRules:\nWhen the shop creates art, we can conclude the shop is blue.\nWhen sophie volunteers, we can conclude stanford university volunteers.\nIf the shop creates art, then sophie volunteers.\nIf the shop creates art, then the shop is blue.\nIf the shop carries bags, then sophie volunteers.\nGiven that the shop is blue, it follows that the shop carries bags.\nWhen the stadium creates art, we can conclude the shop is blue.", "statement": "The shop carries bags.", "reasoning": "Because when the stadium creates art, we can conclude the shop is blue, we can conclude that the shop is blue.\nSince we know that if the shop is blue, then the shop carries bags, it follows that the shop carries bags.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the shop creates art, we can conclude the shop is blue., Given that the shop is blue, it follows that the shop carries bags., The shop creates art., The shop carries bags.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef grows plants.\nThe sky reads books.\nThe garden grows plants.\nRules:\nIf the sky reads books, then the garden reads books.\nBased on the garden grows plants, it is evident that the chef is happy.\nGiven that the garden grows plants, it follows that the teacher is happy.\nBased on the garden reads books, it is evident that the chef is happy.\nBased on the sky reads books, it is evident that the garden grows plants.\nWhen the garden is happy, we can conclude the chef is happy.\nBased on the garden grows plants, it is evident that the teacher is happy.\nGiven that the sky reads books, it follows that the garden is happy.", "statement": "The chef is happy.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the sky reads books, it is evident that the garden is happy, it is evident that the garden is happy.\nSince we know that if the garden is happy, then the chef is happy, it follows that the chef is happy.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the sky reads books, then the garden reads books. Based on the garden reads books, it is evident that the chef is happy, the chef is happy.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas runs quickly.\nSarah plays football.\nThe train is funny.\nRules:\nGiven that lucas runs quickly, it follows that the train is funny.\nGiven that lucas runs quickly, it follows that lucas cooks well.\nAssuming lucas runs quickly, we can say the train runs quickly.\nGiven that sarah cooks well, it follows that lucas runs quickly.\nIf the train is funny, then sarah cooks well.\nGiven that lucas runs quickly, it follows that lucas runs quickly.\nIf lucas cooks well, then lucas runs quickly.", "statement": "Lucas runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that lucas runs quickly, it follows that the train is funny, it follows that the train is funny.\nSince we know that based on the train is funny, it is evident that sarah cooks well, it follows that sarah cooks well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on sarah cooks well, it is evident that lucas runs quickly, we can see that lucas runs quickly.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that lucas runs quickly, it follows that lucas runs quickly, Lucas runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house rides bikes.\nThe house fishes in lakes.\nThe house jumps high.\nRules:\nGiven that the house fishes in lakes, it follows that the forest jumps high.\nWhen the house jumps high, we can conclude the forest fishes in lakes.\nWhen the house rides bikes, we can conclude the dog jumps high.\nIf the house jumps high, then the forest fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the house jumps high, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes.\nBased on the forest fishes in lakes, it is evident that the forest jumps high.\nAssuming the house rides bikes, we can say the dog jumps high.\nIf the forest fishes in lakes, then the house jumps high.\nAssuming the dog fishes in lakes, we can say ethan makes pizza.", "statement": "The dog fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the house jumps high, it is evident that the forest fishes in lakes, it follows that the forest fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the forest fishes in lakes, it is evident that the house jumps high, we can see that the house jumps high.\nApplying the logic of given that the house jumps high, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes, we deduce that the dog fishes in lakes.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Given that the house jumps high, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest hosts parties.\nAlice paints pictures.\nMike runs marathons.\nRules:\nWhen mike runs marathons, we can conclude mike paints pictures.\nAssuming mike runs marathons, we can say alice enjoys music.\nGiven that mike runs marathons, it follows that the forest runs marathons.\nGiven that alice paints pictures, it follows that alice enjoys music.\nAssuming the forest hosts parties, we can say the forest runs marathons.\nGiven that the wall enjoys music, it follows that the forest runs marathons.\nIf the wall hosts parties, then alice paints pictures.\nAssuming alice enjoys music, we can say the wall hosts parties.\nAssuming the forest enjoys music, we can say the wall enjoys music.", "statement": "Alice paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Given that when mike runs marathons, we can conclude alice enjoys music, it is evident that alice enjoys music.\nSince we know that based on alice enjoys music, it is evident that the wall hosts parties, it follows that the wall hosts parties.\nApplying the logic of based on the wall hosts parties, it is evident that alice paints pictures, we deduce that alice paints pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Alice paints pictures, {conclusion}\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe plays games.\nCharlie makes pizza.\nLucas runs quickly.\nRules:\nIf charlie makes pizza, then lucas runs quickly.\nIf the globe runs quickly, then lucas plays games.\nGiven that the globe plays games, it follows that the globe runs quickly.\nAssuming the globe plays games, we can say the globe runs quickly.\nWhen charlie plays games, we can conclude charlie makes pizza.", "statement": "Lucas plays games.", "reasoning": "Because given that the globe plays games, it follows that the globe runs quickly, we can conclude that the globe runs quickly.\nSince we know that when the globe runs quickly, we can conclude lucas plays games, it follows that lucas plays games.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the globe plays games, it follows that the globe runs quickly., If the globe runs quickly, then lucas plays games., Lucas plays games.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma grows plants.\nMike is tall.\nEmma is tall.\nRules:\nBased on emma grows plants, it is evident that mike plays instruments.\nGiven that emma is tall, it follows that emma is tall.\nAssuming the stadium is quiet, we can say mike plays instruments.\nBased on emma is quiet, it is evident that the stadium is tall.\nIf the stadium is tall, then the stadium is quiet.\nGiven that mike is tall, it follows that emma is quiet.", "statement": "The stadium is tall.", "reasoning": "Given that based on mike is tall, it is evident that emma is quiet, it is evident that emma is quiet.\nApplying the logic of assuming emma is quiet, we can say the stadium is tall, we deduce that the stadium is tall.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that mike is tall, it follows that emma is quiet, Based on emma is quiet, it is evident that the stadium is tall, the stadium is tall\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike is fast.\nMike is fast.\nHenry jumps high.\nRules:\nGiven that henry jumps high, it follows that the bridge is fast.\nIf henry jumps high, then the bridge jumps high.\nBased on mike is fast, it is evident that the bridge jumps high.\nBased on henry jumps high, it is evident that henry is fast.\nIf the stadium takes pictures, then mike takes pictures.\nIf mike is fast, then the bridge jumps high.\nGiven that henry is fast, it follows that the bridge jumps high.\nWhen mike is fast, we can conclude the stadium takes pictures.", "statement": "Mike takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Given that based on mike is fast, it is evident that the stadium takes pictures, it is evident that the stadium takes pictures.\nSince we know that assuming the stadium takes pictures, we can say mike takes pictures, it follows that mike takes pictures.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when mike is fast, we can conclude the stadium takes pictures. If the stadium takes pictures, then mike takes pictures., Mike takes pictures.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi is loud.\nJianzhi does yoga.\nThe fountain is loud.\nRules:\nGiven that jianzhi does yoga, it follows that jack does yoga.\nWhen jack is loud, we can conclude the fountain is loud.\nWhen the fountain is loud, we can conclude jack explores cities.\nIf jianzhi is loud, then jack is loud.\nWhen the cat does yoga, we can conclude jack is loud.", "statement": "The fountain is loud.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming jianzhi is loud, we can say jack is loud, it follows that jack is loud.\nGiven that given that jack is loud, it follows that the fountain is loud, it is evident that the fountain is loud.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because The fountain is loud, The fountain is loud\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river jumps high.\nThe mountain is colorful.\nThe musician is colorful.\nRules:\nGiven that the musician is colorful, it follows that the musician jumps high.\nWhen the musician explores cities, we can conclude the wall is colorful.\nIf the mountain is colorful, then the musician explores cities.\nIf the river jumps high, then the musician explores cities.\nWhen the wall is colorful, we can conclude the musician jumps high.", "statement": "The wall is colorful.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the mountain is colorful, it is evident that the musician explores cities, it follows that the musician explores cities.\nGiven that if the musician explores cities, then the wall is colorful, it is evident that the wall is colorful.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the river jumps high, then the musician explores cities, When the musician explores cities, we can conclude the wall is colorful, The wall is colorful.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car jumps high.\nLiam fishes in lakes.\nJack is magical.\nRules:\nGiven that the car jumps high, it follows that liam fishes in lakes.\nAssuming jack is magical, we can say liam is magical.\nBased on liam is magical, it is evident that liam fishes in lakes.\nBased on jack is magical, it is evident that liam jumps high.\nGiven that jack jumps high, it follows that chuan is fast.\nIf liam jumps high, then chuan is magical.\nBased on the car jumps high, it is evident that jack jumps high.", "statement": "Chuan is fast.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the car jumps high, we can conclude jack jumps high, we can see that jack jumps high.\nApplying the logic of given that jack jumps high, it follows that chuan is fast, we deduce that chuan is fast.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the car jumps high, it is evident that jack jumps high., Given that jack jumps high, it follows that chuan is fast., Chuan is fast.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah jumps high.\nThe bakery is tall.\nThe playground jumps high.\nRules:\nIf sarah jumps high, then sarah carries bags.\nIf sarah rides bikes, then sarah carries bags.\nBased on sarah jumps high, it is evident that jianzhi carries bags.\nGiven that jianzhi jumps high, it follows that the bakery jumps high.\nGiven that the bakery is tall, it follows that jianzhi jumps high.\nBased on sarah carries bags, it is evident that the bakery carries bags.", "statement": "The bakery jumps high.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the bakery is tall, it is evident that jianzhi jumps high, it follows that jianzhi jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if jianzhi jumps high, then the bakery jumps high, we can see that the bakery jumps high.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the bakery is tall, it follows that jianzhi jumps high. Given that jianzhi jumps high, it follows that the bakery jumps high. Therefore, the bakery jumps high.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is an artist.\nThe ocean is a doctor.\nThe ocean is an artist.\nRules:\nWhen the ocean is an artist, we can conclude the ocean is an artist.\nGiven that the teacher is an artist, it follows that the tree sings beautifully.\nGiven that the ocean is a doctor, it follows that the tree is an artist.\nBased on the ocean teaches math, it is evident that the tree is an artist.\nIf the ocean teaches math, then the tree is an artist.\nIf the ocean teaches math, then the teacher teaches math.\nBased on the ocean is a doctor, it is evident that the ocean teaches math.", "statement": "The tree is an artist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the ocean is a doctor, it is evident that the ocean teaches math, it follows that the ocean teaches math.\nBecause assuming the ocean teaches math, we can say the tree is an artist, we can conclude that the tree is an artist.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the ocean is a doctor, it follows that the tree is an artist, The tree is an artist\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone dances gracefully.\nThe artist carries bags.\nThe artist hikes mountains.\nRules:\nBased on the artist carries bags, it is evident that the tree carries bags.\nAssuming the artist carries bags, we can say the phone dances gracefully.\nBased on the phone plays instruments, it is evident that the wall dances gracefully.\nWhen the phone dances gracefully, we can conclude the phone plays instruments.\nAssuming the wall dances gracefully, we can say the phone hikes mountains.\nIf the wall carries bags, then the tree hikes mountains.", "statement": "The wall dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the phone dances gracefully, we can conclude the phone plays instruments, we deduce that the phone plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the phone plays instruments, we can say the wall dances gracefully, we can see that the wall dances gracefully.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the phone dances gracefully, we can conclude the phone plays instruments, based on the phone plays instruments, it is evident that the wall dances gracefully, the wall dances gracefully.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas is a scientist.\nThe phone is a scientist.\nLucas creates art.\nRules:\nIf lucas creates art, then the sky is a scientist.\nBased on lucas is a scientist, it is evident that the computer is fast.\nBased on lucas is a scientist, it is evident that lucas is a scientist.\nBased on the phone is a scientist, it is evident that the sky creates art.\nIf the phone creates art, then the sky is fast.\nBased on the sky is fast, it is evident that the sky is a scientist.\nGiven that lucas is a scientist, it follows that the phone is fast.\nWhen the sky creates art, we can conclude the phone creates art.\nGiven that lucas is a scientist, it follows that the phone creates art.", "statement": "The sky is fast.", "reasoning": "Given that when the phone is a scientist, we can conclude the sky creates art, it is evident that the sky creates art.\nGiven that given that the sky creates art, it follows that the phone creates art, it is evident that the phone creates art.\nSince we know that when the phone creates art, we can conclude the sky is fast, it follows that the sky is fast.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Based on the phone is a scientist, it is evident that the sky creates art., When the sky creates art, we can conclude the phone creates art., If the phone creates art, then the sky is fast., The sky is fast.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan is a doctor.\nLiam runs marathons.\nThe wall runs marathons.\nRules:\nGiven that liam runs marathons, it follows that liam explores cities.\nGiven that liam is a doctor, it follows that liam is a doctor.\nGiven that liam is a doctor, it follows that chuan runs marathons.\nAssuming chuan cooks well, we can say chuan runs marathons.\nAssuming the wall runs marathons, we can say liam is a doctor.", "statement": "Chuan runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the wall runs marathons, it follows that liam is a doctor, it is evident that liam is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of when liam is a doctor, we can conclude chuan runs marathons, we deduce that chuan runs marathons.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the wall runs marathons, we can say liam is a doctor, given that liam is a doctor, it follows that chuan runs marathons, Chuan runs marathons.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat plays instruments.\nThe ocean is an artist.\nThe ocean hosts parties.\nRules:\nBased on the cat plays instruments, it is evident that the cat is an artist.\nIf the cat plays instruments, then the ocean plays instruments.\nWhen the ocean hosts parties, we can conclude the cat plays instruments.\nIf the ocean plays instruments, then the cat is an artist.\nAssuming the ocean hosts parties, we can say mia volunteers.", "statement": "The ocean plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the ocean hosts parties, we can conclude the cat plays instruments, we can see that the cat plays instruments.\nBecause given that the cat plays instruments, it follows that the ocean plays instruments, we can conclude that the ocean plays instruments.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The cat plays instruments, it is evident that the cat is an artist, If the cat plays instruments, then the ocean plays instruments, The ocean plays instruments\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge is fluffy.\nThe cloud is fluffy.\nThe bridge teaches math.\nRules:\nWhen the bridge is fluffy, we can conclude the cloud does yoga.\nBased on the bridge teaches math, it is evident that the cloud grows plants.\nGiven that the cloud is fluffy, it follows that jianzhi teaches math.\nGiven that the bridge is fluffy, it follows that the cloud does yoga.\nWhen the cloud does yoga, we can conclude the bridge grows plants.\nAssuming the bridge is fluffy, we can say the bridge does yoga.\nWhen the bridge teaches math, we can conclude the cloud grows plants.\nAssuming the bridge grows plants, we can say the bridge is fluffy.", "statement": "The bridge does yoga.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge is fluffy, it is evident that the cloud does yoga, we can see that the cloud does yoga.\nGiven that based on the cloud does yoga, it is evident that the bridge grows plants, it is evident that the bridge grows plants.\nGiven that given that the bridge grows plants, it follows that the bridge is fluffy, it is evident that the bridge is fluffy.\nSince we know that given that the bridge is fluffy, it follows that the bridge does yoga, it follows that the bridge does yoga.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the bridge is fluffy, we can say the bridge does yoga, The bridge is fluffy, The bridge does yoga\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician creates art.\nThe musician swims well.\nSophie swims well.\nRules:\nGiven that the musician swims well, it follows that sarah swims well.\nIf the musician swims well, then the musician plays games.\nIf sophie swims well, then the musician plays games.\nAssuming the musician swims well, we can say sarah swims well.\nBased on the stadium creates art, it is evident that the stadium swims well.\nAssuming the musician plays games, we can say the musician creates art.\nWhen the musician creates art, we can conclude the stadium creates art.\nWhen the stadium creates art, we can conclude the musician plays games.\nBased on sarah swims well, it is evident that the musician creates art.", "statement": "The stadium swims well.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the musician creates art, we can say the stadium creates art, we can conclude that the stadium creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium creates art, then the stadium swims well, we can see that the stadium swims well.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the musician creates art, when the musician creates art, we can conclude the stadium creates art, based on the stadium creates art, it is evident that the stadium swims well, the stadium swims well\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain sings beautifully.\nThe mountain is magical.\nLucas is magical.\nRules:\nWhen lucas is magical, we can conclude the phone carries bags.\nAssuming lucas is magical, we can say the phone carries bags.\nBased on the mountain sings beautifully, it is evident that the phone carries bags.\nGiven that the mountain is magical, it follows that sarah swims well.\nIf the mountain carries bags, then the phone swims well.\nWhen the phone carries bags, we can conclude the mountain carries bags.\nIf the phone swims well, then sarah is magical.\nGiven that the mountain is magical, it follows that the mountain carries bags.\nIf the mountain carries bags, then the phone carries bags.", "statement": "The phone swims well.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the mountain is magical, it is evident that the mountain carries bags, we can see that the mountain carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the mountain carries bags, we can conclude the phone swims well, we can see that the phone swims well.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the mountain sings beautifully, it is evident that the phone carries bags, If the phone carries bags, then the mountain carries bags, If the mountain carries bags, then the phone swims well, The phone swims well\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery is friendly.\nLucas is friendly.\nThe bakery is happy.\nRules:\nWhen the bakery is happy, we can conclude jianzhi creates art.\nWhen lucas is friendly, we can conclude lucas is happy.\nBased on the bakery is friendly, it is evident that lucas is friendly.\nWhen the bakery is friendly, we can conclude lucas is friendly.\nWhen the bakery is friendly, we can conclude lucas is happy.\nGiven that lucas is friendly, it follows that jianzhi creates art.\nAssuming lucas is friendly, we can say jianzhi creates art.\nBased on lucas is friendly, it is evident that jianzhi is happy.\nIf lucas is friendly, then lucas is friendly.\nGiven that lucas is friendly, it follows that lucas is happy.", "statement": "Jianzhi is happy.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the bakery is friendly, we can conclude lucas is friendly, it follows that lucas is friendly.\nBecause based on lucas is friendly, it is evident that lucas is friendly, we can conclude that lucas is friendly.\nBecause given that lucas is friendly, it follows that jianzhi is happy, we can conclude that jianzhi is happy.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on lucas is friendly, it is evident that jianzhi is happy, Jianzhi is happy.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium plays games.\nThe stadium paints pictures.\nThe garden carries bags.\nRules:\nAssuming the stadium plays games, we can say the stadium carries bags.\nIf the stadium paints pictures, then the stadium carries bags.\nAssuming the stadium paints pictures, we can say the cat grows plants.\nGiven that the garden carries bags, it follows that the garden plays games.\nWhen the stadium paints pictures, we can conclude the cat grows plants.\nIf the stadium paints pictures, then james carries bags.\nGiven that the cat grows plants, it follows that the stadium paints pictures.\nGiven that the stadium plays games, it follows that james carries bags.\nGiven that the stadium carries bags, it follows that the cat grows plants.", "statement": "James carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium paints pictures, then the cat grows plants, we can see that the cat grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the cat grows plants, we can say the stadium paints pictures, we can see that the stadium paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the stadium paints pictures, we can say james carries bags, we can see that james carries bags.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the stadium plays games, it follows that james carries bags., James carries bags.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician becomes famous.\nThe musician is a chef.\nThe wall writes stories.\nRules:\nBased on the wall writes stories, it is evident that the musician is tall.\nAssuming the musician becomes famous, we can say the book becomes famous.\nIf the wall is a chef, then chuan writes stories.\nIf the musician is a chef, then the musician is tall.\nWhen the wall writes stories, we can conclude the wall is a chef.\nBased on chuan writes stories, it is evident that the book becomes famous.\nWhen the wall writes stories, we can conclude the book becomes famous.", "statement": "Chuan writes stories.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the wall writes stories, it is evident that the wall is a chef, we can see that the wall is a chef.\nBecause assuming the wall is a chef, we can say chuan writes stories, we can conclude that chuan writes stories.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because When the wall writes stories, we can conclude the wall is a chef, If the wall is a chef, then chuan writes stories, Chuan writes stories.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone plays instruments.\nThe sky plays instruments.\nLucas plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf the sky plays instruments, then the phone is friendly.\nGiven that the sky plays instruments, it follows that alice runs quickly.\nBased on lucas plays instruments, it is evident that lucas runs quickly.\nIf the sky plays instruments, then lucas runs quickly.\nAssuming the phone plays instruments, we can say the phone is friendly.\nIf the phone plays instruments, then the sky plays instruments.\nIf the sky plays instruments, then alice runs quickly.\nGiven that the phone plays instruments, it follows that lucas plays instruments.\nGiven that the phone is friendly, it follows that lucas plays games.\nIf lucas runs quickly, then the phone plays instruments.", "statement": "The sky plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on lucas plays instruments, it is evident that lucas runs quickly, we can see that lucas runs quickly.\nGiven that given that lucas runs quickly, it follows that the phone plays instruments, it is evident that the phone plays instruments.\nSince we know that if the phone plays instruments, then the sky plays instruments, it follows that the sky plays instruments.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the phone plays instruments, then the sky plays instruments, The phone plays instruments, The sky plays instruments.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich plays games.\nThe sandwich runs quickly.\nThe forest plays games.\nRules:\nGiven that the sandwich runs quickly, it follows that lucas hosts parties.\nAssuming the sandwich plays games, we can say jack plays games.\nBased on the forest plays games, it is evident that lucas hosts parties.\nBased on the sandwich runs quickly, it is evident that lucas plays games.\nWhen the sandwich volunteers, we can conclude the sandwich runs quickly.\nIf the forest plays games, then the sandwich runs quickly.\nIf the forest plays games, then the forest plays games.\nAssuming jack runs quickly, we can say lucas plays games.", "statement": "The sandwich runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the forest plays games, we can conclude the forest plays games, we deduce that the forest plays games.\nBecause given that the forest plays games, it follows that the sandwich runs quickly, we can conclude that the sandwich runs quickly.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the forest plays games, then the sandwich runs quickly, The forest plays games, The sandwich runs quickly\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon goes to the hospital.\nThe festival rides bikes.\nThe moon is friendly.\nRules:\nWhen the festival rides bikes, we can conclude the bakery goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the festival rides bikes, we can say the bakery is blue.\nAssuming the moon goes to the hospital, we can say the bakery goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the festival is blue, we can say the festival is blue.\nIf the moon is blue, then the festival is blue.\nIf the moon is friendly, then the bakery is blue.\nWhen the festival rides bikes, we can conclude the moon is blue.", "statement": "The festival is blue.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the festival rides bikes, it is evident that the moon is blue, it is evident that the moon is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the moon is blue, we can say the festival is blue, we can see that the festival is blue.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the festival rides bikes, we can conclude the moon is blue., If the moon is blue, then the festival is blue., The festival is blue.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat writes stories.\nThe bridge becomes famous.\nThe cat plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf the cat plays instruments, then the house plays instruments.\nAssuming the cat plays instruments, we can say the house writes stories.\nIf the city becomes famous, then the house writes stories.\nGiven that the bridge is a chef, it follows that the city becomes famous.\nIf the house plays instruments, then the bridge is a chef.\nIf the city becomes famous, then the house writes stories.\nGiven that the city plays instruments, it follows that the house writes stories.", "statement": "The city becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the cat plays instruments, it is evident that the house plays instruments, we deduce that the house plays instruments.\nBecause based on the house plays instruments, it is evident that the bridge is a chef, we can conclude that the bridge is a chef.\nApplying the logic of if the bridge is a chef, then the city becomes famous, we deduce that the city becomes famous.", "depth": 2, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the house plays instruments, then the bridge is a chef, if the cat plays instruments, then the house plays instruments, the cat plays instruments, assuming the cat plays instruments, we can say the house writes stories, given that the bridge is a chef, it follows that the city becomes famous, the city becomes famous\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician dances gracefully.\nThe house goes to the hospital.\nThe teacher sings beautifully.\nRules:\nAssuming the musician dances gracefully, we can say the house dances gracefully.\nBased on the teacher sings beautifully, it is evident that the house goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the teacher sings beautifully, it follows that the house goes to the hospital.\nIf the house sings beautifully, then the house goes to the hospital.\nWhen the house goes to the hospital, we can conclude the teacher dances gracefully.\nGiven that the teacher dances gracefully, it follows that chuan dances gracefully.\nWhen the house goes to the hospital, we can conclude the house dances gracefully.\nBased on the musician dances gracefully, it is evident that the house sings beautifully.", "statement": "The house dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the musician dances gracefully, it is evident that the house dances gracefully, we can see that the house dances gracefully.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the house goes to the hospital, we can conclude the house dances gracefully.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry runs marathons.\nThe house dances gracefully.\nHenry is fluffy.\nRules:\nAssuming henry is fluffy, we can say the wall is fluffy.\nGiven that henry runs marathons, it follows that the house is fluffy.\nWhen the house dances gracefully, we can conclude henry dances gracefully.\nBased on the house is fluffy, it is evident that henry is friendly.\nGiven that henry is fluffy, it follows that the house is fluffy.\nWhen henry is friendly, we can conclude the house is fluffy.\nGiven that henry is fluffy, it follows that henry runs marathons.\nBased on henry runs marathons, it is evident that ava is fluffy.", "statement": "The wall is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when henry is fluffy, we can conclude the wall is fluffy, we can see that the wall is fluffy.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming henry is fluffy, we can say the wall is fluffy, The wall is fluffy.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall jumps high.\nThe shop teaches math.\nThe playground swims well.\nRules:\nWhen the playground swims well, we can conclude the dog swims well.\nIf the dog swims well, then the playground teaches math.\nWhen the shop jumps high, we can conclude the wall swims well.\nBased on the dog hikes mountains, it is evident that the playground swims well.\nIf the shop hikes mountains, then the playground swims well.\nAssuming the shop jumps high, we can say the wall hikes mountains.", "statement": "The dog swims well.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the playground swims well, we can say the dog swims well, it follows that the dog swims well.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Based on the dog hikes mountains, it is evident that the playground swims well, When the playground swims well, we can conclude the dog swims well, The dog swims well\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall is a doctor.\nThe wall is a doctor.\nThe wall is tall.\nRules:\nWhen the wall is a doctor, we can conclude the sky is a doctor.\nWhen the wall is a doctor, we can conclude charlie grows plants.\nWhen the sky volunteers, we can conclude the sky is tall.\nWhen the wall is a doctor, we can conclude the sky is tall.\nBased on the sky is a doctor, it is evident that the sky volunteers.\nWhen the cat is tall, we can conclude charlie grows plants.\nBased on the wall is tall, it is evident that the cat is tall.", "statement": "The sky is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the wall is a doctor, we can say the sky is a doctor, it follows that the sky is a doctor.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the wall is a doctor, we can conclude the sky is a doctor, The sky is a doctor.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog explores cities.\nAva travels far.\nThe artist explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that ava travels far, it follows that the garden travels far.\nGiven that ava travels far, it follows that the garden travels far.\nIf the artist explores cities, then the artist explores cities.\nWhen ava travels far, we can conclude the dog is a doctor.\nBased on the artist explores cities, it is evident that the garden travels far.\nBased on the dog explores cities, it is evident that the garden travels far.\nIf the garden is a doctor, then ava plays games.\nBased on the garden travels far, it is evident that the dog is a doctor.\nWhen the dog is a doctor, we can conclude the garden travels far.", "statement": "The garden travels far.", "reasoning": "Because given that ava travels far, it follows that the garden travels far, we can conclude that the garden travels far.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Ava travels far, it follows that the garden travels far, The artist explores cities, it is evident that the garden travels far, The dog explores cities, it is evident that the garden travels far, the garden travels far.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river is an artist.\nThe river plays games.\nThe river explores cities.\nRules:\nAssuming the river explores cities, we can say james plays instruments.\nBased on the river plays games, it is evident that james plays games.\nWhen the river plays games, we can conclude the artist explores cities.\nGiven that the river plays games, it follows that james is an artist.\nGiven that the artist explores cities, it follows that the artist is an artist.\nWhen the river is an artist, we can conclude james is an artist.\nGiven that the river is an artist, it follows that james is an artist.\nGiven that james plays games, it follows that the artist explores cities.\nAssuming the river is an artist, we can say the plane is an artist.", "statement": "James plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Because if the river explores cities, then james plays instruments, we can conclude that james plays instruments.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the river explores cities, we can say james plays instruments, James plays instruments.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean cooks well.\nThe wall cooks well.\nThe wall is loud.\nRules:\nBased on the wall is loud, it is evident that the wall travels far.\nIf the ocean cooks well, then the ocean is loud.\nBased on the wall is loud, it is evident that the artist cooks well.\nWhen the wall cooks well, we can conclude the ocean is loud.\nGiven that the ocean cooks well, it follows that the ocean is a doctor.\nBased on the artist cooks well, it is evident that the ocean is a doctor.\nAssuming the ocean cooks well, we can say the forest travels far.\nIf the wall cooks well, then the wall travels far.\nWhen the wall travels far, we can conclude the ocean is loud.", "statement": "The wall travels far.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the wall is loud, it follows that the wall travels far, it is evident that the wall travels far.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"If the wall cooks well, then the wall travels far., The wall cooks well., The wall travels far.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva is quiet.\nThe sky fishes in lakes.\nAva is quiet.\nRules:\nGiven that ava is quiet, it follows that ethan reads books.\nIf ava is quiet, then ethan reads books.\nGiven that ava is quiet, it follows that ethan hosts parties.\nWhen ava is quiet, we can conclude ethan reads books.\nAssuming ava is quiet, we can say the sky is quiet.\nGiven that ethan reads books, it follows that emma reads books.\nBased on ethan reads books, it is evident that the sky is quiet.", "statement": "Ethan reads books.", "reasoning": "Because if ava is quiet, then ethan reads books, we can conclude that ethan reads books.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that ava is quiet, it follows that ethan reads books, If ava is quiet, then ethan reads books, When ava is quiet, we can conclude ethan reads books, Ethan reads books.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie collects stamps.\nSophie makes pizza.\nCharlie carries bags.\nRules:\nWhen charlie carries bags, we can conclude the book is funny.\nIf sophie makes pizza, then charlie collects stamps.\nWhen charlie carries bags, we can conclude charlie collects stamps.\nWhen sophie makes pizza, we can conclude charlie collects stamps.\nBased on the book collects stamps, it is evident that charlie collects stamps.\nBased on sophie makes pizza, it is evident that charlie carries bags.\nIf charlie carries bags, then the book is funny.\nGiven that sophie is funny, it follows that the book collects stamps.", "statement": "The book is funny.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when charlie carries bags, we can conclude the book is funny, it follows that the book is funny.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When charlie carries bags, we can conclude the book is funny, If charlie carries bags, then the book is funny, The book is funny\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie sings beautifully.\nSophie sings beautifully.\nLucy paints pictures.\nRules:\nAssuming sophie sings beautifully, we can say sophie sings beautifully.\nBased on charlie sings beautifully, it is evident that the sandwich carries bags.\nGiven that lucy paints pictures, it follows that charlie is magical.\nBased on sophie sings beautifully, it is evident that charlie carries bags.\nGiven that lucy paints pictures, it follows that charlie carries bags.\nBased on charlie sings beautifully, it is evident that charlie paints pictures.\nGiven that charlie carries bags, it follows that sophie is magical.\nWhen sophie is magical, we can conclude sophie sings beautifully.\nGiven that lucy paints pictures, it follows that sophie sings beautifully.\nAssuming lucy paints pictures, we can say lucy sings beautifully.", "statement": "Sophie sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when sophie sings beautifully, we can conclude sophie sings beautifully, it follows that sophie sings beautifully.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Given that lucy paints pictures, it follows that sophie sings beautifully.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas dances gracefully.\nThe mountain is fluffy.\nLucas solves puzzles.\nRules:\nGiven that the mountain is fluffy, it follows that ava paints pictures.\nWhen lucas solves puzzles, we can conclude lucas is fluffy.\nIf lucas dances gracefully, then ava dances gracefully.\nGiven that the mountain is fluffy, it follows that ava is fluffy.\nWhen lucas dances gracefully, we can conclude ava is fluffy.\nBased on lucas solves puzzles, it is evident that lucas is fluffy.\nIf lucas is fluffy, then ava dances gracefully.\nBased on ava dances gracefully, it is evident that lucas is fluffy.\nWhen the mountain paints pictures, we can conclude the mountain paints pictures.\nBased on lucas dances gracefully, it is evident that the stadium paints pictures.", "statement": "Ava paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the mountain is fluffy, we can conclude ava paints pictures, it follows that ava paints pictures.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the mountain is fluffy, it follows that ava paints pictures, Ava paints pictures.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames becomes famous.\nThe globe becomes famous.\nJames becomes famous.\nRules:\nBased on the globe becomes famous, it is evident that james makes pizza.\nWhen the globe swims well, we can conclude the garden becomes famous.\nBased on james becomes famous, it is evident that the garden becomes famous.\nWhen the globe swims well, we can conclude the globe swims well.\nWhen the teacher swims well, we can conclude the globe swims well.", "statement": "James makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the globe becomes famous, we can conclude james makes pizza, we can see that james makes pizza.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on the globe becomes famous, it is evident that james makes pizza, James makes pizza.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean makes pizza.\nThe ocean is magical.\nMike sings beautifully.\nRules:\nBased on the ocean is magical, it is evident that the festival is magical.\nGiven that the ocean is magical, it follows that the ocean sings beautifully.\nIf mike sings beautifully, then the festival sings beautifully.\nAssuming the ocean is magical, we can say the ocean sings beautifully.\nAssuming mike sings beautifully, we can say the festival sings beautifully.\nWhen the festival makes pizza, we can conclude the ocean is magical.\nGiven that the festival makes pizza, it follows that the moon is magical.\nGiven that the ocean sings beautifully, it follows that the festival sings beautifully.\nWhen the festival is magical, we can conclude the ocean is magical.\nWhen the ocean sings beautifully, we can conclude the festival sings beautifully.", "statement": "The festival is magical.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the ocean is magical, we can say the festival is magical, we can conclude that the festival is magical.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the ocean is magical, it is evident that the festival is magical.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy is a doctor.\nEthan explores cities.\nEthan makes pizza.\nRules:\nGiven that ethan makes pizza, it follows that liam explores cities.\nAssuming ethan makes pizza, we can say liam fishes in lakes.\nAssuming ethan explores cities, we can say liam explores cities.\nGiven that lucy is a doctor, it follows that liam fishes in lakes.\nAssuming ethan makes pizza, we can say the sky makes pizza.\nBased on liam explores cities, it is evident that liam explores cities.\nWhen the sky makes pizza, we can conclude liam explores cities.\nAssuming liam explores cities, we can say liam fishes in lakes.\nGiven that ethan fishes in lakes, it follows that liam explores cities.", "statement": "Liam explores cities.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if ethan makes pizza, then liam explores cities, we deduce that liam explores cities.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Ethan makes pizza, it follows that Liam explores cities, Liam explores cities, Liam explores cities, the assertion is true.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery hikes mountains.\nThe car rides bikes.\nHenry rides bikes.\nRules:\nWhen the car rides bikes, we can conclude the car rides bikes.\nIf henry rides bikes, then henry hikes mountains.\nWhen the car rides bikes, we can conclude alice rides bikes.\nWhen henry rides bikes, we can conclude the car is loud.\nIf the bakery is loud, then henry hikes mountains.\nAssuming the bakery is fast, we can say the car rides bikes.\nGiven that alice is loud, it follows that henry is fast.\nAssuming the car is loud, we can say henry hikes mountains.", "statement": "The car rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the car rides bikes, it follows that the car rides bikes, it follows that the car rides bikes.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the car rides bikes, we can conclude the car rides bikes, The car rides bikes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge jumps high.\nThe musician is a doctor.\nJames draws maps.\nRules:\nAssuming the musician is a doctor, we can say the bridge jumps high.\nBased on james draws maps, it is evident that the pig draws maps.\nGiven that the bridge jumps high, it follows that the pig explores cities.\nWhen the musician is a doctor, we can conclude the pig is a doctor.\nBased on the musician is a doctor, it is evident that the pig is a doctor.\nWhen the musician explores cities, we can conclude the pig is a doctor.\nBased on the pig is a doctor, it is evident that the pig explores cities.\nWhen the bridge jumps high, we can conclude the musician explores cities.\nWhen the bridge jumps high, we can conclude the pig is a doctor.\nWhen the pig is a doctor, we can conclude the pig draws maps.", "statement": "The bridge jumps high.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the musician is a doctor, we can say the bridge jumps high, we can conclude that the bridge jumps high.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because The bridge jumps high is a fact, The bridge jumps high.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall is colorful.\nJack is colorful.\nJack is loud.\nRules:\nGiven that jack is loud, it follows that the wall collects stamps.\nBased on jack is loud, it is evident that mike is colorful.\nGiven that the wall is a scientist, it follows that the tree is a scientist.\nIf the wall collects stamps, then the wall is loud.\nAssuming the wall is colorful, we can say jack collects stamps.\nWhen the wall is colorful, we can conclude the wall is loud.", "statement": "The wall collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when jack is loud, we can conclude the wall collects stamps, we can see that the wall collects stamps.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that jack is loud, it follows that the wall collects stamps, The wall collects stamps\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia is a scientist.\nMia is a scientist.\nThe river fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nIf the river fishes in lakes, then the zoo paints pictures.\nIf mia is a scientist, then mia is a scientist.\nWhen mia draws maps, we can conclude mia is a scientist.\nGiven that mia draws maps, it follows that mia is a scientist.\nBased on mia draws maps, it is evident that mia is a scientist.\nAssuming mia is a scientist, we can say the river is a scientist.", "statement": "The zoo paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Because if the river fishes in lakes, then the zoo paints pictures, we can conclude that the zoo paints pictures.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the river fishes in lakes, then the zoo paints pictures, The zoo paints pictures.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi volunteers.\nJianzhi is friendly.\nThe pig explores cities.\nRules:\nBased on jianzhi is friendly, it is evident that the pig is friendly.\nIf jianzhi volunteers, then the pig explores cities.\nBased on the playground is friendly, it is evident that the pig is a scientist.\nWhen jianzhi explores cities, we can conclude the dog is friendly.\nAssuming jianzhi is friendly, we can say jianzhi volunteers.\nAssuming jianzhi is friendly, we can say jianzhi volunteers.\nIf jianzhi explores cities, then the playground is friendly.", "statement": "The pig is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when jianzhi is friendly, we can conclude the pig is friendly, we can see that the pig is friendly.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on jianzhi is friendly, it is evident that the pig is friendly, The pig is friendly\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud is funny.\nJack is funny.\nThe cloud is an artist.\nRules:\nAssuming the cloud is funny, we can say the city is tall.\nWhen the cloud is an artist, we can conclude the cloud is funny.\nWhen the cloud is an artist, we can conclude the city takes pictures.\nBased on the city takes pictures, it is evident that the cloud is funny.\nIf the cloud is an artist, then the moon is funny.\nGiven that jack is tall, it follows that the city takes pictures.\nAssuming the cloud is funny, we can say jack is funny.", "statement": "The city is tall.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the cloud is funny, it is evident that the city is tall, it follows that the city is tall.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the cloud is funny, we can say the city is tall, The city is tall\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain is fluffy.\nThe cloud is interesting.\nThe cloud swims well.\nRules:\nAssuming the cloud is interesting, we can say the car swims well.\nWhen the cloud is interesting, we can conclude the fountain is quiet.\nWhen the fountain is fluffy, we can conclude the car swims well.\nIf the cloud swims well, then the car swims well.\nIf the cloud is interesting, then the car is quiet.\nAssuming the shop is fluffy, we can say the car swims well.\nAssuming the fountain is quiet, we can say the car is quiet.\nWhen the cloud swims well, we can conclude the car swims well.", "statement": "The car swims well.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the cloud is interesting, we can say the car swims well, we can conclude that the car swims well.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the fountain is fluffy, we can conclude the car swims well, The car swims well.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon is magical.\nThe river goes to the hospital.\nThe cat is fast.\nRules:\nBased on the cat is fast, it is evident that the river goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the moon is magical, we can say the moon is magical.\nIf the river goes to the hospital, then alice is fast.\nWhen the moon is magical, we can conclude the river is magical.\nIf the moon is magical, then the river is fast.\nAssuming the moon is magical, we can say the moon is magical.\nGiven that the cat paints pictures, it follows that the river goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the moon is magical, we can say alice is fast.\nWhen the river goes to the hospital, we can conclude the river goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the moon is magical, we can say the river goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The river goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the cat is fast, we can conclude the river goes to the hospital, it follows that the river goes to the hospital.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When the river goes to the hospital, we can conclude the river goes to the hospital.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog writes stories.\nLucy is a doctor.\nThe dog is a scientist.\nRules:\nBased on the dog writes stories, it is evident that the artist is a scientist.\nIf the dog is a scientist, then the dog is a scientist.\nBased on the computer is a doctor, it is evident that the artist is a scientist.\nGiven that lucy is a scientist, it follows that the computer writes stories.\nAssuming lucy is a doctor, we can say the computer is a doctor.\nAssuming lucy is a scientist, we can say the computer is a doctor.", "statement": "The artist is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the dog writes stories, it is evident that the artist is a scientist, we deduce that the artist is a scientist.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the dog writes stories, it is evident that the artist is a scientist, the artist is a scientist\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium goes to the hospital.\nThe stadium writes stories.\nThe zoo goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf the stadium goes to the hospital, then the zoo writes stories.\nGiven that the zoo goes to the hospital, it follows that the fountain draws maps.\nIf the stadium goes to the hospital, then the stadium writes stories.\nAssuming the fountain goes to the hospital, we can say the zoo writes stories.\nWhen the zoo goes to the hospital, we can conclude the stadium writes stories.\nIf the zoo writes stories, then the fountain is a scientist.\nIf the fountain draws maps, then the stadium writes stories.\nBased on the fountain goes to the hospital, it is evident that the stadium goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The zoo writes stories.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the stadium goes to the hospital, it is evident that the zoo writes stories, we can see that the zoo writes stories.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the stadium goes to the hospital, then the zoo writes stories., The stadium goes to the hospital., the zoo writes stories\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah runs marathons.\nEthan is an engineer.\nSarah is an engineer.\nRules:\nGiven that sarah runs marathons, it follows that ethan rides bikes.\nAssuming sarah runs marathons, we can say sarah is an engineer.\nGiven that sarah is an engineer, it follows that ethan runs marathons.\nBased on ethan rides bikes, it is evident that chuan is friendly.\nIf sarah is an engineer, then sarah runs marathons.\nWhen sarah runs marathons, we can conclude ethan runs marathons.\nWhen sarah runs marathons, we can conclude ethan rides bikes.", "statement": "Ethan rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when sarah runs marathons, we can conclude ethan rides bikes, it follows that ethan rides bikes.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that sarah runs marathons, it follows that ethan rides bikes, the conclusion is Ethan rides bikes.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat does yoga.\nMike does yoga.\nMike paints pictures.\nRules:\nIf the cat does yoga, then mike paints pictures.\nGiven that the cat does yoga, it follows that the fountain paints pictures.\nGiven that emma cooks well, it follows that the fountain explores cities.\nIf the fountain explores cities, then the fountain cooks well.\nIf the cat does yoga, then the fountain paints pictures.\nWhen the fountain paints pictures, we can conclude the fountain cooks well.", "statement": "Mike paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the cat does yoga, then mike paints pictures, we deduce that mike paints pictures.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the cat does yoga. If the cat does yoga, then mike paints pictures., Mike paints pictures.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry does yoga.\nThe mountain enjoys music.\nThe mountain does yoga.\nRules:\nBased on the mountain does yoga, it is evident that henry is friendly.\nWhen the mountain does yoga, we can conclude henry enjoys music.\nGiven that the mountain does yoga, it follows that the tree is friendly.\nAssuming henry does yoga, we can say the tree is friendly.\nIf the cat does yoga, then henry enjoys music.\nGiven that henry enjoys music, it follows that the cat does yoga.\nBased on the cat does yoga, it is evident that henry enjoys music.\nBased on the mountain enjoys music, it is evident that the mountain is interesting.", "statement": "Henry is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the mountain does yoga, we can say henry is friendly, we can see that henry is friendly.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the mountain does yoga, Based on the mountain does yoga, it is evident that henry is friendly, Henry is friendly\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog cooks well.\nThe train jumps high.\nThe train cooks well.\nRules:\nBased on the train cooks well, it is evident that the train jumps high.\nIf the dog cooks well, then the stadium is a scientist.\nBased on the dog cooks well, it is evident that the stadium is a scientist.\nBased on the train cooks well, it is evident that the stadium is tall.\nGiven that the train cooks well, it follows that the stadium is tall.\nAssuming the stadium is a scientist, we can say the dog jumps high.\nGiven that the train jumps high, it follows that the dog jumps high.\nAssuming the dog jumps high, we can say the train jumps high.\nIf the train jumps high, then ethan cooks well.\nGiven that the dog cooks well, it follows that the train is a scientist.", "statement": "The train jumps high.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the train cooks well, it follows that the train jumps high, it is evident that the train jumps high.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Based on the train cooks well, it is evident that the train jumps high.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah is magical.\nThe sun fishes in lakes.\nSarah travels far.\nRules:\nGiven that sarah is magical, it follows that the festival fishes in lakes.\nWhen the sun fishes in lakes, we can conclude sarah is magical.\nBased on sarah is magical, it is evident that the musician travels far.\nGiven that sarah travels far, it follows that the musician travels far.\nIf the sun fishes in lakes, then the musician is magical.\nBased on sarah is magical, it is evident that the musician is magical.\nBased on sarah is magical, it is evident that the sun fishes in lakes.\nGiven that sarah is magical, it follows that the musician is magical.\nAssuming the musician fishes in lakes, we can say the festival fishes in lakes.\nWhen sarah is magical, we can conclude sarah is magical.", "statement": "The festival fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Because assuming sarah is magical, we can say the festival fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the festival fishes in lakes.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on sarah is magical, it is evident that the sun fishes in lakes., Given that sarah is magical, it follows that the festival fishes in lakes., The festival fishes in lakes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan carries bags.\nLiam becomes famous.\nChuan does yoga.\nRules:\nIf liam becomes famous, then chuan dances gracefully.\nAssuming chuan carries bags, we can say mia becomes famous.\nAssuming chuan carries bags, we can say mia dances gracefully.\nAssuming chuan carries bags, we can say liam carries bags.\nIf chuan carries bags, then mia becomes famous.\nAssuming mia carries bags, we can say chuan dances gracefully.\nBased on the shop does yoga, it is evident that mia dances gracefully.\nAssuming mia becomes famous, we can say the shop carries bags.\nWhen mia dances gracefully, we can conclude liam carries bags.\nIf liam carries bags, then the shop does yoga.", "statement": "Chuan dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Given that when liam becomes famous, we can conclude chuan dances gracefully, it is evident that chuan dances gracefully.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If liam becomes famous, then chuan dances gracefully., Chuan dances gracefully.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge solves puzzles.\nThe zoo is tall.\nThe bridge solves puzzles.\nRules:\nIf the bridge solves puzzles, then the book solves puzzles.\nIf the bridge solves puzzles, then the book solves puzzles.\nAssuming the zoo is tall, we can say the book solves puzzles.\nWhen the book dances gracefully, we can conclude the bridge is colorful.\nAssuming the computer is tall, we can say the book dances gracefully.\nBased on the zoo solves puzzles, it is evident that the book solves puzzles.\nBased on the computer is tall, it is evident that the book solves puzzles.", "statement": "The book solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the bridge solves puzzles, we can say the book solves puzzles, it follows that the book solves puzzles.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the bridge solves puzzles, then the book solves puzzles., If the bridge solves puzzles, then the book solves puzzles., The bridge solves puzzles., The bridge solves puzzles., the book solves puzzles.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge volunteers.\nThe bridge volunteers.\nThe bridge paints pictures.\nRules:\nIf the bridge volunteers, then the bridge plays football.\nIf the bridge volunteers, then the bridge plays football.\nIf the bridge paints pictures, then the sun paints pictures.\nGiven that jack plays football, it follows that the sun paints pictures.\nIf the bridge paints pictures, then the sun paints pictures.\nBased on jack plays football, it is evident that the sun paints pictures.", "statement": "The bridge plays football.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the bridge volunteers, it follows that the bridge plays football, it follows that the bridge plays football.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the bridge volunteers, then the bridge plays football, If the bridge volunteers, then the bridge plays football, The bridge volunteers, The bridge volunteers, The bridge plays football\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas is friendly.\nThe sun grows plants.\nThe sun is friendly.\nRules:\nIf lucas is friendly, then the chef is funny.\nGiven that lucas is friendly, it follows that the chef is loud.\nAssuming the sun grows plants, we can say the chef is funny.\nBased on the sun grows plants, it is evident that stanford university is friendly.\nIf the sun grows plants, then stanford university is friendly.\nBased on the chef is loud, it is evident that the sun grows plants.\nAssuming the sun grows plants, we can say stanford university is friendly.\nWhen lucas is funny, we can conclude the chef is loud.", "statement": "The chef is funny.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that lucas is friendly, it follows that the chef is funny, it follows that the chef is funny.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Lucas is friendly, then the chef is funny, the chef is funny\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas is a scientist.\nHenry is blue.\nHenry becomes famous.\nRules:\nWhen lucas is a scientist, we can conclude lucas is tall.\nGiven that lucas is a scientist, it follows that lucas is a scientist.\nWhen lucas is a scientist, we can conclude lucas is a scientist.\nBased on henry becomes famous, it is evident that lucas becomes famous.\nAssuming henry becomes famous, we can say lucas is a scientist.\nGiven that lucas is a scientist, it follows that the festival becomes famous.\nWhen henry becomes famous, we can conclude henry becomes famous.\nGiven that henry becomes famous, it follows that the festival becomes famous.\nGiven that henry becomes famous, it follows that the festival is tall.\nAssuming lucas is a scientist, we can say lucas becomes famous.", "statement": "Lucas is tall.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on lucas is a scientist, it is evident that lucas is tall, it follows that lucas is tall.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when lucas is a scientist, we can conclude lucas is tall, lucas is a scientist, it follows that lucas is a scientist, lucas is a scientist, we can conclude lucas is a scientist, lucas is tall.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo writes stories.\nThe dog plays games.\nThe computer writes stories.\nRules:\nWhen the dog plays games, we can conclude the computer plays games.\nGiven that the zoo writes stories, it follows that the zoo makes pizza.\nBased on the dog plays games, it is evident that the zoo makes pizza.\nGiven that the computer writes stories, it follows that the computer plays games.\nAssuming the computer plays games, we can say mia plays games.\nIf the dog hikes mountains, then the zoo makes pizza.\nAssuming the zoo writes stories, we can say the dog hikes mountains.\nWhen the zoo makes pizza, we can conclude mia plays games.\nWhen the computer writes stories, we can conclude the dog hikes mountains.", "statement": "The computer plays games.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the dog plays games, then the computer plays games, it follows that the computer plays games.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the computer writes stories, it follows that the computer plays games.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun fishes in lakes.\nChuan fishes in lakes.\nLucas fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nBased on the sun fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan fishes in lakes.\nAssuming chuan fishes in lakes, we can say chuan fishes in lakes.\nWhen chuan fishes in lakes, we can conclude chuan fishes in lakes.\nWhen chuan fishes in lakes, we can conclude lucas is friendly.\nWhen chuan is a doctor, we can conclude emma makes pizza.", "statement": "Chuan fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the sun fishes in lakes, we can conclude chuan fishes in lakes, we deduce that chuan fishes in lakes.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming chuan fishes in lakes, we can say chuan fishes in lakes., Chuan fishes in lakes.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist is funny.\nThe artist jumps high.\nThe cat goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nGiven that the cat goes to the hospital, it follows that the cat goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the artist is funny, it follows that the river goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the artist is funny, we can say james jumps high.\nAssuming james jumps high, we can say the river goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the artist goes to the hospital, it follows that james jumps high.", "statement": "The cat goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the cat goes to the hospital, it is evident that the cat goes to the hospital, it follows that the cat goes to the hospital.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the cat goes to the hospital, it follows that the cat goes to the hospital, The cat goes to the hospital.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe computer is loud.\nThe playground is loud.\nLiam is fast.\nRules:\nGiven that the playground is loud, it follows that the playground cooks well.\nBased on the playground is loud, it is evident that the computer is loud.\nGiven that the playground is loud, it follows that the playground is fast.\nGiven that liam is loud, it follows that the playground cooks well.\nAssuming liam is fast, we can say the playground is loud.\nGiven that the computer is loud, it follows that the playground is fast.", "statement": "The playground cooks well.", "reasoning": "Because based on the playground is loud, it is evident that the playground cooks well, we can conclude that the playground cooks well.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the playground is loud, it follows that the playground cooks well, the playground cooks well\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river goes to the hospital.\nChuan swims well.\nThe teacher is a scientist.\nRules:\nIf the teacher is a scientist, then the river is a scientist.\nGiven that the teacher is a scientist, it follows that the phone goes to the hospital.\nIf the teacher is a scientist, then the river swims well.\nAssuming the teacher is a scientist, we can say the teacher is a scientist.\nIf chuan swims well, then the teacher is a scientist.\nAssuming the teacher swims well, we can say the phone is a scientist.\nIf the river is a scientist, then the phone goes to the hospital.\nBased on chuan is a scientist, it is evident that the river is a scientist.\nIf the river is a scientist, then the phone is a scientist.\nWhen the river swims well, we can conclude the teacher swims well.", "statement": "The river is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the teacher is a scientist, we can conclude the river is a scientist, we deduce that the river is a scientist.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If chuan swims well, then the teacher is a scientist., Assuming the teacher is a scientist, we can say the teacher is a scientist., If the teacher is a scientist, then the river is a scientist., The river is a scientist.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin is a doctor.\nThe teacher runs marathons.\nThe pumpkin is a chef.\nRules:\nBased on the pumpkin is a chef, it is evident that the musician is a doctor.\nAssuming the teacher runs marathons, we can say the teacher is a chef.\nBased on the teacher runs marathons, it is evident that the musician is a chef.\nAssuming the teacher runs marathons, we can say the musician is a doctor.\nIf the teacher runs marathons, then the musician is a chef.\nAssuming the musician is a chef, we can say the teacher is a chef.\nWhen the musician is a chef, we can conclude the teacher is a chef.\nGiven that the pumpkin is a chef, it follows that the pumpkin is a chef.\nWhen the musician is a chef, we can conclude the pumpkin is a chef.", "statement": "The musician is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the pumpkin is a chef, we can conclude the musician is a doctor, it follows that the musician is a doctor.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the teacher runs marathons, we can say the musician is a doctor, the musician is a doctor\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi travels far.\nLucy is happy.\nThe stadium travels far.\nRules:\nBased on lucy is happy, it is evident that the river travels far.\nGiven that lucy is happy, it follows that lucy is an engineer.\nWhen lucy is happy, we can conclude the stadium travels far.\nBased on jianzhi hikes mountains, it is evident that jianzhi hikes mountains.\nGiven that lucy is happy, it follows that the stadium travels far.\nGiven that jianzhi hikes mountains, it follows that the river travels far.\nWhen the stadium travels far, we can conclude jianzhi hikes mountains.", "statement": "The river travels far.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that lucy is happy, it follows that the river travels far, we can see that the river travels far.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Lucy is happy, it is evident that the river travels far.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef plays instruments.\nThe chef cooks well.\nThe garden plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf the garden plays instruments, then alice cooks well.\nIf the chef plays instruments, then the chef cooks well.\nGiven that the garden cooks well, it follows that the garden becomes famous.\nAssuming alice cooks well, we can say alice plays instruments.\nWhen alice cooks well, we can conclude the garden cooks well.\nAssuming alice cooks well, we can say the chef becomes famous.", "statement": "Alice cooks well.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the garden plays instruments, it is evident that alice cooks well, we can see that alice cooks well.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the garden plays instruments, then alice cooks well, Alice cooks well.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is funny.\nThe dog becomes famous.\nThe phone grows plants.\nRules:\nGiven that the dog becomes famous, it follows that the pig grows plants.\nAssuming the phone grows plants, we can say the pig grows plants.\nIf the city grows plants, then the pig grows plants.\nIf the city is funny, then the phone is funny.\nBased on the phone grows plants, it is evident that the city becomes famous.\nAssuming the city becomes famous, we can say the city is funny.\nAssuming the pig grows plants, we can say the pig grows plants.", "statement": "The pig grows plants.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the dog becomes famous, we can say the pig grows plants, it is evident that the pig grows plants.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Assuming the phone grows plants, we can say the pig grows plants.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival is a chef.\nThe river is magical.\nThe festival is a chef.\nRules:\nWhen the river is magical, we can conclude the zoo grows plants.\nIf the river is magical, then the zoo is magical.\nWhen the festival is a chef, we can conclude the river is magical.\nBased on the river is magical, it is evident that the river is magical.\nAssuming the sandwich grows plants, we can say the zoo grows plants.\nWhen the river is magical, we can conclude the zoo is magical.\nBased on the zoo is magical, it is evident that the zoo grows plants.\nAssuming the river is magical, we can say the zoo hosts parties.\nGiven that the river is magical, it follows that the zoo grows plants.", "statement": "The zoo grows plants.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the river is magical, it is evident that the zoo grows plants, we can see that the zoo grows plants.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"When the festival is a chef, we can conclude the river is magical. Given that the river is magical, it follows that the zoo grows plants. The zoo grows plants.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig grows plants.\nThe zoo takes pictures.\nEthan is an artist.\nRules:\nWhen the zoo takes pictures, we can conclude the shop is fast.\nIf ethan is an artist, then the pig grows plants.\nBased on the pig grows plants, it is evident that the pig is an artist.\nGiven that the zoo takes pictures, it follows that the zoo takes pictures.\nIf the pig takes pictures, then the pig grows plants.\nWhen the shop is fast, we can conclude the pig grows plants.\nAssuming the pig grows plants, we can say the zoo takes pictures.\nBased on the shop takes pictures, it is evident that the pig is an artist.\nIf the pig is an artist, then ethan takes pictures.", "statement": "The shop is fast.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the zoo takes pictures, we can say the shop is fast, it follows that the shop is fast.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the zoo takes pictures, we can conclude the shop is fast, Given that the zoo takes pictures, it follows that the zoo takes pictures, The zoo takes pictures, The shop is fast.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain volunteers.\nSarah volunteers.\nThe bakery makes pizza.\nRules:\nBased on the bakery makes pizza, it is evident that the bakery makes pizza.\nIf the fountain makes pizza, then the globe makes pizza.\nGiven that the bakery volunteers, it follows that sarah volunteers.\nBased on the fountain makes pizza, it is evident that sarah is interesting.\nBased on the fountain makes pizza, it is evident that the fountain is interesting.", "statement": "The bakery makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Given that when the bakery makes pizza, we can conclude the bakery makes pizza, it is evident that the bakery makes pizza.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because based on the bakery makes pizza, it is evident that the bakery makes pizza, the bakery makes pizza\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry paints pictures.\nThe bridge explores cities.\nThe globe fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nBased on henry paints pictures, it is evident that the bridge paints pictures.\nWhen the globe fishes in lakes, we can conclude lucas fishes in lakes.\nWhen the globe fishes in lakes, we can conclude lucas paints pictures.\nBased on the bridge paints pictures, it is evident that the bridge paints pictures.\nGiven that lucas paints pictures, it follows that lucas fishes in lakes.\nGiven that lucas takes pictures, it follows that lucas paints pictures.", "statement": "The bridge paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when henry paints pictures, we can conclude the bridge paints pictures, it follows that the bridge paints pictures.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on henry paints pictures, it is evident that the bridge paints pictures, based on the bridge paints pictures, it is evident that the bridge paints pictures, the bridge paints pictures.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky travels far.\nThe plane does yoga.\nThe plane does yoga.\nRules:\nWhen the plane does yoga, we can conclude the playground does yoga.\nIf the sky travels far, then the plane makes pizza.\nIf the plane does yoga, then the playground makes pizza.\nIf the playground hosts parties, then lucy does yoga.\nGiven that the sky travels far, it follows that the playground makes pizza.\nWhen the plane does yoga, we can conclude the playground hosts parties.\nGiven that the playground makes pizza, it follows that lucy does yoga.", "statement": "The playground does yoga.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the plane does yoga, we can say the playground does yoga, it is evident that the playground does yoga.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the plane does yoga, we can conclude the playground does yoga, The playground does yoga\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain enjoys music.\nThe city enjoys music.\nThe city cooks well.\nRules:\nGiven that the city cooks well, it follows that mia cooks well.\nWhen the city enjoys music, we can conclude mike solves puzzles.\nAssuming the city enjoys music, we can say mia cooks well.\nBased on mike enjoys music, it is evident that mike cooks well.\nGiven that mike enjoys music, it follows that the fountain enjoys music.\nBased on mike cooks well, it is evident that the fountain plays instruments.", "statement": "Mia cooks well.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the city cooks well, it follows that mia cooks well, it follows that mia cooks well.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the city enjoys music, we can say mia cooks well, Mia cooks well.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah fishes in lakes.\nThe river grows plants.\nSarah takes pictures.\nRules:\nGiven that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that the artist takes pictures.\nWhen sarah takes pictures, we can conclude sarah is interesting.\nGiven that the river grows plants, it follows that sarah is interesting.\nAssuming the river takes pictures, we can say the bakery takes pictures.\nAssuming sarah fishes in lakes, we can say the artist takes pictures.\nWhen the artist takes pictures, we can conclude the river is interesting.\nWhen the river takes pictures, we can conclude the bakery takes pictures.\nGiven that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that the river fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The artist takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if sarah fishes in lakes, then the artist takes pictures, we can see that the artist takes pictures.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that the artist takes pictures, The artist takes pictures.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river makes pizza.\nEthan is fluffy.\nEthan takes pictures.\nRules:\nAssuming ethan is fluffy, we can say ethan takes pictures.\nAssuming the river makes pizza, we can say ethan takes pictures.\nAssuming ethan takes pictures, we can say the computer is fluffy.\nWhen ethan takes pictures, we can conclude ethan is fluffy.\nBased on the computer is fluffy, it is evident that the river is fluffy.\nBased on ethan takes pictures, it is evident that ethan makes pizza.\nIf ethan takes pictures, then ethan makes pizza.", "statement": "Ethan takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Given that based on ethan is fluffy, it is evident that ethan takes pictures, it is evident that ethan takes pictures.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming ethan is fluffy, we can say ethan takes pictures, Ethan takes pictures.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich is funny.\nThe globe jumps high.\nThe sandwich goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nGiven that the sandwich is funny, it follows that the car is blue.\nGiven that the sandwich is funny, it follows that the globe goes to the hospital.\nIf the sandwich is funny, then the sandwich jumps high.\nIf the globe goes to the hospital, then the bakery goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the car is funny, we can say the sandwich jumps high.\nGiven that the globe jumps high, it follows that the car is blue.\nBased on the globe goes to the hospital, it is evident that the bakery goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The car is blue.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the sandwich is funny, it follows that the car is blue, we deduce that the car is blue.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the sandwich is funny, it follows that the car is blue, the car is blue.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo is quiet.\nThe plane is quiet.\nThe plane rides bikes.\nRules:\nBased on the plane rides bikes, it is evident that the zoo solves puzzles.\nAssuming the zoo is quiet, we can say the plane is quiet.\nBased on the plane rides bikes, it is evident that the plane solves puzzles.\nIf the plane is quiet, then the zoo solves puzzles.\nWhen the plane rides bikes, we can conclude the plane solves puzzles.\nAssuming the moon is quiet, we can say the plane is quiet.\nIf the plane solves puzzles, then the plane is quiet.", "statement": "The zoo solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the plane rides bikes, it follows that the zoo solves puzzles, we deduce that the zoo solves puzzles.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the plane rides bikes, it is evident that the zoo solves puzzles, The zoo solves puzzles.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher swims well.\nThe teacher hikes mountains.\nThe ocean is fast.\nRules:\nWhen the teacher swims well, we can conclude the teacher hikes mountains.\nIf the ocean is fast, then the ocean hikes mountains.\nBased on the teacher swims well, it is evident that the ocean is fast.\nAssuming the ocean is fast, we can say the teacher hikes mountains.\nBased on the ocean hikes mountains, it is evident that the ocean is fast.\nIf the ocean hikes mountains, then the ocean is fast.\nBased on the teacher hikes mountains, it is evident that the teacher is fast.", "statement": "The teacher hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the teacher swims well, we can conclude the teacher hikes mountains, we can see that the teacher hikes mountains.", "depth": 1, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because When the teacher swims well, we can conclude the teacher hikes mountains, The teacher swims well, The teacher hikes mountains.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}], "ood": [{"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin solves puzzles.\nSarah is interesting.\nSarah solves puzzles.\nRules:\nBased on sarah solves puzzles, it is evident that the teacher plays instruments.\nAssuming sarah solves puzzles, we can say the teacher plays instruments.\nBased on the mountain is fast, it is evident that the teacher plays instruments.\nBased on the mountain is fast, it is evident that the mountain is fast.\nWhen the teacher plays instruments, we can conclude the mountain is fast.\nAssuming sarah is interesting, we can say the teacher plays instruments.\nBased on sarah is fast, it is evident that the mountain is fast.", "statement": "The teacher plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Given that based on sarah is interesting, it is evident that the teacher plays instruments, it is evident that the teacher plays instruments.\nGiven that if the teacher plays instruments, then the mountain is fast, it is evident that the mountain is fast.\nGiven that when the mountain is fast, we can conclude the mountain is fast, it is evident that the mountain is fast.\nApplying the logic of given that the mountain is fast, it follows that the teacher plays instruments, we deduce that the teacher plays instruments.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sarah solves puzzles, it is evident that the teacher plays instruments, Assuming Sarah is interesting, we can say the teacher plays instruments, The teacher plays instruments.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon is a chef.\nThe moon is magical.\nThe musician plays games.\nRules:\nIf the moon is a chef, then the book jumps high.\nAssuming the musician plays games, we can say the fountain is magical.\nWhen the fountain is magical, we can conclude the book is a chef.\nWhen the book plays games, we can conclude the book is a chef.\nAssuming the musician plays games, we can say the book is a chef.\nWhen the moon is magical, we can conclude the book plays games.\nAssuming the book jumps high, we can say the moon is magical.", "statement": "The fountain jumps high.", "reasoning": "Because when the moon is a chef, we can conclude the book jumps high, we can conclude that the book jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the musician plays games, it follows that the fountain is magical, we can see that the fountain is magical.\nSince we know that given that the fountain is magical, it follows that the book is a chef, it follows that the book is a chef.\nApplying the logic of assuming the book jumps high, we can say the moon is magical, we deduce that the moon is magical.\nSince we know that when the moon is magical, we can conclude the book plays games, it follows that the book plays games.\nBecause if the book plays games, then the book is a chef, we can conclude that the book is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the musician plays games, we can say the fountain is magical, The musician plays games, we can say the fountain is magical, When the fountain is magical, we can conclude the book is a chef, When the moon is a chef, then the book jumps high, The moon is a chef, we can say the book jumps high, When the book jumps high, we can say the moon is magical, Assuming the book jumps high, we can say the moon is magical, When the moon is magical, we can conclude the book plays games, The moon is magical, we can say the book plays games, The book jumps high because The moon is a chef, Then the fountain does not jump high\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin is quiet.\nAva rides bikes.\nAva is quiet.\nRules:\nIf ava is quiet, then the pumpkin is quiet.\nWhen the pumpkin is quiet, we can conclude the pumpkin is quiet.\nWhen the pumpkin rides bikes, we can conclude the zoo rides bikes.\nWhen the zoo rides bikes, we can conclude the forest rides bikes.\nGiven that the pumpkin rides bikes, it follows that the zoo rides bikes.\nAssuming ava is quiet, we can say the pumpkin rides bikes.", "statement": "Ava hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Given that if ava is quiet, then the pumpkin is quiet, it is evident that the pumpkin is quiet.\nApplying the logic of based on the pumpkin is quiet, it is evident that the pumpkin is quiet, we deduce that the pumpkin is quiet.\nGiven that when ava is quiet, we can conclude the pumpkin rides bikes, it is evident that the pumpkin rides bikes.\nGiven that based on the pumpkin rides bikes, it is evident that the zoo rides bikes, it is evident that the zoo rides bikes.\nBecause assuming the pumpkin rides bikes, we can say the zoo rides bikes, we can conclude that the zoo rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of assuming the zoo rides bikes, we can say the forest rides bikes, we deduce that the forest rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because None of the provided rules or facts give information related to Ava hosting parties, the assertion cannot be concluded.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry reads books.\nSarah goes to the hospital.\nHenry carries bags.\nRules:\nBased on sarah goes to the hospital, it is evident that the chef reads books.\nIf henry carries bags, then the teacher sings beautifully.\nWhen the teacher reads books, we can conclude sarah carries bags.\nBased on henry carries bags, it is evident that the teacher reads books.\nBased on henry reads books, it is evident that the teacher sings beautifully.\nGiven that the teacher carries bags, it follows that henry carries bags.\nAssuming henry carries bags, we can say the teacher carries bags.", "statement": "Sarah carries bags.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if henry carries bags, then the teacher carries bags, it follows that the teacher carries bags.\nApplying the logic of when the teacher carries bags, we can conclude henry carries bags, we deduce that henry carries bags.\nSince we know that assuming henry carries bags, we can say the teacher reads books, it follows that the teacher reads books.\nGiven that based on the teacher reads books, it is evident that sarah carries bags, it is evident that sarah carries bags.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on henry carries bags, it is evident that the teacher reads books, when the teacher reads books, we can conclude sarah carries bags, Sarah carries bags\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack swims well.\nThe globe plays games.\nThe fountain plays games.\nRules:\nAssuming jack swims well, we can say the globe plays games.\nWhen jack swims well, we can conclude the globe plays games.\nIf the fountain plays games, then the moon swims well.\nIf jack swims well, then the globe is fast.\nWhen jack is fast, we can conclude jack swims well.\nGiven that jack is fast, it follows that the globe plays games.\nWhen the fountain plays games, we can conclude the moon swims well.\nWhen the globe plays games, we can conclude jack is fast.", "statement": "Jack plays games.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on jack swims well, it is evident that the globe plays games, it follows that the globe plays games.\nSince we know that if jack swims well, then the globe plays games, it follows that the globe plays games.\nApplying the logic of when the fountain plays games, we can conclude the moon swims well, we deduce that the moon swims well.\nSince we know that given that the globe plays games, it follows that jack is fast, it follows that jack is fast.\nSince we know that given that jack is fast, it follows that jack swims well, it follows that jack swims well.\nSince we know that when jack swims well, we can conclude the globe is fast, it follows that the globe is fast.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When jack swims well, we can conclude the globe plays games, When the globe plays games, we can conclude jack is fast, Given that jack is fast, it follows that the globe plays games, When jack is fast, we can conclude jack swims well, If jack swims well, then the globe is fast, the conclusion follows that Jack swims well but not that Jack plays games\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician carries bags.\nThe computer is fluffy.\nThe car goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nGiven that the computer is fluffy, it follows that the musician is quiet.\nBased on the musician carries bags, it is evident that the computer carries bags.\nGiven that the musician carries bags, it follows that the musician is quiet.\nGiven that the musician is quiet, it follows that the computer carries bags.\nAssuming emma is quiet, we can say the musician is quiet.\nAssuming the car carries bags, we can say emma is quiet.\nAssuming the musician is quiet, we can say the computer goes to the hospital.\nBased on the musician is quiet, it is evident that the car carries bags.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the computer is fluffy, we can say the musician is quiet, it follows that the musician is quiet.\nBecause if the musician carries bags, then the computer carries bags, we can conclude that the computer carries bags.\nGiven that when the musician is quiet, we can conclude the computer goes to the hospital, it is evident that the computer goes to the hospital.\nBecause if the musician is quiet, then the car carries bags, we can conclude that the car carries bags.\nBecause assuming the car carries bags, we can say emma is quiet, we can conclude that emma is quiet.\nBecause assuming emma is quiet, we can say the musician is quiet, we can conclude that the musician is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the assertion 'Chuan is handsome' is not supported by any fact or derived from any rule or conclusion given in the facts or rules, Chuan is handsome.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAlice does yoga.\nThe festival does yoga.\nThe fountain jumps high.\nRules:\nGiven that alice does yoga, it follows that the fountain is a chef.\nBased on the sandwich is a chef, it is evident that the festival does yoga.\nAssuming the fountain is a chef, we can say the festival is a chef.\nIf the fountain is a chef, then the sandwich is a chef.\nAssuming the sandwich draws maps, we can say the fountain is a chef.\nBased on the fountain is a chef, it is evident that the sandwich draws maps.", "statement": "The festival does yoga.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that alice does yoga, it follows that the fountain is a chef, it follows that the fountain is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the fountain is a chef, it follows that the sandwich draws maps, we can see that the sandwich draws maps.\nGiven that based on the sandwich draws maps, it is evident that the fountain is a chef, it is evident that the fountain is a chef.\nApplying the logic of assuming the fountain is a chef, we can say the sandwich is a chef, we deduce that the sandwich is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the sandwich is a chef, then the festival does yoga, we can see that the festival does yoga.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because based on the sandwich is a chef, it is evident that the festival does yoga, the festival does yoga\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat is a doctor.\nLucy is loud.\nAva hosts parties.\nRules:\nGiven that ava hosts parties, it follows that ava is a doctor.\nGiven that the car is loud, it follows that lucy is loud.\nBased on the cat is loud, it is evident that lucy is loud.\nGiven that lucy is loud, it follows that the cat is loud.\nAssuming lucy is loud, we can say lucy is loud.\nBased on ava is a doctor, it is evident that lucy is loud.", "statement": "Lucy is loud.", "reasoning": "Given that when ava hosts parties, we can conclude ava is a doctor, it is evident that ava is a doctor.\nGiven that based on ava is a doctor, it is evident that lucy is loud, it is evident that lucy is loud.\nApplying the logic of if lucy is loud, then lucy is loud, we deduce that lucy is loud.\nBecause based on lucy is loud, it is evident that the cat is loud, we can conclude that the cat is loud.\nSince we know that based on the cat is loud, it is evident that lucy is loud, it follows that lucy is loud.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming lucy is loud, we can say lucy is loud, Lucy is loud.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky runs quickly.\nThe dog teaches math.\nThe artist takes pictures.\nRules:\nAssuming the artist takes pictures, we can say the sky teaches math.\nBased on the artist takes pictures, it is evident that the artist takes pictures.\nIf the sky runs quickly, then the artist takes pictures.\nAssuming the dog teaches math, we can say the sky teaches math.\nWhen the artist takes pictures, we can conclude the sky teaches math.\nBased on the sky teaches math, it is evident that the artist takes pictures.\nWhen the dog runs quickly, we can conclude alice carries bags.\nGiven that the dog carries bags, it follows that the dog runs quickly.\nAssuming the artist takes pictures, we can say the dog carries bags.\nWhen the artist takes pictures, we can conclude the artist takes pictures.", "statement": "Alice carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the artist takes pictures, we can say the artist takes pictures, we deduce that the artist takes pictures.\nGiven that if the artist takes pictures, then the dog carries bags, it is evident that the dog carries bags.\nGiven that based on the dog carries bags, it is evident that the dog runs quickly, it is evident that the dog runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the dog runs quickly, we can conclude alice carries bags, we can see that alice carries bags.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the artist takes pictures, we can say the dog carries bags, and given that the dog carries bags, it follows that the dog runs quickly, and when the dog runs quickly, we can conclude alice carries bags, Alice carries bags.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon travels far.\nThe sandwich becomes famous.\nThe forest becomes famous.\nRules:\nBased on the moon travels far, it is evident that the moon makes pizza.\nBased on the forest becomes famous, it is evident that the sandwich becomes famous.\nAssuming the forest becomes famous, we can say the moon makes pizza.\nAssuming the moon travels far, we can say the forest plays games.\nIf the forest becomes famous, then the moon becomes famous.\nAssuming the sandwich becomes famous, we can say the sandwich becomes famous.\nAssuming the moon becomes famous, we can say the moon travels far.\nIf the moon makes pizza, then the moon becomes famous.", "statement": "The moon plays games.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the moon travels far, then the moon makes pizza, it follows that the moon makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of when the forest becomes famous, we can conclude the sandwich becomes famous, we deduce that the sandwich becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of when the moon makes pizza, we can conclude the moon becomes famous, we deduce that the moon becomes famous.\nGiven that if the moon becomes famous, then the moon travels far, it is evident that the moon travels far.\nGiven that when the moon travels far, we can conclude the forest plays games, it is evident that the forest plays games.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the moon travels far, we can say the forest plays games, the moon plays games.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival enjoys music.\nLiam is colorful.\nThe zoo is colorful.\nRules:\nAssuming the zoo is colorful, we can say the tree enjoys music.\nIf the festival enjoys music, then the zoo is colorful.\nGiven that the tree draws maps, it follows that the festival enjoys music.\nIf the tree draws maps, then the tree draws maps.\nIf the zoo is colorful, then the tree draws maps.\nWhen the festival is colorful, we can conclude the tree enjoys music.", "statement": "The zoo is colorful.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the zoo is colorful, we can say the tree draws maps, we deduce that the tree draws maps.\nBecause if the tree draws maps, then the tree draws maps, we can conclude that the tree draws maps.\nSince we know that assuming the tree draws maps, we can say the festival enjoys music, it follows that the festival enjoys music.\nBecause given that the festival enjoys music, it follows that the zoo is colorful, we can conclude that the zoo is colorful.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the festival enjoys music, then the zoo is colorful, The zoo is colorful.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop collects stamps.\nThe fountain plays games.\nThe shop collects stamps.\nRules:\nGiven that the shop collects stamps, it follows that chuan is magical.\nAssuming the fountain plays games, we can say chuan is magical.\nWhen the shop collects stamps, we can conclude chuan is funny.\nIf the fountain collects stamps, then chuan collects stamps.\nWhen the shop is magical, we can conclude the fountain collects stamps.\nIf chuan collects stamps, then the shop is magical.\nBased on chuan is funny, it is evident that chuan collects stamps.", "statement": "Chuan collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the shop collects stamps, it is evident that chuan is funny, we can see that chuan is funny.\nGiven that given that chuan is funny, it follows that chuan collects stamps, it is evident that chuan collects stamps.\nSince we know that assuming chuan collects stamps, we can say the shop is magical, it follows that the shop is magical.\nSince we know that when the shop is magical, we can conclude the fountain collects stamps, it follows that the fountain collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the fountain collects stamps, we can conclude chuan collects stamps, we can see that chuan collects stamps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the shop collects stamps, we can conclude chuan is funny., Based on chuan is funny, it is evident that chuan collects stamps., Chuan collects stamps.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery is colorful.\nThe bakery is colorful.\nJianzhi is colorful.\nRules:\nGiven that the bakery is colorful, it follows that jianzhi is fast.\nAssuming jianzhi is colorful, we can say the bakery is fast.\nGiven that the bakery creates art, it follows that jianzhi is colorful.\nBased on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the bakery creates art.\nBased on jianzhi is colorful, it is evident that jianzhi creates art.", "statement": "The bakery is fast.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on jianzhi is colorful, it is evident that jianzhi creates art, we deduce that jianzhi creates art.\nSince we know that based on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the bakery creates art, it follows that the bakery creates art.\nBecause given that the bakery creates art, it follows that jianzhi is colorful, we can conclude that jianzhi is colorful.\nApplying the logic of if jianzhi is colorful, then the bakery is fast, we deduce that the bakery is fast.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming jianzhi is colorful, we can say the bakery is fast, The bakery is fast.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig is quiet.\nThe pig paints pictures.\nSarah is quiet.\nRules:\nWhen sarah is quiet, we can conclude sarah paints pictures.\nBased on the pig is quiet, it is evident that the pig runs quickly.\nWhen the pig paints pictures, we can conclude the pig runs quickly.\nWhen the pig paints pictures, we can conclude the pig runs quickly.\nIf sarah is quiet, then the pig runs quickly.\nGiven that the phone jumps high, it follows that the phone jumps high.\nAssuming sarah paints pictures, we can say the phone jumps high.\nIf the pig runs quickly, then sarah paints pictures.\nIf the pig runs quickly, then the pig runs quickly.\nWhen sarah paints pictures, we can conclude the pig runs quickly.", "statement": "The phone jumps high.", "reasoning": "Given that if the pig is quiet, then the pig runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly.\nBecause based on the pig runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly, we can conclude that the pig runs quickly.\nSince we know that when the pig runs quickly, we can conclude sarah paints pictures, it follows that sarah paints pictures.\nBecause when sarah paints pictures, we can conclude the phone jumps high, we can conclude that the phone jumps high.\nGiven that based on the phone jumps high, it is evident that the phone jumps high, it is evident that the phone jumps high.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sarah is quiet, we can conclude Sarah paints pictures. Assuming Sarah paints pictures, we can say the phone jumps high, The phone jumps high\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia runs quickly.\nMia swims well.\nThe tree jumps high.\nRules:\nIf mia swims well, then mike jumps high.\nWhen mia swims well, we can conclude the tree runs quickly.\nGiven that mia runs quickly, it follows that the city is quiet.\nBased on the tree runs quickly, it is evident that mike jumps high.\nIf mike jumps high, then mike is quiet.\nBased on the city jumps high, it is evident that the city runs quickly.\nAssuming mike runs quickly, we can say the city jumps high.\nAssuming mia runs quickly, we can say mike runs quickly.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that based on mia swims well, it is evident that mike jumps high, it is evident that mike jumps high.\nSince we know that given that mia swims well, it follows that the tree runs quickly, it follows that the tree runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when mia runs quickly, we can conclude the city is quiet, we can see that the city is quiet.\nSince we know that assuming mike jumps high, we can say mike is quiet, it follows that mike is quiet.\nSince we know that assuming mia runs quickly, we can say mike runs quickly, it follows that mike runs quickly.\nBecause if mike runs quickly, then the city jumps high, we can conclude that the city jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the city jumps high, we can say the city runs quickly, we can see that the city runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting the given facts to the assertion, Chuan is handsome.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig runs quickly.\nSarah is tall.\nThe stadium plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf the stadium plays instruments, then the pig runs quickly.\nWhen sarah reads books, we can conclude sarah runs quickly.\nBased on the stadium is tall, it is evident that sarah reads books.\nBased on sarah reads books, it is evident that the stadium is tall.\nAssuming the pig runs quickly, we can say sarah reads books.", "statement": "Sarah runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium plays instruments, then the pig runs quickly, we can see that the pig runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of given that the pig runs quickly, it follows that sarah reads books, we deduce that sarah reads books.\nSince we know that based on sarah reads books, it is evident that the stadium is tall, it follows that the stadium is tall.\nSince we know that given that the stadium is tall, it follows that sarah reads books, it follows that sarah reads books.\nBecause when sarah reads books, we can conclude sarah runs quickly, we can conclude that sarah runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the stadium plays instruments, then the pig runs quickly, assuming the pig runs quickly, we can say sarah reads books, when sarah reads books, we can conclude sarah runs quickly, Sarah runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop is friendly.\nThe shop carries bags.\nThe playground is friendly.\nRules:\nBased on the shop carries bags, it is evident that the playground carries bags.\nIf the playground is friendly, then the playground carries bags.\nWhen the playground sings beautifully, we can conclude the playground is an artist.\nAssuming the playground carries bags, we can say the playground sings beautifully.\nGiven that the shop is friendly, it follows that the playground carries bags.\nBased on the playground carries bags, it is evident that the playground carries bags.\nIf the shop is friendly, then the playground carries bags.", "statement": "The city is an artist.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the shop carries bags, we can conclude the playground carries bags, we can see that the playground carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the shop is friendly, it follows that the playground carries bags, we can see that the playground carries bags.\nGiven that assuming the playground carries bags, we can say the playground sings beautifully, it is evident that the playground sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the playground sings beautifully, we can say the playground is an artist, we can see that the playground is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the playground sings beautifully, we can conclude the playground is an artist, assuming the playground carries bags, we can say the playground sings beautifully, if the playground is friendly, then the playground carries bags, the playground is friendly, the playground carries bags, the playground sings beautifully, the playground is an artist, the negation of the city is an artist\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river travels far.\nEthan travels far.\nThe chef travels far.\nRules:\nGiven that the river travels far, it follows that the dog teaches math.\nIf the chef is a chef, then the dog travels far.\nGiven that the river travels far, it follows that the chef is a chef.\nIf ethan travels far, then the river travels far.\nBased on the river travels far, it is evident that the chef jumps high.", "statement": "The dog is a chef.", "reasoning": "Given that when the river travels far, we can conclude the dog teaches math, it is evident that the dog teaches math.\nSince we know that based on ethan travels far, it is evident that the river travels far, it follows that the river travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the river travels far, we can conclude the chef jumps high, we can see that the chef jumps high.\nApplying the logic of when the river travels far, we can conclude the chef is a chef, we deduce that the chef is a chef.\nGiven that assuming the chef is a chef, we can say the dog travels far, it is evident that the dog travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the river travels far, it follows that the chef is a chef, The chef is a chef, If the chef is a chef, then the dog travels far, The dog travels far, the dog teaches math, The dog is a chef\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car is tall.\nThe car hikes mountains.\nLucas runs quickly.\nRules:\nGiven that the car hikes mountains, it follows that the bridge is tall.\nBased on lucas runs quickly, it is evident that the bridge is a scientist.\nAssuming lucas hikes mountains, we can say lucas runs quickly.\nBased on the car runs quickly, it is evident that lucas hikes mountains.\nGiven that the car is a scientist, it follows that the bridge is a scientist.\nBased on the car is tall, it is evident that the car runs quickly.", "statement": "The bridge is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the car is tall, it is evident that the car runs quickly, we can see that the car runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of when the car runs quickly, we can conclude lucas hikes mountains, we deduce that lucas hikes mountains.\nBecause given that lucas hikes mountains, it follows that lucas runs quickly, we can conclude that lucas runs quickly.\nGiven that if lucas runs quickly, then the bridge is a scientist, it is evident that the bridge is a scientist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the car hikes mountains, it follows that the bridge is tall, based on lucas runs quickly, it is evident that the bridge is a scientist, the assertion is true\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car is magical.\nThe chef is interesting.\nThe musician is magical.\nRules:\nIf the musician is magical, then the chef dances gracefully.\nWhen the artist is magical, we can conclude the artist dances gracefully.\nWhen the car is magical, we can conclude the artist is magical.\nAssuming the musician is a doctor, we can say the car is magical.\nBased on the chef dances gracefully, it is evident that the musician is a doctor.", "statement": "The artist dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the musician is magical, we can say the chef dances gracefully, it follows that the chef dances gracefully.\nBecause assuming the chef dances gracefully, we can say the musician is a doctor, we can conclude that the musician is a doctor.\nSince we know that if the musician is a doctor, then the car is magical, it follows that the car is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the car is magical, we can conclude the artist is magical, we can see that the artist is magical.\nBecause based on the artist is magical, it is evident that the artist dances gracefully, we can conclude that the artist dances gracefully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when the car is magical, we can conclude the artist is magical, When the artist is magical, we can conclude the artist dances gracefully, The artist dances gracefully\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo volunteers.\nThe bakery is tall.\nThe bakery volunteers.\nRules:\nIf the bakery volunteers, then the bakery volunteers.\nIf the bakery volunteers, then the zoo is friendly.\nWhen the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the zoo is friendly.\nWhen the shop becomes famous, we can conclude jack is friendly.\nGiven that the bakery volunteers, it follows that the shop becomes famous.\nAssuming the bakery is friendly, we can say the bakery volunteers.\nWhen the bakery is tall, we can conclude the bakery is friendly.", "statement": "Jack is friendly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the bakery is tall, we can conclude the bakery is friendly, it follows that the bakery is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the bakery is friendly, it follows that the bakery volunteers, we can see that the bakery volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the bakery volunteers, we can say the shop becomes famous, we can see that the shop becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the shop becomes famous, it follows that jack is friendly, we can see that jack is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the bakery volunteers, then the zoo is friendly, Given that the bakery volunteers, it follows that the shop becomes famous, When the shop becomes famous, we can conclude jack is friendly, Jack is friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium goes to the hospital.\nThe stadium goes to the hospital.\nThe zoo goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nGiven that the stadium goes to the hospital, it follows that the stadium sings beautifully.\nWhen the stadium goes to the hospital, we can conclude the stadium sings beautifully.\nWhen jianzhi hosts parties, we can conclude the zoo goes to the hospital.\nIf jianzhi hosts parties, then jianzhi hosts parties.\nBased on the zoo sings beautifully, it is evident that jianzhi hosts parties.\nBased on the stadium sings beautifully, it is evident that the zoo sings beautifully.\nAssuming the stadium sings beautifully, we can say the stadium hosts parties.", "statement": "The zoo goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the stadium goes to the hospital, we can conclude the stadium sings beautifully, we deduce that the stadium sings beautifully.\nGiven that when the stadium sings beautifully, we can conclude the zoo sings beautifully, it is evident that the zoo sings beautifully.\nGiven that if the zoo sings beautifully, then jianzhi hosts parties, it is evident that jianzhi hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if jianzhi hosts parties, then jianzhi hosts parties, we can see that jianzhi hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that jianzhi hosts parties, it follows that the zoo goes to the hospital, we can see that the zoo goes to the hospital.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the zoo goes to the hospital, the zoo goes to the hospital, the conclusion is that the zoo goes to the hospital.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma plays football.\nEmma is quiet.\nJack collects stamps.\nRules:\nBased on jack collects stamps, it is evident that jack is quiet.\nBased on emma plays football, it is evident that jack is quiet.\nIf jack is quiet, then the teacher plays football.\nIf the teacher plays football, then jack is quiet.\nWhen the teacher grows plants, we can conclude the teacher plays football.\nAssuming jack is quiet, we can say the teacher grows plants.\nBased on the teacher is quiet, it is evident that jack is quiet.", "statement": "The teacher plays football.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that jack collects stamps, it follows that jack is quiet, it follows that jack is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on jack is quiet, it is evident that the teacher grows plants, we can see that the teacher grows plants.\nSince we know that assuming the teacher grows plants, we can say the teacher plays football, it follows that the teacher plays football.\nGiven that assuming the teacher plays football, we can say jack is quiet, it is evident that jack is quiet.\nApplying the logic of when jack is quiet, we can conclude the teacher plays football, we deduce that the teacher plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because based on emma plays football, it is evident that jack is quiet, if jack is quiet, then the teacher plays football, the teacher plays football\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain is blue.\nEthan is blue.\nThe forest is blue.\nRules:\nWhen ethan is blue, we can conclude the chef plays games.\nIf the mountain is colorful, then ethan is colorful.\nWhen the mountain is colorful, we can conclude the mountain is colorful.\nWhen the mountain plays games, we can conclude the mountain is colorful.\nBased on ethan is blue, it is evident that ethan is colorful.\nGiven that ethan is blue, it follows that the mountain plays games.", "statement": "Ethan is colorful.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on ethan is blue, it is evident that the mountain plays games, we can see that the mountain plays games.\nSince we know that based on the mountain plays games, it is evident that the mountain is colorful, it follows that the mountain is colorful.\nSince we know that assuming the mountain is colorful, we can say the mountain is colorful, it follows that the mountain is colorful.\nApplying the logic of based on the mountain is colorful, it is evident that ethan is colorful, we deduce that ethan is colorful.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on ethan is blue, it is evident that ethan is colorful, Ethan is colorful.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean makes pizza.\nThe musician carries bags.\nThe mountain makes pizza.\nRules:\nAssuming the mountain makes pizza, we can say the mountain enjoys music.\nAssuming the ocean makes pizza, we can say the mountain enjoys music.\nAssuming the mountain is quiet, we can say the ocean carries bags.\nGiven that the ocean is quiet, it follows that the mountain is quiet.\nAssuming the stadium makes pizza, we can say the ocean is quiet.\nIf the musician carries bags, then the stadium makes pizza.\nAssuming the ocean makes pizza, we can say the mountain enjoys music.", "statement": "The ocean carries bags.", "reasoning": "Because given that the musician carries bags, it follows that the stadium makes pizza, we can conclude that the stadium makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the stadium makes pizza, it follows that the ocean is quiet, we can see that the ocean is quiet.\nGiven that assuming the ocean is quiet, we can say the mountain is quiet, it is evident that the mountain is quiet.\nBecause if the mountain is quiet, then the ocean carries bags, we can conclude that the ocean carries bags.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the ocean is quiet, it follows that the mountain is quiet., Assuming the mountain is quiet, we can say the ocean carries bags., The ocean makes pizza., The musician carries bags., If the musician carries bags, then the stadium makes pizza., Assuming the stadium makes pizza, we can say the ocean is quiet., The ocean carries bags.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi creates art.\nThe wall is an artist.\nThe river paints pictures.\nRules:\nBased on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the river creates art.\nWhen jianzhi creates art, we can conclude stanford university is quiet.\nIf the river paints pictures, then jianzhi is an artist.\nWhen jianzhi is quiet, we can conclude the river paints pictures.\nBased on the river is an artist, it is evident that the river paints pictures.\nAssuming the wall is an artist, we can say the river is an artist.", "statement": "Stanford University creates art.", "reasoning": "Because based on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the river creates art, we can conclude that the river creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming jianzhi creates art, we can say stanford university is quiet, we can see that stanford university is quiet.\nApplying the logic of based on the wall is an artist, it is evident that the river is an artist, we deduce that the river is an artist.\nApplying the logic of assuming the river is an artist, we can say the river paints pictures, we deduce that the river paints pictures.\nBecause based on the river paints pictures, it is evident that jianzhi is an artist, we can conclude that jianzhi is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When jianzhi creates art, we can conclude stanford university is quiet., {conclusion}\", \n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall draws maps.\nThe wall travels far.\nThe artist travels far.\nRules:\nWhen the wall travels far, we can conclude the wall draws maps.\nWhen the artist travels far, we can conclude the wall draws maps.\nGiven that the wall travels far, it follows that the wall draws maps.\nWhen the wall travels far, we can conclude the wall draws maps.\nGiven that the artist travels far, it follows that the house becomes famous.\nBased on the wall draws maps, it is evident that the artist travels far.\nIf the artist becomes famous, then the wall becomes famous.\nBased on the artist travels far, it is evident that the wall is colorful.\nAssuming the house becomes famous, we can say the artist becomes famous.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because when the wall travels far, we can conclude the wall draws maps, we can conclude that the wall draws maps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the artist travels far, it is evident that the wall draws maps, we can see that the wall draws maps.\nBecause given that the wall draws maps, it follows that the artist travels far, we can conclude that the artist travels far.\nGiven that assuming the artist travels far, we can say the wall is colorful, it is evident that the wall is colorful.\nGiven that given that the artist travels far, it follows that the house becomes famous, it is evident that the house becomes famous.\nGiven that when the house becomes famous, we can conclude the artist becomes famous, it is evident that the artist becomes famous.\nBecause based on the artist becomes famous, it is evident that the wall becomes famous, we can conclude that the wall becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"The assertion 'Chuan is handsome' is not supported by any rule or fact in the given context, and there is no direct connection to facts or rules provided.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is colorful.\nThe city is fluffy.\nThe moon is colorful.\nRules:\nAssuming the city is fluffy, we can say the zoo is funny.\nWhen the moon writes stories, we can conclude the city writes stories.\nAssuming the zoo is funny, we can say the zoo is fluffy.\nGiven that the moon writes stories, it follows that the zoo is funny.\nGiven that the fountain is fluffy, it follows that the moon writes stories.\nIf the zoo is funny, then the fountain is fluffy.", "statement": "The zoo is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the city is fluffy, we can say the zoo is funny, we deduce that the zoo is funny.\nSince we know that when the zoo is funny, we can conclude the fountain is fluffy, it follows that the fountain is fluffy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the fountain is fluffy, we can conclude the moon writes stories, we can see that the moon writes stories.\nGiven that when the moon writes stories, we can conclude the zoo is funny, it is evident that the zoo is funny.\nBecause based on the zoo is funny, it is evident that the zoo is fluffy, we can conclude that the zoo is fluffy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Assuming the city is fluffy, we can say the zoo is funny. Assuming the zoo is funny, we can say the zoo is fluffy. Therefore, the zoo is fluffy.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi becomes famous.\nThe musician is fluffy.\nThe playground is friendly.\nRules:\nWhen the playground is friendly, we can conclude jianzhi sings beautifully.\nBased on the playground is friendly, it is evident that the festival is friendly.\nAssuming jianzhi becomes famous, we can say the festival is friendly.\nBased on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that jianzhi becomes famous.\nIf the festival becomes famous, then the musician becomes famous.\nGiven that the musician is fluffy, it follows that the festival becomes famous.", "statement": "The festival is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the musician is fluffy, it is evident that the festival becomes famous, we deduce that the festival becomes famous.\nGiven that assuming the festival becomes famous, we can say the musician becomes famous, it is evident that the musician becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the musician becomes famous, it follows that jianzhi becomes famous, we can see that jianzhi becomes famous.\nGiven that assuming jianzhi becomes famous, we can say the festival is friendly, it is evident that the festival is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the playground is friendly, it is evident that the festival is friendly, the festival is friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium is a doctor.\nThe plane reads books.\nThe stadium is a doctor.\nRules:\nGiven that the stadium is a doctor, it follows that the cloud is a doctor.\nAssuming the stadium is a doctor, we can say the cloud is a doctor.\nWhen the stadium is a doctor, we can conclude the wall reads books.\nBased on the plane reads books, it is evident that the stadium is a doctor.\nIf the cloud is a doctor, then the stadium is a doctor.", "statement": "The plane is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Because when the stadium is a doctor, we can conclude the cloud is a doctor, we can conclude that the cloud is a doctor.\nGiven that if the plane reads books, then the stadium is a doctor, it is evident that the stadium is a doctor.\nSince we know that given that the stadium is a doctor, it follows that the cloud is a doctor, it follows that the cloud is a doctor.\nBecause assuming the cloud is a doctor, we can say the stadium is a doctor, we can conclude that the stadium is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming the stadium is a doctor, we can say the wall reads books, we deduce that the wall reads books.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the plane reads books, it is evident that the stadium is a doctor, Given that the stadium is a doctor, it follows that the cloud is a doctor, If the cloud is a doctor, then the stadium is a doctor, the negation of The plane is a doctor\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival is an engineer.\nThe festival goes to the hospital.\nAva grows plants.\nRules:\nAssuming the festival goes to the hospital, we can say the festival goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the festival is an engineer, we can say the festival goes to the hospital.\nGiven that ava grows plants, it follows that the festival goes to the hospital.\nBased on the cloud grows plants, it is evident that the book grows plants.\nWhen the book goes to the hospital, we can conclude the cloud plays games.\nGiven that ava is an engineer, it follows that the book goes to the hospital.\nWhen the festival goes to the hospital, we can conclude ava is an engineer.", "statement": "The book grows plants.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the festival goes to the hospital, we can conclude the festival goes to the hospital, we deduce that the festival goes to the hospital.\nBecause assuming the festival is an engineer, we can say the festival goes to the hospital, we can conclude that the festival goes to the hospital.\nGiven that based on the festival goes to the hospital, it is evident that ava is an engineer, it is evident that ava is an engineer.\nSince we know that based on ava is an engineer, it is evident that the book goes to the hospital, it follows that the book goes to the hospital.\nGiven that based on the book goes to the hospital, it is evident that the cloud plays games, it is evident that the cloud plays games.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the cloud grows plants, it is evident that the book grows plants, the book grows plants\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun rides bikes.\nJames dances gracefully.\nThe pumpkin rides bikes.\nRules:\nWhen the pumpkin rides bikes, we can conclude sarah rides bikes.\nAssuming the pumpkin rides bikes, we can say sarah rides bikes.\nBased on the sun rides bikes, it is evident that sarah dances gracefully.\nGiven that the pumpkin rides bikes, it follows that the sun is loud.\nWhen the sun rides bikes, we can conclude sarah rides bikes.\nBased on james is loud, it is evident that the pumpkin rides bikes.\nIf sarah dances gracefully, then james is loud.\nAssuming the sun rides bikes, we can say sarah dances gracefully.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the pumpkin rides bikes, we can say sarah rides bikes, it is evident that sarah rides bikes.\nBecause based on the sun rides bikes, it is evident that sarah dances gracefully, we can conclude that sarah dances gracefully.\nGiven that given that the pumpkin rides bikes, it follows that the sun is loud, it is evident that the sun is loud.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the sun rides bikes, it follows that sarah rides bikes, we can see that sarah rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of when the sun rides bikes, we can conclude sarah dances gracefully, we deduce that sarah dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of given that sarah dances gracefully, it follows that james is loud, we deduce that james is loud.\nBecause if james is loud, then the pumpkin rides bikes, we can conclude that the pumpkin rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the facts and rules do not provide any information about Chuan or being handsome, the assertion cannot be determined.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival is an engineer.\nThe festival reads books.\nStanford University is an engineer.\nRules:\nBased on stanford university is an engineer, it is evident that the moon is an engineer.\nWhen the festival reads books, we can conclude the festival is an engineer.\nBased on stanford university is an engineer, it is evident that the moon is an engineer.\nGiven that the moon is an engineer, it follows that the moon is an engineer.\nGiven that the moon draws maps, it follows that the festival is an engineer.\nIf the moon is an engineer, then the moon draws maps.\nAssuming the festival reads books, we can say the festival is an engineer.\nGiven that the festival is an engineer, it follows that the moon is an engineer.", "statement": "The house draws maps.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming stanford university is an engineer, we can say the moon is an engineer, it is evident that the moon is an engineer.\nBecause based on the festival reads books, it is evident that the festival is an engineer, we can conclude that the festival is an engineer.\nGiven that assuming the festival is an engineer, we can say the moon is an engineer, it is evident that the moon is an engineer.\nSince we know that if the moon is an engineer, then the moon is an engineer, it follows that the moon is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of when the moon is an engineer, we can conclude the moon draws maps, we deduce that the moon draws maps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the moon draws maps, then the festival is an engineer, we can see that the festival is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the moon is an engineer, then the moon draws maps, based on stanford university is an engineer, it is evident that the moon is an engineer, the moon draws maps does not imply the house draws maps, the house draws maps is unsupported.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden hikes mountains.\nThe sun is funny.\nThe garden is funny.\nRules:\nBased on the garden hikes mountains, it is evident that the garden is a doctor.\nWhen the garden is funny, we can conclude the garden is funny.\nGiven that the city hikes mountains, it follows that the playground hikes mountains.\nGiven that the sun hikes mountains, it follows that the city hikes mountains.\nWhen the garden is funny, we can conclude the sun hikes mountains.\nWhen the sun is funny, we can conclude the garden is a doctor.", "statement": "The playground plays games.", "reasoning": "Because given that the garden hikes mountains, it follows that the garden is a doctor, we can conclude that the garden is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the garden is funny, it follows that the garden is funny, we can see that the garden is funny.\nApplying the logic of assuming the garden is funny, we can say the sun hikes mountains, we deduce that the sun hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of if the sun is funny, then the garden is a doctor, we deduce that the garden is a doctor.\nSince we know that based on the sun hikes mountains, it is evident that the city hikes mountains, it follows that the city hikes mountains.\nGiven that based on the city hikes mountains, it is evident that the playground hikes mountains, it is evident that the playground hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion does not have any related rules or facts supporting it being true, The playground plays games.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain is a scientist.\nThe artist is a scientist.\nThe book becomes famous.\nRules:\nBased on the artist is a scientist, it is evident that james becomes famous.\nBased on the fountain is a scientist, it is evident that the artist is quiet.\nWhen the fountain becomes famous, we can conclude james becomes famous.\nIf james is a scientist, then the artist is a scientist.\nBased on the artist is quiet, it is evident that james is a scientist.\nAssuming james is quiet, we can say james becomes famous.\nWhen the artist is a scientist, we can conclude the fountain becomes famous.", "statement": "The fountain carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the artist is a scientist, it follows that james becomes famous, we deduce that james becomes famous.\nBecause assuming the fountain is a scientist, we can say the artist is quiet, we can conclude that the artist is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the artist is quiet, it is evident that james is a scientist, we can see that james is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on james is a scientist, it is evident that the artist is a scientist, we can see that the artist is a scientist.\nGiven that assuming the artist is a scientist, we can say the fountain becomes famous, it is evident that the fountain becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the fountain becomes famous, we can say james becomes famous, we can see that james becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the fountain is a scientist, it is evident that the artist is quiet, based on the artist is quiet, it is evident that james is a scientist, when the artist is a scientist, we can conclude the fountain becomes famous, when the fountain becomes famous, we can conclude james becomes famous, the assertion is false. Therefore the rules and facts do not derive or relate to the conclusion 'The fountain carries bags'.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie teaches math.\nCharlie grows plants.\nCharlie teaches math.\nRules:\nBased on charlie teaches math, it is evident that charlie is friendly.\nAssuming charlie teaches math, we can say the tree is friendly.\nAssuming charlie grows plants, we can say the tree plays instruments.\nAssuming the globe plays instruments, we can say the globe is friendly.\nBased on charlie teaches math, it is evident that the globe plays instruments.\nBased on charlie teaches math, it is evident that the globe plays instruments.\nAssuming the tree plays instruments, we can say the tree plays instruments.\nIf the tree plays instruments, then charlie teaches math.", "statement": "The bakery plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Because if charlie teaches math, then charlie is friendly, we can conclude that charlie is friendly.\nSince we know that assuming charlie teaches math, we can say the tree is friendly, it follows that the tree is friendly.\nBecause given that charlie grows plants, it follows that the tree plays instruments, we can conclude that the tree plays instruments.\nApplying the logic of assuming the tree plays instruments, we can say charlie teaches math, we deduce that charlie teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that charlie teaches math, it follows that the globe plays instruments, we can see that the globe plays instruments.\nApplying the logic of when the globe plays instruments, we can conclude the globe is friendly, we deduce that the globe is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no rules linking the given facts to the assertion 'The bakery plays instruments'. None of the provided facts 'Charlie teaches math' and 'Charlie grows plants' lead to any conclusion about 'The bakery plays instruments'.\", \n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival draws maps.\nThe plane fishes in lakes.\nHenry is a doctor.\nRules:\nGiven that henry is a doctor, it follows that the plane is a doctor.\nBased on the festival draws maps, it is evident that the festival fishes in lakes.\nWhen the plane fishes in lakes, we can conclude the festival fishes in lakes.\nIf henry draws maps, then the plane fishes in lakes.\nBased on the festival draws maps, it is evident that henry draws maps.\nWhen the bridge is a doctor, we can conclude the festival draws maps.\nBased on the festival fishes in lakes, it is evident that the bridge is a doctor.", "statement": "The plane fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the festival draws maps, we can say the festival fishes in lakes, we can see that the festival fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that if the festival fishes in lakes, then the bridge is a doctor, it follows that the bridge is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge is a doctor, it is evident that the festival draws maps, we can see that the festival draws maps.\nGiven that given that the festival draws maps, it follows that henry draws maps, it is evident that henry draws maps.\nSince we know that when henry draws maps, we can conclude the plane fishes in lakes, it follows that the plane fishes in lakes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because The plane fishes in lakes, The plane fishes in lakes.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi creates art.\nJianzhi is loud.\nThe shop creates art.\nRules:\nGiven that jianzhi creates art, it follows that ava jumps high.\nIf jianzhi creates art, then ava jumps high.\nWhen jianzhi is loud, we can conclude ava is fast.\nGiven that ava creates art, it follows that jianzhi jumps high.\nIf the shop jumps high, then ava creates art.\nGiven that jianzhi is loud, it follows that the teacher jumps high.\nWhen ava is fast, we can conclude the shop jumps high.\nWhen the teacher jumps high, we can conclude ava is fast.", "statement": "The teacher is fast.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that jianzhi creates art, it follows that ava jumps high, we deduce that ava jumps high.\nGiven that assuming jianzhi is loud, we can say ava is fast, it is evident that ava is fast.\nSince we know that if jianzhi is loud, then the teacher jumps high, it follows that the teacher jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on ava is fast, it is evident that the shop jumps high, we can see that the shop jumps high.\nApplying the logic of based on the shop jumps high, it is evident that ava creates art, we deduce that ava creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if ava creates art, then jianzhi jumps high, we can see that jianzhi jumps high.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that jianzhi is loud, it follows that the teacher jumps high., When the teacher jumps high, we can conclude ava is fast., The teacher is fast.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam plays instruments.\nThe sky sings beautifully.\nJack sings beautifully.\nRules:\nGiven that liam plays instruments, it follows that the sky sings beautifully.\nIf jack sings beautifully, then jack creates art.\nBased on the sky sings beautifully, it is evident that jack volunteers.\nBased on jack sings beautifully, it is evident that liam plays instruments.\nGiven that jack creates art, it follows that liam sings beautifully.\nIf the sky sings beautifully, then jack creates art.\nGiven that jack volunteers, it follows that liam plays instruments.\nIf jack plays instruments, then the sky sings beautifully.\nAssuming liam plays instruments, we can say jack plays instruments.", "statement": "Liam sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if liam plays instruments, then jack plays instruments, it follows that jack plays instruments.\nSince we know that if jack plays instruments, then the sky sings beautifully, it follows that the sky sings beautifully.\nBecause when the sky sings beautifully, we can conclude jack creates art, we can conclude that jack creates art.\nSince we know that if jack creates art, then liam sings beautifully, it follows that liam sings beautifully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the sky sings beautifully, then jack creates art., Given that jack creates art, it follows that liam sings beautifully., Liam sings beautifully.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium fishes in lakes.\nThe garden makes pizza.\nThe artist makes pizza.\nRules:\nAssuming the artist makes pizza, we can say the stadium makes pizza.\nAssuming the garden makes pizza, we can say emma makes pizza.\nIf the garden is a chef, then the stadium makes pizza.\nWhen the stadium is a chef, we can conclude the garden is a chef.\nWhen the garden fishes in lakes, we can conclude emma fishes in lakes.\nBased on the artist fishes in lakes, it is evident that the stadium is a chef.\nAssuming emma makes pizza, we can say the artist fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The garden fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the artist makes pizza, it is evident that the stadium makes pizza, it follows that the stadium makes pizza.\nGiven that based on the garden makes pizza, it is evident that emma makes pizza, it is evident that emma makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of based on emma makes pizza, it is evident that the artist fishes in lakes, we deduce that the artist fishes in lakes.\nGiven that based on the artist fishes in lakes, it is evident that the stadium is a chef, it is evident that the stadium is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the stadium is a chef, we can conclude the garden is a chef, we can see that the garden is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the garden fishes in lakes, we can conclude emma fishes in lakes.,  emma fishes in lakes is not established, The garden fishes in lakes is false.\", \n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge is magical.\nThe bridge is magical.\nThe musician is colorful.\nRules:\nGiven that the bridge is magical, it follows that the musician is magical.\nIf the fountain plays instruments, then the bakery plays instruments.\nWhen the bridge plays instruments, we can conclude the bridge is magical.\nAssuming the bakery plays instruments, we can say the bridge is magical.\nGiven that the bakery plays instruments, it follows that the fountain plays instruments.\nWhen the bridge is magical, we can conclude the bakery plays instruments.", "statement": "The bridge plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the bridge is magical, we can conclude the musician is magical, we deduce that the musician is magical.\nGiven that when the bridge is magical, we can conclude the bakery plays instruments, it is evident that the bakery plays instruments.\nSince we know that based on the bakery plays instruments, it is evident that the bridge is magical, it follows that the bridge is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the bakery plays instruments, then the fountain plays instruments, we can see that the fountain plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the fountain plays instruments, we can conclude the bakery plays instruments, we can see that the bakery plays instruments.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the bridge is magical, we can conclude the bakery plays instruments., Assuming the bakery plays instruments, we can say the bridge is magical., When the bridge plays instruments, we can conclude the bridge is magical., The bridge is magical., The bridge plays instruments.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog becomes famous.\nEmma is a doctor.\nThe playground becomes famous.\nRules:\nIf the playground becomes famous, then the playground goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the playground becomes famous, it follows that emma becomes famous.\nBased on emma is a doctor, it is evident that emma becomes famous.\nGiven that the ocean is a doctor, it follows that emma becomes famous.\nBased on the ocean goes to the hospital, it is evident that the ocean is a doctor.\nWhen the ocean is a doctor, we can conclude the ocean goes to the hospital.\nIf the playground becomes famous, then the ocean is a doctor.", "statement": "Emma becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the playground becomes famous, then the ocean is a doctor, we deduce that the ocean is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming the ocean is a doctor, we can say the ocean goes to the hospital, we deduce that the ocean goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that assuming the ocean goes to the hospital, we can say the ocean is a doctor, it follows that the ocean is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of if the ocean is a doctor, then emma becomes famous, we deduce that emma becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the playground becomes famous, it follows that emma becomes famous.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog is fluffy.\nThe ocean volunteers.\nThe ocean is an artist.\nRules:\nBased on the ocean volunteers, it is evident that the dog volunteers.\nIf the ocean is an artist, then lucas volunteers.\nAssuming lucas volunteers, we can say the dog is fluffy.\nWhen the ocean is fluffy, we can conclude lucas volunteers.\nAssuming the dog is fluffy, we can say the ocean volunteers.\nGiven that the car is fluffy, it follows that the ocean is fluffy.\nAssuming the ocean is an artist, we can say the car is fluffy.", "statement": "The dog is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the ocean is an artist, we can say the car is fluffy, it follows that the car is fluffy.\nSince we know that given that the car is fluffy, it follows that the ocean is fluffy, it follows that the ocean is fluffy.\nBecause based on the ocean is fluffy, it is evident that lucas volunteers, we can conclude that lucas volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucas volunteers, we can say the dog is fluffy, we can see that the dog is fluffy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the dog is fluffy, we can say the ocean volunteers, the dog is fluffy.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef hikes mountains.\nThe chef hikes mountains.\nThe river hikes mountains.\nRules:\nWhen the chef hikes mountains, we can conclude the chef is colorful.\nAssuming the chef hikes mountains, we can say the chef is happy.\nBased on the chef hikes mountains, it is evident that the chef is colorful.\nWhen the chef hikes mountains, we can conclude the chef is happy.\nGiven that the chef hikes mountains, it follows that the chef goes to the hospital.\nWhen the chef goes to the hospital, we can conclude the chef is colorful.\nWhen the river hikes mountains, we can conclude the globe is colorful.\nIf the globe is colorful, then the chef goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the chef is colorful, we can say the globe is colorful.", "statement": "The globe hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the chef hikes mountains, we can conclude the chef is colorful, we deduce that the chef is colorful.\nGiven that based on the chef hikes mountains, it is evident that the chef is happy, it is evident that the chef is happy.\nGiven that assuming the river hikes mountains, we can say the globe is colorful, it is evident that the globe is colorful.\nApplying the logic of if the chef is colorful, then the globe is colorful, we deduce that the globe is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the globe is colorful, we can say the chef goes to the hospital, we can see that the chef goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that assuming the chef goes to the hospital, we can say the chef is colorful, it follows that the chef is colorful.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When the river hikes mountains, we can conclude the globe is colorful., The river hikes mountains., The globe hikes mountains.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop teaches math.\nThe plane reads books.\nThe shop is happy.\nRules:\nAssuming the shop teaches math, we can say the shop reads books.\nAssuming the sun goes to the hospital, we can say the shop reads books.\nGiven that the garden reads books, it follows that the sun goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the garden is happy, it follows that the garden reads books.\nAssuming the garden reads books, we can say the garden is happy.\nIf the plane reads books, then the garden reads books.", "statement": "The sun goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Given that if the plane reads books, then the garden reads books, it is evident that the garden reads books.\nBecause assuming the garden reads books, we can say the garden is happy, we can conclude that the garden is happy.\nBecause based on the garden is happy, it is evident that the garden reads books, we can conclude that the garden reads books.\nBecause when the garden reads books, we can conclude the sun goes to the hospital, we can conclude that the sun goes to the hospital.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the plane reads books, then the garden reads books., Given that the garden reads books, it follows that the sun goes to the hospital., The sun goes to the hospital.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames is magical.\nThe mountain jumps high.\nThe mountain jumps high.\nRules:\nIf james is magical, then the mountain is magical.\nWhen james runs marathons, we can conclude the dog travels far.\nAssuming the plane jumps high, we can say james runs marathons.\nGiven that the plane is magical, it follows that the plane jumps high.\nWhen the mountain jumps high, we can conclude the plane is magical.", "statement": "The dog travels far.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the mountain jumps high, we can say the plane is magical, it is evident that the plane is magical.\nApplying the logic of given that the plane is magical, it follows that the plane jumps high, we deduce that the plane jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the plane jumps high, then james runs marathons, we can see that james runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that james runs marathons, it follows that the dog travels far, we can see that the dog travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When the mountain jumps high, we can conclude the plane is magical., Given that the plane is magical, it follows that the plane jumps high., Assuming the plane jumps high, we can say james runs marathons., When james runs marathons, we can conclude the dog travels far., The dog travels far.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry enjoys music.\nThe car goes to the hospital.\nThe car goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nBased on the car goes to the hospital, it is evident that the cat sings beautifully.\nAssuming the car enjoys music, we can say the car sings beautifully.\nGiven that henry enjoys music, it follows that the car enjoys music.\nIf henry sings beautifully, then henry enjoys music.\nWhen the cat sings beautifully, we can conclude henry sings beautifully.", "statement": "The car sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the car goes to the hospital, we can conclude the cat sings beautifully, we deduce that the cat sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of if the cat sings beautifully, then henry sings beautifully, we deduce that henry sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that henry sings beautifully, it follows that henry enjoys music, we can see that henry enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on henry enjoys music, it is evident that the car enjoys music, we can see that the car enjoys music.\nBecause given that the car enjoys music, it follows that the car sings beautifully, we can conclude that the car sings beautifully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that henry enjoys music, it follows that the car enjoys music., Assuming the car enjoys music, we can say the car sings beautifully., The car sings beautifully.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam is an artist.\nThe dog swims well.\nThe phone swims well.\nRules:\nAssuming liam is an artist, we can say jianzhi swims well.\nWhen liam is fluffy, we can conclude jianzhi swims well.\nWhen liam swims well, we can conclude liam is fluffy.\nBased on jianzhi swims well, it is evident that liam swims well.\nIf the dog is fluffy, then jianzhi swims well.", "statement": "The phone is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if liam is an artist, then jianzhi swims well, we can see that jianzhi swims well.\nApplying the logic of if jianzhi swims well, then liam swims well, we deduce that liam swims well.\nApplying the logic of if liam swims well, then liam is fluffy, we deduce that liam is fluffy.\nSince we know that based on liam is fluffy, it is evident that jianzhi swims well, it follows that jianzhi swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"The provided facts and rules do not address the friendliness of the phone or create any links to determine it. Therefore, there is no basis to conclude the assertion. The phone is friendly.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucas is a scientist.\nThe mountain is a scientist.\nThe sky collects stamps.\nRules:\nIf lucas is a scientist, then lucas is a scientist.\nIf lucas is a scientist, then the sky is a scientist.\nWhen the mountain is a scientist, we can conclude the sky is a scientist.\nWhen the mountain dances gracefully, we can conclude the sky is a scientist.\nWhen lucas collects stamps, we can conclude the mountain dances gracefully.\nWhen lucas collects stamps, we can conclude lucas collects stamps.\nIf lucas is a scientist, then lucas collects stamps.", "statement": "The sky is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming lucas is a scientist, we can say lucas is a scientist, it follows that lucas is a scientist.\nGiven that assuming lucas is a scientist, we can say lucas collects stamps, it is evident that lucas collects stamps.\nApplying the logic of assuming lucas collects stamps, we can say lucas collects stamps, we deduce that lucas collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that lucas collects stamps, it follows that the mountain dances gracefully, we can see that the mountain dances gracefully.\nSince we know that based on the mountain dances gracefully, it is evident that the sky is a scientist, it follows that the sky is a scientist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Lucas is a scientist, then the sky is a scientist, the sky is a scientist\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack rides bikes.\nJack volunteers.\nJack is friendly.\nRules:\nAssuming jack volunteers, we can say ava volunteers.\nGiven that jack is friendly, it follows that the river volunteers.\nGiven that the river rides bikes, it follows that jack is friendly.\nBased on jack is friendly, it is evident that the river rides bikes.\nAssuming jianzhi is a doctor, we can say jack is friendly.\nIf jack rides bikes, then jianzhi is a doctor.", "statement": "Jack is friendly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when jack rides bikes, we can conclude jianzhi is a doctor, it follows that jianzhi is a doctor.\nGiven that if jianzhi is a doctor, then jack is friendly, it is evident that jack is friendly.\nApplying the logic of based on jack is friendly, it is evident that the river rides bikes, we deduce that the river rides bikes.\nBecause if the river rides bikes, then jack is friendly, we can conclude that jack is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Jack rides bikes, then jianzhi is a doctor. Assuming jianzhi is a doctor, we can say jack is friendly, Jack is friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean is quiet.\nThe plane is a doctor.\nThe cloud is a doctor.\nRules:\nGiven that the cloud is a doctor, it follows that the plane swims well.\nIf the plane is a doctor, then the pig swims well.\nAssuming the cloud is a doctor, we can say the plane is a doctor.\nBased on the plane is an artist, it is evident that the ocean is a doctor.\nIf the ocean is a doctor, then the cloud is a doctor.\nAssuming the cloud is a doctor, we can say the plane is an artist.", "statement": "The pig swims well.", "reasoning": "Because given that the cloud is a doctor, it follows that the plane is an artist, we can conclude that the plane is an artist.\nGiven that given that the plane is an artist, it follows that the ocean is a doctor, it is evident that the ocean is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of if the ocean is a doctor, then the cloud is a doctor, we deduce that the cloud is a doctor.\nSince we know that given that the cloud is a doctor, it follows that the plane is a doctor, it follows that the plane is a doctor.\nBecause assuming the plane is a doctor, we can say the pig swims well, we can conclude that the pig swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the cloud is a doctor, we can say the plane is a doctor, If the plane is a doctor, then the pig swims well, The pig swims well\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef becomes famous.\nThe chef becomes famous.\nEmma is magical.\nRules:\nWhen the chef becomes famous, we can conclude emma becomes famous.\nAssuming the chef fishes in lakes, we can say the book fishes in lakes.\nIf emma is a scientist, then the chef fishes in lakes.\nIf the chef becomes famous, then the dog becomes famous.\nIf the dog fishes in lakes, then emma is a scientist.\nWhen the chef becomes famous, we can conclude the dog fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The book fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the chef becomes famous, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes, we deduce that the dog fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that when the dog fishes in lakes, we can conclude emma is a scientist, it follows that emma is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when emma is a scientist, we can conclude the chef fishes in lakes, we can see that the chef fishes in lakes.\nGiven that given that the chef fishes in lakes, it follows that the book fishes in lakes, it is evident that the book fishes in lakes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the chef becomes famous, we can conclude the dog fishes in lakes, assuming the chef fishes in lakes, we can say the book fishes in lakes, the book fishes in lakes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie dances gracefully.\nThe wall dances gracefully.\nCharlie grows plants.\nRules:\nBased on charlie grows plants, it is evident that the wall explores cities.\nBased on the wall grows plants, it is evident that the wall dances gracefully.\nGiven that the sky dances gracefully, it follows that the wall dances gracefully.\nWhen the wall explores cities, we can conclude the sky dances gracefully.\nGiven that the wall grows plants, it follows that the wall explores cities.\nAssuming charlie dances gracefully, we can say the wall grows plants.", "statement": "The wall dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming charlie dances gracefully, we can say the wall grows plants, it is evident that the wall grows plants.\nGiven that assuming the wall grows plants, we can say the wall explores cities, it is evident that the wall explores cities.\nGiven that based on the wall explores cities, it is evident that the sky dances gracefully, it is evident that the sky dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the sky dances gracefully, we can conclude the wall dances gracefully, we can see that the wall dances gracefully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming charlie dances gracefully, we can say the wall grows plants, Based on the wall grows plants, it is evident that the wall dances gracefully, The wall dances gracefully\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam grows plants.\nThe fountain grows plants.\nThe playground runs marathons.\nRules:\nWhen the fountain grows plants, we can conclude the playground paints pictures.\nGiven that the fountain grows plants, it follows that the fountain paints pictures.\nWhen the musician teaches math, we can conclude the musician paints pictures.\nAssuming the musician teaches math, we can say the playground paints pictures.\nBased on the playground paints pictures, it is evident that the musician teaches math.\nIf the musician paints pictures, then the playground paints pictures.\nGiven that the playground paints pictures, it follows that the playground paints pictures.", "statement": "Liam teaches math.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the fountain grows plants, it follows that the playground paints pictures, it is evident that the playground paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of when the fountain grows plants, we can conclude the fountain paints pictures, we deduce that the fountain paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of if the playground paints pictures, then the playground paints pictures, we deduce that the playground paints pictures.\nBecause if the playground paints pictures, then the musician teaches math, we can conclude that the musician teaches math.\nSince we know that assuming the musician teaches math, we can say the musician paints pictures, it follows that the musician paints pictures.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion does not follow from any of the given facts or rules, its negation\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack does yoga.\nMike is fluffy.\nMike is fluffy.\nRules:\nWhen jack does yoga, we can conclude sarah does yoga.\nAssuming mike is fluffy, we can say james is fluffy.\nIf mike is fluffy, then sarah does yoga.\nWhen mike is fluffy, we can conclude james is fluffy.\nBased on mike is fluffy, it is evident that mike volunteers.\nIf sarah reads books, then mike is fluffy.\nWhen sarah volunteers, we can conclude sarah reads books.\nAssuming jack does yoga, we can say mike reads books.\nBased on mike is fluffy, it is evident that sarah volunteers.", "statement": "Mike volunteers.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming mike is fluffy, we can say sarah volunteers, it follows that sarah volunteers.\nSince we know that if sarah volunteers, then sarah reads books, it follows that sarah reads books.\nApplying the logic of when sarah reads books, we can conclude mike is fluffy, we deduce that mike is fluffy.\nGiven that if mike is fluffy, then mike volunteers, it is evident that mike volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on mike is fluffy, it is evident that mike volunteers, Mike volunteers.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo plays games.\nThe pig makes pizza.\nThe zoo hikes mountains.\nRules:\nIf the pig makes pizza, then the chef becomes famous.\nGiven that the zoo hikes mountains, it follows that the zoo plays games.\nAssuming the zoo hikes mountains, we can say the chef becomes famous.\nWhen the pig makes pizza, we can conclude the cloud makes pizza.\nWhen the zoo hikes mountains, we can conclude the cloud makes pizza.\nIf the cloud makes pizza, then the zoo hikes mountains.\nWhen the chef makes pizza, we can conclude the cloud makes pizza.\nBased on the chef plays games, it is evident that the chef makes pizza.\nGiven that the cloud makes pizza, it follows that the chef makes pizza.\nGiven that the pig makes pizza, it follows that the chef plays games.", "statement": "The zoo hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Because if the pig makes pizza, then the chef plays games, we can conclude that the chef plays games.\nApplying the logic of given that the chef plays games, it follows that the chef makes pizza, we deduce that the chef makes pizza.\nGiven that given that the chef makes pizza, it follows that the cloud makes pizza, it is evident that the cloud makes pizza.\nSince we know that when the cloud makes pizza, we can conclude the zoo hikes mountains, it follows that the zoo hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the zoo hikes mountains, it follows that the zoo plays games, the assertion is true\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician fishes in lakes.\nThe musician is an engineer.\nThe bakery fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nAssuming the bakery fishes in lakes, we can say liam becomes famous.\nBased on henry fishes in lakes, it is evident that henry becomes famous.\nBased on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that henry fishes in lakes.\nIf henry is an engineer, then the musician becomes famous.\nGiven that the musician becomes famous, it follows that the musician becomes famous.\nAssuming the musician is an engineer, we can say henry is an engineer.", "statement": "Henry becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the musician is an engineer, it is evident that henry is an engineer, we can see that henry is an engineer.\nBecause based on henry is an engineer, it is evident that the musician becomes famous, we can conclude that the musician becomes famous.\nSince we know that if the musician becomes famous, then henry fishes in lakes, it follows that henry fishes in lakes.\nGiven that given that henry fishes in lakes, it follows that henry becomes famous, it is evident that henry becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that henry fishes in lakes, Based on henry fishes in lakes, it is evident that henry becomes famous\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva is friendly.\nThe stadium is friendly.\nThe stadium is friendly.\nRules:\nIf the stadium is friendly, then the bakery is a doctor.\nWhen the stadium is friendly, we can conclude the bakery is fast.\nBased on the stadium is friendly, it is evident that the bakery is a doctor.\nWhen the playground is a doctor, we can conclude the bakery is fast.\nAssuming the stadium is fast, we can say the bakery is fast.\nWhen the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the playground is a doctor.\nIf the stadium is friendly, then the bakery volunteers.", "statement": "The stadium is fast.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the stadium is friendly, it is evident that the bakery is a doctor, we can see that the bakery is a doctor.\nSince we know that if the stadium is friendly, then the bakery is fast, it follows that the bakery is fast.\nBecause if the stadium is friendly, then the bakery volunteers, we can conclude that the bakery volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the playground is a doctor, we can see that the playground is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of if the playground is a doctor, then the bakery is fast, we deduce that the bakery is fast.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because if the stadium is friendly, then the bakery volunteers, the stadium is friendly, when the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the playground is a doctor, when the playground is a doctor, we can conclude the bakery is fast, assuming the stadium is fast, we can say the bakery is fast, the stadium is fast.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo is an artist.\nThe sky is a doctor.\nThe city is a doctor.\nRules:\nWhen the city is a doctor, we can conclude the city is an artist.\nGiven that the sky is a doctor, it follows that the zoo is an artist.\nGiven that the city is a doctor, it follows that the city is an artist.\nAssuming the sky is a doctor, we can say the sky is a doctor.\nGiven that the dog is an artist, it follows that the sky is a doctor.\nWhen the zoo is an artist, we can conclude the dog is an artist.", "statement": "The zoo is an artist.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the zoo is an artist, it is evident that the dog is an artist, we deduce that the dog is an artist.\nSince we know that when the dog is an artist, we can conclude the sky is a doctor, it follows that the sky is a doctor.\nSince we know that assuming the sky is a doctor, we can say the sky is a doctor, it follows that the sky is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the sky is a doctor, it follows that the zoo is an artist, we can see that the zoo is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the zoo is an artist, the assertion is true\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium makes pizza.\nThe stadium enjoys music.\nThe stadium volunteers.\nRules:\nIf the stadium enjoys music, then stanford university makes pizza.\nIf the stadium volunteers, then stanford university makes pizza.\nAssuming the stadium swims well, we can say the stadium enjoys music.\nWhen the teacher makes pizza, we can conclude the stadium swims well.\nIf the fountain enjoys music, then stanford university swims well.\nIf stanford university swims well, then the teacher makes pizza.\nBased on the stadium enjoys music, it is evident that stanford university swims well.", "statement": "The stadium enjoys music.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the stadium enjoys music, it follows that stanford university swims well, we can see that stanford university swims well.\nBecause assuming stanford university swims well, we can say the teacher makes pizza, we can conclude that the teacher makes pizza.\nBecause based on the teacher makes pizza, it is evident that the stadium swims well, we can conclude that the stadium swims well.\nGiven that if the stadium swims well, then the stadium enjoys music, it is evident that the stadium enjoys music.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the stadium enjoys music, the assertion is true.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University plays games.\nSophie plays games.\nEmma plays games.\nRules:\nGiven that sophie plays games, it follows that emma is funny.\nBased on stanford university is an artist, it is evident that emma draws maps.\nWhen sophie plays games, we can conclude stanford university is an artist.\nIf emma plays games, then emma is funny.\nAssuming emma is funny, we can say sophie plays games.", "statement": "Stanford University draws maps.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if sophie plays games, then emma is funny, it follows that emma is funny.\nBecause when emma is funny, we can conclude sophie plays games, we can conclude that sophie plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when sophie plays games, we can conclude stanford university is an artist, we can see that stanford university is an artist.\nGiven that based on stanford university is an artist, it is evident that emma draws maps, it is evident that emma draws maps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when sophie plays games, we can conclude stanford university is an artist, based on stanford university is an artist, it is evident that emma draws maps, Stanford University draws maps\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah plays games.\nSarah is colorful.\nThe zoo is fast.\nRules:\nAssuming sarah plays games, we can say the zoo plays games.\nAssuming james is fast, we can say the zoo is fast.\nWhen the moon is colorful, we can conclude james is fast.\nBased on james becomes famous, it is evident that the moon is colorful.\nAssuming the moon is colorful, we can say the zoo plays games.\nBased on sarah is colorful, it is evident that james becomes famous.", "statement": "The zoo is fast.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming sarah is colorful, we can say james becomes famous, it is evident that james becomes famous.\nSince we know that given that james becomes famous, it follows that the moon is colorful, it follows that the moon is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the moon is colorful, it follows that james is fast, we can see that james is fast.\nApplying the logic of if james is fast, then the zoo is fast, we deduce that the zoo is fast.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sarah is colorful, based on sarah is colorful, it is evident that james becomes famous, based on james becomes famous, it is evident that the moon is colorful, when the moon is colorful, we can conclude james is fast, assuming james is fast, we can say the zoo is fast, the zoo is fast.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car is magical.\nThe car is magical.\nThe forest grows plants.\nRules:\nBased on the forest grows plants, it is evident that the bakery is magical.\nIf the bakery swims well, then the forest jumps high.\nAssuming the forest swims well, we can say the bakery swims well.\nWhen the car is magical, we can conclude the forest swims well.\nIf the bakery is magical, then the bakery is magical.", "statement": "The sky is magical.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the forest grows plants, we can say the bakery is magical, it is evident that the bakery is magical.\nBecause if the car is magical, then the forest swims well, we can conclude that the forest swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the bakery is magical, we can say the bakery is magical, we can see that the bakery is magical.\nApplying the logic of when the forest swims well, we can conclude the bakery swims well, we deduce that the bakery swims well.\nBecause if the bakery swims well, then the forest jumps high, we can conclude that the forest jumps high.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when the car is magical, we can conclude the forest swims well, assuming the forest swims well, we can say the bakery swims well, based on the forest grows plants, it is evident that the bakery is magical, if the bakery is magical, then the bakery is magical, the forest grows plants, the bakery is magical does not imply the sky is magical, the negation of the assertion\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo jumps high.\nThe cloud jumps high.\nThe playground collects stamps.\nRules:\nWhen the zoo jumps high, we can conclude the cloud is friendly.\nGiven that the artist is friendly, it follows that the cloud is friendly.\nWhen the artist collects stamps, we can conclude the playground collects stamps.\nGiven that the cloud carries bags, it follows that the artist collects stamps.\nGiven that the cloud is friendly, it follows that the cloud carries bags.\nBased on the cloud jumps high, it is evident that the artist is friendly.", "statement": "The playground collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Given that when the cloud jumps high, we can conclude the artist is friendly, it is evident that the artist is friendly.\nSince we know that given that the artist is friendly, it follows that the cloud is friendly, it follows that the cloud is friendly.\nApplying the logic of if the cloud is friendly, then the cloud carries bags, we deduce that the cloud carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the cloud carries bags, we can conclude the artist collects stamps, we can see that the artist collects stamps.\nGiven that given that the artist collects stamps, it follows that the playground collects stamps, it is evident that the playground collects stamps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the artist collects stamps, we can conclude the playground collects stamps, given that the cloud is friendly, it follows that the cloud carries bags, given that the cloud carries bags, it follows that the artist collects stamps, when the zoo jumps high, we can conclude the cloud is friendly, the zoo jumps high, the playground collects stamps\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud collects stamps.\nMia is quiet.\nThe sky collects stamps.\nRules:\nGiven that the sky collects stamps, it follows that the bakery collects stamps.\nIf the cloud collects stamps, then mia is a scientist.\nWhen the bakery collects stamps, we can conclude the sky is quiet.\nGiven that the sky collects stamps, it follows that the bakery collects stamps.\nWhen the sky enjoys music, we can conclude the sky collects stamps.\nWhen the sky collects stamps, we can conclude the sky enjoys music.", "statement": "The sky is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the sky collects stamps, it follows that the sky enjoys music, we can see that the sky enjoys music.\nApplying the logic of if the sky enjoys music, then the sky collects stamps, we deduce that the sky collects stamps.\nBecause given that the sky collects stamps, it follows that the bakery collects stamps, we can conclude that the bakery collects stamps.\nGiven that given that the bakery collects stamps, it follows that the sky is quiet, it is evident that the sky is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the sky collects stamps, it follows that the bakery collects stamps., When the bakery collects stamps, we can conclude the sky is quiet., The sky collects stamps., The sky is quiet.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia is colorful.\nMia writes stories.\nThe fountain is colorful.\nRules:\nIf the fountain is colorful, then the fountain is an engineer.\nWhen the pig runs marathons, we can conclude the pumpkin is an engineer.\nGiven that the fountain is colorful, it follows that the pumpkin is an engineer.\nAssuming the pumpkin is an engineer, we can say the pig runs marathons.\nBased on the fountain writes stories, it is evident that the pumpkin is an engineer.\nBased on the fountain is an engineer, it is evident that the fountain writes stories.", "statement": "The pumpkin is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the fountain is colorful, it follows that the fountain is an engineer, it follows that the fountain is an engineer.\nSince we know that assuming the fountain is an engineer, we can say the fountain writes stories, it follows that the fountain writes stories.\nBecause given that the fountain writes stories, it follows that the pumpkin is an engineer, we can conclude that the pumpkin is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of given that the pumpkin is an engineer, it follows that the pig runs marathons, we deduce that the pig runs marathons.\nGiven that when the pig runs marathons, we can conclude the pumpkin is an engineer, it is evident that the pumpkin is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the fountain is colorful, it follows that the pumpkin is an engineer, The pumpkin is an engineer\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is blue.\nSophie becomes famous.\nThe wall plays games.\nRules:\nWhen sophie becomes famous, we can conclude sophie plays games.\nBased on the teacher is blue, it is evident that the teacher plays games.\nIf the teacher is loud, then the sky is blue.\nGiven that the teacher is loud, it follows that the teacher is loud.\nIf sophie is blue, then the teacher is loud.\nWhen the teacher is blue, we can conclude the wall is loud.\nAssuming the teacher plays games, we can say sophie is blue.", "statement": "The sky is blue.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the teacher is blue, it follows that the teacher plays games, we deduce that the teacher plays games.\nSince we know that given that the teacher plays games, it follows that sophie is blue, it follows that sophie is blue.\nBecause when sophie is blue, we can conclude the teacher is loud, we can conclude that the teacher is loud.\nApplying the logic of given that the teacher is loud, it follows that the teacher is loud, we deduce that the teacher is loud.\nSince we know that assuming the teacher is loud, we can say the sky is blue, it follows that the sky is blue.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the teacher is loud, then the sky is blue, given that the teacher is loud, it follows that the teacher is loud, the sky is blue.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich runs quickly.\nThe zoo runs marathons.\nThe sandwich writes stories.\nRules:\nGiven that the zoo runs marathons, it follows that the zoo runs quickly.\nBased on the sandwich runs quickly, it is evident that the zoo runs quickly.\nGiven that the sandwich runs quickly, it follows that the zoo paints pictures.\nIf the zoo runs marathons, then the sandwich paints pictures.\nBased on jack paints pictures, it is evident that jack paints pictures.\nBased on the zoo writes stories, it is evident that jack paints pictures.\nIf the sandwich writes stories, then the zoo writes stories.\nAssuming jack paints pictures, we can say the book paints pictures.", "statement": "The book runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the zoo runs marathons, it is evident that the zoo runs quickly, it follows that the zoo runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of if the sandwich runs quickly, then the zoo paints pictures, we deduce that the zoo paints pictures.\nGiven that based on the zoo runs marathons, it is evident that the sandwich paints pictures, it is evident that the sandwich paints pictures.\nSince we know that assuming the sandwich writes stories, we can say the zoo writes stories, it follows that the zoo writes stories.\nSince we know that if the zoo writes stories, then jack paints pictures, it follows that jack paints pictures.\nSince we know that assuming jack paints pictures, we can say jack paints pictures, it follows that jack paints pictures.\nSince we know that if jack paints pictures, then the book paints pictures, it follows that the book paints pictures.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the zoo writes stories, it is evident that jack paints pictures. Assuming jack paints pictures, we can say the book paints pictures.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop explores cities.\nThe shop carries bags.\nThe shop takes pictures.\nRules:\nIf the shop explores cities, then ethan carries bags.\nWhen the globe carries bags, we can conclude ethan explores cities.\nIf the shop takes pictures, then the globe carries bags.\nBased on the shop explores cities, it is evident that the globe explores cities.\nAssuming the shop enjoys music, we can say the bridge takes pictures.\nIf ethan explores cities, then the shop enjoys music.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the shop explores cities, it follows that ethan carries bags, it follows that ethan carries bags.\nGiven that assuming the shop takes pictures, we can say the globe carries bags, it is evident that the globe carries bags.\nBecause when the shop explores cities, we can conclude the globe explores cities, we can conclude that the globe explores cities.\nApplying the logic of given that the globe carries bags, it follows that ethan explores cities, we deduce that ethan explores cities.\nGiven that given that ethan explores cities, it follows that the shop enjoys music, it is evident that the shop enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the shop enjoys music, we can conclude the bridge takes pictures, we can see that the bridge takes pictures.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"The provided facts and rules do not contain any information related to 'Chuan is handsome'. There is no logical link between the facts/rules provided and the assertion.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef collects stamps.\nThe chef dances gracefully.\nThe globe is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf the chef collects stamps, then the chef is fluffy.\nGiven that the phone collects stamps, it follows that the phone dances gracefully.\nGiven that the phone dances gracefully, it follows that the phone collects stamps.\nBased on the artist collects stamps, it is evident that the phone dances gracefully.\nIf the chef is fluffy, then the artist collects stamps.", "statement": "The phone dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the chef collects stamps, it is evident that the chef is fluffy, we can see that the chef is fluffy.\nGiven that assuming the chef is fluffy, we can say the artist collects stamps, it is evident that the artist collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the artist collects stamps, it is evident that the phone dances gracefully, we can see that the phone dances gracefully.\nGiven that given that the phone dances gracefully, it follows that the phone collects stamps, it is evident that the phone collects stamps.\nSince we know that assuming the phone collects stamps, we can say the phone dances gracefully, it follows that the phone dances gracefully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the artist collects stamps, it is evident that the phone dances gracefully, the phone dances gracefully.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city collects stamps.\nJames collects stamps.\nThe mountain does yoga.\nRules:\nIf the mountain does yoga, then james is happy.\nBased on the mountain is happy, it is evident that james makes pizza.\nWhen lucy does yoga, we can conclude the mountain is happy.\nIf the city makes pizza, then the city makes pizza.\nWhen the city collects stamps, we can conclude lucy does yoga.\nGiven that the mountain is happy, it follows that lucy does yoga.", "statement": "The city makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Because based on the mountain does yoga, it is evident that james is happy, we can conclude that james is happy.\nApplying the logic of when the city collects stamps, we can conclude lucy does yoga, we deduce that lucy does yoga.\nApplying the logic of given that lucy does yoga, it follows that the mountain is happy, we deduce that the mountain is happy.\nApplying the logic of given that the mountain is happy, it follows that james makes pizza, we deduce that james makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because when the city collects stamps, we can conclude lucy does yoga, when lucy does yoga, we can conclude the mountain is happy, given that the mountain is happy, it follows that lucy does yoga, the city makes pizza.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef creates art.\nChuan sings beautifully.\nThe playground is tall.\nRules:\nWhen chuan sings beautifully, we can conclude chuan creates art.\nWhen chuan sings beautifully, we can conclude chuan creates art.\nIf chuan sings beautifully, then the mountain sings beautifully.\nAssuming chuan sings beautifully, we can say chuan is tall.\nIf chuan is tall, then the mountain runs quickly.\nBased on chuan sings beautifully, it is evident that chuan is tall.\nIf chuan runs quickly, then chuan sings beautifully.\nBased on chuan creates art, it is evident that chuan runs quickly.", "statement": "The mountain runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on chuan sings beautifully, it is evident that chuan creates art, we can see that chuan creates art.\nSince we know that based on chuan creates art, it is evident that chuan runs quickly, it follows that chuan runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of based on chuan runs quickly, it is evident that chuan sings beautifully, we deduce that chuan sings beautifully.\nSince we know that if chuan sings beautifully, then chuan is tall, it follows that chuan is tall.\nBecause given that chuan is tall, it follows that the mountain runs quickly, we can conclude that the mountain runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Chuan sings beautifully, we can say Chuan is tall, If Chuan is tall, then the mountain runs quickly, The mountain runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician fishes in lakes.\nThe plane carries bags.\nThe musician fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nGiven that the musician fishes in lakes, it follows that the pig carries bags.\nIf emma is loud, then the musician carries bags.\nWhen the musician fishes in lakes, we can conclude emma is loud.\nWhen the musician plays instruments, we can conclude emma is loud.\nAssuming the plane fishes in lakes, we can say the musician fishes in lakes.\nBased on the pig carries bags, it is evident that the plane fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The musician carries bags.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the musician fishes in lakes, we can say the pig carries bags, it is evident that the pig carries bags.\nGiven that if the pig carries bags, then the plane fishes in lakes, it is evident that the plane fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that given that the plane fishes in lakes, it follows that the musician fishes in lakes, it follows that the musician fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that assuming the musician fishes in lakes, we can say emma is loud, it follows that emma is loud.\nGiven that assuming emma is loud, we can say the musician carries bags, it is evident that the musician carries bags.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The musician fishes in lakes, When the musician fishes in lakes, we can conclude emma is loud, If emma is loud, then the musician carries bags, The musician carries bags.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan solves puzzles.\nThe bridge becomes famous.\nThe bridge becomes famous.\nRules:\nGiven that the bridge becomes famous, it follows that the ocean solves puzzles.\nAssuming chuan solves puzzles, we can say the ocean solves puzzles.\nGiven that the bridge becomes famous, it follows that the ocean swims well.\nBased on chuan becomes famous, it is evident that the bridge becomes famous.\nAssuming the bridge becomes famous, we can say chuan becomes famous.\nAssuming chuan teaches math, we can say the bridge becomes famous.\nIf the bridge becomes famous, then chuan teaches math.", "statement": "The bridge becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the bridge becomes famous, it follows that chuan teaches math, it follows that chuan teaches math.\nGiven that if chuan teaches math, then the bridge becomes famous, it is evident that the bridge becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the bridge becomes famous, it follows that chuan becomes famous, we can see that chuan becomes famous.\nGiven that based on chuan becomes famous, it is evident that the bridge becomes famous, it is evident that the bridge becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the bridge becomes famous, the bridge becomes famous, the assertion is confirmed.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia is magical.\nEmma is an artist.\nThe city is magical.\nRules:\nGiven that mia is magical, it follows that emma hikes mountains.\nBased on mia is magical, it is evident that mia hikes mountains.\nAssuming the city is an artist, we can say mia is magical.\nBased on mia is magical, it is evident that the city is an artist.\nBased on emma is an artist, it is evident that emma hikes mountains.", "statement": "Emma is magical.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if mia is magical, then emma hikes mountains, we deduce that emma hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if mia is magical, then the city is an artist, we can see that the city is an artist.\nApplying the logic of based on the city is an artist, it is evident that mia is magical, we deduce that mia is magical.\nSince we know that if mia is magical, then mia hikes mountains, it follows that mia hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Mia is magical, and based on emma is an artist, it is evident that emma hikes mountains, Emma hikes mountains, but there is no rule connecting Emma being an artist or hiking mountains to Emma being magical directly, resulting in the negation of the assertion Emma is magical\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun travels far.\nMia paints pictures.\nThe dog becomes famous.\nRules:\nIf the sun travels far, then mia travels far.\nIf the dog becomes famous, then mia travels far.\nWhen the dog becomes famous, we can conclude the bridge is an artist.\nGiven that mia paints pictures, it follows that the dog becomes famous.\nAssuming mia becomes famous, we can say mia paints pictures.\nAssuming the dog becomes famous, we can say mia becomes famous.", "statement": "Mia travels far.", "reasoning": "Because given that the dog becomes famous, it follows that mia becomes famous, we can conclude that mia becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that mia becomes famous, it follows that mia paints pictures, we can see that mia paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of based on mia paints pictures, it is evident that the dog becomes famous, we deduce that the dog becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of when the dog becomes famous, we can conclude mia travels far, we deduce that mia travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The dog becomes famous, If the dog becomes famous, then mia travels far, Mia travels far.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi reads books.\nJames is tall.\nLucy is tall.\nRules:\nGiven that lucy is tall, it follows that the house reads books.\nIf lucy is tall, then lucy dances gracefully.\nAssuming lucy is tall, we can say jianzhi reads books.\nWhen lucy dances gracefully, we can conclude the house reads books.\nBased on jianzhi reads books, it is evident that jianzhi reads books.\nIf jianzhi reads books, then lucy is tall.\nIf james is tall, then jianzhi reads books.", "statement": "Lucy reads books.", "reasoning": "Given that if lucy is tall, then the house reads books, it is evident that the house reads books.\nApplying the logic of assuming lucy is tall, we can say lucy dances gracefully, we deduce that lucy dances gracefully.\nBecause if lucy dances gracefully, then the house reads books, we can conclude that the house reads books.\nApplying the logic of if james is tall, then jianzhi reads books, we deduce that jianzhi reads books.\nBecause assuming jianzhi reads books, we can say jianzhi reads books, we can conclude that jianzhi reads books.\nGiven that assuming jianzhi reads books, we can say lucy is tall, it is evident that lucy is tall.\nBecause given that lucy is tall, it follows that jianzhi reads books, we can conclude that jianzhi reads books.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if james is tall, then jianzhi reads books, Based on jianzhi reads books, it is evident that jianzhi reads books, If jianzhi reads books, then lucy is tall, Lucy being tall has no direct rule stating she reads books, Lucy reads books is not a derived conclusion\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo travels far.\nThe zoo fishes in lakes.\nThe city is blue.\nRules:\nAssuming the zoo travels far, we can say the city fishes in lakes.\nIf ava travels far, then the festival rides bikes.\nAssuming the city is blue, we can say ava travels far.\nGiven that the festival is blue, it follows that the city is blue.\nBased on the city fishes in lakes, it is evident that the festival is blue.\nBased on ava travels far, it is evident that ava travels far.", "statement": "The festival rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Given that if the zoo travels far, then the city fishes in lakes, it is evident that the city fishes in lakes.\nGiven that when the city fishes in lakes, we can conclude the festival is blue, it is evident that the festival is blue.\nBecause given that the festival is blue, it follows that the city is blue, we can conclude that the city is blue.\nGiven that if the city is blue, then ava travels far, it is evident that ava travels far.\nBecause assuming ava travels far, we can say the festival rides bikes, we can conclude that the festival rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the city is blue, we can say ava travels far, If ava travels far, then the festival rides bikes, The festival rides bikes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe playground is an engineer.\nThe globe plays games.\nMia plays games.\nRules:\nWhen the playground is an engineer, we can conclude mia is an engineer.\nGiven that the playground is an engineer, it follows that the globe plays games.\nGiven that mia is an engineer, it follows that mia is an engineer.\nBased on the playground is an engineer, it is evident that the globe is an engineer.\nAssuming the river plays games, we can say mia is an engineer.\nWhen mia is an engineer, we can conclude the river plays games.\nGiven that the globe plays games, it follows that mia is an engineer.", "statement": "Mia is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the playground is an engineer, we can conclude the globe plays games, we can see that the globe plays games.\nBecause when the globe plays games, we can conclude mia is an engineer, we can conclude that mia is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of given that mia is an engineer, it follows that the river plays games, we deduce that the river plays games.\nSince we know that if the river plays games, then mia is an engineer, it follows that mia is an engineer.\nGiven that when mia is an engineer, we can conclude mia is an engineer, it is evident that mia is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the globe plays games, it follows that mia is an engineer, Mia is an engineer.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo takes pictures.\nThe bakery takes pictures.\nThe city creates art.\nRules:\nAssuming the bakery takes pictures, we can say the city is blue.\nWhen the city creates art, we can conclude the city is blue.\nIf the zoo takes pictures, then the bakery creates art.\nIf the city sings beautifully, then the city creates art.\nIf the bridge sings beautifully, then the city sings beautifully.\nIf the bridge takes pictures, then the bridge sings beautifully.\nIf the city creates art, then the bridge takes pictures.", "statement": "The city creates art.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the city creates art, we can say the bridge takes pictures, it follows that the bridge takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of given that the bridge takes pictures, it follows that the bridge sings beautifully, we deduce that the bridge sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of assuming the bridge sings beautifully, we can say the city sings beautifully, we deduce that the city sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of when the city sings beautifully, we can conclude the city creates art, we deduce that the city creates art.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the city creates art, we can conclude the city is blue, the zoo takes pictures, then the bakery creates art, the bridge takes pictures, then the bridge sings beautifully, if the bridge sings beautifully, then the city sings beautifully, if the city sings beautifully, then the city creates art, the city is blue, the city creates art\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack is friendly.\nJack fishes in lakes.\nJack is friendly.\nRules:\nAssuming jack is friendly, we can say jack is friendly.\nWhen jack is friendly, we can conclude the cloud makes pizza.\nBased on the cloud is a doctor, it is evident that jack is friendly.\nIf the chef makes pizza, then the teacher makes pizza.\nGiven that the teacher makes pizza, it follows that the cloud is a doctor.\nIf jack fishes in lakes, then the chef makes pizza.", "statement": "The cloud makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that jack fishes in lakes, it follows that the chef makes pizza, it follows that the chef makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the chef makes pizza, we can say the teacher makes pizza, we can see that the teacher makes pizza.\nSince we know that assuming the teacher makes pizza, we can say the cloud is a doctor, it follows that the cloud is a doctor.\nGiven that when the cloud is a doctor, we can conclude jack is friendly, it is evident that jack is friendly.\nSince we know that given that jack is friendly, it follows that the cloud makes pizza, it follows that the cloud makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If jack fishes in lakes, then the chef makes pizza., If the chef makes pizza, then the teacher makes pizza., Given that the teacher makes pizza, it follows that the cloud is a doctor., When jack is friendly, we can conclude the cloud makes pizza., The cloud makes pizza.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car reads books.\nThe pig reads books.\nThe pig carries bags.\nRules:\nWhen the pig reads books, we can conclude the pig travels far.\nWhen the car is interesting, we can conclude the car carries bags.\nAssuming the teacher travels far, we can say the pig travels far.\nAssuming the car reads books, we can say the car is interesting.\nBased on the teacher reads books, it is evident that the car reads books.\nBased on the pig carries bags, it is evident that the teacher reads books.", "statement": "The car carries bags.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the pig carries bags, we can conclude the teacher reads books, it follows that the teacher reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the teacher reads books, we can say the car reads books, we can see that the car reads books.\nApplying the logic of based on the car reads books, it is evident that the car is interesting, we deduce that the car is interesting.\nSince we know that given that the car is interesting, it follows that the car carries bags, it follows that the car carries bags.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the car reads books, we can say the car is interesting, when the car is interesting, we can conclude the car carries bags, the car reads books, the car carries bags\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy is happy.\nThe festival paints pictures.\nLucy is an artist.\nRules:\nBased on lucy is an artist, it is evident that the festival plays games.\nWhen ava plays games, we can conclude the festival plays games.\nAssuming the pumpkin plays games, we can say ava plays games.\nAssuming the pumpkin paints pictures, we can say the pumpkin plays games.\nGiven that the festival plays games, it follows that the pumpkin paints pictures.", "statement": "The festival plays games.", "reasoning": "Given that if lucy is an artist, then the festival plays games, it is evident that the festival plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the festival plays games, it follows that the pumpkin paints pictures, we can see that the pumpkin paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of based on the pumpkin paints pictures, it is evident that the pumpkin plays games, we deduce that the pumpkin plays games.\nSince we know that given that the pumpkin plays games, it follows that ava plays games, it follows that ava plays games.\nBecause if ava plays games, then the festival plays games, we can conclude that the festival plays games.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because based on lucy is an artist, it is evident that the festival plays games, the festival plays games\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva enjoys music.\nThe river travels far.\nAlice is an artist.\nRules:\nBased on the river travels far, it is evident that the river enjoys music.\nAssuming the river travels far, we can say ava travels far.\nBased on the river enjoys music, it is evident that the river enjoys music.\nBased on ava enjoys music, it is evident that the river travels far.\nAssuming ava enjoys music, we can say the river enjoys music.\nGiven that ava enjoys music, it follows that ava enjoys music.\nBased on the river enjoys music, it is evident that the cloud travels far.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the river travels far, we can conclude the river enjoys music, we deduce that the river enjoys music.\nSince we know that assuming the river travels far, we can say ava travels far, it follows that ava travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava enjoys music, it follows that the river travels far, we can see that the river travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava enjoys music, it follows that ava enjoys music, we can see that ava enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when ava enjoys music, we can conclude the river enjoys music, we can see that the river enjoys music.\nApplying the logic of assuming the river enjoys music, we can say the river enjoys music, we deduce that the river enjoys music.\nApplying the logic of when the river enjoys music, we can conclude the cloud travels far, we deduce that the cloud travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"The assertion 'Chuan is handsome' is not addressed by any facts or rules provided. Therefore, there is not enough information to conclude about it.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop teaches math.\nThe house fishes in lakes.\nThe pumpkin is magical.\nRules:\nAssuming the house fishes in lakes, we can say the shop is quiet.\nAssuming the pumpkin is quiet, we can say the plane is quiet.\nIf the house is quiet, then the pumpkin fishes in lakes.\nBased on the pumpkin fishes in lakes, it is evident that the pumpkin is quiet.\nBased on the house fishes in lakes, it is evident that the house fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the shop teaches math, we can say the pumpkin fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The house is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the house fishes in lakes, we can say the shop is quiet, we deduce that the shop is quiet.\nSince we know that if the house fishes in lakes, then the house fishes in lakes, it follows that the house fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of if the shop teaches math, then the pumpkin fishes in lakes, we deduce that the pumpkin fishes in lakes.\nGiven that given that the pumpkin fishes in lakes, it follows that the pumpkin is quiet, it is evident that the pumpkin is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the pumpkin is quiet, then the plane is quiet, we can see that the plane is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the house fishes in lakes, it is evident that the house fishes in lakes, the house fishes in lakes, assuming the house fishes in lakes, we can say the shop is quiet, the shop teaches math, assuming the shop teaches math, we can say the pumpkin fishes in lakes, based on the pumpkin fishes in lakes, it is evident that the pumpkin is quiet, if the house is quiet, then the pumpkin fishes in lakes, the pumpkin fishes in lakes, the pumpkin is quiet, the house is not quiet, the house is not quiet, the house is not quiet, the house is not quiet, the house is not quiet, the house is not quiet, the house is quiet, the house is quiet\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop is a scientist.\nThe pumpkin takes pictures.\nThe pumpkin is an artist.\nRules:\nWhen the shop is a scientist, we can conclude the house takes pictures.\nGiven that the pumpkin is an artist, it follows that the shop takes pictures.\nIf the house takes pictures, then the pumpkin is an artist.\nWhen the city is a scientist, we can conclude the house takes pictures.\nGiven that the pumpkin is a scientist, it follows that the city is a scientist.\nIf the shop takes pictures, then the pumpkin is a scientist.\nAssuming the shop takes pictures, we can say the shop rides bikes.", "statement": "The pumpkin is an artist.", "reasoning": "Given that if the pumpkin is an artist, then the shop takes pictures, it is evident that the shop takes pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the shop takes pictures, we can say the pumpkin is a scientist, we can see that the pumpkin is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the pumpkin is a scientist, then the city is a scientist, we can see that the city is a scientist.\nGiven that assuming the city is a scientist, we can say the house takes pictures, it is evident that the house takes pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the house takes pictures, we can conclude the pumpkin is an artist, we can see that the pumpkin is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the pumpkin is an artist, the pumpkin is an artist\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book cooks well.\nThe chef grows plants.\nThe pumpkin cooks well.\nRules:\nWhen the book cooks well, we can conclude the pumpkin grows plants.\nGiven that the book grows plants, it follows that the chef grows plants.\nBased on mia grows plants, it is evident that mia creates art.\nIf the chef grows plants, then mia grows plants.\nWhen the pumpkin grows plants, we can conclude the book grows plants.\nAssuming mia creates art, we can say the pumpkin grows plants.", "statement": "The chef grows plants.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the chef grows plants, we can say mia grows plants, it follows that mia grows plants.\nBecause based on mia grows plants, it is evident that mia creates art, we can conclude that mia creates art.\nApplying the logic of if mia creates art, then the pumpkin grows plants, we deduce that the pumpkin grows plants.\nApplying the logic of assuming the pumpkin grows plants, we can say the book grows plants, we deduce that the book grows plants.\nGiven that assuming the book grows plants, we can say the chef grows plants, it is evident that the chef grows plants.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the book cooks well, we can conclude the pumpkin grows plants. When the pumpkin grows plants, we can conclude the book grows plants. Given that the book grows plants, it follows that the chef grows plants, The chef grows plants.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain jumps high.\nThe mountain jumps high.\nThe mountain does yoga.\nRules:\nWhen the mountain does yoga, we can conclude the zoo jumps high.\nIf the mountain does yoga, then the zoo is magical.\nGiven that the mountain does yoga, it follows that the mountain does yoga.\nBased on the zoo jumps high, it is evident that the mountain does yoga.\nIf the zoo jumps high, then the book is magical.\nWhen the zoo jumps high, we can conclude the zoo jumps high.", "statement": "The zoo is magical.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the mountain does yoga, we can say the zoo jumps high, it is evident that the zoo jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the zoo jumps high, then the zoo jumps high, we can see that the zoo jumps high.\nApplying the logic of given that the zoo jumps high, it follows that the mountain does yoga, we deduce that the mountain does yoga.\nBecause given that the mountain does yoga, it follows that the mountain does yoga, we can conclude that the mountain does yoga.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the mountain does yoga, then the zoo is magical, we can see that the zoo is magical.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the mountain does yoga, then the zoo is magical, The mountain does yoga, it follows that The zoo is magical\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is an artist.\nThe sky is happy.\nThe globe is friendly.\nRules:\nGiven that the sky is an artist, it follows that the sky is an artist.\nWhen the sky is happy, we can conclude the globe is magical.\nBased on the fountain is an artist, it is evident that the globe is friendly.\nWhen the fountain is magical, we can conclude the globe is an artist.\nGiven that the sky is an artist, it follows that the globe is magical.\nBased on the globe is friendly, it is evident that the fountain is magical.\nWhen the sky is happy, we can conclude the fountain is an artist.", "statement": "The fountain is happy.", "reasoning": "Given that when the sky is an artist, we can conclude the sky is an artist, it is evident that the sky is an artist.\nApplying the logic of assuming the sky is happy, we can say the globe is magical, we deduce that the globe is magical.\nSince we know that when the sky is happy, we can conclude the fountain is an artist, it follows that the fountain is an artist.\nApplying the logic of if the fountain is an artist, then the globe is friendly, we deduce that the globe is friendly.\nBecause based on the globe is friendly, it is evident that the fountain is magical, we can conclude that the fountain is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the fountain is magical, then the globe is an artist, we can see that the globe is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the sky is happy, we can conclude the fountain is an artist, the globe is friendly, it is evident that the fountain is magical, the fountain is magical, we can conclude the globe is an artist, the sky is an artist, it follows that the globe is magical, the conclusion does not lead to the fountain being happy, negation of the assertion. There is no provided rule or complete logical path to conclude that the fountain is happy.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah fishes in lakes.\nThe mountain is happy.\nThe mountain explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that the mountain explores cities.\nAssuming the mountain is happy, we can say the chef fishes in lakes.\nGiven that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that sarah fishes in lakes.\nIf sarah fishes in lakes, then sarah fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the mountain fishes in lakes, it follows that sarah is happy.\nBased on the mountain is happy, it is evident that the mountain fishes in lakes.\nIf sarah fishes in lakes, then the mountain is happy.\nBased on the chef fishes in lakes, it is evident that the mountain is happy.", "statement": "Sarah explores cities.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when sarah fishes in lakes, we can conclude the mountain explores cities, we can see that the mountain explores cities.\nSince we know that assuming the mountain is happy, we can say the chef fishes in lakes, it follows that the chef fishes in lakes.\nGiven that when sarah fishes in lakes, we can conclude sarah fishes in lakes, it is evident that sarah fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that if sarah fishes in lakes, then the mountain is happy, it follows that the mountain is happy.\nSince we know that given that the chef fishes in lakes, it follows that the mountain is happy, it follows that the mountain is happy.\nSince we know that if the mountain is happy, then the mountain fishes in lakes, it follows that the mountain fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the mountain fishes in lakes, it is evident that sarah is happy, we can see that sarah is happy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that sarah fishes in lakes, it follows that sarah fishes in lakes, if sarah fishes in lakes, then the mountain explores cities, sarah explores cities\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is happy.\nThe sun is happy.\nThe city is happy.\nRules:\nIf the city is happy, then the house cooks well.\nBased on the sun is happy, it is evident that the house cooks well.\nWhen the sun is happy, we can conclude the sun fishes in lakes.\nWhen the house cooks well, we can conclude the pumpkin is fast.\nBased on the house cooks well, it is evident that the city is happy.\nGiven that the house is fast, it follows that the house cooks well.\nBased on the city is fast, it is evident that the house cooks well.\nBased on the sun fishes in lakes, it is evident that the city is fast.", "statement": "The house is fast.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the city is happy, it is evident that the house cooks well, we can see that the house cooks well.\nGiven that if the sun is happy, then the house cooks well, it is evident that the house cooks well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the sun is happy, then the sun fishes in lakes, we can see that the sun fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the house cooks well, then the pumpkin is fast, we can see that the pumpkin is fast.\nGiven that when the sun fishes in lakes, we can conclude the city is fast, it is evident that the city is fast.\nBecause when the city is fast, we can conclude the house cooks well, we can conclude that the house cooks well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the house cooks well, it is evident that the city is happy, we can see that the city is happy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the sun is happy, we can conclude the sun fishes in lakes., Based on the sun fishes in lakes, it is evident that the city is fast., Based on the city is fast, it is evident that the house cooks well., Given that the house is fast, it follows that the house cooks well., The house cooks well, The house is fast\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy goes to the hospital.\nLucy runs marathons.\nLucy goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf lucy goes to the hospital, then sophie goes to the hospital.\nIf emma goes to the hospital, then ethan is tall.\nBased on ethan is tall, it is evident that lucy is tall.\nAssuming lucy goes to the hospital, we can say emma goes to the hospital.\nAssuming emma is tall, we can say lucy goes to the hospital.\nAssuming sophie goes to the hospital, we can say emma is tall.", "statement": "Ethan is tall.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if lucy goes to the hospital, then sophie goes to the hospital, we deduce that sophie goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that assuming sophie goes to the hospital, we can say emma is tall, it follows that emma is tall.\nSince we know that assuming emma is tall, we can say lucy goes to the hospital, it follows that lucy goes to the hospital.\nBecause assuming lucy goes to the hospital, we can say emma goes to the hospital, we can conclude that emma goes to the hospital.\nApplying the logic of when emma goes to the hospital, we can conclude ethan is tall, we deduce that ethan is tall.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming lucy goes to the hospital, we can say emma goes to the hospital., If emma goes to the hospital, then ethan is tall., Ethan is tall.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma rides bikes.\nThe globe is fast.\nEmma rides bikes.\nRules:\nBased on the globe is fast, it is evident that emma is quiet.\nGiven that the globe is fast, it follows that the ocean cooks well.\nAssuming the ocean rides bikes, we can say the globe is quiet.\nGiven that sarah is quiet, it follows that the ocean rides bikes.\nGiven that the globe is quiet, it follows that sarah is quiet.\nBased on emma rides bikes, it is evident that the globe is quiet.\nBased on the ocean rides bikes, it is evident that sarah is quiet.", "statement": "The globe is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that emma rides bikes, it follows that the globe is quiet, we can see that the globe is quiet.\nApplying the logic of when the globe is quiet, we can conclude sarah is quiet, we deduce that sarah is quiet.\nGiven that given that sarah is quiet, it follows that the ocean rides bikes, it is evident that the ocean rides bikes.\nGiven that assuming the ocean rides bikes, we can say the globe is quiet, it is evident that the globe is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on emma rides bikes, it is evident that the globe is quiet, The globe is quiet.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain is an engineer.\nThe house dances gracefully.\nThe mountain dances gracefully.\nRules:\nGiven that the mountain is an engineer, it follows that ethan becomes famous.\nIf the mountain is an engineer, then the house dances gracefully.\nGiven that the house is fast, it follows that mike dances gracefully.\nBased on the house is fast, it is evident that mike dances gracefully.\nWhen ethan becomes famous, we can conclude mike is fast.\nGiven that the mountain dances gracefully, it follows that the house is fast.\nWhen mike dances gracefully, we can conclude the house is fast.", "statement": "The house is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Given that when the mountain is an engineer, we can conclude ethan becomes famous, it is evident that ethan becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of assuming the mountain is an engineer, we can say the house dances gracefully, we deduce that the house dances gracefully.\nSince we know that when ethan becomes famous, we can conclude mike is fast, it follows that mike is fast.\nGiven that when the mountain dances gracefully, we can conclude the house is fast, it is evident that the house is fast.\nGiven that if the house is fast, then mike dances gracefully, it is evident that mike dances gracefully.\nSince we know that based on mike dances gracefully, it is evident that the house is fast, it follows that the house is fast.\nSince we know that assuming the house is fast, we can say mike dances gracefully, it follows that mike dances gracefully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules that imply the house is an engineer either directly or indirectly given the facts.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef is tall.\nThe chef is tall.\nSarah cooks well.\nRules:\nIf sarah cooks well, then the sky does yoga.\nWhen the sky is tall, we can conclude the sky does yoga.\nIf the phone is tall, then the sky is tall.\nAssuming sarah is tall, we can say the phone is tall.\nBased on sarah is tall, it is evident that sarah is tall.\nWhen sarah cooks well, we can conclude sarah is tall.", "statement": "The sky is tall.", "reasoning": "Because given that sarah cooks well, it follows that sarah is tall, we can conclude that sarah is tall.\nGiven that assuming sarah is tall, we can say sarah is tall, it is evident that sarah is tall.\nBecause given that sarah is tall, it follows that the phone is tall, we can conclude that the phone is tall.\nGiven that if the phone is tall, then the sky is tall, it is evident that the sky is tall.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Sarah cooks well, then the sky does yoga, Sarah cooks well, we can conclude sarah is tall, assuming sarah is tall, we can say the phone is tall, if the phone is tall, then the sky is tall, the sky is tall.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train collects stamps.\nThe train collects stamps.\nThe cloud does yoga.\nRules:\nWhen the cloud does yoga, we can conclude the garden solves puzzles.\nWhen the cloud does yoga, we can conclude the book solves puzzles.\nBased on the cloud solves puzzles, it is evident that the cloud does yoga.\nWhen the cloud does yoga, we can conclude the garden solves puzzles.\nWhen the cloud solves puzzles, we can conclude the cloud does yoga.\nGiven that the garden solves puzzles, it follows that the cloud solves puzzles.", "statement": "The garden is loud.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the cloud does yoga, it is evident that the garden solves puzzles, it follows that the garden solves puzzles.\nBecause based on the garden solves puzzles, it is evident that the cloud solves puzzles, we can conclude that the cloud solves puzzles.\nSince we know that assuming the cloud solves puzzles, we can say the cloud does yoga, it follows that the cloud does yoga.\nGiven that given that the cloud does yoga, it follows that the book solves puzzles, it is evident that the book solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"There are no rules that conclude the garden is loud from the facts given.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah is an engineer.\nThe sun is an engineer.\nSarah is blue.\nRules:\nIf the sun is an engineer, then mike is an engineer.\nGiven that sarah is blue, it follows that the sun is an engineer.\nGiven that mike carries bags, it follows that sarah is blue.\nIf sarah is an engineer, then mike is blue.\nIf the dog is an engineer, then mike carries bags.\nAssuming mike is an engineer, we can say the dog is an engineer.", "statement": "The sun is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the sun is an engineer, it is evident that mike is an engineer, we can see that mike is an engineer.\nGiven that based on mike is an engineer, it is evident that the dog is an engineer, it is evident that the dog is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of when the dog is an engineer, we can conclude mike carries bags, we deduce that mike carries bags.\nGiven that based on mike carries bags, it is evident that sarah is blue, it is evident that sarah is blue.\nApplying the logic of given that sarah is blue, it follows that the sun is an engineer, we deduce that the sun is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that sarah is blue, it follows that the sun is an engineer, the sun is an engineer.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud hikes mountains.\nThe cloud travels far.\nThe cloud sings beautifully.\nRules:\nGiven that the cloud travels far, it follows that the bakery travels far.\nGiven that the cloud hikes mountains, it follows that the stadium hikes mountains.\nWhen the cloud travels far, we can conclude the cloud hikes mountains.\nAssuming the cloud travels far, we can say the stadium hikes mountains.\nGiven that the bakery plays football, it follows that the phone plays football.\nWhen the phone hikes mountains, we can conclude the bakery plays football.\nWhen the cloud hikes mountains, we can conclude the phone hikes mountains.", "statement": "The cloud plays football.", "reasoning": "Because if the cloud travels far, then the bakery travels far, we can conclude that the bakery travels far.\nSince we know that if the cloud hikes mountains, then the stadium hikes mountains, it follows that the stadium hikes mountains.\nBecause given that the cloud travels far, it follows that the cloud hikes mountains, we can conclude that the cloud hikes mountains.\nSince we know that given that the cloud hikes mountains, it follows that the phone hikes mountains, it follows that the phone hikes mountains.\nGiven that when the phone hikes mountains, we can conclude the bakery plays football, it is evident that the bakery plays football.\nBecause when the bakery plays football, we can conclude the phone plays football, we can conclude that the phone plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there is no rule that directly or indirectly implies that the cloud plays football from the given facts, the negation of the assertion holds.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah does yoga.\nSarah is happy.\nThe moon does yoga.\nRules:\nGiven that the moon does yoga, it follows that the moon is happy.\nAssuming the playground makes pizza, we can say the playground makes pizza.\nGiven that the moon is happy, it follows that the playground makes pizza.\nGiven that the playground does yoga, it follows that the moon is happy.\nWhen the moon is happy, we can conclude the playground does yoga.", "statement": "The playground makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the moon does yoga, it is evident that the moon is happy, it follows that the moon is happy.\nSince we know that if the moon is happy, then the playground does yoga, it follows that the playground does yoga.\nBecause based on the playground does yoga, it is evident that the moon is happy, we can conclude that the moon is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the moon is happy, we can say the playground makes pizza, we can see that the playground makes pizza.\nSince we know that if the playground makes pizza, then the playground makes pizza, it follows that the playground makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Given that the moon does yoga, it follows that the moon is happy., Given that the moon is happy, it follows that the playground makes pizza., The playground makes pizza.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician creates art.\nThe musician writes stories.\nThe musician creates art.\nRules:\nAssuming the musician creates art, we can say the chef teaches math.\nGiven that the musician creates art, it follows that the musician teaches math.\nWhen the musician writes stories, we can conclude the musician teaches math.\nIf the river teaches math, then the musician creates art.\nWhen the river creates art, we can conclude the chef travels far.\nGiven that the chef travels far, it follows that the river creates art.\nWhen the chef travels far, we can conclude the chef travels far.\nWhen the musician writes stories, we can conclude the chef travels far.", "statement": "The chef travels far.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the musician writes stories, then the chef travels far, we can see that the chef travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the chef travels far, it is evident that the chef travels far, we can see that the chef travels far.\nSince we know that when the chef travels far, we can conclude the river creates art, it follows that the river creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the river creates art, we can conclude the chef travels far, we can see that the chef travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the musician writes stories, we can conclude the chef travels far.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan runs quickly.\nAva runs quickly.\nAlice runs quickly.\nRules:\nBased on alice runs quickly, it is evident that the cat paints pictures.\nAssuming the cat volunteers, we can say chuan volunteers.\nAssuming ava volunteers, we can say the cat volunteers.\nAssuming chuan is fast, we can say ava volunteers.\nWhen alice runs quickly, we can conclude chuan is fast.\nIf the cat volunteers, then the cat runs quickly.", "statement": "Chuan volunteers.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if alice runs quickly, then chuan is fast, it follows that chuan is fast.\nSince we know that when chuan is fast, we can conclude ava volunteers, it follows that ava volunteers.\nSince we know that given that ava volunteers, it follows that the cat volunteers, it follows that the cat volunteers.\nBecause based on the cat volunteers, it is evident that chuan volunteers, we can conclude that chuan volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When alice runs quickly, we can conclude chuan is fast, Assuming chuan is fast, we can say ava volunteers, Assuming ava volunteers, we can say the cat volunteers, Assuming the cat volunteers, we can say chuan volunteers, Chuan volunteers\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich goes to the hospital.\nThe zoo takes pictures.\nThe chef is fluffy.\nRules:\nGiven that the zoo takes pictures, it follows that the zoo goes to the hospital.\nWhen the sandwich goes to the hospital, we can conclude the zoo goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the chef is fluffy, it follows that the sandwich goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the chef takes pictures, it follows that the sandwich writes stories.\nBased on the sandwich goes to the hospital, it is evident that the sandwich takes pictures.\nBased on the chef writes stories, it is evident that the chef takes pictures.\nWhen the train writes stories, we can conclude the chef writes stories.\nAssuming the zoo goes to the hospital, we can say the train writes stories.", "statement": "The sandwich writes stories.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the zoo takes pictures, it follows that the zoo goes to the hospital, it follows that the zoo goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that when the zoo goes to the hospital, we can conclude the train writes stories, it follows that the train writes stories.\nGiven that based on the train writes stories, it is evident that the chef writes stories, it is evident that the chef writes stories.\nGiven that if the chef writes stories, then the chef takes pictures, it is evident that the chef takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of assuming the chef takes pictures, we can say the sandwich writes stories, we deduce that the sandwich writes stories.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the chef is fluffy, it follows that the sandwich goes to the hospital., Based on the sandwich goes to the hospital, it is evident that the sandwich takes pictures., Given that the zoo takes pictures, it follows that the zoo goes to the hospital., Assuming the zoo goes to the hospital, we can say the train writes stories., When the train writes stories, we can conclude the chef writes stories., Based on the chef writes stories, it is evident that the chef takes pictures., Given that the chef takes pictures, it follows that the sandwich writes stories., The sandwich writes stories.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat does yoga.\nThe ocean reads books.\nThe ocean carries bags.\nRules:\nAssuming the ocean carries bags, we can say the ocean carries bags.\nGiven that the ocean reads books, it follows that the ocean reads books.\nAssuming the ocean carries bags, we can say the cat carries bags.\nIf the computer does yoga, then the ocean carries bags.\nWhen the ocean carries bags, we can conclude the ocean reads books.\nBased on the ocean reads books, it is evident that the computer does yoga.\nBased on the cat carries bags, it is evident that the artist is fluffy.", "statement": "The cat reads books.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the ocean carries bags, it follows that the ocean carries bags, we can see that the ocean carries bags.\nSince we know that when the ocean reads books, we can conclude the ocean reads books, it follows that the ocean reads books.\nGiven that given that the ocean reads books, it follows that the computer does yoga, it is evident that the computer does yoga.\nGiven that based on the computer does yoga, it is evident that the ocean carries bags, it is evident that the ocean carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the ocean carries bags, then the cat carries bags, we can see that the cat carries bags.\nGiven that assuming the cat carries bags, we can say the artist is fluffy, it is evident that the artist is fluffy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts connecting the cat to reading books, the cat reads books is negated.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike is quiet.\nThe tree travels far.\nAlice runs quickly.\nRules:\nIf mike is quiet, then mike runs quickly.\nIf alice runs quickly, then mike is quiet.\nAssuming alice jumps high, we can say mike is quiet.\nBased on alice jumps high, it is evident that alice jumps high.\nIf the tree travels far, then alice jumps high.", "statement": "The tree is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on mike is quiet, it is evident that mike runs quickly, we can see that mike runs quickly.\nGiven that if alice runs quickly, then mike is quiet, it is evident that mike is quiet.\nSince we know that based on the tree travels far, it is evident that alice jumps high, it follows that alice jumps high.\nApplying the logic of when alice jumps high, we can conclude alice jumps high, we deduce that alice jumps high.\nApplying the logic of if alice jumps high, then mike is quiet, we deduce that mike is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the tree travels far, then alice jumps high., Based on alice jumps high, it is evident that alice jumps high., Assuming alice jumps high, we can say mike is quiet., The tree travels far., Mike is quiet., The tree is not quiet.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium grows plants.\nThe moon teaches math.\nThe stadium plays football.\nRules:\nBased on the stadium plays football, it is evident that the stadium teaches math.\nAssuming the stadium plays football, we can say the moon grows plants.\nBased on the moon teaches math, it is evident that the moon grows plants.\nAssuming the stadium grows plants, we can say the festival teaches math.\nIf the stadium is blue, then the moon is blue.\nGiven that the festival grows plants, it follows that the stadium is blue.\nWhen the stadium plays football, we can conclude the stadium teaches math.\nWhen the festival teaches math, we can conclude the festival grows plants.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that if the stadium plays football, then the stadium teaches math, it is evident that the stadium teaches math.\nApplying the logic of based on the stadium plays football, it is evident that the moon grows plants, we deduce that the moon grows plants.\nBecause given that the stadium grows plants, it follows that the festival teaches math, we can conclude that the festival teaches math.\nGiven that when the stadium plays football, we can conclude the stadium teaches math, it is evident that the stadium teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the festival teaches math, we can conclude the festival grows plants, we can see that the festival grows plants.\nApplying the logic of if the festival grows plants, then the stadium is blue, we deduce that the stadium is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the stadium is blue, it is evident that the moon is blue, we can see that the moon is blue.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"The assertion is unrelated to the facts and rules given.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames goes to the hospital.\nThe ocean grows plants.\nThe cloud goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nAssuming the ocean grows plants, we can say the house goes to the hospital.\nGiven that james grows plants, it follows that the house goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the house goes to the hospital, we can say the house grows plants.\nWhen the ocean grows plants, we can conclude the house goes to the hospital.\nWhen the house goes to the hospital, we can conclude the ocean grows plants.\nWhen james goes to the hospital, we can conclude the house goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The house grows plants.", "reasoning": "Given that based on james goes to the hospital, it is evident that the house goes to the hospital, it is evident that the house goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the house goes to the hospital, we can conclude the ocean grows plants, we can see that the ocean grows plants.\nSince we know that assuming the ocean grows plants, we can say the house goes to the hospital, it follows that the house goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the house goes to the hospital, it follows that the house grows plants, we can see that the house grows plants.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when james goes to the hospital, we can conclude the house goes to the hospital, assuming the house goes to the hospital, we can say the house grows plants, the house grows plants\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge reads books.\nThe bridge reads books.\nCharlie hikes mountains.\nRules:\nIf charlie hikes mountains, then the bridge paints pictures.\nGiven that the bridge reads books, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains.\nAssuming stanford university paints pictures, we can say the bridge hikes mountains.\nAssuming charlie grows plants, we can say stanford university paints pictures.\nAssuming charlie hikes mountains, we can say charlie grows plants.", "statement": "The ocean grows plants.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming charlie hikes mountains, we can say the bridge paints pictures, we deduce that the bridge paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of when the bridge reads books, we can conclude the bridge hikes mountains, we deduce that the bridge hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of assuming charlie hikes mountains, we can say charlie grows plants, we deduce that charlie grows plants.\nBecause given that charlie grows plants, it follows that stanford university paints pictures, we can conclude that stanford university paints pictures.\nBecause given that stanford university paints pictures, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains, we can conclude that the bridge hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because if charlie hikes mountains, then the bridge paints pictures, given that the bridge reads books, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains, assuming charlie hikes mountains, we can say charlie grows plants, assuming charlie grows plants, we can say stanford university paints pictures, assuming stanford university paints pictures, we can say the bridge hikes mountains, the ocean grows plants\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest reads books.\nThe river teaches math.\nThe forest reads books.\nRules:\nIf the forest reads books, then the cat rides bikes.\nGiven that the cat teaches math, it follows that the cat teaches math.\nBased on the cat is an artist, it is evident that the cat teaches math.\nWhen the sky reads books, we can conclude the river teaches math.\nGiven that the cat is an artist, it follows that the river teaches math.\nBased on the river teaches math, it is evident that the cat is an artist.", "statement": "The sky reads books.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the forest reads books, it is evident that the cat rides bikes, it is evident that the cat rides bikes.\nBecause when the river teaches math, we can conclude the cat is an artist, we can conclude that the cat is an artist.\nApplying the logic of assuming the cat is an artist, we can say the cat teaches math, we deduce that the cat teaches math.\nApplying the logic of given that the cat is an artist, it follows that the river teaches math, we deduce that the river teaches math.\nBecause given that the cat teaches math, it follows that the cat teaches math, we can conclude that the cat teaches math.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because when the sky reads books, we can conclude the river teaches math, based on the river teaches math, it is evident that the cat is an artist, given that the cat is an artist, it follows that the river teaches math, the river teaches math, the cat is an artist, it is evident that the cat teaches math, the cat teaches math, given that the cat teaches math, it follows that the cat teaches math, if the forest reads books, then the cat rides bikes, the forest reads books, the forest reads books, the conclusion is the negation of the sky reads books.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam plays football.\nThe sandwich paints pictures.\nThe wall swims well.\nRules:\nIf liam plays football, then the phone paints pictures.\nBased on the sandwich paints pictures, it is evident that liam is quiet.\nGiven that liam plays football, it follows that the wall paints pictures.\nGiven that the wall swims well, it follows that liam is quiet.\nAssuming liam plays football, we can say liam is quiet.\nWhen the phone is quiet, we can conclude liam swims well.\nWhen the sandwich swims well, we can conclude the phone is quiet.\nIf liam plays football, then the sandwich swims well.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if liam plays football, then the phone paints pictures, we can see that the phone paints pictures.\nGiven that assuming the sandwich paints pictures, we can say liam is quiet, it is evident that liam is quiet.\nBecause when liam plays football, we can conclude the wall paints pictures, we can conclude that the wall paints pictures.\nSince we know that based on the wall swims well, it is evident that liam is quiet, it follows that liam is quiet.\nApplying the logic of based on liam plays football, it is evident that the sandwich swims well, we deduce that the sandwich swims well.\nApplying the logic of when the sandwich swims well, we can conclude the phone is quiet, we deduce that the phone is quiet.\nBecause based on the phone is quiet, it is evident that liam swims well, we can conclude that liam swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"None of the rules or facts mentions anything about Chuan being handsome, so we can't determine anything related to Chuan's handsomeness.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie is a doctor.\nThe bridge solves puzzles.\nThe stadium is a doctor.\nRules:\nIf charlie is a doctor, then the stadium solves puzzles.\nWhen charlie is a doctor, we can conclude lucas solves puzzles.\nGiven that charlie solves puzzles, it follows that charlie is a doctor.\nWhen lucas solves puzzles, we can conclude the stadium solves puzzles.\nAssuming the stadium teaches math, we can say charlie solves puzzles.\nGiven that charlie is a doctor, it follows that the stadium teaches math.", "statement": "Lucas solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming charlie is a doctor, we can say the stadium teaches math, it is evident that the stadium teaches math.\nBecause when the stadium teaches math, we can conclude charlie solves puzzles, we can conclude that charlie solves puzzles.\nApplying the logic of assuming charlie solves puzzles, we can say charlie is a doctor, we deduce that charlie is a doctor.\nSince we know that when charlie is a doctor, we can conclude lucas solves puzzles, it follows that lucas solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Charlie is a doctor, then when charlie is a doctor, we can conclude lucas solves puzzles, Lucas solves puzzles.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain is a scientist.\nThe cloud is friendly.\nMia is friendly.\nRules:\nBased on mia is friendly, it is evident that the mountain is blue.\nBased on the cloud is friendly, it is evident that the mountain is a scientist.\nWhen the mountain is a scientist, we can conclude the mountain is blue.\nBased on the cloud is friendly, it is evident that the musician runs quickly.\nAssuming mia is friendly, we can say the musician runs quickly.\nGiven that the musician is blue, it follows that mia is friendly.\nWhen the musician is a scientist, we can conclude the musician is friendly.\nBased on the musician is friendly, it is evident that the musician is blue.\nIf mia runs quickly, then the musician is friendly.\nAssuming the mountain is a scientist, we can say mia runs quickly.", "statement": "Mia is friendly.", "reasoning": "Given that when the mountain is a scientist, we can conclude mia runs quickly, it is evident that mia runs quickly.\nBecause when mia runs quickly, we can conclude the musician is friendly, we can conclude that the musician is friendly.\nGiven that given that the musician is friendly, it follows that the musician is blue, it is evident that the musician is blue.\nSince we know that if the musician is blue, then mia is friendly, it follows that mia is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Mia is friendly, Mia is friendly\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is magical.\nThe forest travels far.\nThe house travels far.\nRules:\nIf the house travels far, then the forest enjoys music.\nIf the house travels far, then the house is magical.\nWhen the forest travels far, we can conclude the sun is magical.\nGiven that charlie carries bags, it follows that charlie enjoys music.\nWhen the forest enjoys music, we can conclude the forest travels far.\nBased on the sun is magical, it is evident that charlie carries bags.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that if the house travels far, then the forest enjoys music, it is evident that the forest enjoys music.\nSince we know that based on the house travels far, it is evident that the house is magical, it follows that the house is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the forest enjoys music, it follows that the forest travels far, we can see that the forest travels far.\nBecause given that the forest travels far, it follows that the sun is magical, we can conclude that the sun is magical.\nBecause if the sun is magical, then charlie carries bags, we can conclude that charlie carries bags.\nBecause given that charlie carries bags, it follows that charlie enjoys music, we can conclude that charlie enjoys music.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion is not related to any rules given nor can be concluded from the facts present as there is no link to Chuan in the facts or rules, hence we cannot make a conclusion about Chuan's appearance.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie paints pictures.\nAva carries bags.\nThe plane writes stories.\nRules:\nGiven that the plane writes stories, it follows that liam paints pictures.\nGiven that sophie paints pictures, it follows that the plane carries bags.\nIf sophie paints pictures, then liam paints pictures.\nAssuming sophie paints pictures, we can say ava carries bags.\nGiven that ava is a scientist, it follows that liam paints pictures.\nBased on the plane is a scientist, it is evident that ava is a scientist.\nWhen ava carries bags, we can conclude the plane is a scientist.\nAssuming liam paints pictures, we can say the plane is a scientist.\nWhen the plane carries bags, we can conclude ava carries bags.", "statement": "Liam writes stories.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the plane writes stories, then liam paints pictures, it follows that liam paints pictures.\nGiven that when sophie paints pictures, we can conclude the plane carries bags, it is evident that the plane carries bags.\nBecause assuming sophie paints pictures, we can say ava carries bags, we can conclude that ava carries bags.\nBecause given that ava carries bags, it follows that the plane is a scientist, we can conclude that the plane is a scientist.\nGiven that assuming the plane is a scientist, we can say ava is a scientist, it is evident that ava is a scientist.\nSince we know that given that ava is a scientist, it follows that liam paints pictures, it follows that liam paints pictures.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the plane writes stories, it follows that liam paints pictures, liam paints pictures, we can say the plane is a scientist, the plane is a scientist, it is evident that ava is a scientist, ava is a scientist, it follows that liam paints pictures, the plane writes stories, it follows that liam paints pictures, its negation\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun is blue.\nThe festival is blue.\nHenry is blue.\nRules:\nAssuming henry is blue, we can say emma is colorful.\nGiven that the festival is blue, it follows that the sun is funny.\nIf the festival is blue, then the sun dances gracefully.\nIf the festival is blue, then the sun is funny.\nBased on the sun dances gracefully, it is evident that henry dances gracefully.\nIf henry is funny, then the festival is blue.\nWhen the festival is blue, we can conclude henry is funny.\nAssuming the festival is blue, we can say the sun dances gracefully.", "statement": "Emma is funny.", "reasoning": "Given that when henry is blue, we can conclude emma is colorful, it is evident that emma is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the festival is blue, we can say the sun is funny, we can see that the sun is funny.\nGiven that when the festival is blue, we can conclude the sun dances gracefully, it is evident that the sun dances gracefully.\nSince we know that given that the festival is blue, it follows that henry is funny, it follows that henry is funny.\nBecause based on henry is funny, it is evident that the festival is blue, we can conclude that the festival is blue.\nApplying the logic of given that the festival is blue, it follows that the sun dances gracefully, we deduce that the sun dances gracefully.\nBecause if the sun dances gracefully, then henry dances gracefully, we can conclude that henry dances gracefully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming henry is blue, we can say emma is colorful, Emma is colorful\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car rides bikes.\nJianzhi rides bikes.\nThe garden carries bags.\nRules:\nWhen jianzhi rides bikes, we can conclude sarah carries bags.\nAssuming the car is an engineer, we can say sarah rides bikes.\nAssuming jianzhi is a chef, we can say the car is an engineer.\nAssuming jianzhi is a chef, we can say jianzhi is an engineer.\nWhen the garden carries bags, we can conclude jianzhi is a chef.", "statement": "The car carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that jianzhi rides bikes, it follows that sarah carries bags, we deduce that sarah carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the garden carries bags, it is evident that jianzhi is a chef, we can see that jianzhi is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming jianzhi is a chef, we can say the car is an engineer, we can see that the car is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if jianzhi is a chef, then jianzhi is an engineer, we can see that jianzhi is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of given that the car is an engineer, it follows that sarah rides bikes, we deduce that sarah rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the garden carries bags, we can conclude jianzhi is a chef, assuming jianzhi is a chef, we can say the car is an engineer, the car rides bikes, the car carries bags.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi is an artist.\nJianzhi reads books.\nJianzhi reads books.\nRules:\nBased on jianzhi reads books, it is evident that the artist runs quickly.\nBased on jianzhi reads books, it is evident that the artist runs quickly.\nWhen jianzhi reads books, we can conclude the artist runs quickly.\nAssuming the pumpkin reads books, we can say ethan runs quickly.\nAssuming jianzhi is an artist, we can say the pumpkin reads books.\nGiven that the artist runs quickly, it follows that jianzhi is an artist.\nAssuming the artist runs quickly, we can say jianzhi is an artist.\nAssuming jianzhi is an artist, we can say the artist runs quickly.", "statement": "Ethan runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Because assuming jianzhi is an artist, we can say the artist runs quickly, we can conclude that the artist runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of assuming the artist runs quickly, we can say jianzhi is an artist, we deduce that jianzhi is an artist.\nGiven that if jianzhi is an artist, then the pumpkin reads books, it is evident that the pumpkin reads books.\nBecause if the pumpkin reads books, then ethan runs quickly, we can conclude that ethan runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming jianzhi reads books, it is evident that the artist runs quickly, when jianzhi reads books, we can conclude the artist runs quickly, assuming jianzhi is an artist, we can say the pumpkin reads books, assuming the pumpkin reads books, we can say ethan runs quickly, Ethan runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery rides bikes.\nMia solves puzzles.\nMia is an engineer.\nRules:\nBased on mia is an engineer, it is evident that the bakery rides bikes.\nIf mia is an engineer, then the house travels far.\nBased on the house rides bikes, it is evident that mia rides bikes.\nIf mia rides bikes, then mia rides bikes.\nGiven that the house rides bikes, it follows that the house rides bikes.\nBased on the bakery rides bikes, it is evident that the house rides bikes.\nBased on mia rides bikes, it is evident that mia rides bikes.", "statement": "Mia rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming mia is an engineer, we can say the bakery rides bikes, it follows that the bakery rides bikes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the bakery rides bikes, we can say the house rides bikes, we can see that the house rides bikes.\nSince we know that based on the house rides bikes, it is evident that the house rides bikes, it follows that the house rides bikes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the house rides bikes, it follows that mia rides bikes, we can see that mia rides bikes.\nBecause when mia rides bikes, we can conclude mia rides bikes, we can conclude that mia rides bikes.\nBecause if mia rides bikes, then mia rides bikes, we can conclude that mia rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on the bakery rides bikes, it is evident that the house rides bikes., Based on the house rides bikes, it is evident that mia rides bikes., Mia rides bikes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone fishes in lakes.\nThe sun fishes in lakes.\nThe phone fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nIf the sun fishes in lakes, then the dog is friendly.\nBased on the dog is friendly, it is evident that the sun hikes mountains.\nGiven that the sun is tall, it follows that the dog is friendly.\nWhen the phone fishes in lakes, we can conclude the sun is tall.\nIf the sun hikes mountains, then the phone hikes mountains.", "statement": "The chef fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the sun fishes in lakes, then the dog is friendly, we can see that the dog is friendly.\nBecause given that the phone fishes in lakes, it follows that the sun is tall, we can conclude that the sun is tall.\nApplying the logic of when the sun is tall, we can conclude the dog is friendly, we deduce that the dog is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the dog is friendly, it is evident that the sun hikes mountains, we can see that the sun hikes mountains.\nGiven that based on the sun hikes mountains, it is evident that the phone hikes mountains, it is evident that the phone hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the sun fishes in lakes, then the dog is friendly. When the phone fishes in lakes, we can conclude the sun is tall. Thus, we cannot directly conclude anything about the chef fishing in lakes.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest hosts parties.\nSophie rides bikes.\nSophie hosts parties.\nRules:\nBased on the forest hosts parties, it is evident that the stadium hosts parties.\nWhen sophie hosts parties, we can conclude lucas jumps high.\nAssuming lucas is an engineer, we can say sophie rides bikes.\nIf sophie hosts parties, then lucas is an engineer.\nWhen the stadium hosts parties, we can conclude the stadium hosts parties.\nWhen sophie hosts parties, we can conclude sophie hosts parties.", "statement": "The forest is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the forest hosts parties, it follows that the stadium hosts parties, we can see that the stadium hosts parties.\nGiven that if sophie hosts parties, then lucas jumps high, it is evident that lucas jumps high.\nGiven that when sophie hosts parties, we can conclude sophie hosts parties, it is evident that sophie hosts parties.\nSince we know that when sophie hosts parties, we can conclude lucas is an engineer, it follows that lucas is an engineer.\nGiven that based on lucas is an engineer, it is evident that sophie rides bikes, it is evident that sophie rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules establish a connection between the forest being an engineer based on the given facts or rules, the forest is not an engineer\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef fishes in lakes.\nThe phone is magical.\nThe phone is magical.\nRules:\nIf the chef fishes in lakes, then the chef fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the phone is magical, we can say the chef fishes in lakes.\nAssuming emma is magical, we can say the phone makes pizza.\nAssuming emma is magical, we can say the chef is magical.\nIf the chef is magical, then emma is magical.\nGiven that the phone is magical, it follows that the chef is magical.\nGiven that the chef fishes in lakes, it follows that the phone is magical.", "statement": "The phone makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the chef fishes in lakes, it is evident that the phone is magical, it follows that the phone is magical.\nSince we know that if the phone is magical, then the chef is magical, it follows that the chef is magical.\nApplying the logic of given that the chef is magical, it follows that emma is magical, we deduce that emma is magical.\nBecause based on emma is magical, it is evident that the phone makes pizza, we can conclude that the phone makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming emma is magical, we can say the phone makes pizza., Given that the phone is magical, it follows that the chef is magical., If the chef is magical, then emma is magical., The phone is magical., The phone makes pizza.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe plays games.\nStanford University is a scientist.\nStanford University explores cities.\nRules:\nWhen stanford university is a scientist, we can conclude the stadium is a scientist.\nAssuming stanford university explores cities, we can say the car plays games.\nGiven that stanford university is a scientist, it follows that the globe is fast.\nAssuming the car explores cities, we can say stanford university explores cities.\nGiven that the globe plays games, it follows that the globe is a scientist.\nBased on the stadium plays games, it is evident that the car explores cities.\nIf the car plays games, then the stadium plays games.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming stanford university is a scientist, we can say the stadium is a scientist, it follows that the stadium is a scientist.\nBecause based on stanford university explores cities, it is evident that the car plays games, we can conclude that the car plays games.\nBecause when stanford university is a scientist, we can conclude the globe is fast, we can conclude that the globe is fast.\nApplying the logic of based on the globe plays games, it is evident that the globe is a scientist, we deduce that the globe is a scientist.\nGiven that based on the car plays games, it is evident that the stadium plays games, it is evident that the stadium plays games.\nSince we know that assuming the stadium plays games, we can say the car explores cities, it follows that the car explores cities.\nSince we know that based on the car explores cities, it is evident that stanford university explores cities, it follows that stanford university explores cities.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion 'Chuan is handsome' is not mentioned or related to any facts or rules provided, its truth value cannot be determined from the given information.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival is blue.\nThe playground is blue.\nThe bridge is blue.\nRules:\nWhen the bridge is blue, we can conclude ava is blue.\nBased on the bridge is blue, it is evident that ava is loud.\nBased on ava is loud, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains.\nBased on the bridge is loud, it is evident that ava is loud.\nGiven that the playground is loud, it follows that ava is loud.\nBased on the bridge hikes mountains, it is evident that the bridge is loud.\nBased on ava is blue, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains.", "statement": "The bridge hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the bridge is blue, then ava is blue, it follows that ava is blue.\nGiven that based on ava is blue, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of assuming the bridge hikes mountains, we can say the bridge is loud, we deduce that the bridge is loud.\nApplying the logic of if the bridge is loud, then ava is loud, we deduce that ava is loud.\nGiven that given that ava is loud, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the bridge is blue, we can conclude ava is blue., Based on ava is blue, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains., The bridge hikes mountains.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car plays instruments.\nThe bakery swims well.\nThe cloud draws maps.\nRules:\nIf the car plays instruments, then the cloud swims well.\nBased on the cloud draws maps, it is evident that the garden swims well.\nWhen the car plays instruments, we can conclude the car cooks well.\nWhen the car swims well, we can conclude the cloud draws maps.\nIf the garden swims well, then the car swims well.\nBased on the bakery draws maps, it is evident that the garden swims well.\nIf the garden swims well, then the bakery draws maps.", "statement": "The cloud draws maps.", "reasoning": "Because based on the cloud draws maps, it is evident that the garden swims well, we can conclude that the garden swims well.\nSince we know that assuming the garden swims well, we can say the bakery draws maps, it follows that the bakery draws maps.\nBecause when the bakery draws maps, we can conclude the garden swims well, we can conclude that the garden swims well.\nApplying the logic of based on the garden swims well, it is evident that the car swims well, we deduce that the car swims well.\nSince we know that when the car swims well, we can conclude the cloud draws maps, it follows that the cloud draws maps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the cloud draws maps, it is evident that the garden swims well.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University is a chef.\nThe computer plays instruments.\nThe musician plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf the musician plays instruments, then the computer is a chef.\nWhen the computer plays instruments, we can conclude the musician grows plants.\nAssuming the computer plays instruments, we can say the musician plays instruments.\nWhen the computer plays instruments, we can conclude the computer grows plants.\nWhen the musician reads books, we can conclude the computer is a chef.\nBased on stanford university is a chef, it is evident that the musician reads books.\nGiven that henry grows plants, it follows that stanford university is a chef.\nIf stanford university is a chef, then the computer grows plants.\nIf the musician grows plants, then henry grows plants.", "statement": "The computer is a chef.", "reasoning": "Given that if the computer plays instruments, then the musician grows plants, it is evident that the musician grows plants.\nGiven that given that the musician grows plants, it follows that henry grows plants, it is evident that henry grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming henry grows plants, we can say stanford university is a chef, we can see that stanford university is a chef.\nApplying the logic of based on stanford university is a chef, it is evident that the musician reads books, we deduce that the musician reads books.\nGiven that when the musician reads books, we can conclude the computer is a chef, it is evident that the computer is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because if the musician plays instruments, then the computer is a chef. Assuming the computer plays instruments, we can say the musician plays instruments., The computer is a chef.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is tall.\nThe sky carries bags.\nThe house is tall.\nRules:\nGiven that the house is tall, it follows that the house carries bags.\nAssuming the sky is loud, we can say the sky is tall.\nWhen the moon is tall, we can conclude the sky is loud.\nBased on the house carries bags, it is evident that the house is tall.\nAssuming the house is tall, we can say the moon is tall.", "statement": "The moon carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the house is tall, it follows that the house carries bags, we deduce that the house carries bags.\nSince we know that if the house is tall, then the moon is tall, it follows that the moon is tall.\nBecause given that the moon is tall, it follows that the sky is loud, we can conclude that the sky is loud.\nBecause if the sky is loud, then the sky is tall, we can conclude that the sky is tall.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming the house is tall, we can say the moon is tall, The moon carries bags is not a direct logical consequence of the given rules and facts.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is a scientist.\nThe city runs marathons.\nThe tree runs marathons.\nRules:\nIf the city runs marathons, then the tree jumps high.\nWhen the tree runs marathons, we can conclude the book writes stories.\nGiven that the tree runs marathons, it follows that the book writes stories.\nIf the playground is a scientist, then the tree writes stories.\nWhen the city writes stories, we can conclude the playground is a scientist.\nWhen the tree jumps high, we can conclude the city writes stories.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the city runs marathons, it is evident that the tree jumps high, we deduce that the tree jumps high.\nApplying the logic of assuming the tree runs marathons, we can say the book writes stories, we deduce that the book writes stories.\nSince we know that based on the tree jumps high, it is evident that the city writes stories, it follows that the city writes stories.\nBecause assuming the city writes stories, we can say the playground is a scientist, we can conclude that the playground is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the playground is a scientist, then the tree writes stories, we can see that the tree writes stories.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules or facts are related to Chuan being handsome, the assertion cannot be proven or disproven by the given information.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva is an artist.\nThe plane is magical.\nAva is magical.\nRules:\nIf the plane is magical, then ava is magical.\nBased on ava is magical, it is evident that stanford university swims well.\nWhen ava is magical, we can conclude the cat is magical.\nGiven that the plane is magical, it follows that the plane swims well.\nWhen stanford university is an artist, we can conclude the cat is interesting.\nBased on stanford university is an artist, it is evident that the plane swims well.\nAssuming the cat is magical, we can say stanford university is an artist.\nWhen the cat is interesting, we can conclude the cat is magical.\nGiven that stanford university swims well, it follows that the cat is interesting.", "statement": "The cat is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming ava is magical, we can say stanford university swims well, we can see that stanford university swims well.\nSince we know that when stanford university swims well, we can conclude the cat is interesting, it follows that the cat is interesting.\nBecause assuming the cat is interesting, we can say the cat is magical, we can conclude that the cat is magical.\nGiven that when the cat is magical, we can conclude stanford university is an artist, it is evident that stanford university is an artist.\nGiven that assuming stanford university is an artist, we can say the cat is interesting, it is evident that the cat is interesting.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Ava is magical, it is evident that stanford university swims well. Given that stanford university swims well, it follows that the cat is interesting.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city paints pictures.\nThe artist becomes famous.\nThe artist runs quickly.\nRules:\nBased on the artist runs quickly, it is evident that the artist paints pictures.\nAssuming the globe volunteers, we can say the globe becomes famous.\nWhen the artist becomes famous, we can conclude the city runs quickly.\nAssuming the artist volunteers, we can say the globe volunteers.\nAssuming the city paints pictures, we can say the artist volunteers.\nAssuming the artist becomes famous, we can say the city paints pictures.", "statement": "The globe becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the artist becomes famous, it is evident that the city paints pictures, it is evident that the city paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of given that the city paints pictures, it follows that the artist volunteers, we deduce that the artist volunteers.\nBecause given that the artist volunteers, it follows that the globe volunteers, we can conclude that the globe volunteers.\nApplying the logic of based on the globe volunteers, it is evident that the globe becomes famous, we deduce that the globe becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the artist becomes famous, we can say the city paints pictures, The artist becomes famous, we can conclude the city paints pictures. Assuming the city paints pictures, we can say the artist volunteers, we can conclude the artist volunteers. Assuming the artist volunteers, we can say the globe volunteers, we can conclude the globe volunteers. Assuming the globe volunteers, we can say the globe becomes famous, we can conclude the globe becomes famous.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist is loud.\nThe artist plays football.\nThe artist plays football.\nRules:\nBased on the artist is loud, it is evident that the artist runs marathons.\nGiven that the artist plays football, it follows that the artist runs quickly.\nBased on stanford university runs marathons, it is evident that the artist plays football.\nGiven that lucy is loud, it follows that stanford university runs marathons.\nBased on the artist plays football, it is evident that lucy is loud.\nGiven that the artist is loud, it follows that the artist runs marathons.", "statement": "The artist runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the artist plays football, we can conclude lucy is loud, it follows that lucy is loud.\nGiven that assuming lucy is loud, we can say stanford university runs marathons, it is evident that stanford university runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of if stanford university runs marathons, then the artist plays football, we deduce that the artist plays football.\nBecause given that the artist plays football, it follows that the artist runs quickly, we can conclude that the artist runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the artist plays football, it follows that the artist runs quickly, The artist runs quickly.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma sings beautifully.\nEmma is an artist.\nChuan is an artist.\nRules:\nGiven that chuan is an artist, it follows that stanford university sings beautifully.\nAssuming chuan is an artist, we can say stanford university sings beautifully.\nWhen the globe is an artist, we can conclude chuan is an artist.\nWhen chuan is an artist, we can conclude the globe is an artist.\nAssuming chuan is an artist, we can say the globe is an artist.\nAssuming chuan is an artist, we can say stanford university sings beautifully.", "statement": "The globe is a chef.", "reasoning": "Given that given that chuan is an artist, it follows that stanford university sings beautifully, it is evident that stanford university sings beautifully.\nBecause based on chuan is an artist, it is evident that the globe is an artist, we can conclude that the globe is an artist.\nSince we know that given that the globe is an artist, it follows that chuan is an artist, it follows that chuan is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if chuan is an artist, then stanford university sings beautifully, we can see that stanford university sings beautifully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when chuan is an artist, we can conclude the globe is an artist, the assertion the globe is a chef is not supported by the facts or rules given.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin hosts parties.\nThe fountain travels far.\nThe phone teaches math.\nRules:\nGiven that the fountain travels far, it follows that the pumpkin does yoga.\nWhen the pumpkin hosts parties, we can conclude the phone hosts parties.\nGiven that the artist travels far, it follows that the phone travels far.\nGiven that the phone hosts parties, it follows that the phone travels far.\nAssuming the phone teaches math, we can say the phone hosts parties.\nGiven that the artist travels far, it follows that the phone teaches math.\nGiven that the phone hosts parties, it follows that the artist travels far.", "statement": "The phone travels far.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the pumpkin hosts parties, it is evident that the phone hosts parties, we can see that the phone hosts parties.\nSince we know that given that the phone hosts parties, it follows that the artist travels far, it follows that the artist travels far.\nApplying the logic of based on the artist travels far, it is evident that the phone teaches math, we deduce that the phone teaches math.\nGiven that if the phone teaches math, then the phone hosts parties, it is evident that the phone hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the phone hosts parties, it follows that the phone travels far, we can see that the phone travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Assuming the phone teaches math, we can say the phone hosts parties., Given that the phone hosts parties, it follows that the phone travels far., The phone travels far.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University grows plants.\nThe wall is colorful.\nThe garden is tall.\nRules:\nAssuming stanford university grows plants, we can say stanford university grows plants.\nGiven that stanford university makes pizza, it follows that the garden makes pizza.\nIf james grows plants, then stanford university makes pizza.\nGiven that the garden makes pizza, it follows that stanford university makes pizza.\nAssuming the garden is tall, we can say james grows plants.", "statement": "James is tall.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when stanford university grows plants, we can conclude stanford university grows plants, we can see that stanford university grows plants.\nSince we know that based on the garden is tall, it is evident that james grows plants, it follows that james grows plants.\nGiven that based on james grows plants, it is evident that stanford university makes pizza, it is evident that stanford university makes pizza.\nBecause when stanford university makes pizza, we can conclude the garden makes pizza, we can conclude that the garden makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming the garden is tall, we can say james grows plants, James is tall\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge goes to the hospital.\nThe computer makes pizza.\nThe bridge goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nWhen the computer makes pizza, we can conclude the bridge goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the bridge goes to the hospital, we can say the sun makes pizza.\nAssuming the computer goes to the hospital, we can say the tree runs marathons.\nGiven that the bridge runs marathons, it follows that the bridge makes pizza.\nWhen the bridge makes pizza, we can conclude the computer goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the bridge goes to the hospital, it follows that the bridge runs marathons.\nGiven that the bridge makes pizza, it follows that the bridge makes pizza.", "statement": "The tree runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the computer makes pizza, it is evident that the bridge goes to the hospital, we can see that the bridge goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that based on the bridge goes to the hospital, it is evident that the bridge runs marathons, it follows that the bridge runs marathons.\nGiven that when the bridge runs marathons, we can conclude the bridge makes pizza, it is evident that the bridge makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of if the bridge makes pizza, then the bridge makes pizza, we deduce that the bridge makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the bridge makes pizza, then the computer goes to the hospital, we can see that the computer goes to the hospital.\nBecause based on the computer goes to the hospital, it is evident that the tree runs marathons, we can conclude that the tree runs marathons.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because The computer makes pizza., When the computer makes pizza, we can conclude the bridge goes to the hospital., The bridge goes to the hospital., Given that the bridge goes to the hospital, it follows that the bridge runs marathons., Assuming the computer goes to the hospital, we can say the tree runs marathons., The tree runs marathons.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car grows plants.\nThe car becomes famous.\nThe car does yoga.\nRules:\nWhen the car becomes famous, we can conclude ava does yoga.\nIf the car does yoga, then ava is interesting.\nGiven that mia does yoga, it follows that the car grows plants.\nGiven that mia grows plants, it follows that mia does yoga.\nGiven that ava is interesting, it follows that mia grows plants.\nGiven that the car grows plants, it follows that ava does yoga.\nIf mia does yoga, then ava does yoga.", "statement": "Ava becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Because given that the car becomes famous, it follows that ava does yoga, we can conclude that ava does yoga.\nApplying the logic of assuming the car does yoga, we can say ava is interesting, we deduce that ava is interesting.\nApplying the logic of if ava is interesting, then mia grows plants, we deduce that mia grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on mia grows plants, it is evident that mia does yoga, we can see that mia does yoga.\nApplying the logic of based on mia does yoga, it is evident that the car grows plants, we deduce that the car grows plants.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When the car becomes famous, we can conclude ava does yoga, If the car does yoga, then ava is interesting, Given that ava is interesting, it follows that mia grows plants, Given that the car grows plants, it follows that ava does yoga, {assertion_negation}\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat is colorful.\nThe cat collects stamps.\nJianzhi runs quickly.\nRules:\nAssuming the cat is colorful, we can say the cat teaches math.\nAssuming jianzhi runs quickly, we can say the cat teaches math.\nBased on the cat collects stamps, it is evident that the cat runs quickly.\nWhen jianzhi runs quickly, we can conclude the cat runs quickly.\nIf jianzhi collects stamps, then the dog is colorful.\nWhen the chef collects stamps, we can conclude jianzhi collects stamps.\nGiven that jianzhi runs quickly, it follows that the chef collects stamps.", "statement": "Jianzhi is colorful.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the cat is colorful, we can conclude the cat teaches math, we can see that the cat teaches math.\nSince we know that given that the cat collects stamps, it follows that the cat runs quickly, it follows that the cat runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if jianzhi runs quickly, then the chef collects stamps, we can see that the chef collects stamps.\nSince we know that assuming the chef collects stamps, we can say jianzhi collects stamps, it follows that jianzhi collects stamps.\nSince we know that assuming jianzhi collects stamps, we can say the dog is colorful, it follows that the dog is colorful.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that jianzhi runs quickly, it follows that the chef collects stamps, Assuming jianzhi runs quickly, we can say the cat teaches math, Based on the cat collects stamps, it is evident that the cat runs quickly, When jianzhi runs quickly, we can conclude the cat runs quickly, Assuming the cat is colorful, we can say the cat teaches math, the assertion is negation.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge is friendly.\nThe sky is tall.\nThe fountain hosts parties.\nRules:\nAssuming the sky is tall, we can say the bridge is friendly.\nGiven that the fountain hosts parties, it follows that the fountain is friendly.\nWhen the bridge is friendly, we can conclude the fountain hosts parties.\nAssuming the fountain hosts parties, we can say the fountain hosts parties.\nBased on the fountain hosts parties, it is evident that the fountain hosts parties.\nBased on the bridge hosts parties, it is evident that the river hosts parties.\nIf the bridge is tall, then the bridge hosts parties.\nBased on the fountain becomes famous, it is evident that the bridge hosts parties.\nBased on the bridge is friendly, it is evident that the fountain becomes famous.\nBased on the fountain hosts parties, it is evident that the bridge is tall.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the sky is tall, it is evident that the bridge is friendly, we deduce that the bridge is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the fountain hosts parties, it follows that the fountain is friendly, we can see that the fountain is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge is friendly, it is evident that the fountain hosts parties, we can see that the fountain hosts parties.\nBecause assuming the bridge is friendly, we can say the fountain becomes famous, we can conclude that the fountain becomes famous.\nBecause assuming the fountain hosts parties, we can say the bridge is tall, we can conclude that the bridge is tall.\nBecause if the bridge is tall, then the bridge hosts parties, we can conclude that the bridge hosts parties.\nApplying the logic of assuming the bridge hosts parties, we can say the river hosts parties, we deduce that the river hosts parties.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because there are no relevant rules pertaining to the assertion, the assertion Chuan is handsome cannot be evaluated from the given facts and rules\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan writes stories.\nThe stadium is happy.\nThe wall is happy.\nRules:\nWhen the stadium is happy, we can conclude the wall grows plants.\nWhen chuan writes stories, we can conclude chuan grows plants.\nAssuming chuan writes stories, we can say the stadium writes stories.\nWhen the stadium is happy, we can conclude chuan grows plants.\nBased on the wall is happy, it is evident that the wall writes stories.\nGiven that the wall is funny, it follows that the wall is happy.\nAssuming the artist grows plants, we can say the wall is funny.\nGiven that chuan grows plants, it follows that the artist grows plants.", "statement": "The wall writes stories.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on chuan writes stories, it is evident that chuan grows plants, we can see that chuan grows plants.\nGiven that given that chuan grows plants, it follows that the artist grows plants, it is evident that the artist grows plants.\nSince we know that based on the artist grows plants, it is evident that the wall is funny, it follows that the wall is funny.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the wall is funny, it is evident that the wall is happy, we can see that the wall is happy.\nBecause assuming the wall is happy, we can say the wall writes stories, we can conclude that the wall writes stories.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the wall is happy, it is evident that the wall writes stories, the wall writes stories.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is an artist.\nChuan is an engineer.\nStanford University is an engineer.\nRules:\nWhen the house is an artist, we can conclude the house is an artist.\nWhen chuan grows plants, we can conclude chuan grows plants.\nGiven that the house is an artist, it follows that chuan grows plants.\nIf the house grows plants, then chuan grows plants.\nGiven that chuan is an engineer, it follows that the house grows plants.\nBased on chuan grows plants, it is evident that chuan is an engineer.", "statement": "Chuan grows plants.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the house is an artist, then chuan grows plants, we deduce that chuan grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on chuan grows plants, it is evident that chuan grows plants, we can see that chuan grows plants.\nBecause given that chuan grows plants, it follows that chuan is an engineer, we can conclude that chuan is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of given that chuan is an engineer, it follows that the house grows plants, we deduce that the house grows plants.\nSince we know that based on the house grows plants, it is evident that chuan grows plants, it follows that chuan grows plants.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the house is an artist, it follows that chuan grows plants, Chuan grows plants.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon plays instruments.\nThe zoo is blue.\nThe zoo is interesting.\nRules:\nBased on the moon plays instruments, it is evident that the zoo is blue.\nGiven that the zoo is interesting, it follows that the zoo is blue.\nWhen the zoo is interesting, we can conclude the zoo is interesting.\nIf the zoo is blue, then the moon fishes in lakes.\nIf the zoo is blue, then the zoo is interesting.\nGiven that jack is blue, it follows that the zoo is blue.\nGiven that the zoo is interesting, it follows that jack is blue.\nWhen the zoo is blue, we can conclude the zoo is interesting.\nBased on the zoo is interesting, it is evident that the zoo is interesting.", "statement": "The moon is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the moon plays instruments, it follows that the zoo is blue, we can see that the zoo is blue.\nApplying the logic of when the zoo is interesting, we can conclude the zoo is interesting, we deduce that the zoo is interesting.\nBecause based on the zoo is blue, it is evident that the moon fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the moon fishes in lakes.\nBecause based on the zoo is blue, it is evident that the zoo is interesting, we can conclude that the zoo is interesting.\nBecause given that the zoo is interesting, it follows that jack is blue, we can conclude that jack is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that jack is blue, it follows that the zoo is blue, we can see that the zoo is blue.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no rules that connect the moon playing instruments or the zoo being interesting to the moon being interesting, thus there is no conclusion to the assertion.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan becomes famous.\nCharlie becomes famous.\nChuan rides bikes.\nRules:\nAssuming chuan becomes famous, we can say stanford university plays instruments.\nWhen chuan becomes famous, we can conclude chuan becomes famous.\nAssuming charlie becomes famous, we can say the cloud becomes famous.\nIf chuan becomes famous, then the cloud becomes famous.\nGiven that chuan plays instruments, it follows that chuan becomes famous.\nIf chuan plays instruments, then charlie plays instruments.\nBased on chuan becomes famous, it is evident that chuan plays instruments.\nWhen chuan becomes famous, we can conclude chuan becomes famous.\nWhen chuan becomes famous, we can conclude the cloud is blue.", "statement": "Stanford University is blue.", "reasoning": "Given that based on chuan becomes famous, it is evident that stanford university plays instruments, it is evident that stanford university plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming chuan becomes famous, we can say chuan becomes famous, we can see that chuan becomes famous.\nGiven that based on charlie becomes famous, it is evident that the cloud becomes famous, it is evident that the cloud becomes famous.\nGiven that given that chuan becomes famous, it follows that chuan becomes famous, it is evident that chuan becomes famous.\nSince we know that when chuan becomes famous, we can conclude the cloud is blue, it follows that the cloud is blue.\nBecause assuming chuan becomes famous, we can say chuan plays instruments, we can conclude that chuan plays instruments.\nBecause when chuan plays instruments, we can conclude charlie plays instruments, we can conclude that charlie plays instruments.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because assuming chuan becomes famous, we can say stanford university plays instruments, when chuan becomes famous, we can conclude the cloud is blue, the assertion is Stanford University is blue.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train is loud.\nThe train is tall.\nAlice reads books.\nRules:\nWhen the train is tall, we can conclude the fountain is loud.\nIf the fountain is loud, then the train is happy.\nGiven that alice reads books, it follows that the train is tall.\nWhen alice is loud, we can conclude alice reads books.\nWhen the train is loud, we can conclude alice is loud.\nWhen alice reads books, we can conclude the train is loud.", "statement": "The train is tall.", "reasoning": "Because assuming alice reads books, we can say the train is loud, we can conclude that the train is loud.\nApplying the logic of given that the train is loud, it follows that alice is loud, we deduce that alice is loud.\nApplying the logic of given that alice is loud, it follows that alice reads books, we deduce that alice reads books.\nApplying the logic of assuming alice reads books, we can say the train is tall, we deduce that the train is tall.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Alice reads books, it follows that the train is tall, the train is tall.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi is interesting.\nThe cloud is loud.\nThe forest swims well.\nRules:\nWhen the forest swims well, we can conclude james is loud.\nGiven that james swims well, it follows that jianzhi swims well.\nWhen james is loud, we can conclude james cooks well.\nBased on james swims well, it is evident that james swims well.\nBased on james cooks well, it is evident that james swims well.\nAssuming james is loud, we can say the forest swims well.", "statement": "The cloud swims well.", "reasoning": "Given that if the forest swims well, then james is loud, it is evident that james is loud.\nBecause if james is loud, then james cooks well, we can conclude that james cooks well.\nSince we know that assuming james cooks well, we can say james swims well, it follows that james swims well.\nGiven that assuming james is loud, we can say the forest swims well, it is evident that the forest swims well.\nApplying the logic of if james swims well, then james swims well, we deduce that james swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that james swims well, it follows that jianzhi swims well, we can see that jianzhi swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the forest swims well, we can conclude james is loud, when james is loud, we can conclude james cooks well, based on james cooks well, it is evident that james swims well, the forest swims well, the cloud swims well is not concluded\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon travels far.\nThe book travels far.\nThe moon sings beautifully.\nRules:\nGiven that the moon sings beautifully, it follows that ava is a scientist.\nBased on the moon travels far, it is evident that the book is a scientist.\nGiven that the book travels far, it follows that the moon is a scientist.\nBased on the moon travels far, it is evident that the moon is a scientist.\nGiven that the moon travels far, it follows that the book is a scientist.\nGiven that the moon plays games, it follows that the book sings beautifully.\nGiven that ava plays games, it follows that the moon plays games.\nGiven that the moon is a scientist, it follows that the book is a scientist.\nIf the moon sings beautifully, then ava plays games.", "statement": "Sophie is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the moon sings beautifully, then ava is a scientist, it follows that ava is a scientist.\nBecause given that the moon travels far, it follows that the book is a scientist, we can conclude that the book is a scientist.\nBecause if the book travels far, then the moon is a scientist, we can conclude that the moon is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the moon sings beautifully, we can say ava plays games, we can see that ava plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava plays games, it follows that the moon plays games, we can see that the moon plays games.\nSince we know that assuming the moon plays games, we can say the book sings beautifully, it follows that the book sings beautifully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"The provided rules and facts do not lead to any conclusion about Sophie. There are no rules related to Sophie in the provided data.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud is an engineer.\nThe sun is a chef.\nThe sun plays instruments.\nRules:\nIf the sun is a chef, then liam is an engineer.\nWhen the cloud is an engineer, we can conclude the cloud is an engineer.\nBased on the sun plays instruments, it is evident that liam is an engineer.\nAssuming the sky travels far, we can say liam is an engineer.\nAssuming the sun plays instruments, we can say the sky travels far.\nAssuming the sky travels far, we can say the cloud is an engineer.\nBased on liam is an engineer, it is evident that the sun plays instruments.", "statement": "The cloud is a chef.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the sun is a chef, it follows that liam is an engineer, it follows that liam is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the cloud is an engineer, it follows that the cloud is an engineer, we can see that the cloud is an engineer.\nSince we know that when liam is an engineer, we can conclude the sun plays instruments, it follows that the sun plays instruments.\nGiven that given that the sun plays instruments, it follows that the sky travels far, it is evident that the sky travels far.\nBecause based on the sky travels far, it is evident that liam is an engineer, we can conclude that liam is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the cloud is an engineer, we can conclude the cloud is an engineer, Based on liam is an engineer, it is evident that the sun plays instruments, The cloud is an engineer, The sun plays instruments, The cloud is a chef is not implied by any rule or fact, The cloud is not a chef.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie hikes mountains.\nChuan hikes mountains.\nThe forest is magical.\nRules:\nIf the forest is magical, then the book is a chef.\nIf sophie hikes mountains, then the forest is magical.\nIf the forest is magical, then sophie hikes mountains.\nGiven that the forest is a chef, it follows that the forest is magical.\nAssuming the forest is magical, we can say the forest is a chef.", "statement": "Sophie is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the forest is magical, it follows that the book is a chef, we can see that the book is a chef.\nBecause based on sophie hikes mountains, it is evident that the forest is magical, we can conclude that the forest is magical.\nGiven that assuming the forest is magical, we can say the forest is a chef, it is evident that the forest is a chef.\nGiven that given that the forest is a chef, it follows that the forest is magical, it is evident that the forest is magical.\nGiven that based on the forest is magical, it is evident that sophie hikes mountains, it is evident that sophie hikes mountains.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because sophie hikes mountains, then the forest is magical, the forest is magical, then the book is a chef, the book is not related to sophie's profession, sophie is not a chef\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan is blue.\nChuan fishes in lakes.\nChuan runs marathons.\nRules:\nWhen chuan is blue, we can conclude the artist runs marathons.\nIf chuan runs marathons, then the artist runs marathons.\nAssuming chuan runs marathons, we can say the musician is blue.\nIf chuan runs marathons, then chuan fishes in lakes.\nBased on the musician is blue, it is evident that the musician is blue.\nGiven that the artist runs marathons, it follows that the musician is blue.\nIf the artist runs marathons, then chuan runs marathons.\nWhen the musician teaches math, we can conclude the artist runs marathons.\nGiven that the musician is blue, it follows that the musician teaches math.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that if chuan is blue, then the artist runs marathons, it is evident that the artist runs marathons.\nSince we know that based on chuan runs marathons, it is evident that the artist runs marathons, it follows that the artist runs marathons.\nGiven that if chuan runs marathons, then the musician is blue, it is evident that the musician is blue.\nBecause if chuan runs marathons, then chuan fishes in lakes, we can conclude that chuan fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of based on the musician is blue, it is evident that the musician is blue, we deduce that the musician is blue.\nGiven that given that the musician is blue, it follows that the musician teaches math, it is evident that the musician teaches math.\nApplying the logic of when the musician teaches math, we can conclude the artist runs marathons, we deduce that the artist runs marathons.\nSince we know that given that the artist runs marathons, it follows that chuan runs marathons, it follows that chuan runs marathons.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules relating Chuan being blue, fishing in lakes, running marathons, or any other given fact to Chuan being handsome, Chuan is not necessarily handsome.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest makes pizza.\nThe ocean does yoga.\nThe forest does yoga.\nRules:\nAssuming the forest does yoga, we can say the chef makes pizza.\nGiven that the forest makes pizza, it follows that mike enjoys music.\nGiven that the forest makes pizza, it follows that the chef enjoys music.\nIf mike makes pizza, then the ocean does yoga.\nWhen mike jumps high, we can conclude mike makes pizza.\nAssuming the chef does yoga, we can say mike jumps high.\nAssuming the forest makes pizza, we can say the chef does yoga.\nWhen mike makes pizza, we can conclude the chef makes pizza.", "statement": "The ocean does yoga.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the forest makes pizza, we can conclude the chef does yoga, we can see that the chef does yoga.\nApplying the logic of when the chef does yoga, we can conclude mike jumps high, we deduce that mike jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming mike jumps high, we can say mike makes pizza, we can see that mike makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming mike makes pizza, we can say the ocean does yoga, we can see that the ocean does yoga.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if mike makes pizza, then the ocean does yoga, The forest does yoga, we can say the chef makes pizza, we can say mike jumps high, we can conclude the chef enjoys music, we can conclude the chef does yoga, it follows that mike enjoys music. Given that the forest makes pizza, it follows that the chef enjoys music, it follows that mike enjoys music.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia reads books.\nThe teacher goes to the hospital.\nThe teacher sings beautifully.\nRules:\nBased on the teacher sings beautifully, it is evident that the teacher sings beautifully.\nWhen the teacher goes to the hospital, we can conclude the pig reads books.\nIf mia sings beautifully, then the teacher sings beautifully.\nGiven that ava goes to the hospital, it follows that mia sings beautifully.\nBased on the teacher plays football, it is evident that ava goes to the hospital.\nIf the teacher sings beautifully, then the teacher plays football.\nIf mia goes to the hospital, then the teacher sings beautifully.", "statement": "The teacher sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the teacher sings beautifully, we can say the teacher plays football, we can see that the teacher plays football.\nGiven that assuming the teacher plays football, we can say ava goes to the hospital, it is evident that ava goes to the hospital.\nApplying the logic of assuming ava goes to the hospital, we can say mia sings beautifully, we deduce that mia sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of based on mia sings beautifully, it is evident that the teacher sings beautifully, we deduce that the teacher sings beautifully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the teacher sings beautifully, it is evident that the teacher sings beautifully, the teacher sings beautifully.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy plays games.\nThe sandwich is blue.\nLucy is blue.\nRules:\nWhen lucy plays games, we can conclude the sandwich plays games.\nWhen the moon draws maps, we can conclude lucy plays games.\nWhen the sandwich plays games, we can conclude the moon draws maps.\nIf lucy draws maps, then the sandwich plays games.\nBased on the sandwich is blue, it is evident that lucy draws maps.", "statement": "Lucy plays games.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the sandwich is blue, we can conclude lucy draws maps, we deduce that lucy draws maps.\nSince we know that based on lucy draws maps, it is evident that the sandwich plays games, it follows that the sandwich plays games.\nGiven that based on the sandwich plays games, it is evident that the moon draws maps, it is evident that the moon draws maps.\nBecause based on the moon draws maps, it is evident that lucy plays games, we can conclude that lucy plays games.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because based on the sandwich is blue, it is evident that lucy draws maps, if lucy draws maps, then the sandwich plays games, when the sandwich plays games, we can conclude the moon draws maps, when the moon draws maps, we can conclude lucy plays games, lucy plays games\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge plays football.\nThe bridge becomes famous.\nLucy volunteers.\nRules:\nIf the bridge becomes famous, then lucy volunteers.\nWhen the bridge volunteers, we can conclude the bridge explores cities.\nIf lucy becomes famous, then the bridge volunteers.\nBased on the bridge plays football, it is evident that lucy becomes famous.\nIf the teacher plays football, then the bridge volunteers.\nGiven that lucy volunteers, it follows that the bridge plays football.", "statement": "The bridge explores cities.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge becomes famous, it is evident that lucy volunteers, we can see that lucy volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucy volunteers, we can say the bridge plays football, we can see that the bridge plays football.\nApplying the logic of assuming the bridge plays football, we can say lucy becomes famous, we deduce that lucy becomes famous.\nGiven that assuming lucy becomes famous, we can say the bridge volunteers, it is evident that the bridge volunteers.\nGiven that given that the bridge volunteers, it follows that the bridge explores cities, it is evident that the bridge explores cities.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"When the bridge volunteers, we can conclude the bridge explores cities., If the bridge becomes famous, then lucy volunteers., Based on the bridge plays football, it is evident that lucy becomes famous., Given that lucy volunteers, it follows that the bridge plays football.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean is a doctor.\nAva volunteers.\nThe sky becomes famous.\nRules:\nWhen the sky becomes famous, we can conclude ava is a doctor.\nIf ava volunteers, then mia is a doctor.\nIf ava volunteers, then mia is a doctor.\nGiven that the ocean is a doctor, it follows that mia is a doctor.\nIf ava volunteers, then mia is a doctor.\nAssuming the sky becomes famous, we can say mia is a doctor.\nIf ava becomes famous, then the ocean is a doctor.\nWhen the ocean is a doctor, we can conclude mia is a doctor.\nIf ava becomes famous, then ava becomes famous.\nAssuming the ocean is a doctor, we can say ava becomes famous.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the sky becomes famous, it is evident that ava is a doctor, we can see that ava is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava volunteers, it follows that mia is a doctor, we can see that mia is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava volunteers, it follows that mia is a doctor, we can see that mia is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the ocean is a doctor, we can conclude mia is a doctor, we can see that mia is a doctor.\nSince we know that when the ocean is a doctor, we can conclude ava becomes famous, it follows that ava becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of given that ava becomes famous, it follows that ava becomes famous, we deduce that ava becomes famous.\nGiven that assuming ava becomes famous, we can say the ocean is a doctor, it is evident that the ocean is a doctor.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"The assertion concerns whether Chuan is handsome, but there are no facts or rules provided that relate to or mention Chuan or determine anyone's handsomeness. Therefore, we cannot conclude anything about the assertion 'Chuan is handsome.' There is no connection between the provided facts/rules and the assertion.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone volunteers.\nThe festival solves puzzles.\nThe festival solves puzzles.\nRules:\nIf the festival solves puzzles, then mike volunteers.\nBased on the festival solves puzzles, it is evident that the bakery volunteers.\nIf the festival reads books, then the festival volunteers.\nWhen the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the festival reads books.\nGiven that the festival solves puzzles, it follows that the festival solves puzzles.\nWhen the festival volunteers, we can conclude mike volunteers.", "statement": "Mike reads books.", "reasoning": "Given that when the festival solves puzzles, we can conclude mike volunteers, it is evident that mike volunteers.\nSince we know that when the festival solves puzzles, we can conclude the festival solves puzzles, it follows that the festival solves puzzles.\nGiven that assuming the festival solves puzzles, we can say the bakery volunteers, it is evident that the bakery volunteers.\nApplying the logic of given that the bakery volunteers, it follows that the festival reads books, we deduce that the festival reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the festival reads books, it follows that the festival volunteers, we can see that the festival volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the festival solves puzzles, then mike volunteers, Based on the festival solves puzzles, it is evident that the bakery volunteers, When the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the festival reads books, Mike reads books is not a direct consequence of any rule, Mike reads books is a negation of the assertion.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam rides bikes.\nThe cat is funny.\nThe moon rides bikes.\nRules:\nBased on liam rides bikes, it is evident that the cat rides bikes.\nAssuming the cat is funny, we can say the cat rides bikes.\nBased on the cat is funny, it is evident that the cat is interesting.\nGiven that the cat rides bikes, it follows that the cat is funny.\nAssuming the cat is funny, we can say the cat rides bikes.\nGiven that liam rides bikes, it follows that the cat is funny.", "statement": "The cat is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that liam rides bikes, it follows that the cat is funny, we can see that the cat is funny.\nGiven that assuming the cat is funny, we can say the cat rides bikes, it is evident that the cat rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of when the cat rides bikes, we can conclude the cat is funny, we deduce that the cat is funny.\nApplying the logic of given that the cat is funny, it follows that the cat is interesting, we deduce that the cat is interesting.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The cat is funny, Based on the cat is funny, it is evident that the cat is interesting, The cat is interesting\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist plays football.\nThe bridge plays football.\nThe bridge is loud.\nRules:\nIf the bridge plays football, then the artist plays football.\nIf the sky is loud, then the bridge is magical.\nWhen the bridge plays football, we can conclude the artist plays football.\nBased on the artist is magical, it is evident that the sky is loud.\nGiven that the bridge is loud, it follows that the artist is magical.\nBased on the artist plays football, it is evident that the bridge is loud.", "statement": "The bridge is magical.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the artist plays football, we can conclude the bridge is loud, we deduce that the bridge is loud.\nApplying the logic of assuming the bridge is loud, we can say the artist is magical, we deduce that the artist is magical.\nSince we know that given that the artist is magical, it follows that the sky is loud, it follows that the sky is loud.\nBecause given that the sky is loud, it follows that the bridge is magical, we can conclude that the bridge is magical.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because if the sky is loud, then the bridge is magical, based on the artist is magical, it is evident that the sky is loud, given that the bridge is loud, it follows that the artist is magical, conclusion: the bridge is magical\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig plays football.\nThe stadium volunteers.\nThe stadium goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nGiven that the pig plays football, it follows that the stadium plays football.\nIf the pig plays football, then the stadium plays football.\nGiven that the stadium fishes in lakes, it follows that mia fishes in lakes.\nIf the moon volunteers, then the stadium fishes in lakes.\nIf the moon fishes in lakes, then the moon volunteers.\nWhen mia fishes in lakes, we can conclude the moon fishes in lakes.\nBased on the stadium goes to the hospital, it is evident that the moon fishes in lakes.", "statement": "Mia fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Given that if the stadium goes to the hospital, then the moon fishes in lakes, it is evident that the moon fishes in lakes.\nBecause when the moon fishes in lakes, we can conclude the moon volunteers, we can conclude that the moon volunteers.\nSince we know that if the moon volunteers, then the stadium fishes in lakes, it follows that the stadium fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of assuming the stadium fishes in lakes, we can say mia fishes in lakes, we deduce that mia fishes in lakes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the stadium goes to the hospital, it is evident that the moon fishes in lakes, When mia fishes in lakes, we can conclude the moon fishes in lakes, the negation of Mia fishes in lakes.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAlice fishes in lakes.\nCharlie goes to the hospital.\nChuan cooks well.\nRules:\nIf chuan cooks well, then chuan cooks well.\nBased on chuan is colorful, it is evident that chuan is colorful.\nWhen charlie goes to the hospital, we can conclude the teacher is colorful.\nAssuming chuan is colorful, we can say charlie goes to the hospital.\nBased on alice fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan is colorful.\nBased on chuan cooks well, it is evident that chuan is colorful.", "statement": "The teacher cooks well.", "reasoning": "Given that based on chuan cooks well, it is evident that chuan cooks well, it is evident that chuan cooks well.\nApplying the logic of based on alice fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan is colorful, we deduce that chuan is colorful.\nApplying the logic of when chuan cooks well, we can conclude chuan is colorful, we deduce that chuan is colorful.\nApplying the logic of assuming chuan is colorful, we can say charlie goes to the hospital, we deduce that charlie goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that assuming charlie goes to the hospital, we can say the teacher is colorful, it follows that the teacher is colorful.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when charlie goes to the hospital, we can conclude the teacher is colorful, charlie goes to the hospital, assuming chuan is colorful, we can say charlie goes to the hospital, based on alice fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan is colorful, based on chuan is colorful, it is evident that chuan is colorful, based on chuan cooks well, it is evident that chuan is colorful, if chuan cooks well, then chuan cooks well, the teacher is colorful but not necessarily that the teacher cooks well, the negation of the teacher cooks well\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car explores cities.\nSophie explores cities.\nThe car reads books.\nRules:\nWhen the car reads books, we can conclude the sandwich explores cities.\nWhen the car explores cities, we can conclude the sandwich explores cities.\nAssuming sophie explores cities, we can say the sandwich plays football.\nAssuming the bridge plays football, we can say sophie explores cities.\nIf the sandwich explores cities, then the car explores cities.\nBased on sophie explores cities, it is evident that the car explores cities.\nGiven that the bridge reads books, it follows that the bridge plays football.\nWhen the sandwich plays football, we can conclude the bridge reads books.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the car reads books, we can say the sandwich explores cities, we deduce that the sandwich explores cities.\nSince we know that given that sophie explores cities, it follows that the sandwich plays football, it follows that the sandwich plays football.\nApplying the logic of if the sandwich explores cities, then the car explores cities, we deduce that the car explores cities.\nBecause assuming the sandwich plays football, we can say the bridge reads books, we can conclude that the bridge reads books.\nBecause when the bridge reads books, we can conclude the bridge plays football, we can conclude that the bridge plays football.\nBecause given that the bridge plays football, it follows that sophie explores cities, we can conclude that sophie explores cities.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts connecting Chuan to being handsome, Chuan is handsome is not supported by the given information.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train swims well.\nThe sky swims well.\nThe train swims well.\nRules:\nIf the train swims well, then sophie plays games.\nBased on the train swims well, it is evident that sophie plays games.\nIf the train swims well, then the sky draws maps.\nIf the sky swims well, then sophie plays games.\nWhen the train swims well, we can conclude the pig plays games.\nGiven that sophie plays games, it follows that sophie plays games.\nAssuming sophie swims well, we can say sophie plays games.\nIf the sky plays games, then sophie swims well.\nGiven that the sky plays games, it follows that the sky plays games.\nBased on the train swims well, it is evident that the sky plays games.", "statement": "Sophie plays games.", "reasoning": "Because if the train swims well, then the sky plays games, we can conclude that the sky plays games.\nApplying the logic of if the sky plays games, then the sky plays games, we deduce that the sky plays games.\nSince we know that assuming the sky plays games, we can say sophie swims well, it follows that sophie swims well.\nApplying the logic of assuming sophie swims well, we can say sophie plays games, we deduce that sophie plays games.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because if the train swims well, then sophie plays games, Based on the train swims well, it is evident that sophie plays games, the train swims well, it is evident that sophie plays games\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University solves puzzles.\nMia is tall.\nThe globe solves puzzles.\nRules:\nAssuming the globe solves puzzles, we can say mia solves puzzles.\nGiven that the globe solves puzzles, it follows that stanford university paints pictures.\nAssuming the globe solves puzzles, we can say stanford university paints pictures.\nIf mia is tall, then mia solves puzzles.\nBased on stanford university solves puzzles, it is evident that stanford university solves puzzles.\nAssuming the cat paints pictures, we can say stanford university solves puzzles.\nAssuming stanford university fishes in lakes, we can say the cat paints pictures.\nWhen stanford university paints pictures, we can conclude stanford university fishes in lakes.", "statement": "Stanford University solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the globe solves puzzles, then stanford university paints pictures, we deduce that stanford university paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that stanford university paints pictures, it follows that stanford university fishes in lakes, we can see that stanford university fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that assuming stanford university fishes in lakes, we can say the cat paints pictures, it follows that the cat paints pictures.\nBecause based on the cat paints pictures, it is evident that stanford university solves puzzles, we can conclude that stanford university solves puzzles.\nBecause if stanford university solves puzzles, then stanford university solves puzzles, we can conclude that stanford university solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on stanford university solves puzzles, it is evident that stanford university solves puzzles, the conclusion is Stanford University solves puzzles.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun is quiet.\nThe computer is loud.\nThe cloud is a doctor.\nRules:\nAssuming the computer is loud, we can say the computer is a doctor.\nAssuming the computer is loud, we can say the computer is loud.\nAssuming the computer is loud, we can say the computer is loud.\nWhen the musician is a doctor, we can conclude the computer is loud.\nGiven that the cloud is fluffy, it follows that the musician is quiet.\nBased on the cloud is a doctor, it is evident that the musician is a doctor.", "statement": "The computer is loud.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the cloud is a doctor, we can say the musician is a doctor, we deduce that the musician is a doctor.\nBecause based on the musician is a doctor, it is evident that the computer is loud, we can conclude that the computer is loud.\nBecause if the computer is loud, then the computer is loud, we can conclude that the computer is loud.\nSince we know that when the computer is loud, we can conclude the computer is loud, it follows that the computer is loud.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the computer is loud, we can say the computer is loud, Assuming the computer is loud, we can say the computer is loud, Assuming the computer is loud, we can say the computer is loud, The computer is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree is happy.\nThe tree solves puzzles.\nThe globe runs quickly.\nRules:\nBased on the tree is happy, it is evident that the sandwich is happy.\nAssuming the tree is happy, we can say the house solves puzzles.\nIf the tree is happy, then the sandwich is happy.\nAssuming the tree solves puzzles, we can say the tree solves puzzles.\nWhen the globe runs quickly, we can conclude the house runs quickly.\nBased on the sandwich solves puzzles, it is evident that the tree solves puzzles.\nBased on the tree is happy, it is evident that the globe solves puzzles.\nGiven that the tree solves puzzles, it follows that the sandwich solves puzzles.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the tree is happy, we can say the sandwich is happy, we can see that the sandwich is happy.\nGiven that given that the tree is happy, it follows that the house solves puzzles, it is evident that the house solves puzzles.\nGiven that given that the globe runs quickly, it follows that the house runs quickly, it is evident that the house runs quickly.\nSince we know that when the tree is happy, we can conclude the globe solves puzzles, it follows that the globe solves puzzles.\nApplying the logic of when the tree solves puzzles, we can conclude the sandwich solves puzzles, we deduce that the sandwich solves puzzles.\nApplying the logic of when the sandwich solves puzzles, we can conclude the tree solves puzzles, we deduce that the tree solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the tree solves puzzles, it follows that the tree solves puzzles, we can see that the tree solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts related to Chuan or handsomeness; therefore, none of the provided rules or facts can be used to deduce the assertion.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city travels far.\nThe city travels far.\nThe city teaches math.\nRules:\nGiven that the city travels far, it follows that liam teaches math.\nGiven that liam teaches math, it follows that henry teaches math.\nGiven that henry travels far, it follows that liam teaches math.\nAssuming the city travels far, we can say stanford university teaches math.\nBased on henry teaches math, it is evident that stanford university teaches math.\nGiven that the city travels far, it follows that henry travels far.", "statement": "The city is tall.", "reasoning": "Because based on the city travels far, it is evident that liam teaches math, we can conclude that liam teaches math.\nBecause if the city travels far, then stanford university teaches math, we can conclude that stanford university teaches math.\nSince we know that if the city travels far, then henry travels far, it follows that henry travels far.\nGiven that if henry travels far, then liam teaches math, it is evident that liam teaches math.\nGiven that given that liam teaches math, it follows that henry teaches math, it is evident that henry teaches math.\nSince we know that based on henry teaches math, it is evident that stanford university teaches math, it follows that stanford university teaches math.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules link the city being tall to the given facts or other derived conclusions, the city is tall cannot be concluded.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river is friendly.\nSophie explores cities.\nAlice is magical.\nRules:\nWhen sophie explores cities, we can conclude the river is magical.\nBased on sophie is magical, it is evident that alice is friendly.\nWhen the river is friendly, we can conclude the bridge explores cities.\nIf alice teaches math, then sophie is magical.\nGiven that sophie is magical, it follows that alice teaches math.\nGiven that the bridge explores cities, it follows that sophie is magical.", "statement": "Alice is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the river is friendly, we can conclude the bridge explores cities, we can see that the bridge explores cities.\nBecause assuming the bridge explores cities, we can say sophie is magical, we can conclude that sophie is magical.\nGiven that assuming sophie is magical, we can say alice teaches math, it is evident that alice teaches math.\nGiven that when alice teaches math, we can conclude sophie is magical, it is evident that sophie is magical.\nSince we know that when sophie is magical, we can conclude alice is friendly, it follows that alice is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the river is friendly, we can conclude the bridge explores cities. Given that the bridge explores cities, it follows that sophie is magical. Based on sophie is magical, it is evident that alice is friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry is funny.\nThe musician is an engineer.\nThe musician is funny.\nRules:\nGiven that the musician is funny, it follows that henry hikes mountains.\nAssuming the musician is funny, we can say the bridge hikes mountains.\nBased on henry is funny, it is evident that henry hikes mountains.\nAssuming the musician is funny, we can say the bridge goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the musician is funny, we can say the bridge goes to the hospital.\nGiven that the musician is funny, it follows that the bridge goes to the hospital.\nIf the bridge hikes mountains, then the musician is funny.\nGiven that the musician is funny, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains.\nIf the bridge hikes mountains, then the musician is funny.", "statement": "The bridge goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the musician is funny, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the bridge hikes mountains, we can say the musician is funny, we can see that the musician is funny.\nBecause based on the musician is funny, it is evident that the bridge hikes mountains, we can conclude that the bridge hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of given that the bridge hikes mountains, it follows that the musician is funny, we deduce that the musician is funny.\nApplying the logic of if the musician is funny, then the bridge goes to the hospital, we deduce that the bridge goes to the hospital.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Given that the musician is funny, it follows that the bridge goes to the hospital.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery explores cities.\nThe artist sings beautifully.\nThe bakery sings beautifully.\nRules:\nGiven that the artist sings beautifully, it follows that charlie explores cities.\nGiven that the artist sings beautifully, it follows that charlie explores cities.\nAssuming charlie plays instruments, we can say mike is loud.\nIf mike is loud, then charlie plays instruments.\nWhen mike plays instruments, we can conclude charlie plays instruments.\nBased on charlie plays instruments, it is evident that mike plays instruments.\nBased on the bakery explores cities, it is evident that charlie plays instruments.", "statement": "Mike is loud.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the bakery explores cities, we can conclude charlie plays instruments, we deduce that charlie plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming charlie plays instruments, we can say mike plays instruments, we can see that mike plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming mike plays instruments, we can say charlie plays instruments, we can see that charlie plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if charlie plays instruments, then mike is loud, we can see that mike is loud.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Based on the bakery explores cities, it is evident that charlie plays instruments, If mike is loud, then charlie plays instruments, Mike is loud.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe playground dances gracefully.\nLucas is blue.\nThe city is magical.\nRules:\nBased on the city is magical, it is evident that the pumpkin runs quickly.\nAssuming the city dances gracefully, we can say the pumpkin runs quickly.\nAssuming lucas is magical, we can say the city dances gracefully.\nAssuming the city runs quickly, we can say lucas is magical.\nWhen the city dances gracefully, we can conclude lucas is magical.\nIf the pumpkin runs quickly, then the city runs quickly.", "statement": "The pumpkin runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the city is magical, then the pumpkin runs quickly, we deduce that the pumpkin runs quickly.\nBecause given that the pumpkin runs quickly, it follows that the city runs quickly, we can conclude that the city runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the city runs quickly, we can say lucas is magical, we can see that lucas is magical.\nBecause assuming lucas is magical, we can say the city dances gracefully, we can conclude that the city dances gracefully.\nBecause when the city dances gracefully, we can conclude the pumpkin runs quickly, we can conclude that the pumpkin runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the city is magical, it is evident that the pumpkin runs quickly, the pumpkin runs quickly\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain carries bags.\nThe cat is a doctor.\nJianzhi is a doctor.\nRules:\nAssuming jianzhi is a doctor, we can say the cat is a chef.\nBased on the cat is a doctor, it is evident that the mountain is a chef.\nIf the mountain is a doctor, then the cat is a doctor.\nWhen the mountain carries bags, we can conclude the mountain is a doctor.\nGiven that the mountain is a doctor, it follows that jianzhi is a chef.\nWhen the mountain is a chef, we can conclude the mountain is a doctor.", "statement": "Jianzhi is a chef.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the mountain carries bags, we can say the mountain is a doctor, it is evident that the mountain is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the mountain is a doctor, then the cat is a doctor, we can see that the cat is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming the cat is a doctor, we can say the mountain is a chef, we deduce that the mountain is a chef.\nBecause based on the mountain is a chef, it is evident that the mountain is a doctor, we can conclude that the mountain is a doctor.\nSince we know that based on the mountain is a doctor, it is evident that jianzhi is a chef, it follows that jianzhi is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the mountain carries bags, we can conclude the mountain is a doctor., Given that the mountain is a doctor, it follows that jianzhi is a chef., Jianzhi is a chef.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher hikes mountains.\nThe fountain hikes mountains.\nThe wall explores cities.\nRules:\nIf the teacher hikes mountains, then the wall hikes mountains.\nAssuming the teacher explores cities, we can say the wall is a doctor.\nAssuming the wall is a doctor, we can say the teacher explores cities.\nWhen the teacher explores cities, we can conclude the wall is a doctor.\nIf the fountain hikes mountains, then the teacher explores cities.\nAssuming the wall explores cities, we can say the teacher explores cities.", "statement": "The wall is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the wall explores cities, we can say the teacher explores cities, we deduce that the teacher explores cities.\nSince we know that given that the teacher explores cities, it follows that the wall is a doctor, it follows that the wall is a doctor.\nBecause given that the wall is a doctor, it follows that the teacher explores cities, we can conclude that the teacher explores cities.\nGiven that if the teacher explores cities, then the wall is a doctor, it is evident that the wall is a doctor.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the fountain hikes mountains, then the teacher explores cities., When the teacher explores cities, we can conclude the wall is a doctor., The wall is a doctor.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry is loud.\nThe sun is loud.\nThe plane solves puzzles.\nRules:\nBased on the plane solves puzzles, it is evident that henry is loud.\nWhen the plane solves puzzles, we can conclude mia solves puzzles.\nIf the sun is quiet, then henry is loud.\nWhen mia is quiet, we can conclude the sun is loud.\nBased on the plane is loud, it is evident that mia is quiet.\nIf the sun is quiet, then the plane is loud.\nAssuming mia solves puzzles, we can say the sun is quiet.", "statement": "The sun is loud.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the plane solves puzzles, it follows that mia solves puzzles, it is evident that mia solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when mia solves puzzles, we can conclude the sun is quiet, we can see that the sun is quiet.\nSince we know that based on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the plane is loud, it follows that the plane is loud.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the plane is loud, we can say mia is quiet, we can see that mia is quiet.\nApplying the logic of if mia is quiet, then the sun is loud, we deduce that the sun is loud.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when mia is quiet, we can conclude the sun is loud., Based on the plane is loud, it is evident that mia is quiet., The sun is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book swims well.\nThe book fishes in lakes.\nThe garden fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nWhen the garden fishes in lakes, we can conclude the book swims well.\nAssuming the book creates art, we can say the book is magical.\nGiven that the garden is magical, it follows that the garden swims well.\nIf the book creates art, then the book swims well.\nAssuming the book is magical, we can say the garden is magical.\nIf the book swims well, then the book creates art.", "statement": "The garden creates art.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the garden fishes in lakes, we can say the book swims well, it follows that the book swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the book swims well, we can say the book creates art, we can see that the book creates art.\nBecause when the book creates art, we can conclude the book is magical, we can conclude that the book is magical.\nBecause if the book is magical, then the garden is magical, we can conclude that the garden is magical.\nApplying the logic of given that the garden is magical, it follows that the garden swims well, we deduce that the garden swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the garden fishes in lakes, we can conclude the book swims well, If the book swims well, then the book creates art, Assuming the book creates art, we can say the book is magical, Assuming the book is magical, we can say the garden is magical, Given that the garden is magical, it follows that the garden swims well, The garden fishes in lakes, we can conclude The garden creates art.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe collects stamps.\nThe globe collects stamps.\nThe globe runs marathons.\nRules:\nIf the globe collects stamps, then stanford university travels far.\nIf the globe runs marathons, then the globe runs marathons.\nIf stanford university does yoga, then the globe collects stamps.\nIf the globe runs marathons, then stanford university does yoga.\nWhen the globe travels far, we can conclude the globe collects stamps.\nIf the globe collects stamps, then the globe runs marathons.", "statement": "The globe travels far.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the globe collects stamps, it follows that stanford university travels far, we deduce that stanford university travels far.\nGiven that when the globe collects stamps, we can conclude the globe runs marathons, it is evident that the globe runs marathons.\nGiven that based on the globe runs marathons, it is evident that stanford university does yoga, it is evident that stanford university does yoga.\nGiven that based on stanford university does yoga, it is evident that the globe collects stamps, it is evident that the globe collects stamps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the globe collects stamps, then stanford university travels far., the globe collects stamps, stanford university travels far., the globe travels far.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan dances gracefully.\nThe cloud does yoga.\nChuan dances gracefully.\nRules:\nBased on chuan dances gracefully, it is evident that chuan volunteers.\nGiven that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that the garden volunteers.\nWhen the cloud does yoga, we can conclude the zoo volunteers.\nGiven that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that the garden volunteers.\nBased on chuan dances gracefully, it is evident that chuan dances gracefully.\nAssuming chuan dances gracefully, we can say the garden volunteers.\nWhen the garden volunteers, we can conclude chuan dances gracefully.\nBased on the garden volunteers, it is evident that the garden volunteers.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because given that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that chuan volunteers, we can conclude that chuan volunteers.\nApplying the logic of when chuan dances gracefully, we can conclude the garden volunteers, we deduce that the garden volunteers.\nApplying the logic of based on the cloud does yoga, it is evident that the zoo volunteers, we deduce that the zoo volunteers.\nGiven that assuming the garden volunteers, we can say the garden volunteers, it is evident that the garden volunteers.\nSince we know that when the garden volunteers, we can conclude chuan dances gracefully, it follows that chuan dances gracefully.\nBecause based on chuan dances gracefully, it is evident that chuan dances gracefully, we can conclude that chuan dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of if chuan dances gracefully, then the garden volunteers, we deduce that the garden volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules linking Chuan dances gracefully or the cloud does yoga to Chuan being handsome, Chuan is not handsome.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician paints pictures.\nThe pig paints pictures.\nThe fountain paints pictures.\nRules:\nGiven that the fountain paints pictures, it follows that emma rides bikes.\nWhen the musician paints pictures, we can conclude emma enjoys music.\nBased on the fountain plays football, it is evident that emma plays football.\nBased on the fountain paints pictures, it is evident that the pig enjoys music.\nGiven that emma enjoys music, it follows that the fountain plays football.\nBased on the pig paints pictures, it is evident that emma enjoys music.", "statement": "The fountain enjoys music.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the fountain paints pictures, it follows that emma rides bikes, we can see that emma rides bikes.\nBecause given that the musician paints pictures, it follows that emma enjoys music, we can conclude that emma enjoys music.\nGiven that given that the fountain paints pictures, it follows that the pig enjoys music, it is evident that the pig enjoys music.\nApplying the logic of based on the pig paints pictures, it is evident that emma enjoys music, we deduce that emma enjoys music.\nGiven that assuming emma enjoys music, we can say the fountain plays football, it is evident that the fountain plays football.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the fountain plays football, it is evident that emma plays football, we can see that emma plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the fountain paints pictures, it is evident that the pig enjoys music, Based on the pig paints pictures, it is evident that emma enjoys music, Given that emma enjoys music, it follows that the fountain plays football, The musician paints pictures, When the musician paints pictures, we can conclude emma enjoys music, Based on the fountain plays football, it is evident that emma plays football, Given that the fountain paints pictures, it follows that emma rides bikes, The fountain enjoys music\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam swims well.\nLiam draws maps.\nLiam is a scientist.\nRules:\nIf liam swims well, then the wall swims well.\nIf liam draws maps, then jack draws maps.\nAssuming liam swims well, we can say the wall swims well.\nIf liam is a scientist, then liam swims well.\nBased on the river is a scientist, it is evident that jack draws maps.\nIf liam swims well, then jack draws maps.\nWhen liam writes stories, we can conclude the river is a scientist.\nIf the wall swims well, then the wall draws maps.\nWhen liam swims well, we can conclude liam writes stories.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that liam swims well, it follows that the wall swims well, it follows that the wall swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that liam draws maps, it follows that jack draws maps, we can see that jack draws maps.\nBecause given that liam swims well, it follows that the wall swims well, we can conclude that the wall swims well.\nApplying the logic of when liam is a scientist, we can conclude liam swims well, we deduce that liam swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the wall swims well, we can say the wall draws maps, we can see that the wall draws maps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming liam swims well, we can say liam writes stories, we can see that liam writes stories.\nBecause when liam writes stories, we can conclude the river is a scientist, we can conclude that the river is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of assuming the river is a scientist, we can say jack draws maps, we deduce that jack draws maps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"The assertion that Chuan is handsome is not supported by any provided facts or rules, and no logical connection can be made from them to conclude about Chuan's appearance.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef is funny.\nThe artist swims well.\nThe artist jumps high.\nRules:\nIf the artist swims well, then the artist jumps high.\nGiven that the artist jumps high, it follows that the artist is happy.\nIf the shop is happy, then the artist jumps high.\nWhen the artist jumps high, we can conclude the shop is happy.\nIf the shop swims well, then the artist swims well.\nWhen the artist is happy, we can conclude the artist jumps high.", "statement": "The shop swims well.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the artist swims well, we can conclude the artist jumps high, it follows that the artist jumps high.\nBecause assuming the artist jumps high, we can say the shop is happy, we can conclude that the shop is happy.\nSince we know that if the shop is happy, then the artist jumps high, it follows that the artist jumps high.\nSince we know that if the artist jumps high, then the artist is happy, it follows that the artist is happy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the artist swims well, then the artist jumps high., Given that the artist jumps high, it follows that the artist is happy., When the artist is happy, we can conclude the artist jumps high., The artist swims well., The artist jumps high., The artist is happy., When the artist jumps high, we can conclude the shop is happy., If the shop swims well, then the artist swims well., The artist swims well., The shop does not swim well.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEthan goes to the hospital.\nSophie teaches math.\nSophie collects stamps.\nRules:\nWhen sophie collects stamps, we can conclude the dog collects stamps.\nGiven that the cat teaches math, it follows that the dog is happy.\nBased on the dog is happy, it is evident that the cat teaches math.\nIf the dog is happy, then the dog teaches math.\nIf the dog teaches math, then the dog is happy.\nWhen ethan goes to the hospital, we can conclude the dog teaches math.", "statement": "The dog is happy.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on ethan goes to the hospital, it is evident that the dog teaches math, we can see that the dog teaches math.\nSince we know that when the dog teaches math, we can conclude the dog is happy, it follows that the dog is happy.\nSince we know that based on the dog is happy, it is evident that the cat teaches math, it follows that the cat teaches math.\nSince we know that assuming the cat teaches math, we can say the dog is happy, it follows that the dog is happy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When ethan goes to the hospital, we can conclude the dog teaches math, If the dog teaches math, then the dog is happy, the dog is happy\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon is loud.\nThe moon is colorful.\nThe moon is interesting.\nRules:\nIf the moon is interesting, then the mountain runs quickly.\nBased on the globe runs quickly, it is evident that the mountain is interesting.\nGiven that the moon is loud, it follows that ethan is interesting.\nWhen ethan is interesting, we can conclude the globe runs quickly.\nBased on the mountain runs quickly, it is evident that the mountain is loud.\nIf the moon is interesting, then ethan is interesting.", "statement": "Ethan is colorful.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the moon is interesting, it is evident that the mountain runs quickly, it follows that the mountain runs quickly.\nBecause when the mountain runs quickly, we can conclude the mountain is loud, we can conclude that the mountain is loud.\nSince we know that if the moon is interesting, then ethan is interesting, it follows that ethan is interesting.\nSince we know that if ethan is interesting, then the globe runs quickly, it follows that the globe runs quickly.\nGiven that given that the globe runs quickly, it follows that the mountain is interesting, it is evident that the mountain is interesting.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the moon is interesting, then ethan is interesting, the moon is interesting, when ethan is interesting, we can conclude the globe runs quickly, based on the globe runs quickly, it is evident that the mountain is interesting, the moon is interesting, the assertion that ethan is colorful is unsupported.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival enjoys music.\nThe car becomes famous.\nThe festival carries bags.\nRules:\nIf the festival carries bags, then mike carries bags.\nIf mike becomes famous, then mike becomes famous.\nGiven that the car becomes famous, it follows that mike becomes famous.\nGiven that the festival is an artist, it follows that the car becomes famous.\nWhen mike carries bags, we can conclude mike carries bags.\nIf the festival carries bags, then the festival is an artist.", "statement": "Mike becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Because when the festival carries bags, we can conclude the festival is an artist, we can conclude that the festival is an artist.\nApplying the logic of when the festival is an artist, we can conclude the car becomes famous, we deduce that the car becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of when the car becomes famous, we can conclude mike becomes famous, we deduce that mike becomes famous.\nGiven that based on mike becomes famous, it is evident that mike becomes famous, it is evident that mike becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the car becomes famous, it follows that mike becomes famous., Mike becomes famous.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich is loud.\nThe city is an artist.\nThe house dances gracefully.\nRules:\nWhen the sandwich is loud, we can conclude the globe dances gracefully.\nWhen the city is an artist, we can conclude the globe is fast.\nWhen the city is an artist, we can conclude the globe is fast.\nAssuming the house dances gracefully, we can say the globe dances gracefully.\nBased on the city is fast, it is evident that the city is an artist.\nAssuming the globe is loud, we can say the city is fast.\nAssuming the city dances gracefully, we can say the globe is loud.\nAssuming the city is loud, we can say the globe dances gracefully.\nWhen the sandwich is loud, we can conclude the city dances gracefully.", "statement": "The city is an artist.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the sandwich is loud, it follows that the city dances gracefully, we can see that the city dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of if the city dances gracefully, then the globe is loud, we deduce that the globe is loud.\nApplying the logic of when the globe is loud, we can conclude the city is fast, we deduce that the city is fast.\nGiven that assuming the city is fast, we can say the city is an artist, it is evident that the city is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because When the city is an artist, we can conclude the globe is fast, Based on the city is fast, it is evident that the city is an artist, The city is an artist\", \n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef draws maps.\nThe stadium fishes in lakes.\nEthan fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nAssuming the stadium fishes in lakes, we can say the chef is fluffy.\nWhen the chef draws maps, we can conclude the chef is fluffy.\nWhen ethan is fluffy, we can conclude the stadium is a chef.\nIf the globe fishes in lakes, then ethan is fluffy.\nGiven that the stadium is a chef, it follows that the stadium is a chef.\nAssuming the stadium fishes in lakes, we can say the globe fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the chef is fluffy, we can say ethan is fluffy.", "statement": "The chef is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the stadium fishes in lakes, it follows that the chef is fluffy, we deduce that the chef is fluffy.\nGiven that given that the stadium fishes in lakes, it follows that the globe fishes in lakes, it is evident that the globe fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that if the globe fishes in lakes, then ethan is fluffy, it follows that ethan is fluffy.\nBecause if ethan is fluffy, then the stadium is a chef, we can conclude that the stadium is a chef.\nApplying the logic of assuming the stadium is a chef, we can say the stadium is a chef, we deduce that the stadium is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the chef draws maps, we can conclude the chef is fluffy, the chef is a chef\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun swims well.\nThe ocean explores cities.\nLucy explores cities.\nRules:\nWhen the sun swims well, we can conclude sophie swims well.\nBased on the sun swims well, it is evident that the ocean swims well.\nWhen the sun swims well, we can conclude sophie swims well.\nWhen the ocean explores cities, we can conclude sophie swims well.\nWhen the ocean sings beautifully, we can conclude lucy plays instruments.\nGiven that lucy plays instruments, it follows that lucy swims well.\nWhen the ocean sings beautifully, we can conclude the ocean sings beautifully.\nAssuming lucy explores cities, we can say lucy swims well.\nBased on lucy explores cities, it is evident that the ocean sings beautifully.", "statement": "Lucy sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the sun swims well, it follows that sophie swims well, we deduce that sophie swims well.\nBecause based on the sun swims well, it is evident that the ocean swims well, we can conclude that the ocean swims well.\nGiven that based on lucy explores cities, it is evident that lucy swims well, it is evident that lucy swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if lucy explores cities, then the ocean sings beautifully, we can see that the ocean sings beautifully.\nBecause if the ocean sings beautifully, then the ocean sings beautifully, we can conclude that the ocean sings beautifully.\nGiven that if the ocean sings beautifully, then lucy plays instruments, it is evident that lucy plays instruments.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the ocean explores cities, Based on lucy explores cities, it is evident that the ocean sings beautifully, When the ocean sings beautifully, we can conclude lucy plays instruments, Given that lucy plays instruments, it follows that lucy swims well, Assuming lucy explores cities, we can say lucy swims well, Lucy sings beautifully\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe swims well.\nThe book is colorful.\nThe globe is tall.\nRules:\nIf the globe is tall, then sarah is tall.\nIf the book is colorful, then sarah is colorful.\nBased on the globe swims well, it is evident that ava is tall.\nWhen the globe is tall, we can conclude ava swims well.\nAssuming sarah is colorful, we can say ava swims well.\nBased on ava is colorful, it is evident that sarah is tall.\nIf the book swims well, then ava is colorful.\nAssuming the book is colorful, we can say the book swims well.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the globe is tall, we can say sarah is tall, it follows that sarah is tall.\nSince we know that based on the book is colorful, it is evident that sarah is colorful, it follows that sarah is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the globe swims well, we can say ava is tall, we can see that ava is tall.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the globe is tall, it follows that ava swims well, we can see that ava swims well.\nSince we know that when the book is colorful, we can conclude the book swims well, it follows that the book swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the book swims well, we can conclude ava is colorful, we can see that ava is colorful.\nBecause given that ava is colorful, it follows that sarah is tall, we can conclude that sarah is tall.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"The provided facts and rules do not relate to whether Chuan is handsome or not and therefore cannot prove or disprove the assertion.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAlice rides bikes.\nAlice takes pictures.\nThe forest hikes mountains.\nRules:\nBased on alice rides bikes, it is evident that liam rides bikes.\nBased on the forest hikes mountains, it is evident that liam rides bikes.\nIf liam writes stories, then the forest rides bikes.\nGiven that alice writes stories, it follows that liam writes stories.\nIf alice rides bikes, then alice writes stories.\nGiven that alice rides bikes, it follows that alice rides bikes.", "statement": "The forest rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Given that based on alice rides bikes, it is evident that alice rides bikes, it is evident that alice rides bikes.\nGiven that assuming alice rides bikes, we can say alice writes stories, it is evident that alice writes stories.\nSince we know that when alice writes stories, we can conclude liam writes stories, it follows that liam writes stories.\nGiven that when liam writes stories, we can conclude the forest rides bikes, it is evident that the forest rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If alice rides bikes, then alice writes stories, Given that alice rides bikes, it follows that alice rides bikes, Given that alice writes stories, it follows that liam writes stories, If liam writes stories, then the forest rides bikes, the forest rides bikes\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam is quiet.\nThe cat is quiet.\nLiam dances gracefully.\nRules:\nGiven that the cat is quiet, it follows that liam volunteers.\nAssuming the cat is quiet, we can say liam volunteers.\nGiven that the moon dances gracefully, it follows that the cat is quiet.\nIf liam is quiet, then liam is quiet.\nIf liam travels far, then the moon dances gracefully.\nAssuming liam is quiet, we can say liam travels far.", "statement": "Liam volunteers.", "reasoning": "Given that when liam is quiet, we can conclude liam travels far, it is evident that liam travels far.\nSince we know that if liam travels far, then the moon dances gracefully, it follows that the moon dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of assuming the moon dances gracefully, we can say the cat is quiet, we deduce that the cat is quiet.\nGiven that based on the cat is quiet, it is evident that liam volunteers, it is evident that liam volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the cat is quiet, we can say liam volunteers, Liam volunteers.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma cooks well.\nThe river solves puzzles.\nEmma rides bikes.\nRules:\nGiven that the river solves puzzles, it follows that the river draws maps.\nGiven that the festival solves puzzles, it follows that emma draws maps.\nBased on emma rides bikes, it is evident that the festival draws maps.\nWhen emma draws maps, we can conclude emma rides bikes.\nWhen the river solves puzzles, we can conclude emma draws maps.", "statement": "The festival solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the river solves puzzles, it follows that the river draws maps, we deduce that the river draws maps.\nBecause if the river solves puzzles, then emma draws maps, we can conclude that emma draws maps.\nGiven that when emma draws maps, we can conclude emma rides bikes, it is evident that emma rides bikes.\nSince we know that based on emma rides bikes, it is evident that the festival draws maps, it follows that the festival draws maps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the river solves puzzles, we can conclude emma draws maps, and when emma draws maps, we can conclude emma rides bikes, and based on emma rides bikes, it is evident that the festival draws maps, the festival solves puzzles.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is interesting.\nThe city is fluffy.\nThe moon is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf the moon is fluffy, then the moon is fluffy.\nIf the city is fluffy, then the sky is interesting.\nBased on the ocean creates art, it is evident that the city is colorful.\nIf the sky is interesting, then the ocean creates art.\nBased on the city is colorful, it is evident that the ocean creates art.\nGiven that the sky is interesting, it follows that the moon is interesting.\nAssuming the moon is fluffy, we can say the sky is interesting.", "statement": "The moon creates art.", "reasoning": "Because based on the moon is fluffy, it is evident that the moon is fluffy, we can conclude that the moon is fluffy.\nBecause when the city is fluffy, we can conclude the sky is interesting, we can conclude that the sky is interesting.\nSince we know that when the sky is interesting, we can conclude the moon is interesting, it follows that the moon is interesting.\nApplying the logic of if the moon is fluffy, then the sky is interesting, we deduce that the sky is interesting.\nSince we know that when the sky is interesting, we can conclude the ocean creates art, it follows that the ocean creates art.\nGiven that assuming the ocean creates art, we can say the city is colorful, it is evident that the city is colorful.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there is no rule connecting the fluffiness or interest of the moon to it creating art, the negation of the assertion\", \n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium dances gracefully.\nThe phone is happy.\nChuan explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that the stadium dances gracefully, it follows that the phone dances gracefully.\nIf the stadium is friendly, then the phone dances gracefully.\nBased on the stadium is friendly, it is evident that the phone dances gracefully.\nWhen the shop explores cities, we can conclude the stadium is friendly.\nWhen the phone dances gracefully, we can conclude the stadium is friendly.\nAssuming the phone dances gracefully, we can say the shop explores cities.", "statement": "The shop is happy.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the stadium dances gracefully, then the phone dances gracefully, it follows that the phone dances gracefully.\nGiven that given that the phone dances gracefully, it follows that the shop explores cities, it is evident that the shop explores cities.\nSince we know that if the shop explores cities, then the stadium is friendly, it follows that the stadium is friendly.\nSince we know that based on the stadium is friendly, it is evident that the phone dances gracefully, it follows that the phone dances gracefully.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules connect the available facts with the assertion, the shop is happy, it follows that the shop is not necessarily happy.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone runs marathons.\nThe phone solves puzzles.\nThe phone writes stories.\nRules:\nBased on the phone solves puzzles, it is evident that the city writes stories.\nIf the city writes stories, then the phone is a doctor.\nAssuming the car is a doctor, we can say the car solves puzzles.\nGiven that the city is a doctor, it follows that the car is a doctor.\nIf the phone is a doctor, then the city is a doctor.\nAssuming the phone runs marathons, we can say the phone is a doctor.", "statement": "The car solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the phone runs marathons, we can conclude the phone is a doctor, we deduce that the phone is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of based on the phone is a doctor, it is evident that the city is a doctor, we deduce that the city is a doctor.\nSince we know that assuming the city is a doctor, we can say the car is a doctor, it follows that the car is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the car is a doctor, we can say the car solves puzzles, we can see that the car solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the phone runs marathons, we can say the phone is a doctor., If the phone is a doctor, then the city is a doctor., Given that the city is a doctor, it follows that the car is a doctor., Assuming the car is a doctor, we can say the car solves puzzles., the car solves puzzles.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky is tall.\nThe fountain writes stories.\nThe sandwich jumps high.\nRules:\nGiven that the sandwich jumps high, it follows that the fountain is tall.\nAssuming lucy writes stories, we can say lucy is fluffy.\nWhen the sandwich is tall, we can conclude lucy is tall.\nAssuming the sky jumps high, we can say lucy writes stories.\nIf lucy writes stories, then lucy writes stories.\nIf the fountain is tall, then lucy writes stories.", "statement": "The sky jumps high.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the sandwich jumps high, then the fountain is tall, we deduce that the fountain is tall.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the fountain is tall, it is evident that lucy writes stories, we can see that lucy writes stories.\nApplying the logic of when lucy writes stories, we can conclude lucy writes stories, we deduce that lucy writes stories.\nSince we know that if lucy writes stories, then lucy is fluffy, it follows that lucy is fluffy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the sandwich jumps high, it follows that the fountain is tall, If the fountain is tall, then lucy writes stories, Assuming lucy writes stories, we can say lucy is fluffy, the assertion The sky jumps high is not concluded through any rules.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan travels far.\nChuan creates art.\nThe phone creates art.\nRules:\nBased on chuan creates art, it is evident that chuan creates art.\nWhen chuan creates art, we can conclude chuan creates art.\nGiven that the phone creates art, it follows that the zoo solves puzzles.\nGiven that the zoo travels far, it follows that the zoo solves puzzles.\nWhen the garden solves puzzles, we can conclude the zoo travels far.\nBased on the phone creates art, it is evident that the garden solves puzzles.\nGiven that the phone creates art, it follows that the phone creates art.", "statement": "The zoo solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the phone creates art, it is evident that the phone creates art, we deduce that the phone creates art.\nSince we know that given that the phone creates art, it follows that the garden solves puzzles, it follows that the garden solves puzzles.\nGiven that assuming the garden solves puzzles, we can say the zoo travels far, it is evident that the zoo travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the zoo travels far, it follows that the zoo solves puzzles, we can see that the zoo solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Given that the phone creates art, it follows that the zoo solves puzzles.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall travels far.\nEthan does yoga.\nJames is friendly.\nRules:\nAssuming ethan does yoga, we can say the plane is friendly.\nIf ethan becomes famous, then james travels far.\nWhen the wall becomes famous, we can conclude ethan becomes famous.\nAssuming the plane travels far, we can say the wall becomes famous.\nIf james is friendly, then the plane travels far.", "statement": "James travels far.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if james is friendly, then the plane travels far, we deduce that the plane travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the plane travels far, it follows that the wall becomes famous, we can see that the wall becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the wall becomes famous, we can say ethan becomes famous, we can see that ethan becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of when ethan becomes famous, we can conclude james travels far, we deduce that james travels far.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If james is friendly, then the plane travels far., Assuming the plane travels far, we can say the wall becomes famous., When the wall becomes famous, we can conclude ethan becomes famous., If ethan becomes famous, then james travels far., James travels far.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher grows plants.\nThe bakery cooks well.\nThe teacher explores cities.\nRules:\nAssuming the teacher explores cities, we can say the teacher cooks well.\nGiven that the teacher grows plants, it follows that the river grows plants.\nAssuming the teacher explores cities, we can say the bakery explores cities.\nBased on the bakery cooks well, it is evident that the car grows plants.\nGiven that the car is an engineer, it follows that the teacher explores cities.\nAssuming the car is an engineer, we can say the car is an engineer.\nAssuming the teacher explores cities, we can say the car is an engineer.\nIf the car is an engineer, then the bakery is an engineer.\nWhen the bakery is an engineer, we can conclude the river grows plants.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the teacher explores cities, we can conclude the teacher cooks well, we can see that the teacher cooks well.\nGiven that assuming the teacher grows plants, we can say the river grows plants, it is evident that the river grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the teacher explores cities, we can say the bakery explores cities, we can see that the bakery explores cities.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the bakery cooks well, it follows that the car grows plants, we can see that the car grows plants.\nBecause assuming the teacher explores cities, we can say the car is an engineer, we can conclude that the car is an engineer.\nBecause if the car is an engineer, then the car is an engineer, we can conclude that the car is an engineer.\nBecause if the car is an engineer, then the bakery is an engineer, we can conclude that the bakery is an engineer.\nApplying the logic of assuming the car is an engineer, we can say the teacher explores cities, we deduce that the teacher explores cities.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no facts or rules supporting the assertion.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher goes to the hospital.\nThe teacher teaches math.\nThe computer explores cities.\nRules:\nIf the teacher goes to the hospital, then the chef teaches math.\nAssuming the chef is a doctor, we can say the chef teaches math.\nGiven that the computer goes to the hospital, it follows that the dog teaches math.\nWhen the teacher teaches math, we can conclude the dog teaches math.\nWhen the computer goes to the hospital, we can conclude the teacher teaches math.\nGiven that the computer explores cities, it follows that the computer goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The chef is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the teacher goes to the hospital, it follows that the chef teaches math, we can see that the chef teaches math.\nApplying the logic of if the computer explores cities, then the computer goes to the hospital, we deduce that the computer goes to the hospital.\nBecause assuming the computer goes to the hospital, we can say the teacher teaches math, we can conclude that the teacher teaches math.\nBecause based on the teacher teaches math, it is evident that the dog teaches math, we can conclude that the dog teaches math.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that the computer explores cities, it follows that the computer goes to the hospital., When the computer goes to the hospital, we can conclude the teacher teaches math., When the teacher teaches math, we can conclude the dog teaches math., The teacher teaches math., If the teacher goes to the hospital, then the chef teaches math., Assuming the chef is a doctor, we can say the chef teaches math., the chef teaches math via rule 1 and rule 2., the assumption chef is a doctor is not required., the assertion 'The chef is a doctor' is negated with rule 3., and rule 4 provides enough.\", \n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium jumps high.\nThe stadium is quiet.\nThe stadium jumps high.\nRules:\nBased on the stadium is quiet, it is evident that the stadium paints pictures.\nAssuming the book paints pictures, we can say the river is quiet.\nIf the tree draws maps, then the book paints pictures.\nAssuming the book jumps high, we can say the tree draws maps.\nGiven that the stadium is quiet, it follows that the book jumps high.\nIf the tree jumps high, then the book jumps high.", "statement": "The river is quiet.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the stadium is quiet, we can say the book jumps high, we can conclude that the book jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the book jumps high, we can conclude the tree draws maps, we can see that the tree draws maps.\nBecause based on the tree draws maps, it is evident that the book paints pictures, we can conclude that the book paints pictures.\nSince we know that given that the book paints pictures, it follows that the river is quiet, it follows that the river is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the stadium is quiet, it follows that the book jumps high., Assuming the book jumps high, we can say the tree draws maps., If the tree draws maps, then the book paints pictures., Assuming the book paints pictures, we can say the river is quiet., The river is quiet.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train paints pictures.\nThe musician plays football.\nJack hosts parties.\nRules:\nAssuming the train paints pictures, we can say the bridge plays football.\nGiven that the train paints pictures, it follows that jack hosts parties.\nIf the train paints pictures, then the bridge plays football.\nGiven that jack hosts parties, it follows that the bridge plays football.\nBased on jack hosts parties, it is evident that the train hosts parties.\nAssuming the train paints pictures, we can say the train hosts parties.\nBased on the train collects stamps, it is evident that the bridge plays football.\nBased on the train hosts parties, it is evident that the train collects stamps.\nWhen the train hosts parties, we can conclude the bridge paints pictures.\nWhen jack hosts parties, we can conclude the train hosts parties.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that when the train paints pictures, we can conclude the bridge plays football, it is evident that the bridge plays football.\nApplying the logic of based on the train paints pictures, it is evident that jack hosts parties, we deduce that jack hosts parties.\nBecause assuming jack hosts parties, we can say the train hosts parties, we can conclude that the train hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming jack hosts parties, we can say the train hosts parties, we can see that the train hosts parties.\nBecause based on the train hosts parties, it is evident that the train collects stamps, we can conclude that the train collects stamps.\nSince we know that assuming the train hosts parties, we can say the bridge paints pictures, it follows that the bridge paints pictures.\nBecause if the train collects stamps, then the bridge plays football, we can conclude that the bridge plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the given facts and rules do not provide any information about Chuan or associate any traits directly or indirectly with him, the assertion cannot be concluded.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University paints pictures.\nStanford University paints pictures.\nThe fountain is colorful.\nRules:\nWhen stanford university paints pictures, we can conclude the mountain is colorful.\nBased on stanford university paints pictures, it is evident that stanford university becomes famous.\nWhen stanford university paints pictures, we can conclude the fountain is a doctor.\nBased on stanford university paints pictures, it is evident that the mountain paints pictures.\nIf the sandwich becomes famous, then the mountain becomes famous.\nBased on the fountain paints pictures, it is evident that the sandwich becomes famous.\nGiven that the sandwich is colorful, it follows that the fountain paints pictures.\nGiven that the fountain is a doctor, it follows that the sandwich is colorful.", "statement": "The mountain becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on stanford university paints pictures, it is evident that the fountain is a doctor, it follows that the fountain is a doctor.\nBecause if the fountain is a doctor, then the sandwich is colorful, we can conclude that the sandwich is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the sandwich is colorful, it follows that the fountain paints pictures, we can see that the fountain paints pictures.\nBecause given that the fountain paints pictures, it follows that the sandwich becomes famous, we can conclude that the sandwich becomes famous.\nSince we know that given that the sandwich becomes famous, it follows that the mountain becomes famous, it follows that the mountain becomes famous.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on stanford university paints pictures, it is evident that the mountain paints pictures, stanford university paints pictures, it is evident that stanford university becomes famous, If the sandwich becomes famous, then the mountain becomes famous, the mountain becomes famous\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river enjoys music.\nThe river runs marathons.\nEmma enjoys music.\nRules:\nBased on the river runs marathons, it is evident that the river runs marathons.\nAssuming the river runs marathons, we can say the river runs marathons.\nGiven that the river runs marathons, it follows that the stadium makes pizza.\nAssuming the river runs marathons, we can say the river runs marathons.\nWhen the river runs marathons, we can conclude the river runs marathons.\nAssuming the river runs marathons, we can say the river runs marathons.\nIf the river runs marathons, then the river runs marathons.", "statement": "The sky is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the river runs marathons, it follows that the river runs marathons, we can see that the river runs marathons.\nBecause if the river runs marathons, then the river runs marathons, we can conclude that the river runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the river runs marathons, we can say the river runs marathons, we can see that the river runs marathons.\nBecause if the river runs marathons, then the river runs marathons, we can conclude that the river runs marathons.\nSince we know that if the river runs marathons, then the river runs marathons, it follows that the river runs marathons.\nGiven that when the river runs marathons, we can conclude the stadium makes pizza, it is evident that the stadium makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the river runs marathons, it is evident that the river runs marathons, assuming the river runs marathons, we can say the river runs marathons, given that the river runs marathons, it follows that the stadium makes pizza, the conclusion The sky is a chef is unrelated to the provided rules and facts\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike solves puzzles.\nSarah solves puzzles.\nThe musician is an artist.\nRules:\nWhen sarah solves puzzles, we can conclude sarah is quiet.\nWhen sarah is quiet, we can conclude the musician solves puzzles.\nAssuming mike fishes in lakes, we can say sarah is quiet.\nGiven that the zoo fishes in lakes, it follows that mike fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the musician is an artist, we can say the zoo fishes in lakes.\nGiven that sarah solves puzzles, it follows that the musician is an artist.", "statement": "The musician solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the musician is an artist, we can conclude the zoo fishes in lakes, we deduce that the zoo fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the zoo fishes in lakes, we can conclude mike fishes in lakes, we can see that mike fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on mike fishes in lakes, it is evident that sarah is quiet, we can see that sarah is quiet.\nSince we know that given that sarah is quiet, it follows that the musician solves puzzles, it follows that the musician solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When sarah solves puzzles, we can conclude sarah is quiet., When sarah is quiet, we can conclude the musician solves puzzles., The musician solves puzzles.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich is colorful.\nThe sky is colorful.\nThe musician is colorful.\nRules:\nWhen the sandwich is colorful, we can conclude the musician is colorful.\nWhen the sky is colorful, we can conclude the sandwich swims well.\nBased on the musician swims well, it is evident that the musician swims well.\nBased on the musician swims well, it is evident that the sky is an engineer.\nGiven that the sky creates art, it follows that the musician swims well.\nGiven that the sandwich swims well, it follows that the sky creates art.", "statement": "The bridge is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the sandwich is colorful, we can conclude the musician is colorful, it follows that the musician is colorful.\nApplying the logic of based on the sky is colorful, it is evident that the sandwich swims well, we deduce that the sandwich swims well.\nApplying the logic of assuming the sandwich swims well, we can say the sky creates art, we deduce that the sky creates art.\nApplying the logic of given that the sky creates art, it follows that the musician swims well, we deduce that the musician swims well.\nSince we know that if the musician swims well, then the sky is an engineer, it follows that the sky is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because there is no rule that connects the facts to the assertion or any information about the bridge, the bridge is an engineer is not concluded\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train explores cities.\nThe pig is tall.\nThe pig explores cities.\nRules:\nBased on the pig is tall, it is evident that the chef runs quickly.\nIf the train explores cities, then the pig runs quickly.\nGiven that the chef explores cities, it follows that the train explores cities.\nWhen the chef runs quickly, we can conclude the chef explores cities.\nIf the pig explores cities, then the chef runs quickly.\nIf the chef is tall, then the chef runs quickly.", "statement": "The pig runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the pig explores cities, we can conclude the chef runs quickly, it follows that the chef runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the chef runs quickly, we can say the chef explores cities, we can see that the chef explores cities.\nBecause assuming the chef explores cities, we can say the train explores cities, we can conclude that the train explores cities.\nGiven that if the train explores cities, then the pig runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the train explores cities, then the pig runs quickly, The train explores cities, The pig runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy is friendly.\nThe forest is a chef.\nThe bakery is magical.\nRules:\nAssuming lucy is friendly, we can say mike is magical.\nWhen the forest is a chef, we can conclude mike is magical.\nGiven that the forest is a chef, it follows that the bakery swims well.\nWhen lucy is friendly, we can conclude lucy swims well.\nWhen the forest is a chef, we can conclude the bakery swims well.\nWhen mike is magical, we can conclude mike swims well.\nIf the forest swims well, then the bakery swims well.\nBased on the bakery swims well, it is evident that mike is magical.\nIf mike is magical, then the bakery swims well.", "statement": "The forest swims well.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on lucy is friendly, it is evident that mike is magical, it follows that mike is magical.\nSince we know that given that the forest is a chef, it follows that the bakery swims well, it follows that the bakery swims well.\nSince we know that based on lucy is friendly, it is evident that lucy swims well, it follows that lucy swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that mike is magical, it follows that the bakery swims well, we can see that the bakery swims well.\nGiven that when the bakery swims well, we can conclude mike is magical, it is evident that mike is magical.\nApplying the logic of given that mike is magical, it follows that mike swims well, we deduce that mike swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because when the forest is a chef, we can conclude the bakery swims well, the bakery swims well does not imply the forest swims well, the forest swims well is not directly supported by the rules or facts, the forest swims well.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium is a scientist.\nEthan is colorful.\nThe stadium jumps high.\nRules:\nBased on the stadium is a scientist, it is evident that the stadium is colorful.\nBased on the stadium jumps high, it is evident that the globe plays football.\nAssuming the globe plays football, we can say the globe plays football.\nIf the globe is colorful, then ethan plays football.\nIf the stadium jumps high, then the globe plays football.\nIf ethan jumps high, then the globe is colorful.\nWhen ethan is colorful, we can conclude ethan jumps high.", "statement": "The zoo jumps high.", "reasoning": "Given that if the stadium is a scientist, then the stadium is colorful, it is evident that the stadium is colorful.\nSince we know that if the stadium jumps high, then the globe plays football, it follows that the globe plays football.\nApplying the logic of assuming the globe plays football, we can say the globe plays football, we deduce that the globe plays football.\nGiven that if ethan is colorful, then ethan jumps high, it is evident that ethan jumps high.\nBecause assuming ethan jumps high, we can say the globe is colorful, we can conclude that the globe is colorful.\nBecause based on the globe is colorful, it is evident that ethan plays football, we can conclude that ethan plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when ethan is colorful, we can conclude ethan jumps high, {conclusion}\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun takes pictures.\nThe chef takes pictures.\nThe sun is an engineer.\nRules:\nBased on the sun is an engineer, it is evident that the cloud takes pictures.\nWhen ethan hosts parties, we can conclude the chef hosts parties.\nAssuming the sun teaches math, we can say ethan hosts parties.\nWhen the chef hosts parties, we can conclude the sun teaches math.\nWhen the sun is an engineer, we can conclude the sun teaches math.\nGiven that the chef takes pictures, it follows that the sun is an engineer.", "statement": "The chef hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the chef takes pictures, we can say the sun is an engineer, it is evident that the sun is an engineer.\nSince we know that when the sun is an engineer, we can conclude the sun teaches math, it follows that the sun teaches math.\nGiven that given that the sun teaches math, it follows that ethan hosts parties, it is evident that ethan hosts parties.\nGiven that based on ethan hosts parties, it is evident that the chef hosts parties, it is evident that the chef hosts parties.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the chef hosts parties, we can conclude the sun teaches math, when the sun is an engineer, we can conclude the sun teaches math, the negation of the chef hosts parties\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest creates art.\nThe forest is a scientist.\nThe forest rides bikes.\nRules:\nAssuming the forest is a scientist, we can say the phone is fast.\nIf the forest creates art, then the car rides bikes.\nBased on the car is a scientist, it is evident that the forest is a scientist.\nGiven that the car is fast, it follows that the car is a scientist.\nWhen the car rides bikes, we can conclude the forest creates art.\nIf the forest is a scientist, then the phone is fast.\nGiven that the forest creates art, it follows that the car is fast.", "statement": "The forest is fast.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that the forest is a scientist, it follows that the phone is fast, we can see that the phone is fast.\nApplying the logic of assuming the forest creates art, we can say the car rides bikes, we deduce that the car rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of given that the car rides bikes, it follows that the forest creates art, we deduce that the forest creates art.\nGiven that based on the forest creates art, it is evident that the car is fast, it is evident that the car is fast.\nBecause based on the car is fast, it is evident that the car is a scientist, we can conclude that the car is a scientist.\nSince we know that assuming the car is a scientist, we can say the forest is a scientist, it follows that the forest is a scientist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the forest is a scientist, the phone is fast. Given that the forest creates art, it follows that the car is fast, the car rides bikes. When the car rides bikes, we can conclude the forest creates art. If the forest is a scientist, then the phone is fast, {conclusion} the forest is fast\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall creates art.\nThe wall creates art.\nThe river creates art.\nRules:\nWhen the wall creates art, we can conclude the festival is tall.\nBased on the wall creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art.\nBased on the wall creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art.\nAssuming the train draws maps, we can say the wall creates art.\nIf the festival is tall, then the train draws maps.\nAssuming the wall creates art, we can say the festival is tall.", "statement": "The wall creates art.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the wall creates art, then the festival is tall, we deduce that the festival is tall.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the festival is tall, we can conclude the train draws maps, we can see that the train draws maps.\nApplying the logic of based on the train draws maps, it is evident that the wall creates art, we deduce that the wall creates art.\nGiven that given that the wall creates art, it follows that the wall creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the wall creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art, the wall creates art.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car is quiet.\nThe chef teaches math.\nThe car is quiet.\nRules:\nWhen the car is quiet, we can conclude the cloud dances gracefully.\nWhen the chef teaches math, we can conclude the chef teaches math.\nAssuming the car is quiet, we can say the cloud teaches math.\nBased on the car is quiet, it is evident that the cloud dances gracefully.\nAssuming the cloud is colorful, we can say the car is quiet.\nAssuming the cloud is colorful, we can say the cloud dances gracefully.\nBased on the car is quiet, it is evident that the cloud is colorful.\nGiven that the car is quiet, it follows that the car is quiet.\nBased on the car is quiet, it is evident that the car is quiet.", "statement": "The car is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the car is quiet, it is evident that the car is quiet, we deduce that the car is quiet.\nGiven that assuming the car is quiet, we can say the car is quiet, it is evident that the car is quiet.\nGiven that when the car is quiet, we can conclude the cloud is colorful, it is evident that the cloud is colorful.\nGiven that assuming the cloud is colorful, we can say the car is quiet, it is evident that the car is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the car is quiet, it is evident that the car is quiet, Given that the car is quiet, it follows that the car is quiet, The car is quiet.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree creates art.\nThe cloud is happy.\nJianzhi cooks well.\nRules:\nBased on the cloud is happy, it is evident that the cloud plays instruments.\nAssuming jianzhi cooks well, we can say the tree creates art.\nBased on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the cloud is happy.\nGiven that the tree cooks well, it follows that jianzhi creates art.\nWhen jianzhi plays instruments, we can conclude the tree cooks well.\nWhen the cloud is happy, we can conclude jianzhi plays instruments.", "statement": "The cloud is happy.", "reasoning": "Because given that the cloud is happy, it follows that jianzhi plays instruments, we can conclude that jianzhi plays instruments.\nBecause if jianzhi plays instruments, then the tree cooks well, we can conclude that the tree cooks well.\nApplying the logic of based on the tree cooks well, it is evident that jianzhi creates art, we deduce that jianzhi creates art.\nGiven that assuming jianzhi creates art, we can say the cloud is happy, it is evident that the cloud is happy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The cloud is happy, {conclusion}\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma is a scientist.\nEthan runs marathons.\nThe cloud hosts parties.\nRules:\nAssuming ethan runs marathons, we can say emma hosts parties.\nBased on emma is a scientist, it is evident that emma runs marathons.\nIf emma runs marathons, then emma is a scientist.\nIf ethan plays instruments, then emma runs marathons.\nAssuming the cloud hosts parties, we can say ethan plays instruments.", "statement": "Emma runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the cloud hosts parties, then ethan plays instruments, we can see that ethan plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming ethan plays instruments, we can say emma runs marathons, we can see that emma runs marathons.\nBecause when emma runs marathons, we can conclude emma is a scientist, we can conclude that emma is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of when emma is a scientist, we can conclude emma runs marathons, we deduce that emma runs marathons.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the cloud hosts parties, assuming the cloud hosts parties, we can say ethan plays instruments, if ethan plays instruments, then emma runs marathons, conclusion: Emma runs marathons.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree is a chef.\nThe bakery solves puzzles.\nThe train reads books.\nRules:\nBased on the tree is a chef, it is evident that the bakery makes pizza.\nIf the tree makes pizza, then the train is a chef.\nWhen the tree makes pizza, we can conclude the tree makes pizza.\nWhen the tree is a chef, we can conclude the tree makes pizza.\nAssuming the train is a chef, we can say the tree is a chef.\nWhen the tree is a chef, we can conclude the train is a chef.", "statement": "The tree makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Given that when the tree is a chef, we can conclude the train is a chef, it is evident that the train is a chef.\nSince we know that assuming the train is a chef, we can say the tree is a chef, it follows that the tree is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the tree is a chef, we can say the tree makes pizza, we can see that the tree makes pizza.\nSince we know that given that the tree makes pizza, it follows that the tree makes pizza, it follows that the tree makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When the tree is a chef, we can conclude the tree makes pizza, The tree is a chef, we can conclude The tree makes pizza.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall is happy.\nChuan is magical.\nChuan creates art.\nRules:\nIf the wall is happy, then chuan is happy.\nAssuming the wall creates art, we can say chuan is funny.\nBased on the teacher creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art.\nWhen chuan creates art, we can conclude the teacher creates art.\nBased on chuan is magical, it is evident that chuan creates art.\nAssuming chuan creates art, we can say the teacher is happy.", "statement": "Chuan is funny.", "reasoning": "Given that given that chuan is magical, it follows that chuan creates art, it is evident that chuan creates art.\nGiven that when chuan creates art, we can conclude the teacher creates art, it is evident that the teacher creates art.\nSince we know that based on the teacher creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art, it follows that the wall creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the wall creates art, we can conclude chuan is funny, we can see that chuan is funny.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because assuming the wall creates art, we can say chuan is funny, based on the teacher creates art, it is evident that the wall creates art, when chuan creates art, we can conclude the teacher creates art, based on chuan is magical, it is evident that chuan creates art, chuan is funny\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden writes stories.\nThe garden writes stories.\nJianzhi writes stories.\nRules:\nAssuming the garden writes stories, we can say mia writes stories.\nIf the garden writes stories, then mia writes stories.\nGiven that the garden writes stories, it follows that jianzhi solves puzzles.\nGiven that the garden writes stories, it follows that mia grows plants.\nAssuming mia writes stories, we can say the garden writes stories.\nBased on jianzhi writes stories, it is evident that mia writes stories.", "statement": "The garden sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Given that if the garden writes stories, then mia writes stories, it is evident that mia writes stories.\nApplying the logic of if the garden writes stories, then mia grows plants, we deduce that mia grows plants.\nApplying the logic of when jianzhi writes stories, we can conclude mia writes stories, we deduce that mia writes stories.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if mia writes stories, then the garden writes stories, we can see that the garden writes stories.\nGiven that if the garden writes stories, then jianzhi solves puzzles, it is evident that jianzhi solves puzzles.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the facts and rules do not mention anything about the garden singing beautifully, the conclusion is the garden sings beautifully is not supported by the given facts and rules.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge draws maps.\nThe computer teaches math.\nEmma draws maps.\nRules:\nGiven that the computer teaches math, it follows that stanford university hosts parties.\nAssuming the bridge draws maps, we can say stanford university hosts parties.\nIf stanford university hosts parties, then the computer hosts parties.\nWhen emma makes pizza, we can conclude the computer hosts parties.\nIf the computer hosts parties, then the bridge draws maps.\nBased on the bridge teaches math, it is evident that the computer hosts parties.\nGiven that the bridge draws maps, it follows that the bridge teaches math.", "statement": "Emma teaches math.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the computer teaches math, it is evident that stanford university hosts parties, it follows that stanford university hosts parties.\nBecause based on the bridge draws maps, it is evident that the bridge teaches math, we can conclude that the bridge teaches math.\nApplying the logic of based on the bridge teaches math, it is evident that the computer hosts parties, we deduce that the computer hosts parties.\nBecause given that the computer hosts parties, it follows that the bridge draws maps, we can conclude that the bridge draws maps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Emma draws maps, the conclusion is the negation: Emma teaches math.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe is a chef.\nThe globe is colorful.\nThe globe is an artist.\nRules:\nAssuming the globe is colorful, we can say the teacher jumps high.\nBased on the globe is colorful, it is evident that the globe is colorful.\nWhen the globe is an artist, we can conclude the globe is an artist.\nBased on the teacher is a chef, it is evident that the globe is an artist.\nWhen the globe is colorful, we can conclude the teacher is colorful.\nWhen the globe is colorful, we can conclude the teacher is a chef.", "statement": "The zoo jumps high.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the globe is colorful, it is evident that the teacher jumps high, it is evident that the teacher jumps high.\nGiven that when the globe is colorful, we can conclude the globe is colorful, it is evident that the globe is colorful.\nGiven that assuming the globe is colorful, we can say the teacher is colorful, it is evident that the teacher is colorful.\nApplying the logic of if the globe is colorful, then the teacher is a chef, we deduce that the teacher is a chef.\nGiven that given that the teacher is a chef, it follows that the globe is an artist, it is evident that the globe is an artist.\nBecause given that the globe is an artist, it follows that the globe is an artist, we can conclude that the globe is an artist.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the globe is colorful, we can say the teacher jumps high, the teacher is a chef when the globe is colorful, the zoo jumps high is not mentioned or implied by any rule or fact, the zoo jumps high is not concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival enjoys music.\nThe festival enjoys music.\nEmma hosts parties.\nRules:\nGiven that the festival enjoys music, it follows that james is quiet.\nIf the festival enjoys music, then emma enjoys music.\nIf the festival grows plants, then emma enjoys music.\nAssuming the festival grows plants, we can say lucas is quiet.\nGiven that lucas grows plants, it follows that the festival grows plants.\nWhen emma enjoys music, we can conclude lucas grows plants.", "statement": "James hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the festival enjoys music, it follows that james is quiet, it follows that james is quiet.\nApplying the logic of given that the festival enjoys music, it follows that emma enjoys music, we deduce that emma enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that emma enjoys music, it follows that lucas grows plants, we can see that lucas grows plants.\nGiven that given that lucas grows plants, it follows that the festival grows plants, it is evident that the festival grows plants.\nGiven that based on the festival grows plants, it is evident that lucas is quiet, it is evident that lucas is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that the festival enjoys music, it follows that james is quiet, the assertion is its negation\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree collects stamps.\nSophie is a doctor.\nMike sings beautifully.\nRules:\nWhen the tree collects stamps, we can conclude mike collects stamps.\nGiven that mike sings beautifully, it follows that sophie is a doctor.\nWhen mike is a doctor, we can conclude liam collects stamps.\nGiven that the tree collects stamps, it follows that mike is a doctor.\nWhen mike is a doctor, we can conclude sophie is a doctor.\nWhen sophie is a doctor, we can conclude the tree collects stamps.\nGiven that the tree collects stamps, it follows that the tree collects stamps.", "statement": "Sophie sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Because if the tree collects stamps, then mike collects stamps, we can conclude that mike collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming mike sings beautifully, we can say sophie is a doctor, we can see that sophie is a doctor.\nBecause if sophie is a doctor, then the tree collects stamps, we can conclude that the tree collects stamps.\nApplying the logic of assuming the tree collects stamps, we can say mike is a doctor, we deduce that mike is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming mike is a doctor, we can say liam collects stamps, we deduce that liam collects stamps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that mike sings beautifully, it follows that sophie is a doctor, sophie is a doctor, it does not follow that sophie sings beautifully, Sophie sings beautifully is not given or derived directly or indirectly from any rules or facts, its negation\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat takes pictures.\nThe cat rides bikes.\nSarah rides bikes.\nRules:\nAssuming sarah rides bikes, we can say the house takes pictures.\nBased on the cat takes pictures, it is evident that the fountain is a chef.\nGiven that the cat rides bikes, it follows that the house takes pictures.\nWhen the cat rides bikes, we can conclude the fountain is a chef.\nBased on the house is a chef, it is evident that the cat rides bikes.\nAssuming the cat is a chef, we can say the house is a chef.\nBased on sarah rides bikes, it is evident that the fountain is a chef.\nGiven that sarah rides bikes, it follows that the cat is a chef.", "statement": "The fountain rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on sarah rides bikes, it is evident that the house takes pictures, we deduce that the house takes pictures.\nBecause assuming the cat takes pictures, we can say the fountain is a chef, we can conclude that the fountain is a chef.\nBecause if sarah rides bikes, then the fountain is a chef, we can conclude that the fountain is a chef.\nGiven that when sarah rides bikes, we can conclude the cat is a chef, it is evident that the cat is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the cat is a chef, we can say the house is a chef, we can see that the house is a chef.\nApplying the logic of based on the house is a chef, it is evident that the cat rides bikes, we deduce that the cat rides bikes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that sarah rides bikes, it follows that the cat is a chef, When the cat rides bikes, we can conclude the fountain is a chef, The fountain rides bikes is not concluded by any rule\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich runs quickly.\nThe cat runs marathons.\nJack runs quickly.\nRules:\nBased on jack runs quickly, it is evident that the cat is interesting.\nAssuming jack runs marathons, we can say the mountain is funny.\nBased on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the sandwich is interesting.\nBased on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the mountain is funny.\nIf the sandwich runs quickly, then the mountain is funny.\nIf jack runs marathons, then the cat is interesting.", "statement": "Jack runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Because when jack runs quickly, we can conclude the cat is interesting, we can conclude that the cat is interesting.\nSince we know that given that the sandwich runs quickly, it follows that the mountain is funny, it follows that the mountain is funny.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the mountain is funny, we can conclude the mountain is funny, we can see that the mountain is funny.\nApplying the logic of based on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the sandwich is interesting, we deduce that the sandwich is interesting.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the sandwich runs quickly, then the mountain is funny, based on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the sandwich is interesting, assuming jack runs marathons, we can say the mountain is funny, the sandwich runs quickly, based on jack runs quickly, it is evident that the cat is interesting, based on jack runs quickly, it is evident that the cat is interesting, if jack runs marathons, then the cat is interesting, if jack runs marathons, then the cat is interesting, the mountain is funny, based on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the mountain is funny, based on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the sandwich is interesting, if the sandwich runs quickly, then the mountain is funny, if the sandwich runs quickly, then the mountain is funny, it is evident that the cat is interesting, jack runs quickly, the sandwich runs quickly, assuming jack runs marathons, we can say the mountain is funny, assuming jack runs marathons, we can say the mountain is funny, the cat runs marathons, the sandwich runs quickly, based on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the mountain is funny, based on the mountain is funny, it is evident that the sandwich is interesting, the mountain is funny, because if the sandwich runs quickly, then the mountain is funny, the cat is interesting, the cat is interesting\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack explores cities.\nAlice paints pictures.\nAlice explores cities.\nRules:\nIf alice paints pictures, then lucy explores cities.\nBased on alice explores cities, it is evident that lucy explores cities.\nIf jack explores cities, then lucy explores cities.\nIf alice paints pictures, then jack jumps high.\nWhen jack explores cities, we can conclude lucy is friendly.\nAssuming the shop jumps high, we can say alice explores cities.\nIf the shop jumps high, then the shop jumps high.\nBased on alice explores cities, it is evident that alice explores cities.\nIf alice paints pictures, then lucy is friendly.\nBased on alice explores cities, it is evident that the shop jumps high.", "statement": "The shop is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if alice paints pictures, then lucy explores cities, we can see that lucy explores cities.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if alice paints pictures, then jack jumps high, we can see that jack jumps high.\nApplying the logic of when jack explores cities, we can conclude lucy is friendly, we deduce that lucy is friendly.\nSince we know that based on alice explores cities, it is evident that the shop jumps high, it follows that the shop jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the shop jumps high, it follows that the shop jumps high, we can see that the shop jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the shop jumps high, then alice explores cities, we can see that alice explores cities.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on alice explores cities, it is evident that the shop jumps high, when jack explores cities, we can conclude lucy is friendly, the shop is friendly\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma does yoga.\nThe sun enjoys music.\nThe moon enjoys music.\nRules:\nGiven that the moon enjoys music, it follows that the wall solves puzzles.\nAssuming the sun enjoys music, we can say emma does yoga.\nBased on the sun enjoys music, it is evident that the moon does yoga.\nIf emma does yoga, then the sun enjoys music.\nIf the moon enjoys music, then the sun grows plants.\nAssuming the sun grows plants, we can say emma does yoga.", "statement": "The sun solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the moon enjoys music, we can conclude the wall solves puzzles, we deduce that the wall solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the moon enjoys music, then the sun grows plants, we can see that the sun grows plants.\nSince we know that assuming the sun grows plants, we can say emma does yoga, it follows that emma does yoga.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if emma does yoga, then the sun enjoys music, we can see that the sun enjoys music.\nGiven that assuming the sun enjoys music, we can say the moon does yoga, it is evident that the moon does yoga.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because if the moon enjoys music, then the sun grows plants, assuming the sun grows plants, we can say emma does yoga, and if emma does yoga, then the sun enjoys music, and based on the sun enjoys music, it is evident that the moon does yoga, its negation\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book sings beautifully.\nLiam plays games.\nThe ocean plays games.\nRules:\nIf liam plays games, then the ocean sings beautifully.\nWhen liam is an artist, we can conclude the book sings beautifully.\nIf the cat is a chef, then the cat plays games.\nIf liam sings beautifully, then the cat is a chef.\nIf the book sings beautifully, then liam sings beautifully.\nBased on liam plays games, it is evident that the book sings beautifully.", "statement": "The cat plays games.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if liam plays games, then the book sings beautifully, it follows that the book sings beautifully.\nBecause when the book sings beautifully, we can conclude liam sings beautifully, we can conclude that liam sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of assuming liam sings beautifully, we can say the cat is a chef, we deduce that the cat is a chef.\nBecause when the cat is a chef, we can conclude the cat plays games, we can conclude that the cat plays games.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if Liam plays games, then the ocean sings beautifully. When Liam is an artist, we can conclude the book sings beautifully. If the book sings beautifully, then Liam sings beautifully. If Liam sings beautifully, then the cat is a chef. If the cat is a chef, then the cat plays games, but none of these indicate Liam is an artist nor make Liam sing beautifully, the cat plays games is not directly supported by provided rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop teaches math.\nThe shop is magical.\nThe shop rides bikes.\nRules:\nGiven that the shop teaches math, it follows that the sun is magical.\nWhen the shop teaches math, we can conclude the pig rides bikes.\nAssuming the shop rides bikes, we can say lucas rides bikes.\nIf the pig runs quickly, then the shop is magical.\nBased on the pig runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly.\nAssuming the sun teaches math, we can say the pig runs quickly.\nIf lucas rides bikes, then the sun teaches math.\nIf lucas rides bikes, then the pig rides bikes.", "statement": "The shop is magical.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the shop rides bikes, it follows that lucas rides bikes, we deduce that lucas rides bikes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucas rides bikes, we can say the sun teaches math, we can see that the sun teaches math.\nSince we know that based on the sun teaches math, it is evident that the pig runs quickly, it follows that the pig runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the pig runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly, we can see that the pig runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the pig runs quickly, then the shop is magical, we can see that the shop is magical.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the shop is magical, the shop is magical\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEthan carries bags.\nThe chef runs quickly.\nThe chef solves puzzles.\nRules:\nIf the chef runs quickly, then the book carries bags.\nBased on ethan carries bags, it is evident that the book runs quickly.\nBased on the chef solves puzzles, it is evident that ethan runs quickly.\nGiven that the book carries bags, it follows that the sky runs quickly.\nBased on the sky plays football, it is evident that the chef plays football.\nIf the book plays football, then the sky plays football.\nWhen the sky carries bags, we can conclude the book plays football.\nBased on the chef solves puzzles, it is evident that the sky carries bags.", "statement": "The chef plays football.", "reasoning": "Given that when the chef solves puzzles, we can conclude the sky carries bags, it is evident that the sky carries bags.\nApplying the logic of assuming the sky carries bags, we can say the book plays football, we deduce that the book plays football.\nSince we know that if the book plays football, then the sky plays football, it follows that the sky plays football.\nBecause if the sky plays football, then the chef plays football, we can conclude that the chef plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on the chef solves puzzles, it is evident that the sky carries bags, when the sky carries bags, we can conclude the book plays football, if the book plays football, then the sky plays football, based on the sky plays football, it is evident that the chef plays football, the chef plays football.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEthan is a chef.\nThe fountain is a chef.\nMia draws maps.\nRules:\nBased on ethan is a chef, it is evident that the fountain draws maps.\nBased on the fountain is a chef, it is evident that the teacher is a chef.\nAssuming the fountain draws maps, we can say mia is a chef.\nAssuming the teacher is colorful, we can say the fountain draws maps.\nBased on mia is a chef, it is evident that the teacher is colorful.\nWhen mia is a chef, we can conclude the teacher is colorful.\nAssuming mia draws maps, we can say the fountain draws maps.", "statement": "Ethan solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Because if ethan is a chef, then the fountain draws maps, we can conclude that the fountain draws maps.\nApplying the logic of if the fountain is a chef, then the teacher is a chef, we deduce that the teacher is a chef.\nBecause when mia draws maps, we can conclude the fountain draws maps, we can conclude that the fountain draws maps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the fountain draws maps, we can say mia is a chef, we can see that mia is a chef.\nApplying the logic of when mia is a chef, we can conclude the teacher is colorful, we deduce that the teacher is colorful.\nBecause given that the teacher is colorful, it follows that the fountain draws maps, we can conclude that the fountain draws maps.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting Ethan being a chef to solving puzzles, Ethan solves puzzles cannot be concluded.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike writes stories.\nMike fishes in lakes.\nThe cat fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nAssuming the cat fishes in lakes, we can say the cat plays football.\nAssuming mike writes stories, we can say the pig fishes in lakes.\nIf the train plays football, then the pig carries bags.\nIf mike plays football, then the train writes stories.\nIf the pig writes stories, then mike plays football.\nIf mike plays football, then the cat plays football.\nIf the cat plays football, then the pig writes stories.", "statement": "The train plays football.", "reasoning": "Because when the cat fishes in lakes, we can conclude the cat plays football, we can conclude that the cat plays football.\nSince we know that when mike writes stories, we can conclude the pig fishes in lakes, it follows that the pig fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of when the cat plays football, we can conclude the pig writes stories, we deduce that the pig writes stories.\nApplying the logic of assuming the pig writes stories, we can say mike plays football, we deduce that mike plays football.\nSince we know that given that mike plays football, it follows that the cat plays football, it follows that the cat plays football.\nSince we know that assuming mike plays football, we can say the train writes stories, it follows that the train writes stories.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming mike writes stories, we can say the pig fishes in lakes., If the pig writes stories, then mike plays football., If mike plays football, then the cat plays football., Assuming the cat fishes in lakes, we can say the cat plays football., If the cat plays football, then the pig writes stories., If the pig writes stories, then mike plays football., If mike plays football, then the train writes stories., If the train plays football, then the pig carries bags., the train plays football.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe computer is a chef.\nMike travels far.\nThe musician travels far.\nRules:\nAssuming mike travels far, we can say mike is a chef.\nBased on the computer is a chef, it is evident that the musician goes to the hospital.\nWhen mike is a chef, we can conclude the musician makes pizza.\nGiven that mike is a chef, it follows that mike is a chef.\nGiven that mike makes pizza, it follows that ava travels far.\nAssuming the musician goes to the hospital, we can say ava travels far.\nAssuming the musician goes to the hospital, we can say mike is a chef.", "statement": "Mike makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Because when mike travels far, we can conclude mike is a chef, we can conclude that mike is a chef.\nApplying the logic of if the computer is a chef, then the musician goes to the hospital, we deduce that the musician goes to the hospital.\nBecause if the musician goes to the hospital, then ava travels far, we can conclude that ava travels far.\nApplying the logic of when the musician goes to the hospital, we can conclude mike is a chef, we deduce that mike is a chef.\nBecause based on mike is a chef, it is evident that mike is a chef, we can conclude that mike is a chef.\nBecause assuming mike is a chef, we can say the musician makes pizza, we can conclude that the musician makes pizza.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Mike travels far, Assuming mike travels far, we can say mike is a chef, When mike is a chef, we can conclude the musician makes pizza, Based on the computer is a chef, it is evident that the musician goes to the hospital, Assuming the musician goes to the hospital, we can say mike is a chef, Given that mike is a chef, it follows that mike is a chef, Given that mike is a chef, it follows that ava travels far, Assuming the musician goes to the hospital, we can say ava travels far, Therefore, Mike makes pizza\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall is loud.\nThe zoo plays games.\nThe zoo plays games.\nRules:\nIf the wall is loud, then the pig is loud.\nBased on lucas runs quickly, it is evident that lucas runs quickly.\nAssuming the pig runs quickly, we can say the zoo runs quickly.\nBased on lucas runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly.\nIf the wall is loud, then lucas runs quickly.\nGiven that the zoo plays games, it follows that the wall is loud.", "statement": "The zoo runs quickly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the zoo plays games, it follows that the wall is loud, it follows that the wall is loud.\nApplying the logic of given that the wall is loud, it follows that lucas runs quickly, we deduce that lucas runs quickly.\nSince we know that based on lucas runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly, it follows that the pig runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the pig runs quickly, it is evident that the zoo runs quickly, we can see that the zoo runs quickly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the wall is loud, then lucas runs quickly, Based on lucas runs quickly, it is evident that the pig runs quickly, Assuming the pig runs quickly, we can say the zoo runs quickly, The wall is loud, The zoo plays games, The zoo plays games., The zoo runs quickly.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie does yoga.\nThe tree does yoga.\nThe ocean becomes famous.\nRules:\nBased on the ocean becomes famous, it is evident that the globe becomes famous.\nBased on the tree does yoga, it is evident that the tree solves puzzles.\nIf the tree becomes famous, then the globe cooks well.\nGiven that the ocean becomes famous, it follows that the globe becomes famous.\nIf sophie solves puzzles, then the tree becomes famous.\nWhen the tree does yoga, we can conclude sophie solves puzzles.\nIf sophie does yoga, then sophie does yoga.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the ocean becomes famous, then the globe becomes famous, it follows that the globe becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of based on the tree does yoga, it is evident that the tree solves puzzles, we deduce that the tree solves puzzles.\nBecause if the ocean becomes famous, then the globe becomes famous, we can conclude that the globe becomes famous.\nBecause assuming the tree does yoga, we can say sophie solves puzzles, we can conclude that sophie solves puzzles.\nBecause assuming sophie does yoga, we can say sophie does yoga, we can conclude that sophie does yoga.\nSince we know that when sophie solves puzzles, we can conclude the tree becomes famous, it follows that the tree becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the tree becomes famous, we can conclude the globe cooks well, we can see that the globe cooks well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts related to Chuan being handsome or not, the provided data does not support any conclusion regarding the assertion.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist is a chef.\nThe mountain plays football.\nChuan draws maps.\nRules:\nIf the mountain plays football, then the mountain swims well.\nWhen the artist is a chef, we can conclude the artist draws maps.\nAssuming chuan draws maps, we can say the mountain is a chef.\nAssuming the mountain swims well, we can say henry is a chef.\nWhen chuan draws maps, we can conclude the mountain swims well.\nAssuming chuan draws maps, we can say chuan draws maps.\nAssuming chuan draws maps, we can say the mountain is a chef.", "statement": "Chuan is a chef.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the mountain plays football, then the mountain swims well, it follows that the mountain swims well.\nGiven that if the artist is a chef, then the artist draws maps, it is evident that the artist draws maps.\nSince we know that given that chuan draws maps, it follows that the mountain is a chef, it follows that the mountain is a chef.\nBecause if chuan draws maps, then chuan draws maps, we can conclude that chuan draws maps.\nBecause if chuan draws maps, then the mountain swims well, we can conclude that the mountain swims well.\nApplying the logic of when the mountain swims well, we can conclude henry is a chef, we deduce that henry is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Assuming chuan draws maps, we can say the mountain is a chef., Assuming the mountain swims well, we can say henry is a chef., When chuan draws maps, we can conclude the mountain swims well., The negation of the assertion.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry is friendly.\nThe fountain is quiet.\nThe fountain is funny.\nRules:\nBased on henry is friendly, it is evident that henry is funny.\nBased on the fountain is funny, it is evident that the festival is funny.\nIf sarah is funny, then the fountain is funny.\nGiven that the festival is funny, it follows that sarah is quiet.\nIf the festival is funny, then the festival is funny.\nAssuming henry is funny, we can say the fountain dances gracefully.\nGiven that sarah is quiet, it follows that sarah is funny.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming henry is friendly, we can say henry is funny, we deduce that henry is funny.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the fountain is funny, it follows that the festival is funny, we can see that the festival is funny.\nApplying the logic of when the festival is funny, we can conclude the festival is funny, we deduce that the festival is funny.\nGiven that based on henry is funny, it is evident that the fountain dances gracefully, it is evident that the fountain dances gracefully.\nBecause when the festival is funny, we can conclude sarah is quiet, we can conclude that sarah is quiet.\nBecause if sarah is quiet, then sarah is funny, we can conclude that sarah is funny.\nGiven that assuming sarah is funny, we can say the fountain is funny, it is evident that the fountain is funny.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion is unrelated to the facts and rules provided, Chuan is handsome is not supported by any premises.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician is an engineer.\nThe zoo hosts parties.\nThe zoo is an engineer.\nRules:\nIf the zoo hosts parties, then the stadium runs marathons.\nBased on the zoo hosts parties, it is evident that the stadium hosts parties.\nWhen the musician collects stamps, we can conclude the bridge runs marathons.\nIf the stadium hosts parties, then the bridge runs marathons.\nAssuming the bridge is an engineer, we can say the stadium hosts parties.\nIf the zoo hosts parties, then the bridge is an engineer.\nGiven that the musician is an engineer, it follows that the zoo hosts parties.", "statement": "The bridge runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the musician is an engineer, we can say the zoo hosts parties, we can see that the zoo hosts parties.\nGiven that given that the zoo hosts parties, it follows that the bridge is an engineer, it is evident that the bridge is an engineer.\nBecause given that the bridge is an engineer, it follows that the stadium hosts parties, we can conclude that the stadium hosts parties.\nSince we know that when the stadium hosts parties, we can conclude the bridge runs marathons, it follows that the bridge runs marathons.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the zoo hosts parties, it is evident that the stadium hosts parties, if the stadium hosts parties, then the bridge runs marathons, the bridge runs marathons\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is an engineer.\nThe ocean is happy.\nThe cat is happy.\nRules:\nGiven that the cat is happy, it follows that the ocean is an engineer.\nWhen the house is a doctor, we can conclude the ocean is happy.\nWhen the ocean is happy, we can conclude the ocean is an engineer.\nGiven that the cat is an engineer, it follows that the house is a doctor.\nIf the house is happy, then the cat is an engineer.\nGiven that the house is an engineer, it follows that the cat is an engineer.", "statement": "The house is interesting.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the cat is happy, we can say the ocean is an engineer, we deduce that the ocean is an engineer.\nGiven that based on the house is an engineer, it is evident that the cat is an engineer, it is evident that the cat is an engineer.\nSince we know that given that the cat is an engineer, it follows that the house is a doctor, it follows that the house is a doctor.\nBecause when the house is a doctor, we can conclude the ocean is happy, we can conclude that the ocean is happy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the assertion cannot be concluded from the given facts and rules\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva collects stamps.\nThe musician draws maps.\nThe musician draws maps.\nRules:\nBased on the musician draws maps, it is evident that ethan draws maps.\nWhen ava collects stamps, we can conclude the bakery goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the bakery goes to the hospital, we can say ethan plays football.\nWhen the musician collects stamps, we can conclude the bakery goes to the hospital.\nWhen the bakery goes to the hospital, we can conclude the musician collects stamps.\nGiven that the musician draws maps, it follows that the bakery goes to the hospital.", "statement": "Ethan plays football.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the musician draws maps, then the bakery goes to the hospital, it follows that the bakery goes to the hospital.\nApplying the logic of if the bakery goes to the hospital, then the musician collects stamps, we deduce that the musician collects stamps.\nBecause given that the musician collects stamps, it follows that the bakery goes to the hospital, we can conclude that the bakery goes to the hospital.\nApplying the logic of when the bakery goes to the hospital, we can conclude ethan plays football, we deduce that ethan plays football.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Ava collects stamps, When ava collects stamps, we can conclude the bakery goes to the hospital., Assuming the bakery goes to the hospital, we can say ethan plays football., Ethan plays football.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden is colorful.\nThe festival is quiet.\nThe garden is friendly.\nRules:\nAssuming the festival is quiet, we can say the garden is colorful.\nIf the festival is quiet, then the festival is blue.\nBased on the festival is quiet, it is evident that the festival is colorful.\nAssuming the zoo is colorful, we can say the dog is quiet.\nGiven that the garden is quiet, it follows that the festival is friendly.\nIf the festival is blue, then the zoo is colorful.\nGiven that the garden is blue, it follows that the garden is quiet.\nBased on the dog is quiet, it is evident that the garden is blue.", "statement": "The festival is friendly.", "reasoning": "Because given that the festival is quiet, it follows that the festival is blue, we can conclude that the festival is blue.\nSince we know that based on the festival is blue, it is evident that the zoo is colorful, it follows that the zoo is colorful.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the zoo is colorful, it follows that the dog is quiet, we can see that the dog is quiet.\nApplying the logic of if the dog is quiet, then the garden is blue, we deduce that the garden is blue.\nGiven that given that the garden is blue, it follows that the garden is quiet, it is evident that the garden is quiet.\nGiven that if the garden is quiet, then the festival is friendly, it is evident that the festival is friendly.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the festival is quiet, then the festival is blue, If the festival is blue, then the zoo is colorful, Assuming the zoo is colorful, we can say the dog is quiet, Based on the dog is quiet, it is evident that the garden is blue, Given that the garden is blue, it follows that the garden is quiet, Given that the garden is quiet, it follows that the festival is friendly, The festival is friendly\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry is an artist.\nThe sandwich is fluffy.\nHenry is fluffy.\nRules:\nBased on henry is an artist, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef.\nGiven that the sandwich is fluffy, it follows that james is an artist.\nBased on henry is an artist, it is evident that the sandwich is an artist.\nBased on henry is an artist, it is evident that henry grows plants.\nIf the sandwich is fluffy, then henry grows plants.\nGiven that the sandwich is fluffy, it follows that the sandwich is an artist.\nBased on the sandwich is an artist, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef.\nWhen the plane is a chef, we can conclude the sandwich is an artist.\nBased on the sandwich is fluffy, it is evident that the plane is a chef.\nWhen henry is fluffy, we can conclude the sandwich is fluffy.", "statement": "The sandwich is a chef.", "reasoning": "Because assuming henry is fluffy, we can say the sandwich is fluffy, we can conclude that the sandwich is fluffy.\nSince we know that if the sandwich is fluffy, then the plane is a chef, it follows that the plane is a chef.\nApplying the logic of if the plane is a chef, then the sandwich is an artist, we deduce that the sandwich is an artist.\nBecause if the sandwich is an artist, then the sandwich is a chef, we can conclude that the sandwich is a chef.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Based on the sandwich is an artist, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef, Given that the sandwich is fluffy, it follows that the sandwich is an artist, The sandwich is a chef\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky reads books.\nChuan draws maps.\nThe sky is an artist.\nRules:\nGiven that the sky reads books, it follows that the pumpkin is an artist.\nAssuming the sky reads books, we can say the pumpkin reads books.\nAssuming the sky is an artist, we can say the pumpkin is an artist.\nIf the sky reads books, then chuan draws maps.\nAssuming chuan draws maps, we can say the pumpkin is an artist.\nBased on chuan draws maps, it is evident that the pumpkin reads books.\nBased on the sky reads books, it is evident that chuan draws maps.\nWhen the sky draws maps, we can conclude chuan draws maps.\nBased on the sky is an artist, it is evident that the sky draws maps.\nIf the pumpkin reads books, then the sky is an artist.", "statement": "The pumpkin reads books.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the sky reads books, then the pumpkin reads books, we can see that the pumpkin reads books.\nApplying the logic of when the pumpkin reads books, we can conclude the sky is an artist, we deduce that the sky is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the sky is an artist, we can conclude the sky draws maps, we can see that the sky draws maps.\nSince we know that based on the sky draws maps, it is evident that chuan draws maps, it follows that chuan draws maps.\nGiven that given that chuan draws maps, it follows that the pumpkin reads books, it is evident that the pumpkin reads books.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming the sky reads books, we can say the pumpkin reads books, The pumpkin reads books\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book is interesting.\nThe pig plays games.\nThe pig plays games.\nRules:\nWhen the pig plays games, we can conclude the pig enjoys music.\nIf the ocean fishes in lakes, then the bakery fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the pig enjoys music, it follows that the ocean fishes in lakes.\nWhen the ocean fishes in lakes, we can conclude the pig enjoys music.\nWhen the pig plays games, we can conclude the pig enjoys music.\nAssuming the pig plays games, we can say the pig plays games.", "statement": "The bakery fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Given that when the pig plays games, we can conclude the pig plays games, it is evident that the pig plays games.\nBecause assuming the pig plays games, we can say the pig enjoys music, we can conclude that the pig enjoys music.\nGiven that when the pig enjoys music, we can conclude the ocean fishes in lakes, it is evident that the ocean fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of based on the ocean fishes in lakes, it is evident that the bakery fishes in lakes, we deduce that the bakery fishes in lakes.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the pig plays games, we can conclude the pig enjoys music., Given that the pig enjoys music, it follows that the ocean fishes in lakes., If the ocean fishes in lakes, then the bakery fishes in lakes., The bakery fishes in lakes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma enjoys music.\nEmma is an engineer.\nThe garden plays instruments.\nRules:\nAssuming the garden plays instruments, we can say the moon grows plants.\nGiven that emma enjoys music, it follows that the artist enjoys music.\nAssuming emma is an engineer, we can say the artist enjoys music.\nIf the moon plays instruments, then the moon is an engineer.\nWhen the moon grows plants, we can conclude the moon plays instruments.\nGiven that emma enjoys music, it follows that the moon grows plants.\nWhen emma enjoys music, we can conclude the artist is an engineer.", "statement": "The garden is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the garden plays instruments, then the moon grows plants, it follows that the moon grows plants.\nGiven that when emma enjoys music, we can conclude the artist enjoys music, it is evident that the artist enjoys music.\nApplying the logic of when emma enjoys music, we can conclude the moon grows plants, we deduce that the moon grows plants.\nGiven that based on emma enjoys music, it is evident that the artist is an engineer, it is evident that the artist is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the moon grows plants, then the moon plays instruments, we can see that the moon plays instruments.\nBecause assuming the moon plays instruments, we can say the moon is an engineer, we can conclude that the moon is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the garden plays instruments, assuming the garden plays instruments, we can say the moon grows plants, when the moon grows plants, we can conclude the moon plays instruments, if the moon plays instruments, then the moon is an engineer, the garden is an engineer\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva becomes famous.\nAva is loud.\nThe pig is loud.\nRules:\nWhen the pig is loud, we can conclude ava becomes famous.\nAssuming ava becomes famous, we can say the book is quiet.\nAssuming ava becomes famous, we can say ava becomes famous.\nAssuming the book is loud, we can say the book is an engineer.\nAssuming ava becomes famous, we can say the dog is an engineer.\nGiven that the book is an engineer, it follows that the book is loud.\nGiven that the dog is loud, it follows that the book is an engineer.\nWhen the book is quiet, we can conclude the dog is loud.", "statement": "The book is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when ava becomes famous, we can conclude the book is quiet, we deduce that the book is quiet.\nBecause based on the book is quiet, it is evident that the dog is loud, we can conclude that the dog is loud.\nSince we know that when the dog is loud, we can conclude the book is an engineer, it follows that the book is an engineer.\nGiven that based on the book is an engineer, it is evident that the book is loud, it is evident that the book is loud.\nBecause when the book is loud, we can conclude the book is an engineer, we can conclude that the book is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Assuming ava becomes famous, we can say the dog is an engineer., Because the pig is loud, we can conclude ava becomes famous., The book is an engineer.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe is a chef.\nThe globe volunteers.\nThe globe is tall.\nRules:\nBased on the globe volunteers, it is evident that the plane is quiet.\nWhen the globe volunteers, we can conclude the book volunteers.\nIf the globe is tall, then the plane is a chef.\nWhen the globe volunteers, we can conclude the plane is a chef.\nBased on the book is quiet, it is evident that the plane is quiet.\nIf the book is quiet, then the globe volunteers.\nAssuming the plane is a chef, we can say the plane is quiet.\nBased on the plane is tall, it is evident that the book is quiet.\nBased on the globe is a chef, it is evident that the plane is tall.", "statement": "The book is a chef.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the globe volunteers, we can say the plane is quiet, it follows that the plane is quiet.\nApplying the logic of when the globe volunteers, we can conclude the book volunteers, we deduce that the book volunteers.\nGiven that given that the globe is tall, it follows that the plane is a chef, it is evident that the plane is a chef.\nGiven that based on the globe volunteers, it is evident that the plane is a chef, it is evident that the plane is a chef.\nBecause if the globe is a chef, then the plane is tall, we can conclude that the plane is tall.\nBecause if the plane is tall, then the book is quiet, we can conclude that the book is quiet.\nGiven that based on the book is quiet, it is evident that the globe volunteers, it is evident that the globe volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on the globe volunteers, we can conclude the book volunteers, the globe is a chef, Based on the globe is a chef, it is evident that the plane is tall, Based on the plane is tall, it is evident that the book is quiet, if the book is quiet, then the globe volunteers, the globe volunteers, we can conclude the book volunteers, the globe is tall, then the plane is a chef, the globe volunteers, we can conclude the plane is a chef, Assuming the plane is a chef, we can say the plane is quiet, Based on the book is quiet, it is evident that the plane is quiet, the conclusion that the book is a chef is not evident\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train is quiet.\nThe artist is a doctor.\nThe artist draws maps.\nRules:\nBased on the train is quiet, it is evident that the artist writes stories.\nGiven that the sun is a doctor, it follows that the sun is quiet.\nBased on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the sun is quiet.\nGiven that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet.\nWhen the artist is a doctor, we can conclude the artist writes stories.", "statement": "The train draws maps.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the train is quiet, it follows that the artist writes stories, it follows that the artist writes stories.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the artist is a doctor, we can conclude the artist writes stories, we can see that the artist writes stories.\nSince we know that if the artist writes stories, then the sun is quiet, it follows that the sun is quiet.\nBecause assuming the sun is quiet, we can say the sun is quiet, we can conclude that the sun is quiet.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When the artist is a doctor, we can conclude the artist writes stories., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., the artist is a doctor., The train is quiet., the artist writes stories., the train is quiet., the sun is quiet., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., the artist is a doctor., Based on the train is quiet, it is evident that the artist writes stories., the sun is quiet., The train is quiet., When the artist is a doctor, we can conclude the artist writes stories., Based on the train is quiet, it is evident that the artist writes stories., the artist draws maps., the sun is quiet., the artist is a doctor., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., Based on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the sun is quiet., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., Based on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., the artist writes stories., the train is quiet., the artist draws maps., Based on the train is quiet, it is evident that the artist writes stories., the train is quiet., the artist draws maps., the artist draws maps., the artist draws maps., it is evident that the artist writes stories., the artist draws maps., Based on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the sun is quiet., Based on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the sun is quiet., the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., Based on the train is quiet, it is evident that the artist writes stories., When the artist is a doctor, we can conclude the artist writes stories., the artist draws maps., When the artist is a doctor, we can conclude the artist writes stories., the train is quiet., the artist draws maps., the artist is a doctor., The artist draws maps., the artist is a doctor., The artist is a doctor., the artist draws maps., the artist writes stories., the sun is quiet., the artist writes stories., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., the artist is a doctor., the artist draws maps., the train is quiet., Based on the artist draws maps., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., Given that the artist writes stories, it follows that the sun is quiet., the artist draws maps., the train is quiet., it is evident that the train draws maps.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLucy is an artist.\nThe mountain grows plants.\nThe mountain hosts parties.\nRules:\nIf lucy is an artist, then lucy is an artist.\nGiven that lucy is an artist, it follows that lucy is an artist.\nGiven that the mountain grows plants, it follows that the car is an artist.\nIf lucy is an artist, then the mountain is an artist.\nGiven that the book hosts parties, it follows that lucy hosts parties.\nAssuming lucy grows plants, we can say the book hosts parties.\nWhen the mountain hosts parties, we can conclude the mountain is an artist.\nBased on lucy is an artist, it is evident that lucy grows plants.\nAssuming the mountain grows plants, we can say the mountain is an artist.", "statement": "The car plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Because given that lucy is an artist, it follows that lucy is an artist, we can conclude that lucy is an artist.\nSince we know that assuming the mountain grows plants, we can say the car is an artist, it follows that the car is an artist.\nApplying the logic of based on lucy is an artist, it is evident that the mountain is an artist, we deduce that the mountain is an artist.\nGiven that if lucy is an artist, then lucy grows plants, it is evident that lucy grows plants.\nBecause assuming lucy grows plants, we can say the book hosts parties, we can conclude that the book hosts parties.\nSince we know that given that the book hosts parties, it follows that lucy hosts parties, it follows that lucy hosts parties.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting Lucy being an artist or any other fact to the car playing instruments, the car plays instruments is negation.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone explores cities.\nSarah is a doctor.\nThe phone explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that the phone explores cities, it follows that stanford university takes pictures.\nBased on the phone explores cities, it is evident that the musician explores cities.\nWhen sarah is a doctor, we can conclude the musician explores cities.\nGiven that the phone explores cities, it follows that stanford university is a doctor.\nGiven that the phone is a doctor, it follows that stanford university takes pictures.\nIf sarah takes pictures, then sarah is a doctor.\nBased on sarah explores cities, it is evident that sarah takes pictures.\nGiven that the phone explores cities, it follows that sarah explores cities.", "statement": "The phone is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the phone explores cities, we can say stanford university takes pictures, it follows that stanford university takes pictures.\nSince we know that when the phone explores cities, we can conclude the musician explores cities, it follows that the musician explores cities.\nBecause assuming the phone explores cities, we can say stanford university is a doctor, we can conclude that stanford university is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the phone explores cities, we can conclude sarah explores cities, we can see that sarah explores cities.\nSince we know that given that sarah explores cities, it follows that sarah takes pictures, it follows that sarah takes pictures.\nGiven that assuming sarah takes pictures, we can say sarah is a doctor, it is evident that sarah is a doctor.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the phone explores cities, it follows that stanford university is a doctor, The phone is a doctor\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house sings beautifully.\nThe bakery hikes mountains.\nThe bakery collects stamps.\nRules:\nBased on the bakery hikes mountains, it is evident that the pumpkin collects stamps.\nWhen the bakery hikes mountains, we can conclude the house collects stamps.\nGiven that the bakery hikes mountains, it follows that the bakery is an engineer.\nGiven that the house collects stamps, it follows that the bakery hikes mountains.\nWhen the house collects stamps, we can conclude the house collects stamps.\nAssuming the house hikes mountains, we can say the house collects stamps.\nAssuming the bakery hikes mountains, we can say the house hikes mountains.", "statement": "The bakery is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the bakery hikes mountains, we can conclude the house hikes mountains, we can see that the house hikes mountains.\nBecause if the house hikes mountains, then the house collects stamps, we can conclude that the house collects stamps.\nBecause when the house collects stamps, we can conclude the bakery hikes mountains, we can conclude that the bakery hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the bakery hikes mountains, it is evident that the bakery is an engineer, we can see that the bakery is an engineer.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Given that the bakery hikes mountains, it follows that the bakery is an engineer, The bakery hikes mountains, Therefore, the bakery is an engineer\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAlice goes to the hospital.\nThe sandwich runs quickly.\nThe sandwich runs quickly.\nRules:\nIf the sandwich runs quickly, then the garden writes stories.\nWhen alice runs quickly, we can conclude the sandwich goes to the hospital.\nBased on alice makes pizza, it is evident that alice runs quickly.\nGiven that alice makes pizza, it follows that alice makes pizza.\nIf the garden writes stories, then the sandwich writes stories.\nIf the sandwich runs quickly, then alice makes pizza.", "statement": "The sandwich goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the sandwich runs quickly, then alice makes pizza, we deduce that alice makes pizza.\nBecause when alice makes pizza, we can conclude alice makes pizza, we can conclude that alice makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of based on alice makes pizza, it is evident that alice runs quickly, we deduce that alice runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that alice runs quickly, it follows that the sandwich goes to the hospital, we can see that the sandwich goes to the hospital.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the sandwich runs quickly, then alice makes pizza., Based on alice makes pizza, it is evident that alice runs quickly., When alice runs quickly, we can conclude the sandwich goes to the hospital., The sandwich runs quickly., the sandwich goes to the hospital.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames is fast.\nThe fountain paints pictures.\nThe fountain sings beautifully.\nRules:\nAssuming the fountain paints pictures, we can say the globe sings beautifully.\nGiven that the fountain sings beautifully, it follows that the fountain paints pictures.\nIf james draws maps, then liam sings beautifully.\nGiven that james paints pictures, it follows that james draws maps.\nWhen james sings beautifully, we can conclude liam is fast.\nWhen james paints pictures, we can conclude james sings beautifully.\nIf james is fast, then james paints pictures.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that when the fountain paints pictures, we can conclude the globe sings beautifully, it is evident that the globe sings beautifully.\nBecause given that the fountain sings beautifully, it follows that the fountain paints pictures, we can conclude that the fountain paints pictures.\nBecause if james is fast, then james paints pictures, we can conclude that james paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on james paints pictures, it is evident that james draws maps, we can see that james draws maps.\nBecause when james paints pictures, we can conclude james sings beautifully, we can conclude that james sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming james draws maps, we can say liam sings beautifully, we can see that liam sings beautifully.\nBecause based on james sings beautifully, it is evident that liam is fast, we can conclude that liam is fast.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if james is fast, then james paints pictures, when james paints pictures, we can conclude james sings beautifully, if james draws maps, then liam sings beautifully, given that james paints pictures, it follows that james draws maps, given that the fountain sings beautifully, it follows that the fountain paints pictures, assuming the fountain paints pictures, we can say the globe sings beautifully, when james sings beautifully, we can conclude liam is fast, Chuan is handsome cannot be directly inferred.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone volunteers.\nThe cat is happy.\nThe cat is fluffy.\nRules:\nBased on the cat is happy, it is evident that the cat is fluffy.\nGiven that the cat is happy, it follows that the cat volunteers.\nWhen james is fluffy, we can conclude the phone is fluffy.\nIf the phone is happy, then james is fluffy.\nBased on the cat is fluffy, it is evident that ethan volunteers.\nGiven that the cat is happy, it follows that ethan volunteers.\nBased on the phone volunteers, it is evident that the phone is happy.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the cat is happy, then the cat is fluffy, we can see that the cat is fluffy.\nBecause assuming the cat is happy, we can say the cat volunteers, we can conclude that the cat volunteers.\nBecause if the cat is fluffy, then ethan volunteers, we can conclude that ethan volunteers.\nApplying the logic of assuming the phone volunteers, we can say the phone is happy, we deduce that the phone is happy.\nGiven that assuming the phone is happy, we can say james is fluffy, it is evident that james is fluffy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if james is fluffy, then the phone is fluffy, we can see that the phone is fluffy.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules pertain to 'Chuan is handsome' or its negation, the negation of 'Chuan is handsome'.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan runs quickly.\nLucas hosts parties.\nThe playground hosts parties.\nRules:\nIf lucas hosts parties, then the bakery runs quickly.\nWhen chuan runs quickly, we can conclude chuan travels far.\nGiven that the bakery runs quickly, it follows that the playground takes pictures.\nIf the bakery runs quickly, then the bakery runs quickly.\nIf the bakery runs quickly, then the bakery runs quickly.\nBased on the bakery runs quickly, it is evident that chuan travels far.\nGiven that lucas hosts parties, it follows that the bakery runs quickly.", "statement": "The bakery hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that lucas hosts parties, it follows that the bakery runs quickly, we deduce that the bakery runs quickly.\nSince we know that when chuan runs quickly, we can conclude chuan travels far, it follows that chuan travels far.\nBecause if lucas hosts parties, then the bakery runs quickly, we can conclude that the bakery runs quickly.\nSince we know that given that the bakery runs quickly, it follows that the bakery runs quickly, it follows that the bakery runs quickly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the bakery runs quickly, it follows that the bakery runs quickly, we can see that the bakery runs quickly.\nApplying the logic of based on the bakery runs quickly, it is evident that the playground takes pictures, we deduce that the playground takes pictures.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if lucas hosts parties, then the bakery runs quickly, given that lucas hosts parties, it follows that the bakery runs quickly, the bakery hosts parties is not necessarily concluded from these facts and rules\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train makes pizza.\nThe stadium makes pizza.\nThe garden enjoys music.\nRules:\nBased on the garden enjoys music, it is evident that the garden enjoys music.\nIf the train makes pizza, then the train makes pizza.\nAssuming the garden makes pizza, we can say the garden volunteers.\nBased on the train carries bags, it is evident that the garden makes pizza.\nAssuming the sky enjoys music, we can say the train carries bags.\nIf the train makes pizza, then the sky enjoys music.", "statement": "The garden volunteers.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the train makes pizza, we can say the sky enjoys music, it follows that the sky enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the sky enjoys music, it is evident that the train carries bags, we can see that the train carries bags.\nApplying the logic of assuming the train carries bags, we can say the garden makes pizza, we deduce that the garden makes pizza.\nGiven that when the garden makes pizza, we can conclude the garden volunteers, it is evident that the garden volunteers.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because assuming the garden makes pizza, we can say the garden volunteers, the garden does not make pizza, the garden volunteers is false.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah swims well.\nEthan is friendly.\nSophie swims well.\nRules:\nBased on sarah swims well, it is evident that the train reads books.\nWhen sophie swims well, we can conclude sarah sings beautifully.\nBased on sophie swims well, it is evident that ethan sings beautifully.\nIf sophie reads books, then ethan swims well.\nWhen sophie swims well, we can conclude ethan swims well.\nWhen sarah sings beautifully, we can conclude sophie swims well.\nWhen ethan swims well, we can conclude sophie reads books.\nAssuming the train reads books, we can say sarah sings beautifully.", "statement": "Ethan swims well.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that sarah swims well, it follows that the train reads books, we deduce that the train reads books.\nApplying the logic of if the train reads books, then sarah sings beautifully, we deduce that sarah sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of given that sarah sings beautifully, it follows that sophie swims well, we deduce that sophie swims well.\nApplying the logic of if sophie swims well, then ethan swims well, we deduce that ethan swims well.\nApplying the logic of if ethan swims well, then sophie reads books, we deduce that sophie reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on sophie reads books, it is evident that ethan swims well, we can see that ethan swims well.", "depth": 4, "flag": "True"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sophie swims well, when sophie swims well, we can conclude ethan swims well, Ethan swims well\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist paints pictures.\nThe artist is funny.\nThe wall teaches math.\nRules:\nGiven that the artist is funny, it follows that the artist paints pictures.\nWhen the artist is funny, we can conclude mike is funny.\nIf the wall teaches math, then liam is funny.\nAssuming the artist is funny, we can say mike is loud.\nBased on the wall teaches math, it is evident that mike is funny.\nAssuming mike teaches math, we can say mike teaches math.\nBased on the artist is funny, it is evident that the artist paints pictures.\nBased on the artist paints pictures, it is evident that mike is loud.\nAssuming mike paints pictures, we can say mike teaches math.\nBased on liam is funny, it is evident that mike paints pictures.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because if the artist is funny, then the artist paints pictures, we can conclude that the artist paints pictures.\nSince we know that if the artist is funny, then mike is funny, it follows that mike is funny.\nSince we know that based on the wall teaches math, it is evident that liam is funny, it follows that liam is funny.\nBecause given that the artist is funny, it follows that mike is loud, we can conclude that mike is loud.\nSince we know that when liam is funny, we can conclude mike paints pictures, it follows that mike paints pictures.\nSince we know that given that mike paints pictures, it follows that mike teaches math, it follows that mike teaches math.\nBecause given that mike teaches math, it follows that mike teaches math, we can conclude that mike teaches math.", "depth": 4, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts given that relate to whether Chuan is handsome.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan dances gracefully.\nHenry hikes mountains.\nChuan dances gracefully.\nRules:\nGiven that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that the cloud dances gracefully.\nGiven that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that chuan makes pizza.\nAssuming the bridge makes pizza, we can say the cloud makes pizza.\nAssuming the cloud makes pizza, we can say the cloud dances gracefully.\nAssuming the cloud is quiet, we can say the bridge makes pizza.\nBased on the cloud dances gracefully, it is evident that the cloud is quiet.\nWhen chuan makes pizza, we can conclude the cloud dances gracefully.", "statement": "The bridge is quiet.", "reasoning": "Given that given that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that the cloud dances gracefully, it is evident that the cloud dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on chuan dances gracefully, it is evident that chuan makes pizza, we can see that chuan makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of if chuan makes pizza, then the cloud dances gracefully, we deduce that the cloud dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the cloud dances gracefully, we can conclude the cloud is quiet, we can see that the cloud is quiet.\nSince we know that when the cloud is quiet, we can conclude the bridge makes pizza, it follows that the bridge makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of when the bridge makes pizza, we can conclude the cloud makes pizza, we deduce that the cloud makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because given that chuan dances gracefully, it follows that the cloud dances gracefully, based on the cloud dances gracefully, it is evident that the cloud is quiet, assuming the cloud is quiet, we can say the bridge makes pizza, the bridge is quiet is unknown.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia does yoga.\nMia does yoga.\nThe bridge makes pizza.\nRules:\nGiven that mia does yoga, it follows that the bridge reads books.\nWhen mia hosts parties, we can conclude the bridge makes pizza.\nIf the car makes pizza, then mia hosts parties.\nAssuming the bridge hosts parties, we can say the car makes pizza.\nWhen mia hosts parties, we can conclude mia reads books.\nGiven that mia does yoga, it follows that the bridge hosts parties.", "statement": "Mia makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Because when mia does yoga, we can conclude the bridge reads books, we can conclude that the bridge reads books.\nSince we know that given that mia does yoga, it follows that the bridge hosts parties, it follows that the bridge hosts parties.\nSince we know that based on the bridge hosts parties, it is evident that the car makes pizza, it follows that the car makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the car makes pizza, it is evident that mia hosts parties, we can see that mia hosts parties.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when mia hosts parties, we can conclude mia reads books, we can see that mia reads books.\nBecause when mia hosts parties, we can conclude the bridge makes pizza, we can conclude that the bridge makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that mia does yoga, it follows that the bridge hosts parties, Assuming the bridge hosts parties, we can say the car makes pizza, If the car makes pizza, then mia hosts parties, When mia hosts parties, we can conclude the bridge makes pizza, the bridge makes pizza, Mia makes pizza is not concluded\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike runs marathons.\nThe musician is colorful.\nThe musician plays games.\nRules:\nIf the musician plays games, then the tree runs marathons.\nWhen the musician is colorful, we can conclude the tree runs marathons.\nGiven that the musician plays games, it follows that sarah is colorful.\nGiven that sarah plays games, it follows that the musician plays games.\nAssuming the musician is colorful, we can say the tree runs marathons.\nBased on the tree runs marathons, it is evident that sarah plays games.\nBased on the tree runs marathons, it is evident that the musician is colorful.", "statement": "Mike is colorful.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the musician plays games, it is evident that the tree runs marathons, we can see that the tree runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the musician is colorful, we can conclude the tree runs marathons, we can see that the tree runs marathons.\nBecause if the tree runs marathons, then the musician is colorful, we can conclude that the musician is colorful.\nSince we know that if the musician is colorful, then the tree runs marathons, it follows that the tree runs marathons.\nGiven that given that the tree runs marathons, it follows that sarah plays games, it is evident that sarah plays games.\nBecause assuming sarah plays games, we can say the musician plays games, we can conclude that the musician plays games.\nBecause based on the musician plays games, it is evident that sarah is colorful, we can conclude that sarah is colorful.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the facts do not connect Mike being colorful with any rule, Mike is colorful cannot be concluded\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi collects stamps.\nThe artist collects stamps.\nThe artist collects stamps.\nRules:\nGiven that the artist collects stamps, it follows that the sky rides bikes.\nIf jianzhi enjoys music, then jianzhi rides bikes.\nIf the sky rides bikes, then the artist plays games.\nIf henry plays games, then jianzhi enjoys music.\nIf the sky enjoys music, then henry plays games.\nIf jianzhi collects stamps, then the sky enjoys music.", "statement": "Henry enjoys music.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the artist collects stamps, it is evident that the sky rides bikes, we deduce that the sky rides bikes.\nGiven that given that the sky rides bikes, it follows that the artist plays games, it is evident that the artist plays games.\nGiven that when jianzhi collects stamps, we can conclude the sky enjoys music, it is evident that the sky enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the sky enjoys music, then henry plays games, we can see that henry plays games.\nSince we know that based on henry plays games, it is evident that jianzhi enjoys music, it follows that jianzhi enjoys music.\nGiven that if jianzhi enjoys music, then jianzhi rides bikes, it is evident that jianzhi rides bikes.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Jianzhi collects stamps, If jianzhi collects stamps, then the sky enjoys music., If the sky enjoys music, then henry plays games., If henry plays games, then jianzhi enjoys music., If jianzhi enjoys music, then jianzhi rides bikes., If the sky rides bikes, then the artist plays games., the negation of Henry enjoys music.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAlice solves puzzles.\nAlice is a scientist.\nAva is a scientist.\nRules:\nAssuming alice is a scientist, we can say alice explores cities.\nWhen alice explores cities, we can conclude charlie is a scientist.\nAssuming charlie is a scientist, we can say alice explores cities.\nWhen the bakery explores cities, we can conclude charlie is a scientist.\nWhen alice explores cities, we can conclude the bakery explores cities.\nGiven that charlie explores cities, it follows that ava solves puzzles.", "statement": "Charlie solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Because given that alice is a scientist, it follows that alice explores cities, we can conclude that alice explores cities.\nBecause when alice explores cities, we can conclude the bakery explores cities, we can conclude that the bakery explores cities.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the bakery explores cities, it is evident that charlie is a scientist, we can see that charlie is a scientist.\nSince we know that assuming charlie is a scientist, we can say alice explores cities, it follows that alice explores cities.\nSince we know that assuming alice explores cities, we can say charlie is a scientist, it follows that charlie is a scientist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming alice is a scientist, we can say alice explores cities, When alice explores cities, we can conclude charlie is a scientist, Given that charlie explores cities, it follows that ava solves puzzles, Charlie does not solve puzzles\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi grows plants.\nJianzhi grows plants.\nThe bridge cooks well.\nRules:\nAssuming jianzhi grows plants, we can say jianzhi cooks well.\nIf the bridge cooks well, then jianzhi is friendly.\nAssuming jianzhi grows plants, we can say jianzhi cooks well.\nWhen the bridge is friendly, we can conclude jianzhi cooks well.\nBased on jianzhi hikes mountains, it is evident that the forest grows plants.\nBased on the bridge is friendly, it is evident that jianzhi hikes mountains.\nAssuming the bridge hikes mountains, we can say the bridge is friendly.\nAssuming the bridge cooks well, we can say the bridge hikes mountains.", "statement": "The garden hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Given that based on jianzhi grows plants, it is evident that jianzhi cooks well, it is evident that jianzhi cooks well.\nApplying the logic of assuming the bridge cooks well, we can say jianzhi is friendly, we deduce that jianzhi is friendly.\nSince we know that given that the bridge cooks well, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains, it follows that the bridge hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of given that the bridge hikes mountains, it follows that the bridge is friendly, we deduce that the bridge is friendly.\nApplying the logic of given that the bridge is friendly, it follows that jianzhi hikes mountains, we deduce that jianzhi hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of assuming jianzhi hikes mountains, we can say the forest grows plants, we deduce that the forest grows plants.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the bridge cooks well, then jianzhi is friendly, Assuming the bridge cooks well, we can say the bridge hikes mountains, Assuming the bridge hikes mountains, we can say the bridge is friendly, The garden hikes mountains is its negation\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car swims well.\nThe cat swims well.\nThe moon is loud.\nRules:\nBased on the cat swims well, it is evident that the car is loud.\nBased on the car is loud, it is evident that the moon is loud.\nIf the cat is magical, then the car is loud.\nGiven that the car is loud, it follows that the cat is magical.\nWhen the cat is magical, we can conclude the cat is loud.\nBased on the moon is loud, it is evident that the cat is magical.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the cat swims well, then the car is loud, we deduce that the car is loud.\nGiven that when the car is loud, we can conclude the cat is magical, it is evident that the cat is magical.\nSince we know that based on the cat is magical, it is evident that the car is loud, it follows that the car is loud.\nApplying the logic of when the car is loud, we can conclude the moon is loud, we deduce that the moon is loud.\nSince we know that based on the moon is loud, it is evident that the cat is magical, it follows that the cat is magical.\nGiven that based on the cat is magical, it is evident that the cat is loud, it is evident that the cat is loud.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the assertion does not follow from any provided facts or rules\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud fishes in lakes.\nThe cloud fishes in lakes.\nSarah fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nGiven that the cloud fishes in lakes, it follows that sarah is friendly.\nAssuming the cloud fishes in lakes, we can say sarah is friendly.\nBased on the cloud fishes in lakes, it is evident that the car hikes mountains.\nAssuming the pig fishes in lakes, we can say the car reads books.\nBased on the cloud is friendly, it is evident that the pig fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the pig hikes mountains, we can say the cloud is friendly.\nGiven that the car hikes mountains, it follows that the pig hikes mountains.", "statement": "The car is friendly.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the cloud fishes in lakes, we can conclude sarah is friendly, it follows that sarah is friendly.\nSince we know that given that the cloud fishes in lakes, it follows that the car hikes mountains, it follows that the car hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of when the car hikes mountains, we can conclude the pig hikes mountains, we deduce that the pig hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the pig hikes mountains, it follows that the cloud is friendly, we can see that the cloud is friendly.\nBecause based on the cloud is friendly, it is evident that the pig fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the pig fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the pig fishes in lakes, we can conclude the car reads books, we can see that the car reads books.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Based on the cloud fishes in lakes, it is evident that the car hikes mountains, Given that the car hikes mountains, it follows that the pig hikes mountains, Assuming the pig hikes mountains, we can say the cloud is friendly, the car is friendly.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sky enjoys music.\nAva jumps high.\nLiam collects stamps.\nRules:\nBased on the sky enjoys music, it is evident that liam jumps high.\nGiven that the sky enjoys music, it follows that liam jumps high.\nGiven that ava jumps high, it follows that the sky jumps high.\nIf liam collects stamps, then liam runs marathons.\nBased on liam collects stamps, it is evident that the wall jumps high.\nBased on liam collects stamps, it is evident that liam runs marathons.\nWhen liam runs marathons, we can conclude liam collects stamps.\nAssuming ava collects stamps, we can say liam runs marathons.\nWhen liam jumps high, we can conclude ava collects stamps.", "statement": "Ava runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the sky enjoys music, it follows that liam jumps high, it follows that liam jumps high.\nSince we know that if ava jumps high, then the sky jumps high, it follows that the sky jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if liam collects stamps, then liam runs marathons, we can see that liam runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if liam jumps high, then ava collects stamps, we can see that ava collects stamps.\nSince we know that when ava collects stamps, we can conclude liam runs marathons, it follows that liam runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of if liam runs marathons, then liam collects stamps, we deduce that liam collects stamps.\nSince we know that when liam collects stamps, we can conclude the wall jumps high, it follows that the wall jumps high.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that ava jumps high, it follows that the sky jumps high, and the sky enjoys music, it follows that liam jumps high, which does not affect Ava, Ava runs marathons is not proven.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall is a scientist.\nLucy is friendly.\nThe wall is friendly.\nRules:\nIf the wall is friendly, then the wall is a scientist.\nBased on the plane is a scientist, it is evident that the wall is friendly.\nIf the plane is a scientist, then the wall rides bikes.\nBased on the wall rides bikes, it is evident that the plane is a scientist.\nGiven that lucy is a scientist, it follows that the wall rides bikes.\nAssuming the wall is a scientist, we can say lucy is a scientist.", "statement": "Lucy rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Given that based on the wall is friendly, it is evident that the wall is a scientist, it is evident that the wall is a scientist.\nBecause when the wall is a scientist, we can conclude lucy is a scientist, we can conclude that lucy is a scientist.\nBecause if lucy is a scientist, then the wall rides bikes, we can conclude that the wall rides bikes.\nGiven that given that the wall rides bikes, it follows that the plane is a scientist, it is evident that the plane is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of given that the plane is a scientist, it follows that the wall is friendly, we deduce that the wall is friendly.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that lucy is a scientist, it follows that the wall rides bikes., Assuming the wall is a scientist, we can say lucy is a scientist., Lucy rides bikes.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJames is colorful.\nThe plane is colorful.\nThe river takes pictures.\nRules:\nAssuming james is colorful, we can say james is loud.\nIf the river takes pictures, then james enjoys music.\nWhen the mountain is loud, we can conclude the mountain enjoys music.\nAssuming james is colorful, we can say the mountain is loud.\nIf the river takes pictures, then james enjoys music.\nAssuming the plane is colorful, we can say james is colorful.\nIf the plane is colorful, then the plane is colorful.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that when james is colorful, we can conclude james is loud, it follows that james is loud.\nSince we know that when the river takes pictures, we can conclude james enjoys music, it follows that james enjoys music.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the plane is colorful, it follows that the plane is colorful, we can see that the plane is colorful.\nSince we know that if the plane is colorful, then james is colorful, it follows that james is colorful.\nSince we know that assuming james is colorful, we can say the mountain is loud, it follows that the mountain is loud.\nGiven that if the mountain is loud, then the mountain enjoys music, it is evident that the mountain enjoys music.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts connecting Chuan to the given facts or any attributes of being handsome. Thus, we cannot conclude anything about Chuan from the provided information.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat is funny.\nLucy is magical.\nThe cat swims well.\nRules:\nGiven that lucy is magical, it follows that the cat swims well.\nIf the cat is funny, then the book is funny.\nWhen lucy is magical, we can conclude the cat is funny.\nAssuming the cat is magical, we can say lucy is magical.\nBased on the book is funny, it is evident that lucy is funny.\nWhen the cat swims well, we can conclude the cat is magical.", "statement": "The book runs marathons.", "reasoning": "Because if lucy is magical, then the cat swims well, we can conclude that the cat swims well.\nApplying the logic of based on the cat swims well, it is evident that the cat is magical, we deduce that the cat is magical.\nGiven that based on the cat is magical, it is evident that lucy is magical, it is evident that lucy is magical.\nApplying the logic of assuming lucy is magical, we can say the cat is funny, we deduce that the cat is funny.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the cat is funny, we can say the book is funny, we can see that the book is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that lucy is magical, it follows that the cat swims well, When lucy is magical, we can conclude the cat is funny, If the cat is funny, then the book is funny, the assertion is false.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike is a scientist.\nMike is a scientist.\nAlice volunteers.\nRules:\nBased on mike is a scientist, it is evident that mike swims well.\nBased on mike cooks well, it is evident that mike is a scientist.\nBased on the dog volunteers, it is evident that mike cooks well.\nAssuming mike is a scientist, we can say mike volunteers.\nGiven that mike volunteers, it follows that the dog volunteers.\nIf mike is a scientist, then mike volunteers.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that mike is a scientist, it follows that mike swims well, we can see that mike swims well.\nSince we know that when mike is a scientist, we can conclude mike volunteers, it follows that mike volunteers.\nSince we know that when mike volunteers, we can conclude the dog volunteers, it follows that the dog volunteers.\nSince we know that when the dog volunteers, we can conclude mike cooks well, it follows that mike cooks well.\nSince we know that given that mike cooks well, it follows that mike is a scientist, it follows that mike is a scientist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the assertion about Chuan is unrelated to the given facts and rules, Chuan is handsome cannot be concluded from the information provided\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist runs marathons.\nCharlie makes pizza.\nCharlie sings beautifully.\nRules:\nIf the artist runs marathons, then charlie sings beautifully.\nAssuming jack sings beautifully, we can say the ocean runs marathons.\nWhen the artist makes pizza, we can conclude jack sings beautifully.\nBased on jack sings beautifully, it is evident that the artist makes pizza.\nIf the artist runs marathons, then jack sings beautifully.\nBased on the ocean runs marathons, it is evident that the artist makes pizza.", "statement": "The ocean makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Given that if the artist runs marathons, then charlie sings beautifully, it is evident that charlie sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of based on the artist runs marathons, it is evident that jack sings beautifully, we deduce that jack sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of based on jack sings beautifully, it is evident that the artist makes pizza, we deduce that the artist makes pizza.\nGiven that assuming the artist makes pizza, we can say jack sings beautifully, it is evident that jack sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on jack sings beautifully, it is evident that the ocean runs marathons, we can see that the ocean runs marathons.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because if the artist runs marathons, then charlie sings beautifully, based on jack sings beautifully, it is evident that the artist makes pizza, assuming jack sings beautifully, we can say the ocean runs marathons, based on the ocean runs marathons, it is evident that the artist makes pizza, the negation of the ocean makes pizza\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium is funny.\nThe tree is funny.\nThe city reads books.\nRules:\nIf the city reads books, then the stadium teaches math.\nBased on the tree is funny, it is evident that the city teaches math.\nAssuming the stadium is funny, we can say the city becomes famous.\nIf the tree is funny, then the city becomes famous.\nIf the city becomes famous, then the stadium is funny.\nAssuming the tree is funny, we can say the tree is funny.\nAssuming the city becomes famous, we can say the city becomes famous.", "statement": "Mike is funny.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the city reads books, then the stadium teaches math, we deduce that the stadium teaches math.\nBecause assuming the tree is funny, we can say the city teaches math, we can conclude that the city teaches math.\nGiven that based on the tree is funny, it is evident that the tree is funny, it is evident that the tree is funny.\nApplying the logic of given that the tree is funny, it follows that the city becomes famous, we deduce that the city becomes famous.\nSince we know that when the city becomes famous, we can conclude the city becomes famous, it follows that the city becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the city becomes famous, it is evident that the stadium is funny, we can see that the stadium is funny.\nBecause if the stadium is funny, then the city becomes famous, we can conclude that the city becomes famous.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion 'Mike is funny' does not follow from any given facts or rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma goes to the hospital.\nEmma goes to the hospital.\nThe sun runs quickly.\nRules:\nBased on the sun runs quickly, it is evident that the sun goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the sandwich is happy, we can say emma is happy.\nIf emma is happy, then the sandwich is happy.\nGiven that emma makes pizza, it follows that emma is happy.\nBased on the ocean makes pizza, it is evident that the sandwich runs quickly.\nIf the sun goes to the hospital, then emma makes pizza.", "statement": "The ocean makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that the sun runs quickly, it follows that the sun goes to the hospital, it follows that the sun goes to the hospital.\nSince we know that when the sun goes to the hospital, we can conclude emma makes pizza, it follows that emma makes pizza.\nGiven that if emma makes pizza, then emma is happy, it is evident that emma is happy.\nBecause given that emma is happy, it follows that the sandwich is happy, we can conclude that the sandwich is happy.\nBecause assuming the sandwich is happy, we can say emma is happy, we can conclude that emma is happy.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the sun runs quickly, it is evident that the sun goes to the hospital, if the sun goes to the hospital, then emma makes pizza, given that emma makes pizza, it follows that emma is happy, if emma is happy, then the sandwich is happy, based on the ocean makes pizza, it is evident that the sandwich runs quickly, the ocean makes pizza.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie is colorful.\nJianzhi is colorful.\nThe bakery is colorful.\nRules:\nAssuming jianzhi is colorful, we can say jianzhi is quiet.\nWhen jianzhi is quiet, we can conclude jianzhi swims well.\nGiven that the chef swims well, it follows that jianzhi is quiet.\nIf the chef swims well, then the chef is colorful.\nIf the chef swims well, then the chef swims well.\nIf jianzhi is quiet, then the chef swims well.", "statement": "The chef is quiet.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that jianzhi is colorful, it follows that jianzhi is quiet, we can see that jianzhi is quiet.\nSince we know that given that jianzhi is quiet, it follows that the chef swims well, it follows that the chef swims well.\nApplying the logic of if the chef swims well, then the chef is colorful, we deduce that the chef is colorful.\nApplying the logic of assuming the chef swims well, we can say the chef swims well, we deduce that the chef swims well.\nGiven that assuming the chef swims well, we can say jianzhi is quiet, it is evident that jianzhi is quiet.\nApplying the logic of based on jianzhi is quiet, it is evident that jianzhi swims well, we deduce that jianzhi swims well.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming jianzhi is colorful, we can say jianzhi is quiet, When jianzhi is quiet, we can conclude jianzhi swims well, If jianzhi is quiet, then the chef swims well, Given that the chef swims well, it follows that jianzhi is quiet, The chef is quiet.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike rides bikes.\nMike runs marathons.\nThe chef runs marathons.\nRules:\nAssuming mike runs marathons, we can say the car writes stories.\nWhen mike becomes famous, we can conclude mike writes stories.\nBased on mike becomes famous, it is evident that mike rides bikes.\nAssuming the car becomes famous, we can say mike becomes famous.\nBased on the chef writes stories, it is evident that the car becomes famous.\nGiven that the car writes stories, it follows that the chef writes stories.", "statement": "Alice rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming mike runs marathons, we can say the car writes stories, it follows that the car writes stories.\nSince we know that based on the car writes stories, it is evident that the chef writes stories, it follows that the chef writes stories.\nGiven that based on the chef writes stories, it is evident that the car becomes famous, it is evident that the car becomes famous.\nSince we know that based on the car becomes famous, it is evident that mike becomes famous, it follows that mike becomes famous.\nGiven that assuming mike becomes famous, we can say mike writes stories, it is evident that mike writes stories.\nApplying the logic of assuming mike becomes famous, we can say mike rides bikes, we deduce that mike rides bikes.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the facts and rules do not relate Alice with riding bikes, Alice rides bikes is not evident\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone explores cities.\nCharlie is happy.\nCharlie is happy.\nRules:\nWhen the phone explores cities, we can conclude mia explores cities.\nIf the phone explores cities, then the phone explores cities.\nIf mia is happy, then the phone explores cities.\nGiven that the chef is happy, it follows that the phone draws maps.\nBased on mia grows plants, it is evident that the chef is happy.\nBased on charlie draws maps, it is evident that mia grows plants.\nAssuming charlie is happy, we can say charlie draws maps.", "statement": "Mia is happy.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the phone explores cities, we can conclude mia explores cities, it follows that mia explores cities.\nApplying the logic of assuming the phone explores cities, we can say the phone explores cities, we deduce that the phone explores cities.\nGiven that assuming charlie is happy, we can say charlie draws maps, it is evident that charlie draws maps.\nBecause when charlie draws maps, we can conclude mia grows plants, we can conclude that mia grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on mia grows plants, it is evident that the chef is happy, we can see that the chef is happy.\nGiven that if the chef is happy, then the phone draws maps, it is evident that the phone draws maps.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the phone explores cities, we can conclude mia explores cities, If the phone explores cities, then the phone explores cities, Assuming charlie is happy, we can say charlie draws maps, Based on charlie draws maps, it is evident that mia grows plants, Based on mia grows plants, it is evident that the chef is happy, Given that the chef is happy, it follows that the phone draws maps, If mia is happy, then the phone explores cities, Mia is happy.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop is colorful.\nThe shop solves puzzles.\nThe sky is colorful.\nRules:\nGiven that the shop solves puzzles, it follows that james solves puzzles.\nIf the shop solves puzzles, then the shop is colorful.\nAssuming james reads books, we can say the shop solves puzzles.\nAssuming the sky is colorful, we can say james reads books.\nBased on the playground reads books, it is evident that the sky is colorful.\nWhen the shop is colorful, we can conclude the playground reads books.\nIf the sky sings beautifully, then the shop is colorful.", "statement": "The sky sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the shop solves puzzles, we can say james solves puzzles, we deduce that james solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the shop solves puzzles, we can conclude the shop is colorful, we can see that the shop is colorful.\nGiven that assuming the shop is colorful, we can say the playground reads books, it is evident that the playground reads books.\nBecause assuming the playground reads books, we can say the sky is colorful, we can conclude that the sky is colorful.\nGiven that given that the sky is colorful, it follows that james reads books, it is evident that james reads books.\nSince we know that based on james reads books, it is evident that the shop solves puzzles, it follows that the shop solves puzzles.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the shop is colorful, when the shop is colorful, we can conclude the playground reads books, based on the playground reads books, it is evident that the sky is colorful, assuming the sky is colorful, we can say james reads books, assuming james reads books, we can say the shop solves puzzles, if the shop solves puzzles, then the shop is colorful, the sky sings beautifully\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train is an artist.\nThe mountain makes pizza.\nThe train is an artist.\nRules:\nWhen the mountain makes pizza, we can conclude the mountain is colorful.\nIf the train is an artist, then the mountain makes pizza.\nWhen the mountain draws maps, we can conclude sophie draws maps.\nIf the train is an artist, then the mountain draws maps.\nWhen the train is colorful, we can conclude the train is an artist.\nIf the mountain makes pizza, then the train is colorful.", "statement": "Lucas is an artist.", "reasoning": "Because given that the mountain makes pizza, it follows that the mountain is colorful, we can conclude that the mountain is colorful.\nSince we know that given that the train is an artist, it follows that the mountain makes pizza, it follows that the mountain makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of when the mountain makes pizza, we can conclude the train is colorful, we deduce that the train is colorful.\nGiven that when the train is colorful, we can conclude the train is an artist, it is evident that the train is an artist.\nGiven that based on the train is an artist, it is evident that the mountain draws maps, it is evident that the mountain draws maps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the mountain draws maps, we can say sophie draws maps, we can see that sophie draws maps.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because If the train is an artist, then the mountain makes pizza, When the mountain makes pizza, we can conclude the mountain is colorful, If the mountain makes pizza, then the train is colorful, When the train is colorful, we can conclude the train is an artist, negation of Lucas is an artist\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry jumps high.\nHenry makes pizza.\nThe pumpkin is loud.\nRules:\nGiven that henry jumps high, it follows that henry jumps high.\nBased on sarah makes pizza, it is evident that the tree makes pizza.\nBased on henry is loud, it is evident that sarah makes pizza.\nWhen henry jumps high, we can conclude sarah is loud.\nIf henry jumps high, then henry jumps high.\nGiven that sarah is loud, it follows that henry is loud.", "statement": "The pumpkin rides bikes.", "reasoning": "Given that if henry jumps high, then henry jumps high, it is evident that henry jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if henry jumps high, then henry jumps high, we can see that henry jumps high.\nApplying the logic of given that henry jumps high, it follows that sarah is loud, we deduce that sarah is loud.\nSince we know that assuming sarah is loud, we can say henry is loud, it follows that henry is loud.\nSince we know that if henry is loud, then sarah makes pizza, it follows that sarah makes pizza.\nGiven that when sarah makes pizza, we can conclude the tree makes pizza, it is evident that the tree makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting the pumpkin being loud to riding bikes, The pumpkin rides bikes is not supported by any facts or rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe festival takes pictures.\nJames travels far.\nThe festival takes pictures.\nRules:\nIf the festival takes pictures, then the cloud takes pictures.\nAssuming the festival takes pictures, we can say the cloud teaches math.\nBased on james travels far, it is evident that james teaches math.\nGiven that the festival takes pictures, it follows that james teaches math.\nGiven that the festival takes pictures, it follows that james teaches math.\nAssuming the cloud teaches math, we can say james takes pictures.\nGiven that james takes pictures, it follows that the cloud teaches math.\nIf the playground teaches math, then james takes pictures.\nIf the cloud takes pictures, then the playground teaches math.\nAssuming the cloud teaches math, we can say the playground takes pictures.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because if the festival takes pictures, then the cloud takes pictures, we can conclude that the cloud takes pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the festival takes pictures, we can say the cloud teaches math, we can see that the cloud teaches math.\nSince we know that assuming james travels far, we can say james teaches math, it follows that james teaches math.\nApplying the logic of if the cloud takes pictures, then the playground teaches math, we deduce that the playground teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the cloud teaches math, it follows that the playground takes pictures, we can see that the playground takes pictures.\nSince we know that when the playground teaches math, we can conclude james takes pictures, it follows that james takes pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming james takes pictures, we can say the cloud teaches math, we can see that the cloud teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the cloud teaches math, we can conclude james takes pictures, we can see that james takes pictures.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"No rules support the conclusion about Chuan's appearance or handsomeness.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry becomes famous.\nThe sky is a scientist.\nJack jumps high.\nRules:\nAssuming henry becomes famous, we can say the sky is a scientist.\nWhen henry becomes famous, we can conclude the sky is a scientist.\nWhen henry is quiet, we can conclude jack becomes famous.\nAssuming henry is a scientist, we can say the sky is quiet.\nBased on the sky is quiet, it is evident that henry is quiet.\nWhen henry becomes famous, we can conclude henry is a scientist.\nIf the sky is a scientist, then henry becomes famous.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if henry becomes famous, then the sky is a scientist, we can see that the sky is a scientist.\nBecause based on the sky is a scientist, it is evident that henry becomes famous, we can conclude that henry becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of assuming henry becomes famous, we can say henry is a scientist, we deduce that henry is a scientist.\nBecause when henry is a scientist, we can conclude the sky is quiet, we can conclude that the sky is quiet.\nBecause based on the sky is quiet, it is evident that henry is quiet, we can conclude that henry is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that henry is quiet, it follows that jack becomes famous, we can see that jack becomes famous.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules or facts relate to Chuan or being handsome, Chuan is handsome cannot be concluded or negated.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat creates art.\nThe cat plays football.\nThe cat is interesting.\nRules:\nAssuming the cat creates art, we can say the cat plays football.\nBased on the cat plays football, it is evident that the cat creates art.\nIf the cat is interesting, then the playground plays football.\nBased on the cat plays football, it is evident that the cat creates art.\nGiven that henry plays football, it follows that the playground is interesting.\nGiven that the tree is interesting, it follows that henry plays football.\nIf the playground creates art, then the tree is interesting.\nIf the cat is interesting, then the playground creates art.\nGiven that the cat creates art, it follows that the playground plays football.", "statement": "The tree creates art.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the cat creates art, it follows that the cat plays football, it is evident that the cat plays football.\nSince we know that based on the cat plays football, it is evident that the cat creates art, it follows that the cat creates art.\nApplying the logic of when the cat is interesting, we can conclude the playground plays football, we deduce that the playground plays football.\nSince we know that based on the cat is interesting, it is evident that the playground creates art, it follows that the playground creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the playground creates art, it is evident that the tree is interesting, we can see that the tree is interesting.\nApplying the logic of if the tree is interesting, then henry plays football, we deduce that henry plays football.\nBecause if henry plays football, then the playground is interesting, we can conclude that the playground is interesting.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the playground creates art, then the tree is interesting, the negation: The tree creates art is false as there is no premise confirming the playground creates art.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan teaches math.\nAva teaches math.\nChuan goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf chuan goes to the hospital, then chuan goes to the hospital.\nBased on chuan teaches math, it is evident that ava is fluffy.\nBased on ava teaches math, it is evident that charlie teaches math.\nAssuming chuan goes to the hospital, we can say the bakery is fluffy.\nWhen ava goes to the hospital, we can conclude chuan is fluffy.\nBased on charlie goes to the hospital, it is evident that chuan goes to the hospital.\nAssuming chuan is fluffy, we can say charlie goes to the hospital.\nWhen chuan teaches math, we can conclude chuan is fluffy.", "statement": "Ava goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Because if chuan goes to the hospital, then chuan goes to the hospital, we can conclude that chuan goes to the hospital.\nBecause based on chuan teaches math, it is evident that ava is fluffy, we can conclude that ava is fluffy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on ava teaches math, it is evident that charlie teaches math, we can see that charlie teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming chuan teaches math, we can say chuan is fluffy, we can see that chuan is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of given that chuan is fluffy, it follows that charlie goes to the hospital, we deduce that charlie goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if charlie goes to the hospital, then chuan goes to the hospital, we can see that chuan goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on chuan goes to the hospital, it is evident that the bakery is fluffy, we can see that the bakery is fluffy.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules supporting the assertion or providing a connection to ava going to the hospital, Ava goes to the hospital is not supported.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house is happy.\nThe sun plays instruments.\nThe sun creates art.\nRules:\nBased on the sun creates art, it is evident that the sun fishes in lakes.\nIf ava fishes in lakes, then the sun is happy.\nIf ava is happy, then ava fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the sun plays instruments, it follows that ava plays instruments.\nGiven that the house is happy, it follows that ava is happy.\nGiven that the sun is happy, it follows that the sun plays instruments.", "statement": "The house plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Because given that the sun creates art, it follows that the sun fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the sun fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that given that the house is happy, it follows that ava is happy, it follows that ava is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that ava is happy, it follows that ava fishes in lakes, we can see that ava fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that if ava fishes in lakes, then the sun is happy, it follows that the sun is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the sun is happy, we can conclude the sun plays instruments, we can see that the sun plays instruments.\nGiven that given that the sun plays instruments, it follows that ava plays instruments, it is evident that ava plays instruments.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the house is happy, it follows that ava is happy, Given that the sun plays instruments, it follows that ava plays instruments, The house plays instruments\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician teaches math.\nSarah teaches math.\nSarah is an artist.\nRules:\nAssuming sarah teaches math, we can say sarah is an artist.\nIf sarah is an artist, then the bakery is an artist.\nIf the train travels far, then the bakery travels far.\nAssuming the musician travels far, we can say sarah becomes famous.\nBased on the train is an artist, it is evident that the musician travels far.\nAssuming the train travels far, we can say the train is an artist.\nGiven that sarah is an artist, it follows that the train travels far.", "statement": "The bakery becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming sarah teaches math, we can say sarah is an artist, we can see that sarah is an artist.\nSince we know that assuming sarah is an artist, we can say the bakery is an artist, it follows that the bakery is an artist.\nGiven that based on sarah is an artist, it is evident that the train travels far, it is evident that the train travels far.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the train travels far, we can conclude the bakery travels far, we can see that the bakery travels far.\nBecause when the train travels far, we can conclude the train is an artist, we can conclude that the train is an artist.\nSince we know that assuming the train is an artist, we can say the musician travels far, it follows that the musician travels far.\nGiven that given that the musician travels far, it follows that sarah becomes famous, it is evident that sarah becomes famous.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If sarah is an artist, then the bakery is an artist., Given that sarah is an artist, it follows that the train travels far., Assuming the train travels far, we can say the train is an artist., Based on the train is an artist, it is evident that the musician travels far., Assuming the musician travels far, we can say sarah becomes famous., The bakery becomes famous is not directly supported by any rule leading from these facts., the bakery does not necessarily become famous.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef teaches math.\nThe chef reads books.\nThe chef is funny.\nRules:\nBased on the chef is funny, it is evident that the fountain reads books.\nBased on the chef reads books, it is evident that the fountain reads books.\nIf the chef is funny, then the chef reads books.\nIf the mountain teaches math, then the chef is funny.\nAssuming the chef reads books, we can say the garden is funny.\nIf the mountain teaches math, then the mountain teaches math.\nGiven that the fountain reads books, it follows that the mountain teaches math.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the chef is funny, then the fountain reads books, it follows that the fountain reads books.\nGiven that assuming the fountain reads books, we can say the mountain teaches math, it is evident that the mountain teaches math.\nApplying the logic of given that the mountain teaches math, it follows that the mountain teaches math, we deduce that the mountain teaches math.\nGiven that assuming the mountain teaches math, we can say the chef is funny, it is evident that the chef is funny.\nSince we know that assuming the chef is funny, we can say the chef reads books, it follows that the chef reads books.\nApplying the logic of based on the chef reads books, it is evident that the garden is funny, we deduce that the garden is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts that relate to Chuan being handsome, the assertion cannot be concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop reads books.\nThe wall carries bags.\nThe bridge is magical.\nRules:\nWhen the shop reads books, we can conclude the bridge is magical.\nAssuming the river is magical, we can say the bridge carries bags.\nAssuming the river is magical, we can say the bridge carries bags.\nAssuming the river reads books, we can say the river is magical.\nAssuming the shop carries bags, we can say the river reads books.\nBased on the shop reads books, it is evident that the shop carries bags.", "statement": "The wall is magical.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the shop reads books, we can say the bridge is magical, we can conclude that the bridge is magical.\nApplying the logic of based on the shop reads books, it is evident that the shop carries bags, we deduce that the shop carries bags.\nApplying the logic of if the shop carries bags, then the river reads books, we deduce that the river reads books.\nSince we know that given that the river reads books, it follows that the river is magical, it follows that the river is magical.\nGiven that given that the river is magical, it follows that the bridge carries bags, it is evident that the bridge carries bags.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the shop reads books, it is evident that the shop carries bags, the shop reads books, we can conclude the bridge is magical, the bridge is magical, the wall carries bags, the bridge carries bags, the assertion is unsupported and unrelated, so the wall is magical is not concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest hikes mountains.\nThe bakery is loud.\nThe forest writes stories.\nRules:\nGiven that the bakery is loud, it follows that the bakery is loud.\nWhen the bakery is loud, we can conclude the forest hikes mountains.\nAssuming the bakery is loud, we can say the bakery is loud.\nWhen the forest hikes mountains, we can conclude the bakery writes stories.\nGiven that the forest writes stories, it follows that the bakery writes stories.\nBased on the forest is blue, it is evident that the forest writes stories.\nGiven that the moon writes stories, it follows that the forest is blue.\nGiven that the forest is blue, it follows that the forest is blue.\nBased on the forest is blue, it is evident that the moon writes stories.\nIf the bakery writes stories, then the forest is blue.", "statement": "The forest is loud.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the bakery is loud, it is evident that the bakery is loud, we deduce that the bakery is loud.\nGiven that based on the bakery is loud, it is evident that the forest hikes mountains, it is evident that the forest hikes mountains.\nApplying the logic of if the forest hikes mountains, then the bakery writes stories, we deduce that the bakery writes stories.\nSince we know that if the bakery writes stories, then the forest is blue, it follows that the forest is blue.\nSince we know that given that the forest is blue, it follows that the moon writes stories, it follows that the moon writes stories.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the moon writes stories, it follows that the forest is blue, we can see that the forest is blue.\nGiven that when the forest is blue, we can conclude the forest writes stories, it is evident that the forest writes stories.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because given that the bakery is loud, it follows that the bakery is loud, assuming the bakery is loud, we can say the bakery is loud, when the bakery is loud, we can conclude the forest hikes mountains, the forest hikes mountains, conclusion: the forest is loud.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva volunteers.\nThe bakery hikes mountains.\nCharlie hikes mountains.\nRules:\nIf charlie hikes mountains, then charlie hikes mountains.\nIf ava volunteers, then charlie hikes mountains.\nBased on the bakery hikes mountains, it is evident that the bakery takes pictures.\nIf the bakery takes pictures, then the bakery volunteers.\nWhen the bakery volunteers, we can conclude the bakery takes pictures.\nBased on charlie volunteers, it is evident that the bakery volunteers.\nGiven that ava volunteers, it follows that the bakery volunteers.\nGiven that the bakery takes pictures, it follows that charlie volunteers.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when charlie hikes mountains, we can conclude charlie hikes mountains, we can see that charlie hikes mountains.\nGiven that if the bakery hikes mountains, then the bakery takes pictures, it is evident that the bakery takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of based on the bakery takes pictures, it is evident that charlie volunteers, we deduce that charlie volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that charlie volunteers, it follows that the bakery volunteers, we can see that the bakery volunteers.\nBecause if the bakery volunteers, then the bakery takes pictures, we can conclude that the bakery takes pictures.\nSince we know that if the bakery takes pictures, then the bakery volunteers, it follows that the bakery volunteers.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because none of the given facts and rules provide any information about Chuan's appearance, Chuan is handsome cannot be concluded from the given information.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone is a scientist.\nThe phone is an artist.\nThe phone is a scientist.\nRules:\nBased on the phone is a scientist, it is evident that alice is an artist.\nBased on jack is a scientist, it is evident that the phone travels far.\nWhen mia is an artist, we can conclude jack is a scientist.\nGiven that alice is an artist, it follows that mia travels far.\nBased on mia travels far, it is evident that mia is an artist.\nBased on the phone is a scientist, it is evident that mia travels far.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the phone is a scientist, then alice is an artist, we can see that alice is an artist.\nApplying the logic of given that alice is an artist, it follows that mia travels far, we deduce that mia travels far.\nGiven that assuming the phone is a scientist, we can say mia travels far, it is evident that mia travels far.\nGiven that given that mia travels far, it follows that mia is an artist, it is evident that mia is an artist.\nBecause when mia is an artist, we can conclude jack is a scientist, we can conclude that jack is a scientist.\nSince we know that when jack is a scientist, we can conclude the phone travels far, it follows that the phone travels far.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the provided facts and rules do not establish any connection to the assertion that Chuan is handsome, the assertion cannot be concluded from them.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house volunteers.\nThe chef hikes mountains.\nThe house volunteers.\nRules:\nIf the house volunteers, then the artist volunteers.\nGiven that the house volunteers, it follows that the house plays instruments.\nIf the house dances gracefully, then the chef plays instruments.\nIf the chef hikes mountains, then the house dances gracefully.\nIf the chef dances gracefully, then the house dances gracefully.\nIf the chef volunteers, then the chef dances gracefully.\nIf the house plays instruments, then the chef volunteers.", "statement": "The bridge volunteers.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the house volunteers, then the artist volunteers, we deduce that the artist volunteers.\nBecause assuming the house volunteers, we can say the house plays instruments, we can conclude that the house plays instruments.\nSince we know that given that the house plays instruments, it follows that the chef volunteers, it follows that the chef volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the chef volunteers, we can say the chef dances gracefully, we can see that the chef dances gracefully.\nBecause if the chef dances gracefully, then the house dances gracefully, we can conclude that the house dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of based on the house dances gracefully, it is evident that the chef plays instruments, we deduce that the chef plays instruments.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"None of the rules directly or indirectly relate the given facts to the bridge volunteering. Therefore, we cannot conclude anything about the bridge volunteering.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam draws maps.\nMia jumps high.\nThe globe teaches math.\nRules:\nBased on the globe teaches math, it is evident that alice teaches math.\nIf mia plays games, then mia teaches math.\nAssuming mia jumps high, we can say liam jumps high.\nGiven that liam jumps high, it follows that mia plays games.\nAssuming alice jumps high, we can say liam jumps high.\nBased on alice teaches math, it is evident that alice jumps high.", "statement": "Liam plays games.", "reasoning": "Given that when the globe teaches math, we can conclude alice teaches math, it is evident that alice teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if mia jumps high, then liam jumps high, we can see that liam jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that alice teaches math, it follows that alice jumps high, we can see that alice jumps high.\nSince we know that assuming alice jumps high, we can say liam jumps high, it follows that liam jumps high.\nApplying the logic of when liam jumps high, we can conclude mia plays games, we deduce that mia plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that mia plays games, it follows that mia teaches math, we can see that mia teaches math.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming mia jumps high, we can say liam jumps high, given that liam jumps high, it follows that mia plays games, the assertion Liam plays games.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is funny.\nThe teacher jumps high.\nThe computer jumps high.\nRules:\nWhen the computer jumps high, we can conclude charlie is funny.\nWhen the computer becomes famous, we can conclude the house is funny.\nWhen the house takes pictures, we can conclude the computer becomes famous.\nGiven that the computer takes pictures, it follows that the house takes pictures.\nWhen charlie jumps high, we can conclude the house takes pictures.\nGiven that charlie is funny, it follows that the computer takes pictures.", "statement": "The teacher takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the computer jumps high, then charlie is funny, we deduce that charlie is funny.\nApplying the logic of when charlie is funny, we can conclude the computer takes pictures, we deduce that the computer takes pictures.\nSince we know that if the computer takes pictures, then the house takes pictures, it follows that the house takes pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the house takes pictures, it follows that the computer becomes famous, we can see that the computer becomes famous.\nSince we know that based on the computer becomes famous, it is evident that the house is funny, it follows that the house is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules linking the teacher to taking pictures, therefore the negation of the assertion follows.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium writes stories.\nThe pig swims well.\nThe stadium writes stories.\nRules:\nAssuming the pig swims well, we can say the pig sings beautifully.\nIf chuan hikes mountains, then lucas sings beautifully.\nBased on the pig swims well, it is evident that chuan swims well.\nBased on the pig hikes mountains, it is evident that chuan hikes mountains.\nIf chuan swims well, then the pig hikes mountains.\nIf the stadium writes stories, then chuan swims well.", "statement": "The pig writes stories.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the pig swims well, it follows that the pig sings beautifully, we deduce that the pig sings beautifully.\nBecause if the pig swims well, then chuan swims well, we can conclude that chuan swims well.\nBecause assuming the stadium writes stories, we can say chuan swims well, we can conclude that chuan swims well.\nApplying the logic of based on chuan swims well, it is evident that the pig hikes mountains, we deduce that the pig hikes mountains.\nSince we know that assuming the pig hikes mountains, we can say chuan hikes mountains, it follows that chuan hikes mountains.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on chuan hikes mountains, it is evident that lucas sings beautifully, we can see that lucas sings beautifully.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the stadium writes stories, then chuan swims well, Based on the pig swims well, it is evident that chuan swims well, assuming the pig swims well, we can say the pig sings beautifully, the assertion is incorrect as it is unrelated to any rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pumpkin is funny.\nThe house swims well.\nSophie swims well.\nRules:\nAssuming sophie swims well, we can say the house swims well.\nAssuming the house swims well, we can say the house swims well.\nWhen the pumpkin swims well, we can conclude the pumpkin is funny.\nGiven that the house is funny, it follows that the pumpkin swims well.\nBased on the house swims well, it is evident that the house is funny.\nAssuming sophie swims well, we can say the house swims well.", "statement": "The pumpkin draws maps.", "reasoning": "Given that when sophie swims well, we can conclude the house swims well, it is evident that the house swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on sophie swims well, it is evident that the house swims well, we can see that the house swims well.\nGiven that assuming the house swims well, we can say the house is funny, it is evident that the house is funny.\nBecause assuming the house is funny, we can say the pumpkin swims well, we can conclude that the pumpkin swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the pumpkin swims well, we can conclude the pumpkin is funny, we can see that the pumpkin is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules connecting the pumpkin swimming well or being funny to the ability to draw maps, the pumpkin draws maps cannot be concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia swims well.\nThe train plays instruments.\nMia plays instruments.\nRules:\nAssuming the train plays instruments, we can say mia plays instruments.\nIf mia is a scientist, then the train is a scientist.\nBased on mia is a scientist, it is evident that mia is a doctor.\nGiven that the bakery is a scientist, it follows that mia is a scientist.\nWhen the train is a scientist, we can conclude the bakery is a scientist.\nAssuming the train plays instruments, we can say the train is a scientist.", "statement": "The bakery is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the train plays instruments, it is evident that mia plays instruments, it follows that mia plays instruments.\nApplying the logic of if the train plays instruments, then the train is a scientist, we deduce that the train is a scientist.\nSince we know that if the train is a scientist, then the bakery is a scientist, it follows that the bakery is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of based on the bakery is a scientist, it is evident that mia is a scientist, we deduce that mia is a scientist.\nSince we know that assuming mia is a scientist, we can say mia is a doctor, it follows that mia is a doctor.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the train plays instruments, we can say the train is a scientist, when the train is a scientist, we can conclude the bakery is a scientist, given that the bakery is a scientist, it follows that mia is a scientist, based on mia is a scientist, it is evident that mia is a doctor, the bakery is a doctor\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nCharlie swims well.\nThe pumpkin reads books.\nThe teacher enjoys music.\nRules:\nGiven that charlie swims well, it follows that the teacher swims well.\nWhen the pumpkin reads books, we can conclude the pumpkin enjoys music.\nWhen alice is a scientist, we can conclude the pumpkin reads books.\nAssuming charlie swims well, we can say alice is a scientist.\nWhen the teacher swims well, we can conclude charlie swims well.\nWhen alice is a scientist, we can conclude charlie reads books.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that when charlie swims well, we can conclude the teacher swims well, it follows that the teacher swims well.\nBecause if the teacher swims well, then charlie swims well, we can conclude that charlie swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if charlie swims well, then alice is a scientist, we can see that alice is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on alice is a scientist, it is evident that charlie reads books, we can see that charlie reads books.\nApplying the logic of if alice is a scientist, then the pumpkin reads books, we deduce that the pumpkin reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the pumpkin reads books, it follows that the pumpkin enjoys music, we can see that the pumpkin enjoys music.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts related to Chuan being handsome, so the assertion Chuan is handsome cannot be concluded.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nHenry collects stamps.\nEmma travels far.\nHenry collects stamps.\nRules:\nWhen emma travels far, we can conclude sarah is a doctor.\nIf emma travels far, then emma travels far.\nGiven that emma travels far, it follows that sarah is a doctor.\nBased on emma is a doctor, it is evident that henry collects stamps.\nWhen sarah reads books, we can conclude the sun reads books.\nBased on emma travels far, it is evident that sarah reads books.\nBased on henry collects stamps, it is evident that emma travels far.\nWhen the sun reads books, we can conclude emma is a doctor.", "statement": "The sun collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when emma travels far, we can conclude sarah is a doctor, it follows that sarah is a doctor.\nGiven that if emma travels far, then emma travels far, it is evident that emma travels far.\nSince we know that if henry collects stamps, then emma travels far, it follows that emma travels far.\nBecause given that emma travels far, it follows that sarah reads books, we can conclude that sarah reads books.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if sarah reads books, then the sun reads books, we can see that the sun reads books.\nApplying the logic of when the sun reads books, we can conclude emma is a doctor, we deduce that emma is a doctor.\nBecause given that emma is a doctor, it follows that henry collects stamps, we can conclude that henry collects stamps.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Based on henry collects stamps, it is evident that emma travels far. When emma travels far, we can conclude sarah is a doctor. Based on emma travels far, it is evident that sarah reads books. When sarah reads books, we can conclude the sun reads books. There is no rule linking the sun reading books to the sun collecting stamps. Hence the sun collects stamps is not a valid conclusion.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat plays football.\nThe sky runs marathons.\nJames runs marathons.\nRules:\nBased on the cat plays football, it is evident that the cat paints pictures.\nBased on james runs marathons, it is evident that the cat paints pictures.\nWhen james runs marathons, we can conclude the cat paints pictures.\nBased on james plays football, it is evident that james plays football.\nWhen the phone plays football, we can conclude james plays football.\nGiven that the cat runs marathons, it follows that the phone plays football.\nIf the sky runs marathons, then the cat runs marathons.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the cat plays football, we can say the cat paints pictures, we can see that the cat paints pictures.\nGiven that assuming the sky runs marathons, we can say the cat runs marathons, it is evident that the cat runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of based on the cat runs marathons, it is evident that the phone plays football, we deduce that the phone plays football.\nApplying the logic of when the phone plays football, we can conclude james plays football, we deduce that james plays football.\nBecause when james plays football, we can conclude james plays football, we can conclude that james plays football.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the assertion is unrelated to any of the given facts or derived conclusions, Chuan is handsome cannot be determined from the provided information.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat is fast.\nStanford University rides bikes.\nThe river rides bikes.\nRules:\nBased on the river rides bikes, it is evident that the playground is a chef.\nAssuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast.\nBased on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast.\nGiven that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities.\nWhen the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef.", "statement": "The cat is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the river rides bikes, then the playground is a chef, we deduce that the playground is a chef.\nBecause based on the cat is fast, it is evident that stanford university is a chef, we can conclude that stanford university is a chef.\nApplying the logic of given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities, we deduce that the cat explores cities.\nSince we know that if the cat explores cities, then stanford university is fast, it follows that stanford university is fast.\nApplying the logic of if stanford university is fast, then stanford university is fast, we deduce that stanford university is fast.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., Based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that stanford university is fast., Assuming stanford university is fast, we can say stanford university is fast., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., When the cat is fast, we can conclude stanford university is a chef., Given that stanford university is a chef, it follows that the cat explores cities., The cat is a chef.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat rides bikes.\nEmma volunteers.\nEmma is an artist.\nRules:\nAssuming the cat rides bikes, we can say the ocean rides bikes.\nBased on emma solves puzzles, it is evident that the cat rides bikes.\nWhen the playground rides bikes, we can conclude emma solves puzzles.\nWhen the ocean is an artist, we can conclude the playground rides bikes.\nAssuming the ocean rides bikes, we can say the ocean is an artist.\nAssuming emma solves puzzles, we can say the ocean is an artist.", "statement": "The cat is an artist.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the cat rides bikes, then the ocean rides bikes, we deduce that the ocean rides bikes.\nBecause when the ocean rides bikes, we can conclude the ocean is an artist, we can conclude that the ocean is an artist.\nApplying the logic of if the ocean is an artist, then the playground rides bikes, we deduce that the playground rides bikes.\nGiven that assuming the playground rides bikes, we can say emma solves puzzles, it is evident that emma solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if emma solves puzzles, then the cat rides bikes, we can see that the cat rides bikes.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"There are no rules or facts indicating that the cat is an artist.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma is fast.\nThe plane is friendly.\nThe plane is fast.\nRules:\nWhen emma is fast, we can conclude the plane fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the plane is friendly, it follows that emma is fast.\nBased on the plane is friendly, it is evident that the plane fishes in lakes.\nAssuming emma hosts parties, we can say the car hosts parties.\nAssuming the mountain is friendly, we can say emma hosts parties.\nAssuming emma hosts parties, we can say the plane fishes in lakes.\nGiven that emma fishes in lakes, it follows that the mountain is friendly.\nWhen emma is fast, we can conclude emma fishes in lakes.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because if emma is fast, then the plane fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the plane fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the plane is friendly, it follows that emma is fast, we can see that emma is fast.\nSince we know that assuming the plane is friendly, we can say the plane fishes in lakes, it follows that the plane fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on emma is fast, it is evident that emma fishes in lakes, we can see that emma fishes in lakes.\nBecause if emma fishes in lakes, then the mountain is friendly, we can conclude that the mountain is friendly.\nGiven that if the mountain is friendly, then emma hosts parties, it is evident that emma hosts parties.\nBecause when emma hosts parties, we can conclude the car hosts parties, we can conclude that the car hosts parties.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules linking the given facts to the assertion, Chuan is handsome cannot be concluded from the facts and rules provided.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe computer solves puzzles.\nThe book collects stamps.\nThe sandwich is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf the sandwich is fluffy, then the book collects stamps.\nGiven that the book is fluffy, it follows that the computer is fluffy.\nGiven that the computer solves puzzles, it follows that the book is fluffy.\nGiven that the cloud becomes famous, it follows that the book is fluffy.\nAssuming the computer becomes famous, we can say the cloud becomes famous.\nWhen the book is fluffy, we can conclude the computer becomes famous.", "statement": "The cloud solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Given that given that the sandwich is fluffy, it follows that the book collects stamps, it is evident that the book collects stamps.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the computer solves puzzles, it is evident that the book is fluffy, we can see that the book is fluffy.\nSince we know that based on the book is fluffy, it is evident that the computer becomes famous, it follows that the computer becomes famous.\nBecause given that the computer becomes famous, it follows that the cloud becomes famous, we can conclude that the cloud becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of based on the cloud becomes famous, it is evident that the book is fluffy, we deduce that the book is fluffy.\nGiven that if the book is fluffy, then the computer is fluffy, it is evident that the computer is fluffy.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there is no rule that implies 'The cloud solves puzzles' from the given facts, 'The cloud solves puzzles.' is not supported.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain hosts parties.\nJack hosts parties.\nJack is happy.\nRules:\nWhen jack hosts parties, we can conclude the mountain is quiet.\nAssuming the car is happy, we can say the mountain is blue.\nBased on jack hosts parties, it is evident that jack is quiet.\nBased on the car hosts parties, it is evident that the car is happy.\nWhen the car is blue, we can conclude the car hosts parties.\nWhen the mountain hosts parties, we can conclude the car is blue.", "statement": "Jack is quiet.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that jack hosts parties, it follows that the mountain is quiet, it follows that the mountain is quiet.\nSince we know that given that the mountain hosts parties, it follows that the car is blue, it follows that the car is blue.\nApplying the logic of given that the car is blue, it follows that the car hosts parties, we deduce that the car hosts parties.\nGiven that assuming the car hosts parties, we can say the car is happy, it is evident that the car is happy.\nGiven that if the car is happy, then the mountain is blue, it is evident that the mountain is blue.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Based on jack hosts parties, it is evident that jack is quiet, Jack is quiet.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe playground is a scientist.\nThe playground explores cities.\nThe train explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that the train explores cities, it follows that the train writes stories.\nWhen the train explores cities, we can conclude the train explores cities.\nWhen the playground is a scientist, we can conclude charlie writes stories.\nWhen the moon explores cities, we can conclude the playground is a scientist.\nIf the moon writes stories, then the moon explores cities.\nBased on the train explores cities, it is evident that the moon writes stories.", "statement": "The train collects stamps.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the train explores cities, it is evident that the train writes stories, we can see that the train writes stories.\nBecause when the train explores cities, we can conclude the train explores cities, we can conclude that the train explores cities.\nApplying the logic of if the train explores cities, then the moon writes stories, we deduce that the moon writes stories.\nSince we know that based on the moon writes stories, it is evident that the moon explores cities, it follows that the moon explores cities.\nBecause if the moon explores cities, then the playground is a scientist, we can conclude that the playground is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of if the playground is a scientist, then charlie writes stories, we deduce that charlie writes stories.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the train explores cities, it is evident that the moon writes stories, given that the train explores cities, it follows that the train writes stories, when the train explores cities, we can conclude the train explores cities, we have no rule or fact concluding the train collects stamps, the negation of the assertion is true\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack makes pizza.\nMia carries bags.\nJack carries bags.\nRules:\nWhen jack carries bags, we can conclude mike writes stories.\nAssuming mike carries bags, we can say mike writes stories.\nAssuming the cloud makes pizza, we can say mike carries bags.\nGiven that mike writes stories, it follows that the cloud makes pizza.\nGiven that jack carries bags, it follows that jack dances gracefully.\nGiven that jack dances gracefully, it follows that mike writes stories.", "statement": "Mike dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Because when jack carries bags, we can conclude mike writes stories, we can conclude that mike writes stories.\nGiven that based on jack carries bags, it is evident that jack dances gracefully, it is evident that jack dances gracefully.\nApplying the logic of given that jack dances gracefully, it follows that mike writes stories, we deduce that mike writes stories.\nBecause based on mike writes stories, it is evident that the cloud makes pizza, we can conclude that the cloud makes pizza.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the cloud makes pizza, then mike carries bags, we can see that mike carries bags.\nGiven that if mike carries bags, then mike writes stories, it is evident that mike writes stories.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Given that jack carries bags, it follows that jack dances gracefully., Given that jack dances gracefully, it follows that mike writes stories., {conclusion}\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe shop grows plants.\nThe shop grows plants.\nThe tree solves puzzles.\nRules:\nIf the shop grows plants, then the mountain solves puzzles.\nAssuming the shop enjoys music, we can say the mountain solves puzzles.\nGiven that the mountain grows plants, it follows that the river solves puzzles.\nAssuming the shop rides bikes, we can say the mountain grows plants.\nWhen the mountain solves puzzles, we can conclude the shop rides bikes.\nWhen the shop grows plants, we can conclude the mountain solves puzzles.", "statement": "The shop enjoys music.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the shop grows plants, we can conclude the mountain solves puzzles, we can see that the mountain solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the shop grows plants, it is evident that the mountain solves puzzles, we can see that the mountain solves puzzles.\nSince we know that given that the mountain solves puzzles, it follows that the shop rides bikes, it follows that the shop rides bikes.\nSince we know that when the shop rides bikes, we can conclude the mountain grows plants, it follows that the mountain grows plants.\nApplying the logic of when the mountain grows plants, we can conclude the river solves puzzles, we deduce that the river solves puzzles.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because If the shop grows plants, then the mountain solves puzzles., When the shop grows plants, we can conclude the mountain solves puzzles., the mountain solves puzzles is true, When the mountain solves puzzles, we can conclude the shop rides bikes., Assuming the shop rides bikes, we can say the mountain grows plants., Given that the mountain grows plants, it follows that the river solves puzzles., Assuming the shop enjoys music, we can say the mountain solves puzzles., the assertion cannot be concluded.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack plays football.\nJack plays football.\nThe mountain goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nIf the mountain goes to the hospital, then the mountain is magical.\nBased on the shop goes to the hospital, it is evident that the mountain is magical.\nIf jack plays football, then the shop goes to the hospital.\nIf the mountain is magical, then jack plays football.\nBased on the artist is magical, it is evident that the mountain is magical.\nIf the mountain is magical, then the artist is magical.", "statement": "The shop is magical.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the mountain goes to the hospital, we can conclude the mountain is magical, it follows that the mountain is magical.\nApplying the logic of given that the mountain is magical, it follows that the artist is magical, we deduce that the artist is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the artist is magical, it is evident that the mountain is magical, we can see that the mountain is magical.\nBecause when the mountain is magical, we can conclude jack plays football, we can conclude that jack plays football.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when jack plays football, we can conclude the shop goes to the hospital, we can see that the shop goes to the hospital.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Jack plays football, If jack plays football, then the shop goes to the hospital, Based on the shop goes to the hospital, it is evident that the mountain is magical, If the mountain is magical, then the artist is magical, If the mountain is magical, then jack plays football, If the mountain goes to the hospital, then the mountain is magical, Based on the artist is magical, it is evident that the mountain is magical, The shop is magical\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe computer plays football.\nThe tree jumps high.\nThe teacher jumps high.\nRules:\nAssuming the computer plays football, we can say the computer jumps high.\nWhen the tree jumps high, we can conclude mia plays football.\nAssuming the computer makes pizza, we can say the computer jumps high.\nIf the teacher plays football, then the computer makes pizza.\nGiven that the teacher plays football, it follows that the teacher plays football.\nBased on the computer makes pizza, it is evident that the teacher plays football.\nBased on the computer plays football, it is evident that the computer makes pizza.", "statement": "The computer swims well.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on the computer plays football, it is evident that the computer jumps high, we deduce that the computer jumps high.\nApplying the logic of if the tree jumps high, then mia plays football, we deduce that mia plays football.\nApplying the logic of if the computer plays football, then the computer makes pizza, we deduce that the computer makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of given that the computer makes pizza, it follows that the teacher plays football, we deduce that the teacher plays football.\nApplying the logic of if the teacher plays football, then the teacher plays football, we deduce that the teacher plays football.\nGiven that when the teacher plays football, we can conclude the computer makes pizza, it is evident that the computer makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the computer plays football, it is evident that the computer makes pizza, assuming the computer makes pizza, we can say the computer jumps high, assuming the computer plays football, we can say the computer jumps high, this does not lead to the conclusion that the computer swims well, the negation is concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe garden teaches math.\nThe bakery does yoga.\nThe computer does yoga.\nRules:\nIf the bakery does yoga, then the computer is friendly.\nWhen the garden teaches math, we can conclude the musician teaches math.\nIf the garden teaches math, then the computer is friendly.\nWhen the garden teaches math, we can conclude the computer is friendly.\nGiven that the computer does yoga, it follows that the bakery does yoga.\nBased on the computer does yoga, it is evident that the garden is fast.\nGiven that the musician is friendly, it follows that the computer does yoga.\nIf the computer teaches math, then the musician is friendly.\nGiven that the computer does yoga, it follows that the computer teaches math.", "statement": "The garden is friendly.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the bakery does yoga, then the computer is friendly, we can see that the computer is friendly.\nBecause if the garden teaches math, then the musician teaches math, we can conclude that the musician teaches math.\nApplying the logic of when the computer does yoga, we can conclude the garden is fast, we deduce that the garden is fast.\nBecause based on the computer does yoga, it is evident that the computer teaches math, we can conclude that the computer teaches math.\nGiven that given that the computer teaches math, it follows that the musician is friendly, it is evident that the musician is friendly.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the musician is friendly, then the computer does yoga, we can see that the computer does yoga.\nApplying the logic of if the computer does yoga, then the bakery does yoga, we deduce that the bakery does yoga.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the garden teaches math, the computer is friendly. Based on the computer does yoga, it is evident that the garden is fast, the garden is not friendly.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bridge is tall.\nStanford University enjoys music.\nStanford University runs marathons.\nRules:\nAssuming stanford university runs marathons, we can say the bridge enjoys music.\nAssuming the bridge runs marathons, we can say the bridge is tall.\nIf mike runs marathons, then the bridge runs marathons.\nWhen stanford university runs marathons, we can conclude mike runs marathons.\nGiven that the bridge is tall, it follows that stanford university runs marathons.\nWhen stanford university enjoys music, we can conclude the city is tall.", "statement": "The bridge is funny.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if stanford university runs marathons, then the bridge enjoys music, it follows that the bridge enjoys music.\nSince we know that if the bridge is tall, then stanford university runs marathons, it follows that stanford university runs marathons.\nGiven that assuming stanford university enjoys music, we can say the city is tall, it is evident that the city is tall.\nApplying the logic of given that stanford university runs marathons, it follows that mike runs marathons, we deduce that mike runs marathons.\nSince we know that given that mike runs marathons, it follows that the bridge runs marathons, it follows that the bridge runs marathons.\nBecause if the bridge runs marathons, then the bridge is tall, we can conclude that the bridge is tall.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion that the bridge is funny is not linked by rules to any of the given facts or other conclusions from the rules, its negation\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is an engineer.\nMike is an engineer.\nMike is an artist.\nRules:\nWhen mike is an engineer, we can conclude jack dances gracefully.\nBased on mike dances gracefully, it is evident that jack dances gracefully.\nBased on mike dances gracefully, it is evident that mike dances gracefully.\nGiven that mike is an artist, it follows that mike dances gracefully.\nGiven that the teacher cooks well, it follows that mike is an artist.\nGiven that jack dances gracefully, it follows that the teacher cooks well.", "statement": "The bridge is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Given that when mike is an engineer, we can conclude jack dances gracefully, it is evident that jack dances gracefully.\nSince we know that if jack dances gracefully, then the teacher cooks well, it follows that the teacher cooks well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the teacher cooks well, then mike is an artist, we can see that mike is an artist.\nApplying the logic of if mike is an artist, then mike dances gracefully, we deduce that mike dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on mike dances gracefully, it is evident that mike dances gracefully, we can see that mike dances gracefully.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts connecting the assertion 'The bridge is an engineer' to any of the given information or rules, the assertion 'The bridge is an engineer' cannot be concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is magical.\nThe phone hosts parties.\nThe teacher hosts parties.\nRules:\nBased on the phone hosts parties, it is evident that the pig swims well.\nIf the teacher is magical, then the pig is a doctor.\nIf the phone hosts parties, then the teacher hosts parties.\nGiven that the teacher hosts parties, it follows that the phone hosts parties.\nBased on the pig is a doctor, it is evident that the phone hosts parties.\nBased on the pig swims well, it is evident that the pig is a doctor.\nIf the phone hosts parties, then the teacher hosts parties.", "statement": "The dog hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the phone hosts parties, we can say the pig swims well, we can see that the pig swims well.\nApplying the logic of if the teacher is magical, then the pig is a doctor, we deduce that the pig is a doctor.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the pig swims well, it is evident that the pig is a doctor, we can see that the pig is a doctor.\nBecause when the pig is a doctor, we can conclude the phone hosts parties, we can conclude that the phone hosts parties.\nBecause if the phone hosts parties, then the teacher hosts parties, we can conclude that the teacher hosts parties.\nGiven that when the teacher hosts parties, we can conclude the phone hosts parties, it is evident that the phone hosts parties.\nBecause if the phone hosts parties, then the teacher hosts parties, we can conclude that the teacher hosts parties.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules relating the dog hosting parties or inferring this from current known facts, the negation of the assertion follows\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe train carries bags.\nThe bridge runs marathons.\nThe phone carries bags.\nRules:\nAssuming the train carries bags, we can say the phone carries bags.\nIf the phone carries bags, then the phone carries bags.\nGiven that the phone runs marathons, it follows that the phone carries bags.\nGiven that the phone runs marathons, it follows that the phone runs marathons.\nBased on the train runs marathons, it is evident that the phone runs marathons.\nBased on the phone runs marathons, it is evident that the train runs marathons.\nGiven that the phone carries bags, it follows that the phone runs marathons.", "statement": "The train creates art.", "reasoning": "Because given that the train carries bags, it follows that the phone carries bags, we can conclude that the phone carries bags.\nBecause if the phone carries bags, then the phone carries bags, we can conclude that the phone carries bags.\nApplying the logic of assuming the phone carries bags, we can say the phone runs marathons, we deduce that the phone runs marathons.\nGiven that if the phone runs marathons, then the train runs marathons, it is evident that the train runs marathons.\nSince we know that if the train runs marathons, then the phone runs marathons, it follows that the phone runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the phone runs marathons, it follows that the phone runs marathons, we can see that the phone runs marathons.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because no relevant rules help in determining the train creates art, the negation of the assertion.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSarah does yoga.\nThe book is a scientist.\nThe computer swims well.\nRules:\nAssuming sarah does yoga, we can say the sun swims well.\nWhen the computer does yoga, we can conclude the computer swims well.\nIf the sun does yoga, then the computer does yoga.\nBased on the sun is a scientist, it is evident that the sun does yoga.\nIf the book is a scientist, then the sun is a scientist.", "statement": "The computer is happy.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when sarah does yoga, we can conclude the sun swims well, we can see that the sun swims well.\nSince we know that assuming the book is a scientist, we can say the sun is a scientist, it follows that the sun is a scientist.\nSince we know that based on the sun is a scientist, it is evident that the sun does yoga, it follows that the sun does yoga.\nGiven that when the sun does yoga, we can conclude the computer does yoga, it is evident that the computer does yoga.\nSince we know that assuming the computer does yoga, we can say the computer swims well, it follows that the computer swims well.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the book is a scientist, then the sun is a scientist, Based on the sun is a scientist, it is evident that the sun does yoga, If the sun does yoga, then the computer does yoga, When the computer does yoga, we can conclude the computer swims well, ..., The computer is happy is not supported by the facts and rules provided\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon fishes in lakes.\nThe tree jumps high.\nThe mountain jumps high.\nRules:\nGiven that the moon fishes in lakes, it follows that the mountain is happy.\nGiven that the moon is happy, it follows that the stadium fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the moon jumps high, it follows that the moon is happy.\nAssuming the moon jumps high, we can say the mountain fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the tree swims well, we can say the moon jumps high.\nAssuming the tree jumps high, we can say the tree swims well.", "statement": "The tree is happy.", "reasoning": "Because given that the moon fishes in lakes, it follows that the mountain is happy, we can conclude that the mountain is happy.\nSince we know that if the tree jumps high, then the tree swims well, it follows that the tree swims well.\nBecause based on the tree swims well, it is evident that the moon jumps high, we can conclude that the moon jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the moon jumps high, we can say the moon is happy, we can see that the moon is happy.\nGiven that if the moon jumps high, then the mountain fishes in lakes, it is evident that the mountain fishes in lakes.\nBecause if the moon is happy, then the stadium fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the stadium fishes in lakes.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Assuming the tree jumps high, we can say the tree swims well, Assuming the tree swims well, we can say the moon jumps high, Given that the moon jumps high, it follows that the moon is happy, The tree is happy\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog swims well.\nThe teacher is colorful.\nEmma creates art.\nRules:\nBased on emma creates art, it is evident that the dog swims well.\nWhen emma is blue, we can conclude emma is colorful.\nWhen the dog is blue, we can conclude emma is blue.\nAssuming the dog swims well, we can say the dog is blue.\nAssuming the book creates art, we can say the dog is blue.\nBased on the dog swims well, it is evident that the dog swims well.", "statement": "The book is blue.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if emma creates art, then the dog swims well, we deduce that the dog swims well.\nGiven that if the dog swims well, then the dog swims well, it is evident that the dog swims well.\nBecause given that the dog swims well, it follows that the dog is blue, we can conclude that the dog is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the dog is blue, we can say emma is blue, we can see that emma is blue.\nGiven that assuming emma is blue, we can say emma is colorful, it is evident that emma is colorful.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because assuming the book creates art, we can say the dog is blue, the book is blue\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cat is a chef.\nCharlie is an artist.\nThe festival plays instruments.\nRules:\nGiven that the festival plays instruments, it follows that charlie travels far.\nIf the festival is a chef, then the ocean travels far.\nWhen the festival is an artist, we can conclude the festival is a chef.\nGiven that the festival is an artist, it follows that the festival is an artist.\nAssuming the festival is an artist, we can say the festival is an artist.\nWhen the festival plays instruments, we can conclude the festival is an artist.", "statement": "The ocean is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming the festival plays instruments, we can say charlie travels far, we can see that charlie travels far.\nApplying the logic of assuming the festival plays instruments, we can say the festival is an artist, we deduce that the festival is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the festival is an artist, then the festival is an artist, we can see that the festival is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the festival is an artist, then the festival is a chef, we can see that the festival is a chef.\nGiven that given that the festival is a chef, it follows that the ocean travels far, it is evident that the ocean travels far.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the festival plays instruments, we can conclude the festival is an artist, and when the festival is an artist, we can conclude the festival is a chef, the ocean travels far when the festival is a chef, the ocean is not necessarily a chef\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe computer is an artist.\nJianzhi is an artist.\nThe computer is fast.\nRules:\nGiven that the computer is an artist, it follows that the computer is an artist.\nIf the bakery is fast, then jianzhi is an artist.\nGiven that emma dances gracefully, it follows that the bakery is fast.\nAssuming the bakery plays football, we can say the computer is an artist.\nWhen the bakery dances gracefully, we can conclude emma dances gracefully.\nAssuming the computer is fast, we can say the bakery dances gracefully.", "statement": "Jianzhi plays football.", "reasoning": "Given that if the computer is an artist, then the computer is an artist, it is evident that the computer is an artist.\nGiven that if the computer is fast, then the bakery dances gracefully, it is evident that the bakery dances gracefully.\nSince we know that given that the bakery dances gracefully, it follows that emma dances gracefully, it follows that emma dances gracefully.\nGiven that given that emma dances gracefully, it follows that the bakery is fast, it is evident that the bakery is fast.\nSince we know that assuming the bakery is fast, we can say jianzhi is an artist, it follows that jianzhi is an artist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Jianzhi is an artist, the computer is fast, Assuming the computer is fast, we can say the bakery dances gracefully, When the bakery dances gracefully, we can conclude emma dances gracefully, Given that emma dances gracefully, it follows that the bakery is fast, If the bakery is fast, then jianzhi is an artist, Jianzhi is an artist, Jianzhi plays football is not mentioned in any rule or derived from given facts, it follows that Jianzhi plays football is unsupported by the given information\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sun is blue.\nThe teacher is an engineer.\nThe sun is blue.\nRules:\nGiven that the sun is blue, it follows that the stadium carries bags.\nIf the bridge is blue, then the stadium is an engineer.\nIf the stadium is blue, then the bridge is blue.\nAssuming the stadium carries bags, we can say the teacher does yoga.\nWhen the stadium carries bags, we can conclude the stadium carries bags.\nAssuming the teacher does yoga, we can say the stadium is blue.", "statement": "The sun is an engineer.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the sun is blue, we can say the stadium carries bags, we deduce that the stadium carries bags.\nApplying the logic of if the stadium carries bags, then the stadium carries bags, we deduce that the stadium carries bags.\nGiven that assuming the stadium carries bags, we can say the teacher does yoga, it is evident that the teacher does yoga.\nApplying the logic of given that the teacher does yoga, it follows that the stadium is blue, we deduce that the stadium is blue.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the stadium is blue, then the bridge is blue, we can see that the bridge is blue.\nSince we know that based on the bridge is blue, it is evident that the stadium is an engineer, it follows that the stadium is an engineer.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the sun is blue, it follows that the stadium carries bags, When the stadium carries bags, we can conclude the stadium carries bags, Assuming the stadium carries bags, we can say the teacher does yoga, Assuming the teacher does yoga, we can say the stadium is blue, If the stadium is blue, then the bridge is blue, If the bridge is blue, then the stadium is an engineer, the assertion that the sun is an engineer is neither supported nor negated by any of the rules\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe forest is an artist.\nLucas is an artist.\nLucas is a scientist.\nRules:\nBased on the forest is an artist, it is evident that lucas is an artist.\nGiven that the forest is an artist, it follows that chuan rides bikes.\nBased on sophie rides bikes, it is evident that sophie is an artist.\nBased on chuan carries bags, it is evident that sophie rides bikes.\nIf chuan carries bags, then chuan carries bags.\nAssuming lucas is an artist, we can say chuan carries bags.", "statement": "The forest carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the forest is an artist, it follows that lucas is an artist, we deduce that lucas is an artist.\nGiven that assuming the forest is an artist, we can say chuan rides bikes, it is evident that chuan rides bikes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if lucas is an artist, then chuan carries bags, we can see that chuan carries bags.\nSince we know that based on chuan carries bags, it is evident that chuan carries bags, it follows that chuan carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when chuan carries bags, we can conclude sophie rides bikes, we can see that sophie rides bikes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when sophie rides bikes, we can conclude sophie is an artist, we can see that sophie is an artist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on the forest is an artist, it is evident that lucas is an artist, assuming lucas is an artist, we can say chuan carries bags, if chuan carries bags, then chuan carries bags, the forest carries bags is not concluded or supported by any rule or fact, the forest carries bags is not the conclusion\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nEmma dances gracefully.\nThe book dances gracefully.\nEmma cooks well.\nRules:\nWhen the book dances gracefully, we can conclude emma cooks well.\nIf the book dances gracefully, then henry is happy.\nGiven that the book is happy, it follows that the book dances gracefully.\nGiven that the book is funny, it follows that the book is happy.\nIf emma cooks well, then the book is funny.\nBased on the book is funny, it is evident that emma cooks well.", "statement": "Henry cooks well.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the book dances gracefully, we can conclude emma cooks well, we can see that emma cooks well.\nBecause if emma cooks well, then the book is funny, we can conclude that the book is funny.\nBecause if the book is funny, then the book is happy, we can conclude that the book is happy.\nApplying the logic of given that the book is happy, it follows that the book dances gracefully, we deduce that the book dances gracefully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the book dances gracefully, it is evident that henry is happy, we can see that henry is happy.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If the book dances gracefully, then henry is happy, the book dances gracefully, henry is happy does not imply Henry cooks well, the negation of Henry cooks well.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog reads books.\nHenry paints pictures.\nThe phone enjoys music.\nRules:\nIf henry paints pictures, then the dog explores cities.\nWhen the phone enjoys music, we can conclude the dog explores cities.\nAssuming the dog enjoys music, we can say henry explores cities.\nBased on the phone enjoys music, it is evident that the dog paints pictures.\nWhen the phone paints pictures, we can conclude the dog enjoys music.\nBased on henry enjoys music, it is evident that the phone paints pictures.\nAssuming the dog explores cities, we can say henry enjoys music.", "statement": "The phone explores cities.", "reasoning": "Because if henry paints pictures, then the dog explores cities, we can conclude that the dog explores cities.\nSince we know that based on the phone enjoys music, it is evident that the dog paints pictures, it follows that the dog paints pictures.\nApplying the logic of assuming the dog explores cities, we can say henry enjoys music, we deduce that henry enjoys music.\nApplying the logic of assuming henry enjoys music, we can say the phone paints pictures, we deduce that the phone paints pictures.\nBecause given that the phone paints pictures, it follows that the dog enjoys music, we can conclude that the dog enjoys music.\nSince we know that assuming the dog enjoys music, we can say henry explores cities, it follows that henry explores cities.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the phone enjoys music, we can conclude the dog explores cities, assuming the dog explores cities, we can say henry enjoys music, based on henry enjoys music, it is evident that the phone paints pictures, when the phone paints pictures, we can conclude the dog enjoys music, assuming the dog enjoys music, we can say henry explores cities, the phone does not explore cities\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam volunteers.\nThe car is colorful.\nThe sandwich is colorful.\nRules:\nBased on liam volunteers, it is evident that the car volunteers.\nBased on the car is colorful, it is evident that the sky is a chef.\nBased on the sky volunteers, it is evident that liam is a chef.\nGiven that the sandwich is a chef, it follows that the sky volunteers.\nBased on the sky cooks well, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef.\nAssuming the sandwich is colorful, we can say the sky cooks well.", "statement": "The sandwich cooks well.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming liam volunteers, we can say the car volunteers, it is evident that the car volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the car is colorful, it follows that the sky is a chef, we can see that the sky is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the sandwich is colorful, it is evident that the sky cooks well, we can see that the sky cooks well.\nSince we know that based on the sky cooks well, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef, it follows that the sandwich is a chef.\nSince we know that based on the sandwich is a chef, it is evident that the sky volunteers, it follows that the sky volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the sky volunteers, it is evident that liam is a chef, we can see that liam is a chef.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the sandwich is colorful, we can say the sky cooks well., Based on the sky cooks well, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef., The sandwich is colorful, The sandwich is a chef, it follows that the sky volunteers., Based on the sky volunteers, it is evident that liam is a chef., Based on liam volunteers, it is evident that the car volunteers., The car is colorful, it is evident that the sky is a chef., Assuming the sandwich is colorful, we can say the sky cooks well., Based on the sky cooks well, it is evident that the sandwich is a chef., The sandwich is colorful, The sandwich is a chef, it follows that the sky volunteers.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe cloud is happy.\nThe book is happy.\nThe pig swims well.\nRules:\nIf the book is happy, then the book hosts parties.\nGiven that the pig hosts parties, it follows that the book hosts parties.\nBased on the cloud dances gracefully, it is evident that the pig hosts parties.\nGiven that the cloud swims well, it follows that the cloud dances gracefully.\nGiven that the cloud is happy, it follows that the cloud swims well.\nAssuming the pig dances gracefully, we can say the pig hosts parties.", "statement": "The pig dances gracefully.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the book is happy, it is evident that the book hosts parties, we can see that the book hosts parties.\nGiven that based on the cloud is happy, it is evident that the cloud swims well, it is evident that the cloud swims well.\nApplying the logic of if the cloud swims well, then the cloud dances gracefully, we deduce that the cloud dances gracefully.\nBecause assuming the cloud dances gracefully, we can say the pig hosts parties, we can conclude that the pig hosts parties.\nGiven that given that the pig hosts parties, it follows that the book hosts parties, it is evident that the book hosts parties.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Given that the cloud is happy, it follows that the cloud swims well., Given that the cloud swims well, it follows that the cloud dances gracefully., Based on the cloud dances gracefully, it is evident that the pig hosts parties., Assuming the pig dances gracefully, we can say the pig hosts parties., the pig dances gracefully.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city teaches math.\nThe chef goes to the hospital.\nThe musician runs marathons.\nRules:\nBased on the chef goes to the hospital, it is evident that the city teaches math.\nGiven that the musician runs marathons, it follows that the musician goes to the hospital.\nIf the city runs marathons, then the musician runs marathons.\nIf the stadium is funny, then the city runs marathons.\nGiven that the musician runs marathons, it follows that the stadium is funny.", "statement": "The stadium goes to the hospital.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the chef goes to the hospital, then the city teaches math, it follows that the city teaches math.\nBecause assuming the musician runs marathons, we can say the stadium is funny, we can conclude that the stadium is funny.\nSince we know that based on the stadium is funny, it is evident that the city runs marathons, it follows that the city runs marathons.\nApplying the logic of if the city runs marathons, then the musician runs marathons, we deduce that the musician runs marathons.\nSince we know that based on the musician runs marathons, it is evident that the musician goes to the hospital, it follows that the musician goes to the hospital.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that the musician runs marathons, it follows that the stadium is funny, the stadium is funny, if the stadium is funny, then the city runs marathons, the city runs marathons, if the city runs marathons, then the musician runs marathons, the musician runs marathons, given that the musician runs marathons, it follows that the musician goes to the hospital, the musician goes to the hospital, the stadium goes to the hospital.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house explores cities.\nThe house reads books.\nMia fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nWhen the house reads books, we can conclude the mountain reads books.\nWhen the house explores cities, we can conclude mia volunteers.\nBased on liam fishes in lakes, it is evident that the house explores cities.\nIf the house explores cities, then the mountain reads books.\nWhen the house explores cities, we can conclude liam fishes in lakes.\nIf mia fishes in lakes, then the house explores cities.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because assuming the house reads books, we can say the mountain reads books, we can conclude that the mountain reads books.\nGiven that given that mia fishes in lakes, it follows that the house explores cities, it is evident that the house explores cities.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the house explores cities, it is evident that liam fishes in lakes, we can see that liam fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of when liam fishes in lakes, we can conclude the house explores cities, we deduce that the house explores cities.\nSince we know that if the house explores cities, then mia volunteers, it follows that mia volunteers.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules or facts relate to the assertion, the assertion Chuan is handsome cannot be concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe becomes famous.\nThe globe becomes famous.\nThe computer becomes famous.\nRules:\nWhen the globe becomes famous, we can conclude the computer is fluffy.\nWhen ethan is friendly, we can conclude the pig is friendly.\nGiven that the globe is fluffy, it follows that ethan is friendly.\nIf the pig becomes famous, then the globe is fluffy.\nBased on the globe becomes famous, it is evident that the pig becomes famous.\nWhen the pig sings beautifully, we can conclude ethan is fluffy.", "statement": "The pig sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the globe becomes famous, it follows that the computer is fluffy, we deduce that the computer is fluffy.\nBecause assuming the globe becomes famous, we can say the pig becomes famous, we can conclude that the pig becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of when the pig becomes famous, we can conclude the globe is fluffy, we deduce that the globe is fluffy.\nApplying the logic of when the globe is fluffy, we can conclude ethan is friendly, we deduce that ethan is friendly.\nApplying the logic of assuming ethan is friendly, we can say the pig is friendly, we deduce that the pig is friendly.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on the globe becomes famous, it is evident that the pig becomes famous, if the pig becomes famous, then the globe is fluffy, given that the globe is fluffy, it follows that ethan is friendly, when ethan is friendly, we can conclude the pig is friendly, the pig sings beautifully.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam is fluffy.\nLiam does yoga.\nLiam hikes mountains.\nRules:\nIf liam hikes mountains, then the bakery does yoga.\nBased on liam is fluffy, it is evident that the bakery does yoga.\nAssuming the bakery does yoga, we can say liam does yoga.\nGiven that sophie does yoga, it follows that the bakery does yoga.\nWhen liam does yoga, we can conclude sophie does yoga.\nAssuming liam does yoga, we can say the bakery does yoga.\nWhen liam is fluffy, we can conclude liam does yoga.", "statement": "Sophie hikes mountains.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming liam hikes mountains, we can say the bakery does yoga, it is evident that the bakery does yoga.\nBecause given that liam is fluffy, it follows that liam does yoga, we can conclude that liam does yoga.\nGiven that if liam does yoga, then sophie does yoga, it is evident that sophie does yoga.\nApplying the logic of when sophie does yoga, we can conclude the bakery does yoga, we deduce that the bakery does yoga.\nSince we know that assuming the bakery does yoga, we can say liam does yoga, it follows that liam does yoga.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when liam is fluffy, we can conclude liam does yoga, when liam does yoga, we can conclude sophie does yoga, sophie hikes mountains is not concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe car swims well.\nThe car makes pizza.\nMike jumps high.\nRules:\nBased on the car swims well, it is evident that the bridge jumps high.\nGiven that the car makes pizza, it follows that the bridge jumps high.\nWhen mike is quiet, we can conclude henry swims well.\nGiven that the car makes pizza, it follows that mike is quiet.\nGiven that the car is quiet, it follows that the car makes pizza.\nIf mike jumps high, then the car is quiet.", "statement": "Henry makes pizza.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the car swims well, it is evident that the bridge jumps high, we can see that the bridge jumps high.\nGiven that when mike jumps high, we can conclude the car is quiet, it is evident that the car is quiet.\nApplying the logic of based on the car is quiet, it is evident that the car makes pizza, we deduce that the car makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of based on the car makes pizza, it is evident that mike is quiet, we deduce that mike is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that mike is quiet, it follows that henry swims well, we can see that henry swims well.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because Given that the car makes pizza, it follows that mike is quiet, When mike is quiet, we can conclude henry swims well, Henry makes pizza is not a conclusion from the given facts and rules\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan carries bags.\nStanford University does yoga.\nChuan carries bags.\nRules:\nAssuming chuan carries bags, we can say chuan carries bags.\nAssuming the cloud carries bags, we can say the cat does yoga.\nBased on stanford university takes pictures, it is evident that the cloud plays instruments.\nBased on chuan carries bags, it is evident that the cloud carries bags.\nWhen the cat takes pictures, we can conclude stanford university takes pictures.\nAssuming the cat does yoga, we can say the cat takes pictures.", "statement": "Chuan takes pictures.", "reasoning": "Given that when chuan carries bags, we can conclude chuan carries bags, it is evident that chuan carries bags.\nApplying the logic of if chuan carries bags, then the cloud carries bags, we deduce that the cloud carries bags.\nApplying the logic of assuming the cloud carries bags, we can say the cat does yoga, we deduce that the cat does yoga.\nGiven that given that the cat does yoga, it follows that the cat takes pictures, it is evident that the cat takes pictures.\nBecause given that the cat takes pictures, it follows that stanford university takes pictures, we can conclude that stanford university takes pictures.\nSince we know that based on stanford university takes pictures, it is evident that the cloud plays instruments, it follows that the cloud plays instruments.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming chuan carries bags, we can say chuan carries bags, Based on chuan carries bags, it is evident that the cloud carries bags, Assuming the cloud carries bags, we can say the cat does yoga, Assuming the cat does yoga, we can say the cat takes pictures, When the cat takes pictures, we can conclude stanford university takes pictures, Based on stanford university takes pictures, it is evident that the cloud plays instruments, Chuan takes pictures\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe playground is a doctor.\nThe cloud carries bags.\nThe musician is an artist.\nRules:\nBased on the musician is an artist, it is evident that the river is a doctor.\nWhen the cloud carries bags, we can conclude the playground carries bags.\nGiven that the playground is a doctor, it follows that the river is a doctor.\nBased on the cloud is an artist, it is evident that the musician hosts parties.\nBased on the cloud carries bags, it is evident that the musician carries bags.\nBased on the cloud carries bags, it is evident that the cloud is an artist.\nWhen the cloud carries bags, we can conclude the cloud carries bags.\nIf the musician carries bags, then the cloud carries bags.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Because when the musician is an artist, we can conclude the river is a doctor, we can conclude that the river is a doctor.\nSince we know that given that the cloud carries bags, it follows that the playground carries bags, it follows that the playground carries bags.\nGiven that when the cloud carries bags, we can conclude the musician carries bags, it is evident that the musician carries bags.\nBecause based on the musician carries bags, it is evident that the cloud carries bags, we can conclude that the cloud carries bags.\nGiven that given that the cloud carries bags, it follows that the cloud carries bags, it is evident that the cloud carries bags.\nGiven that based on the cloud carries bags, it is evident that the cloud is an artist, it is evident that the cloud is an artist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the cloud is an artist, it is evident that the musician hosts parties, we can see that the musician hosts parties.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"The given facts and rules do not provide any information about Chuan or relate to the assertion 'Chuan is handsome'. Thus, no conclusion can be drawn from the given facts and rules.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam paints pictures.\nLiam hosts parties.\nThe computer jumps high.\nRules:\nWhen the computer jumps high, we can conclude james jumps high.\nIf liam hosts parties, then chuan jumps high.\nIf liam paints pictures, then james jumps high.\nWhen the computer jumps high, we can conclude james is interesting.\nWhen the computer jumps high, we can conclude liam jumps high.\nAssuming james hosts parties, we can say the computer jumps high.\nGiven that chuan paints pictures, it follows that james hosts parties.\nGiven that james is interesting, it follows that chuan paints pictures.\nWhen the computer jumps high, we can conclude james jumps high.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the computer jumps high, we can conclude james jumps high, we deduce that james jumps high.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that liam hosts parties, it follows that chuan jumps high, we can see that chuan jumps high.\nGiven that when liam paints pictures, we can conclude james jumps high, it is evident that james jumps high.\nBecause based on the computer jumps high, it is evident that james is interesting, we can conclude that james is interesting.\nSince we know that when james is interesting, we can conclude chuan paints pictures, it follows that chuan paints pictures.\nGiven that assuming chuan paints pictures, we can say james hosts parties, it is evident that james hosts parties.\nGiven that given that james hosts parties, it follows that the computer jumps high, it is evident that the computer jumps high.\nGiven that based on the computer jumps high, it is evident that liam jumps high, it is evident that liam jumps high.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no rules or facts suggesting anything about Chuan being handsome, its negation\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMike is interesting.\nMike is interesting.\nThe dog fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nBased on mike is interesting, it is evident that mike fishes in lakes.\nGiven that mike is interesting, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes.\nBased on mike is interesting, it is evident that the stadium fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the dog is interesting, we can say the sandwich is interesting.\nIf the stadium grows plants, then the dog is interesting.\nBased on the sandwich fishes in lakes, it is evident that the stadium grows plants.\nIf the dog fishes in lakes, then the sandwich fishes in lakes.\nGiven that the dog fishes in lakes, it follows that the stadium fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The stadium is blue.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming mike is interesting, we can say mike fishes in lakes, we can see that mike fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that given that mike is interesting, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes, it follows that the dog fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of given that mike is interesting, it follows that the stadium fishes in lakes, we deduce that the stadium fishes in lakes.\nSince we know that when the dog fishes in lakes, we can conclude the sandwich fishes in lakes, it follows that the sandwich fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the sandwich fishes in lakes, then the stadium grows plants, we can see that the stadium grows plants.\nGiven that when the stadium grows plants, we can conclude the dog is interesting, it is evident that the dog is interesting.\nApplying the logic of given that the dog is interesting, it follows that the sandwich is interesting, we deduce that the sandwich is interesting.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the facts and rules only discuss characteristics and activities related to mike, the dog, the sandwich, and the stadium fishing or being interesting, and not the color of the stadium, there is no information or rule supporting the assertion that 'The stadium is blue'.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician collects stamps.\nThe river creates art.\nThe artist collects stamps.\nRules:\nGiven that the artist collects stamps, it follows that the musician becomes famous.\nWhen the sandwich creates art, we can conclude the sandwich becomes famous.\nGiven that the sandwich collects stamps, it follows that the sandwich creates art.\nBased on the sandwich sings beautifully, it is evident that the sandwich collects stamps.\nAssuming the artist collects stamps, we can say the sandwich sings beautifully.", "statement": "The musician creates art.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the artist collects stamps, then the musician becomes famous, it follows that the musician becomes famous.\nBecause assuming the artist collects stamps, we can say the sandwich sings beautifully, we can conclude that the sandwich sings beautifully.\nBecause given that the sandwich sings beautifully, it follows that the sandwich collects stamps, we can conclude that the sandwich collects stamps.\nGiven that given that the sandwich collects stamps, it follows that the sandwich creates art, it is evident that the sandwich creates art.\nSince we know that assuming the sandwich creates art, we can say the sandwich becomes famous, it follows that the sandwich becomes famous.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the artist collects stamps, Given that the artist collects stamps, it follows that the musician becomes famous, the musician creates art is not derived from available rules, the negation of The musician creates art\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nLiam explores cities.\nThe musician becomes famous.\nThe zoo explores cities.\nRules:\nGiven that the musician becomes famous, it follows that liam becomes famous.\nBased on the zoo explores cities, it is evident that liam is quiet.\nIf the fountain is quiet, then the musician becomes famous.\nIf the fountain sings beautifully, then the fountain is quiet.\nAssuming liam sings beautifully, we can say the fountain sings beautifully.\nBased on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that liam sings beautifully.", "statement": "The zoo sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Because if the musician becomes famous, then liam becomes famous, we can conclude that liam becomes famous.\nSince we know that assuming the zoo explores cities, we can say liam is quiet, it follows that liam is quiet.\nBecause when the musician becomes famous, we can conclude liam sings beautifully, we can conclude that liam sings beautifully.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on liam sings beautifully, it is evident that the fountain sings beautifully, we can see that the fountain sings beautifully.\nApplying the logic of if the fountain sings beautifully, then the fountain is quiet, we deduce that the fountain is quiet.\nGiven that assuming the fountain is quiet, we can say the musician becomes famous, it is evident that the musician becomes famous.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the musician becomes famous, it is evident that liam sings beautifully., Assuming liam sings beautifully, we can say the fountain sings beautifully., If the fountain sings beautifully, then the fountain is quiet., If the fountain is quiet, then the musician becomes famous., Given that the musician becomes famous, it follows that liam becomes famous., we cannot conclude that the zoo sings beautifully without further information explicitly linking the zoo singing beautifully., The negation is The zoo does not necessarily sing beautifully.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo grows plants.\nThe zoo is magical.\nThe zoo makes pizza.\nRules:\nBased on the zoo grows plants, it is evident that the stadium makes pizza.\nAssuming the zoo grows plants, we can say the book is magical.\nBased on the zoo is magical, it is evident that the book makes pizza.\nBased on the stadium travels far, it is evident that the zoo grows plants.\nGiven that the stadium travels far, it follows that the stadium makes pizza.\nGiven that the book makes pizza, it follows that the stadium travels far.\nWhen the book grows plants, we can conclude the book makes pizza.\nWhen the zoo grows plants, we can conclude the book grows plants.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that given that the zoo grows plants, it follows that the stadium makes pizza, it is evident that the stadium makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of given that the zoo grows plants, it follows that the book is magical, we deduce that the book is magical.\nSince we know that given that the zoo is magical, it follows that the book makes pizza, it follows that the book makes pizza.\nSince we know that if the zoo grows plants, then the book grows plants, it follows that the book grows plants.\nBecause if the book grows plants, then the book makes pizza, we can conclude that the book makes pizza.\nSince we know that if the book makes pizza, then the stadium travels far, it follows that the stadium travels far.\nBecause assuming the stadium travels far, we can say the zoo grows plants, we can conclude that the zoo grows plants.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because no rules or facts are related to the assertion, its negation\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig jumps high.\nThe pig plays football.\nMia does yoga.\nRules:\nBased on mia does yoga, it is evident that the sky does yoga.\nAssuming the pig jumps high, we can say the artist plays football.\nAssuming the artist plays football, we can say mia plays football.\nBased on mia does yoga, it is evident that the artist does yoga.\nWhen the artist plays football, we can conclude mia does yoga.\nGiven that the sky jumps high, it follows that the artist plays football.\nAssuming mia does yoga, we can say the sky jumps high.", "statement": "Mia jumps high.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that assuming mia does yoga, we can say the sky does yoga, we can see that the sky does yoga.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the pig jumps high, it is evident that the artist plays football, we can see that the artist plays football.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that mia does yoga, it follows that the sky jumps high, we can see that the sky jumps high.\nBecause given that the sky jumps high, it follows that the artist plays football, we can conclude that the artist plays football.\nApplying the logic of assuming the artist plays football, we can say mia plays football, we deduce that mia plays football.\nGiven that assuming the artist plays football, we can say mia does yoga, it is evident that mia does yoga.\nApplying the logic of when mia does yoga, we can conclude the artist does yoga, we deduce that the artist does yoga.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Based on mia does yoga, it is evident that the sky jumps high, Given that the sky jumps high, it follows that the artist plays football, When the artist plays football, we can conclude mia does yoga, Assuming mia does yoga, we can say the sky jumps high, the negation of Mia jumps high\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon is an engineer.\nThe house travels far.\nThe bridge becomes famous.\nRules:\nIf the bridge becomes famous, then the car is an engineer.\nBased on the moon writes stories, it is evident that the car travels far.\nWhen the car becomes famous, we can conclude the moon writes stories.\nBased on the moon is an engineer, it is evident that the car becomes famous.\nWhen the house travels far, we can conclude the house becomes famous.\nBased on the car is an engineer, it is evident that the moon is an engineer.", "statement": "The house becomes famous.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge becomes famous, it is evident that the car is an engineer, we can see that the car is an engineer.\nBecause when the car is an engineer, we can conclude the moon is an engineer, we can conclude that the moon is an engineer.\nGiven that assuming the moon is an engineer, we can say the car becomes famous, it is evident that the car becomes famous.\nGiven that assuming the car becomes famous, we can say the moon writes stories, it is evident that the moon writes stories.\nGiven that based on the moon writes stories, it is evident that the car travels far, it is evident that the car travels far.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When the house travels far, we can conclude the house becomes famous, The house travels far, The house becomes famous\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi is blue.\nThe mountain is a scientist.\nThe sky volunteers.\nRules:\nWhen the mountain is a scientist, we can conclude chuan is magical.\nAssuming jianzhi is a scientist, we can say the sky is magical.\nWhen the mountain is a scientist, we can conclude jianzhi is a scientist.\nAssuming the mountain is a scientist, we can say the mountain is a scientist.\nIf the mountain is blue, then the sky is magical.\nIf chuan is magical, then the mountain is a scientist.", "statement": "The mountain is blue.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that the mountain is a scientist, it follows that chuan is magical, we deduce that chuan is magical.\nApplying the logic of given that chuan is magical, it follows that the mountain is a scientist, we deduce that the mountain is a scientist.\nBecause given that the mountain is a scientist, it follows that the mountain is a scientist, we can conclude that the mountain is a scientist.\nBecause if the mountain is a scientist, then jianzhi is a scientist, we can conclude that jianzhi is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that jianzhi is a scientist, it follows that the sky is magical, we can see that the sky is magical.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the mountain is a scientist, we can say the mountain is a scientist., The mountain is a scientist., The mountain is not blue., the negation\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan is fluffy.\nChuan is funny.\nThe cat is fluffy.\nRules:\nIf chuan is funny, then the cat is loud.\nIf the fountain fishes in lakes, then the fountain is funny.\nBased on chuan is fluffy, it is evident that the fountain fishes in lakes.\nIf the cat fishes in lakes, then chuan is fluffy.\nIf the cat is fluffy, then the cat fishes in lakes.\nBased on chuan is loud, it is evident that chuan is fluffy.", "statement": "The globe is fluffy.", "reasoning": "Because when chuan is funny, we can conclude the cat is loud, we can conclude that the cat is loud.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the cat is fluffy, it follows that the cat fishes in lakes, we can see that the cat fishes in lakes.\nBecause based on the cat fishes in lakes, it is evident that chuan is fluffy, we can conclude that chuan is fluffy.\nBecause assuming chuan is fluffy, we can say the fountain fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the fountain fishes in lakes.\nBecause given that the fountain fishes in lakes, it follows that the fountain is funny, we can conclude that the fountain is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the cat is fluffy, then the cat fishes in lakes, if the cat fishes in lakes, then chuan is fluffy, if chuan is funny, then the cat is loud, based on chuan is loud, it is evident that chuan is fluffy, the globe is fluffy is not implied.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog sings beautifully.\nThe sun is quiet.\nThe playground makes pizza.\nRules:\nWhen the playground makes pizza, we can conclude the playground makes pizza.\nIf the playground is quiet, then the dog makes pizza.\nWhen the dog sings beautifully, we can conclude the playground is quiet.\nWhen the dog is interesting, we can conclude the dog sings beautifully.\nWhen the sun is quiet, we can conclude the dog is interesting.", "statement": "Charlie sings beautifully.", "reasoning": "Given that if the playground makes pizza, then the playground makes pizza, it is evident that the playground makes pizza.\nSince we know that based on the sun is quiet, it is evident that the dog is interesting, it follows that the dog is interesting.\nSince we know that if the dog is interesting, then the dog sings beautifully, it follows that the dog sings beautifully.\nGiven that given that the dog sings beautifully, it follows that the playground is quiet, it is evident that the playground is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the playground is quiet, we can conclude the dog makes pizza, we can see that the dog makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because When the sun is quiet, we can conclude the dog is interesting, When the dog is interesting, we can conclude the dog sings beautifully, the dog sings beautifully, Charlie sings beautifully.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo carries bags.\nMike draws maps.\nThe shop carries bags.\nRules:\nAssuming the shop carries bags, we can say the garden teaches math.\nAssuming mike draws maps, we can say the garden carries bags.\nAssuming the garden draws maps, we can say the shop teaches math.\nGiven that mike plays games, it follows that the garden draws maps.\nGiven that mike draws maps, it follows that mike plays games.\nGiven that the garden teaches math, it follows that mike draws maps.", "statement": "The shop plays games.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the shop carries bags, we can say the garden teaches math, it is evident that the garden teaches math.\nSince we know that when the garden teaches math, we can conclude mike draws maps, it follows that mike draws maps.\nApplying the logic of given that mike draws maps, it follows that the garden carries bags, we deduce that the garden carries bags.\nApplying the logic of if mike draws maps, then mike plays games, we deduce that mike plays games.\nBecause given that mike plays games, it follows that the garden draws maps, we can conclude that the garden draws maps.\nGiven that given that the garden draws maps, it follows that the shop teaches math, it is evident that the shop teaches math.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because assuming the shop carries bags, we can say the garden teaches math, given that the garden teaches math, it follows that mike draws maps, given that mike draws maps, it follows that mike plays games, and given that mike plays games, it follows that the garden draws maps, assuming the garden draws maps, we can say the shop teaches math, the shop plays games is not concluded\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city explores cities.\nThe city dances gracefully.\nHenry carries bags.\nRules:\nWhen the city explores cities, we can conclude henry does yoga.\nIf the phone carries bags, then henry does yoga.\nAssuming the phone carries bags, we can say the phone dances gracefully.\nGiven that henry does yoga, it follows that the phone carries bags.\nWhen the cat explores cities, we can conclude henry does yoga.\nAssuming the city explores cities, we can say the cat explores cities.", "statement": "The cat does yoga.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of if the city explores cities, then henry does yoga, we deduce that henry does yoga.\nSince we know that given that the city explores cities, it follows that the cat explores cities, it follows that the cat explores cities.\nBecause based on the cat explores cities, it is evident that henry does yoga, we can conclude that henry does yoga.\nSince we know that based on henry does yoga, it is evident that the phone carries bags, it follows that the phone carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the phone carries bags, then the phone dances gracefully, we can see that the phone dances gracefully.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because When the city explores cities, we can conclude henry does yoga., Assuming the city explores cities, we can say the cat explores cities., When the cat explores cities, we can conclude henry does yoga., The cat does yoga.\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe plane runs quickly.\nThe plane runs quickly.\nThe chef runs quickly.\nRules:\nGiven that the plane runs quickly, it follows that the chef fishes in lakes.\nWhen the river runs quickly, we can conclude the plane is funny.\nAssuming the river fishes in lakes, we can say the plane is funny.\nIf the plane is funny, then the river fishes in lakes.\nBased on the plane runs quickly, it is evident that the plane is funny.\nIf the chef runs quickly, then the plane runs quickly.", "statement": "The river is funny.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the plane runs quickly, we can say the chef fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the chef fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the chef runs quickly, it is evident that the plane runs quickly, we can see that the plane runs quickly.\nGiven that based on the plane runs quickly, it is evident that the plane is funny, it is evident that the plane is funny.\nSince we know that if the plane is funny, then the river fishes in lakes, it follows that the river fishes in lakes.\nBecause given that the river fishes in lakes, it follows that the plane is funny, we can conclude that the plane is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the plane runs quickly, it is evident that the plane is funny., If the plane is funny, then the river fishes in lakes., Assuming the river fishes in lakes, we can say the plane is funny., The river is funny.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe house plays football.\nThe pumpkin is loud.\nThe pumpkin plays football.\nRules:\nGiven that the pumpkin is loud, it follows that stanford university grows plants.\nIf stanford university reads books, then the house reads books.\nBased on stanford university grows plants, it is evident that stanford university reads books.\nWhen the house is loud, we can conclude stanford university reads books.\nBased on the pumpkin is loud, it is evident that the house is loud.\nGiven that the pumpkin plays football, it follows that the pumpkin is loud.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Given that given that the pumpkin is loud, it follows that stanford university grows plants, it is evident that stanford university grows plants.\nGiven that assuming stanford university grows plants, we can say stanford university reads books, it is evident that stanford university reads books.\nSince we know that if the pumpkin plays football, then the pumpkin is loud, it follows that the pumpkin is loud.\nGiven that assuming the pumpkin is loud, we can say the house is loud, it is evident that the house is loud.\nSince we know that when the house is loud, we can conclude stanford university reads books, it follows that stanford university reads books.\nSince we know that assuming stanford university reads books, we can say the house reads books, it follows that the house reads books.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules linking the given facts to the assertion about Chuan being handsome. Thus, the assertion cannot be concluded from the given facts and rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe book enjoys music.\nThe cat hosts parties.\nThe book enjoys music.\nRules:\nBased on the book enjoys music, it is evident that the sky hosts parties.\nGiven that the cat is loud, it follows that the book hosts parties.\nWhen the cat hosts parties, we can conclude the cat is loud.\nIf the sky paints pictures, then the cat hosts parties.\nWhen the sky is loud, we can conclude the cat is loud.\nWhen the book enjoys music, we can conclude the sky paints pictures.", "statement": "The sky is loud.", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the book enjoys music, it is evident that the sky hosts parties, it follows that the sky hosts parties.\nGiven that based on the book enjoys music, it is evident that the sky paints pictures, it is evident that the sky paints pictures.\nSince we know that when the sky paints pictures, we can conclude the cat hosts parties, it follows that the cat hosts parties.\nBecause given that the cat hosts parties, it follows that the cat is loud, we can conclude that the cat is loud.\nBecause given that the cat is loud, it follows that the book hosts parties, we can conclude that the book hosts parties.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the book enjoys music, we can conclude the sky paints pictures. If the sky paints pictures, then the cat hosts parties. When the cat hosts parties, we can conclude the cat is loud. When the sky is loud, we can conclude the cat is loud, the sky is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe plane draws maps.\nJack draws maps.\nStanford University is a scientist.\nRules:\nAssuming the plane draws maps, we can say the moon explores cities.\nAssuming jack draws maps, we can say the moon cooks well.\nWhen the plane draws maps, we can conclude the plane draws maps.\nWhen the plane cooks well, we can conclude stanford university is a scientist.\nBased on stanford university is a scientist, it is evident that the plane cooks well.\nGiven that stanford university explores cities, it follows that stanford university is a scientist.\nWhen the plane draws maps, we can conclude stanford university explores cities.", "statement": "Stanford University cooks well.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the plane draws maps, we can say the moon explores cities, it is evident that the moon explores cities.\nBecause given that jack draws maps, it follows that the moon cooks well, we can conclude that the moon cooks well.\nGiven that given that the plane draws maps, it follows that the plane draws maps, it is evident that the plane draws maps.\nApplying the logic of when the plane draws maps, we can conclude stanford university explores cities, we deduce that stanford university explores cities.\nApplying the logic of assuming stanford university explores cities, we can say stanford university is a scientist, we deduce that stanford university is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of when stanford university is a scientist, we can conclude the plane cooks well, we deduce that the plane cooks well.\nApplying the logic of based on the plane cooks well, it is evident that stanford university is a scientist, we deduce that stanford university is a scientist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on stanford university is a scientist, it is evident that the plane cooks well., Stanford University cooks well.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe plane creates art.\nHenry is quiet.\nThe car creates art.\nRules:\nBased on the car creates art, it is evident that the zoo travels far.\nGiven that the zoo is quiet, it follows that the car travels far.\nGiven that the zoo creates art, it follows that the zoo is quiet.\nIf henry travels far, then the zoo creates art.\nAssuming the plane creates art, we can say the plane is quiet.\nAssuming the plane is quiet, we can say henry travels far.", "statement": "The car fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the car creates art, we can conclude the zoo travels far, we can see that the zoo travels far.\nGiven that if the plane creates art, then the plane is quiet, it is evident that the plane is quiet.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the plane is quiet, it is evident that henry travels far, we can see that henry travels far.\nSince we know that given that henry travels far, it follows that the zoo creates art, it follows that the zoo creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the zoo creates art, we can conclude the zoo is quiet, we can see that the zoo is quiet.\nSince we know that if the zoo is quiet, then the car travels far, it follows that the car travels far.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules linking creating art or being quiet with fishing. Therefore, none of the given rules support the assertion that the car fishes in lakes.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium is magical.\nThe stadium dances gracefully.\nThe stadium dances gracefully.\nRules:\nBased on the stadium is magical, it is evident that james writes stories.\nWhen james writes stories, we can conclude the stadium is magical.\nIf the chef writes stories, then james writes stories.\nBased on the chef is magical, it is evident that the chef writes stories.\nWhen james writes stories, we can conclude james explores cities.\nGiven that the stadium dances gracefully, it follows that the chef is magical.", "statement": "Henry explores cities.", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the stadium is magical, we can say james writes stories, it follows that james writes stories.\nGiven that when the stadium dances gracefully, we can conclude the chef is magical, it is evident that the chef is magical.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the chef is magical, we can conclude the chef writes stories, we can see that the chef writes stories.\nGiven that given that the chef writes stories, it follows that james writes stories, it is evident that james writes stories.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming james writes stories, we can say james explores cities, we can see that james explores cities.\nSince we know that assuming james writes stories, we can say the stadium is magical, it follows that the stadium is magical.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the stadium dances gracefully, it follows that the chef is magical; based on the chef is magical, it is evident that the chef writes stories; if the chef writes stories, then james writes stories; when james writes stories, we can conclude james explores cities; neither fact nor rule implies Henry explores cities, Henry explores cities is negation\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe tree goes to the hospital.\nThe ocean enjoys music.\nThe tree goes to the hospital.\nRules:\nWhen the ocean enjoys music, we can conclude the tree goes to the hospital.\nBased on the sky is quiet, it is evident that the sky goes to the hospital.\nBased on the ocean creates art, it is evident that the sky is quiet.\nAssuming the sky enjoys music, we can say the ocean creates art.\nWhen the tree goes to the hospital, we can conclude the sky enjoys music.\nGiven that the ocean enjoys music, it follows that the ocean creates art.", "statement": "Ava enjoys music.", "reasoning": "Given that assuming the ocean enjoys music, we can say the tree goes to the hospital, it is evident that the tree goes to the hospital.\nApplying the logic of given that the tree goes to the hospital, it follows that the sky enjoys music, we deduce that the sky enjoys music.\nBecause given that the ocean enjoys music, it follows that the ocean creates art, we can conclude that the ocean creates art.\nGiven that assuming the sky enjoys music, we can say the ocean creates art, it is evident that the ocean creates art.\nBecause when the ocean creates art, we can conclude the sky is quiet, we can conclude that the sky is quiet.\nBecause given that the sky is quiet, it follows that the sky goes to the hospital, we can conclude that the sky goes to the hospital.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the tree goes to the hospital, When the tree goes to the hospital, we can conclude the sky enjoys music, Assuming the sky enjoys music, we can say the ocean creates art, Given that the ocean enjoys music, it follows that the ocean creates art, When the ocean enjoys music, we can conclude the tree goes to the hospital, the factual chain of events does not lead to Ava enjoying music or anything related to Ava, Ava enjoys music is not concluded\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nStanford University fishes in lakes.\nThe city fishes in lakes.\nThe city fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nBased on stanford university fishes in lakes, it is evident that stanford university fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the fountain rides bikes, we can say the fountain is loud.\nIf the fountain fishes in lakes, then the fountain rides bikes.\nAssuming the ocean fishes in lakes, we can say the fountain fishes in lakes.\nBased on stanford university fishes in lakes, it is evident that the ocean fishes in lakes.\nBased on the city is loud, it is evident that the ocean fishes in lakes.", "statement": "The city is loud.", "reasoning": "Since we know that when stanford university fishes in lakes, we can conclude stanford university fishes in lakes, it follows that stanford university fishes in lakes.\nGiven that given that stanford university fishes in lakes, it follows that the ocean fishes in lakes, it is evident that the ocean fishes in lakes.\nBecause given that the ocean fishes in lakes, it follows that the fountain fishes in lakes, we can conclude that the fountain fishes in lakes.\nBecause if the fountain fishes in lakes, then the fountain rides bikes, we can conclude that the fountain rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of when the fountain rides bikes, we can conclude the fountain is loud, we deduce that the fountain is loud.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because based on the city is loud, it is evident that the ocean fishes in lakes, the city is loud since there are no rules directly supporting or asserting 'the city is loud'.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist solves puzzles.\nThe festival fishes in lakes.\nThe bridge swims well.\nRules:\nIf the artist solves puzzles, then the artist solves puzzles.\nGiven that the bridge swims well, it follows that the festival solves puzzles.\nBased on the artist volunteers, it is evident that the bridge volunteers.\nAssuming the bridge fishes in lakes, we can say the artist volunteers.\nAssuming the artist solves puzzles, we can say the bridge fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the festival fishes in lakes, we can say the artist solves puzzles.\nGiven that the artist solves puzzles, it follows that the book swims well.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the artist solves puzzles, we can say the artist solves puzzles, we deduce that the artist solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the bridge swims well, we can say the festival solves puzzles, we can see that the festival solves puzzles.\nBecause if the festival fishes in lakes, then the artist solves puzzles, we can conclude that the artist solves puzzles.\nBecause given that the artist solves puzzles, it follows that the book swims well, we can conclude that the book swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the artist solves puzzles, we can say the bridge fishes in lakes, we can see that the bridge fishes in lakes.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the bridge fishes in lakes, it follows that the artist volunteers, we can see that the artist volunteers.\nSince we know that if the artist volunteers, then the bridge volunteers, it follows that the bridge volunteers.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules connecting the artist, festival, or bridge activities to the assertion about Chuan's appearance, therefore it doesn't follow from the given information.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe zoo enjoys music.\nThe zoo makes pizza.\nThe sun makes pizza.\nRules:\nIf the zoo enjoys music, then the house paints pictures.\nIf the sun makes pizza, then the sun is a scientist.\nGiven that the house makes pizza, it follows that the house is a scientist.\nWhen the house is a scientist, we can conclude the house makes pizza.\nBased on the zoo enjoys music, it is evident that the house is a scientist.\nWhen the zoo paints pictures, we can conclude the house is a scientist.\nIf the sun makes pizza, then the zoo paints pictures.", "statement": "The garden paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Because when the zoo enjoys music, we can conclude the house paints pictures, we can conclude that the house paints pictures.\nGiven that based on the sun makes pizza, it is evident that the sun is a scientist, it is evident that the sun is a scientist.\nGiven that assuming the sun makes pizza, we can say the zoo paints pictures, it is evident that the zoo paints pictures.\nSince we know that if the zoo paints pictures, then the house is a scientist, it follows that the house is a scientist.\nSince we know that if the house is a scientist, then the house makes pizza, it follows that the house makes pizza.\nGiven that when the house makes pizza, we can conclude the house is a scientist, it is evident that the house is a scientist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if the sun makes pizza, then the sun is a scientist, if the sun makes pizza, then the zoo paints pictures, the sun makes pizza, the zoo enjoys music, the zoo makes pizza, based on the zoo enjoys music, it is evident that the house is a scientist, it is not given that the garden paints pictures, the garden paints pictures cannot be concluded from any rule or fact, the conclusion is the garden does not paint pictures\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe musician rides bikes.\nThe globe rides bikes.\nThe car is loud.\nRules:\nAssuming the musician rides bikes, we can say sarah rides bikes.\nIf the musician rides bikes, then sarah is colorful.\nBased on the globe rides bikes, it is evident that sarah rides bikes.\nBased on the musician is loud, it is evident that the car rides bikes.\nAssuming the globe is loud, we can say the musician is loud.\nIf the musician is a doctor, then the globe is loud.\nGiven that the globe rides bikes, it follows that the musician is a doctor.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the musician rides bikes, we can conclude sarah rides bikes, we can see that sarah rides bikes.\nGiven that if the musician rides bikes, then sarah is colorful, it is evident that sarah is colorful.\nSince we know that when the globe rides bikes, we can conclude the musician is a doctor, it follows that the musician is a doctor.\nApplying the logic of assuming the musician is a doctor, we can say the globe is loud, we deduce that the globe is loud.\nGiven that based on the globe is loud, it is evident that the musician is loud, it is evident that the musician is loud.\nApplying the logic of if the musician is loud, then the car rides bikes, we deduce that the car rides bikes.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules relating to Chuan or being handsome; hence, we cannot conclude anything about Chuan being handsome.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig grows plants.\nThe pig does yoga.\nThe pumpkin grows plants.\nRules:\nIf the pig grows plants, then the zoo runs marathons.\nAssuming the pumpkin grows plants, we can say the zoo does yoga.\nIf the pig grows plants, then the zoo does yoga.\nAssuming the pumpkin grows plants, we can say the zoo runs marathons.\nBased on the pumpkin grows plants, it is evident that the zoo does yoga.\nWhen the bakery runs marathons, we can conclude the bakery runs marathons.\nGiven that the zoo plays instruments, it follows that the bakery runs marathons.\nGiven that the bakery grows plants, it follows that the zoo plays instruments.\nAssuming the zoo runs marathons, we can say the pumpkin plays instruments.\nWhen the pumpkin grows plants, we can conclude the bakery grows plants.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that based on the pig grows plants, it is evident that the zoo runs marathons, it follows that the zoo runs marathons.\nSince we know that given that the pumpkin grows plants, it follows that the zoo does yoga, it follows that the zoo does yoga.\nApplying the logic of if the zoo runs marathons, then the pumpkin plays instruments, we deduce that the pumpkin plays instruments.\nGiven that if the pumpkin grows plants, then the bakery grows plants, it is evident that the bakery grows plants.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the bakery grows plants, we can conclude the zoo plays instruments, we can see that the zoo plays instruments.\nApplying the logic of assuming the zoo plays instruments, we can say the bakery runs marathons, we deduce that the bakery runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the bakery runs marathons, then the bakery runs marathons, we can see that the bakery runs marathons.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because there are no given facts or rules related to whether Chuan is handsome, we cannot conclude anything about the assertion.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone becomes famous.\nThe sandwich makes pizza.\nEmma grows plants.\nRules:\nWhen emma grows plants, we can conclude emma grows plants.\nGiven that emma grows plants, it follows that the moon makes pizza.\nGiven that emma grows plants, it follows that the moon becomes famous.\nIf emma does yoga, then emma grows plants.\nIf the moon grows plants, then emma does yoga.\nIf emma grows plants, then the moon grows plants.", "statement": "The moon does yoga.", "reasoning": "Given that given that emma grows plants, it follows that emma grows plants, it is evident that emma grows plants.\nApplying the logic of when emma grows plants, we can conclude the moon becomes famous, we deduce that the moon becomes famous.\nGiven that when emma grows plants, we can conclude the moon grows plants, it is evident that the moon grows plants.\nGiven that based on the moon grows plants, it is evident that emma does yoga, it is evident that emma does yoga.\nBecause based on emma does yoga, it is evident that emma grows plants, we can conclude that emma grows plants.\nSince we know that if emma grows plants, then the moon makes pizza, it follows that the moon makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because emma grows plants, if emma grows plants, then the moon grows plants, if the moon grows plants, then emma does yoga, if emma does yoga, then emma grows plants, the moon does yoga is not concluded by any of these rules, the negation of the assertion follows\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe mountain is quiet.\nThe cat makes pizza.\nThe fountain makes pizza.\nRules:\nIf the cat makes pizza, then lucas makes pizza.\nIf the mountain is quiet, then lucas teaches math.\nIf the cat makes pizza, then the cat dances gracefully.\nIf lucas makes pizza, then the cat makes pizza.\nWhen the mountain teaches math, we can conclude lucas makes pizza.\nIf the fountain makes pizza, then the mountain teaches math.\nAssuming lucas teaches math, we can say the cat is quiet.", "statement": "Lucas is quiet.", "reasoning": "Because based on the cat makes pizza, it is evident that lucas makes pizza, we can conclude that lucas makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of assuming the mountain is quiet, we can say lucas teaches math, we deduce that lucas teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the fountain makes pizza, it is evident that the mountain teaches math, we can see that the mountain teaches math.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming lucas teaches math, we can say the cat is quiet, we can see that the cat is quiet.\nApplying the logic of when the mountain teaches math, we can conclude lucas makes pizza, we deduce that lucas makes pizza.\nGiven that based on lucas makes pizza, it is evident that the cat makes pizza, it is evident that the cat makes pizza.\nApplying the logic of when the cat makes pizza, we can conclude the cat dances gracefully, we deduce that the cat dances gracefully.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because The mountain is quiet, If the mountain is quiet, then lucas teaches math, Assuming lucas teaches math, we can say the cat is quiet, Lucas is not quiet\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe sandwich volunteers.\nThe sandwich is a scientist.\nThe train is a scientist.\nRules:\nAssuming the sandwich volunteers, we can say the sandwich is a scientist.\nWhen the city carries bags, we can conclude the train enjoys music.\nWhen the city volunteers, we can conclude the city carries bags.\nGiven that the city carries bags, it follows that the city volunteers.\nBased on the train is a scientist, it is evident that the city carries bags.\nWhen the city volunteers, we can conclude the sandwich enjoys music.", "statement": "The house volunteers.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the sandwich volunteers, then the sandwich is a scientist, it follows that the sandwich is a scientist.\nSince we know that based on the train is a scientist, it is evident that the city carries bags, it follows that the city carries bags.\nSince we know that when the city carries bags, we can conclude the city volunteers, it follows that the city volunteers.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the city volunteers, then the city carries bags, we can see that the city carries bags.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the city carries bags, we can say the train enjoys music, we can see that the train enjoys music.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because based on the train is a scientist, it is evident that the city carries bags, given that the city carries bags, it follows that the city volunteers, when the city volunteers, we can conclude the city carries bags, when the city carries bags, we can conclude the train enjoys music, the assertion is false because the train enjoying music is not related to the house volunteering.\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe phone is fast.\nThe river is fast.\nThe river is a scientist.\nRules:\nWhen the river is a scientist, we can conclude the bakery travels far.\nWhen the river is fast, we can conclude mike travels far.\nIf the river is fast, then the river is a scientist.\nBased on the river is fast, it is evident that the river is fast.\nBased on the river is a scientist, it is evident that the river is fast.\nIf the river is a scientist, then the river is a scientist.", "statement": "The phone is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the river is a scientist, we can say the bakery travels far, we can conclude that the bakery travels far.\nBecause when the river is a scientist, we can conclude the river is a scientist, we can conclude that the river is a scientist.\nApplying the logic of based on the river is a scientist, it is evident that the river is fast, we deduce that the river is fast.\nBecause based on the river is fast, it is evident that the river is fast, we can conclude that the river is fast.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that given that the river is fast, it follows that mike travels far, we can see that mike travels far.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there is no rule connecting the speed of the phone or any characteristics of the phone to being a scientist, the phone is a scientist is not derivable from any rules or facts.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia hosts parties.\nEmma enjoys music.\nThe teacher fishes in lakes.\nRules:\nAssuming mia hosts parties, we can say mike hosts parties.\nWhen the teacher fishes in lakes, we can conclude emma hosts parties.\nWhen mike fishes in lakes, we can conclude mike enjoys music.\nIf mike fishes in lakes, then mike fishes in lakes.\nBased on mike hosts parties, it is evident that mike fishes in lakes.\nAssuming emma solves puzzles, we can say mike hosts parties.\nGiven that the teacher fishes in lakes, it follows that mike hosts parties.", "statement": "Mia fishes in lakes.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when mia hosts parties, we can conclude mike hosts parties, we deduce that mike hosts parties.\nGiven that given that the teacher fishes in lakes, it follows that emma hosts parties, it is evident that emma hosts parties.\nSince we know that assuming the teacher fishes in lakes, we can say mike hosts parties, it follows that mike hosts parties.\nApplying the logic of given that mike hosts parties, it follows that mike fishes in lakes, we deduce that mike fishes in lakes.\nBecause based on mike fishes in lakes, it is evident that mike fishes in lakes, we can conclude that mike fishes in lakes.\nBecause based on mike fishes in lakes, it is evident that mike enjoys music, we can conclude that mike enjoys music.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because assuming mia hosts parties, we can say mike hosts parties, based on mike hosts parties, it is evident that mike fishes in lakes, Mia fishes in lakes\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nMia is tall.\nEmma is interesting.\nMia is interesting.\nRules:\nAssuming mia is tall, we can say emma plays instruments.\nGiven that the pumpkin writes stories, it follows that stanford university is tall.\nAssuming emma is interesting, we can say the pumpkin writes stories.\nAssuming stanford university plays instruments, we can say emma plays instruments.\nAssuming stanford university plays instruments, we can say emma is interesting.\nIf mia is interesting, then stanford university plays instruments.", "statement": "Mia plays instruments.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of given that mia is tall, it follows that emma plays instruments, we deduce that emma plays instruments.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when mia is interesting, we can conclude stanford university plays instruments, we can see that stanford university plays instruments.\nSince we know that assuming stanford university plays instruments, we can say emma is interesting, it follows that emma is interesting.\nApplying the logic of assuming emma is interesting, we can say the pumpkin writes stories, we deduce that the pumpkin writes stories.\nApplying the logic of assuming the pumpkin writes stories, we can say stanford university is tall, we deduce that stanford university is tall.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because if mia is interesting, then stanford university plays instruments, assuming stanford university plays instruments, we can say emma plays instruments, assuming mia is tall, we can say emma plays instruments, the pumpkin writes stories, it follows that stanford university is tall, given emma is interesting, we can say the pumpkin writes stories, mia plays instruments\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe pig creates art.\nThe pig solves puzzles.\nThe plane solves puzzles.\nRules:\nIf the pig solves puzzles, then the plane makes pizza.\nIf the chef creates art, then the plane solves puzzles.\nBased on the chef solves puzzles, it is evident that sarah creates art.\nWhen the chef takes pictures, we can conclude the chef creates art.\nBased on sarah creates art, it is evident that the chef takes pictures.\nWhen the pig creates art, we can conclude the chef solves puzzles.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming the pig solves puzzles, we can say the plane makes pizza, it follows that the plane makes pizza.\nBecause based on the pig creates art, it is evident that the chef solves puzzles, we can conclude that the chef solves puzzles.\nSince we know that based on the chef solves puzzles, it is evident that sarah creates art, it follows that sarah creates art.\nGiven that based on sarah creates art, it is evident that the chef takes pictures, it is evident that the chef takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of if the chef takes pictures, then the chef creates art, we deduce that the chef creates art.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when the chef creates art, we can conclude the plane solves puzzles, we can see that the plane solves puzzles.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no applicable rules to directly or indirectly connect the given facts to the assertion.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva reads books.\nAva reads books.\nSarah makes pizza.\nRules:\nWhen ava reads books, we can conclude ava is a chef.\nIf ethan makes pizza, then ava makes pizza.\nIf sarah makes pizza, then ethan reads books.\nGiven that the dog makes pizza, it follows that ethan makes pizza.\nAssuming sarah reads books, we can say the dog makes pizza.\nGiven that ethan reads books, it follows that sarah reads books.", "statement": "Sarah is a chef.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that given that ava reads books, it follows that ava is a chef, we can see that ava is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when sarah makes pizza, we can conclude ethan reads books, we can see that ethan reads books.\nGiven that when ethan reads books, we can conclude sarah reads books, it is evident that sarah reads books.\nBecause assuming sarah reads books, we can say the dog makes pizza, we can conclude that the dog makes pizza.\nBecause if the dog makes pizza, then ethan makes pizza, we can conclude that ethan makes pizza.\nBecause based on ethan makes pizza, it is evident that ava makes pizza, we can conclude that ava makes pizza.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because if sarah makes pizza, then ethan reads books, sarah makes pizza, given that ethan reads books, it follows that sarah reads books, assuming sarah reads books, we can say the dog makes pizza, given that the dog makes pizza, it follows that ethan makes pizza, if ethan makes pizza, then ava makes pizza, when ava reads books, we can conclude ava is a chef, sarah makes pizza, therefore Sarah is a chef\", \"answer\": 1}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe wall paints pictures.\nSarah explores cities.\nThe wall paints pictures.\nRules:\nWhen the wall paints pictures, we can conclude the globe sings beautifully.\nIf sarah explores cities, then the globe sings beautifully.\nAssuming the sandwich paints pictures, we can say the wall is funny.\nAssuming sarah explores cities, we can say the sandwich paints pictures.\nIf the globe paints pictures, then sarah explores cities.\nWhen the globe sings beautifully, we can conclude the globe paints pictures.", "statement": "The wall explores cities.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of when the wall paints pictures, we can conclude the globe sings beautifully, we deduce that the globe sings beautifully.\nSince we know that based on the globe sings beautifully, it is evident that the globe paints pictures, it follows that the globe paints pictures.\nGiven that given that the globe paints pictures, it follows that sarah explores cities, it is evident that sarah explores cities.\nSince we know that based on sarah explores cities, it is evident that the sandwich paints pictures, it follows that the sandwich paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the sandwich paints pictures, we can say the wall is funny, we can see that the wall is funny.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the assertion is not related to any logical conclusion that can be drawn from the given facts and rules, the negation of the assertion is concluded.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nChuan is fluffy.\nChuan swims well.\nChuan swims well.\nRules:\nBased on chuan swims well, it is evident that chuan swims well.\nBased on chuan swims well, it is evident that chuan collects stamps.\nIf chuan swims well, then chuan is fluffy.\nWhen the artist collects stamps, we can conclude chuan is fluffy.\nAssuming mike swims well, we can say the artist collects stamps.\nWhen mike is fluffy, we can conclude mike swims well.\nIf chuan is fluffy, then mike is fluffy.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on chuan swims well, it is evident that chuan swims well, we deduce that chuan swims well.\nApplying the logic of if chuan swims well, then chuan collects stamps, we deduce that chuan collects stamps.\nGiven that if chuan swims well, then chuan is fluffy, it is evident that chuan is fluffy.\nBecause given that chuan is fluffy, it follows that mike is fluffy, we can conclude that mike is fluffy.\nSince we know that assuming mike is fluffy, we can say mike swims well, it follows that mike swims well.\nApplying the logic of given that mike swims well, it follows that the artist collects stamps, we deduce that the artist collects stamps.\nGiven that if the artist collects stamps, then chuan is fluffy, it is evident that chuan is fluffy.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because none of the given rules lead to the conclusion that Chuan is handsome or its negation, the assertion cannot be determined from the provided facts and rules.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe fountain fishes in lakes.\nHenry grows plants.\nHenry plays games.\nRules:\nGiven that henry grows plants, it follows that the fountain rides bikes.\nAssuming lucy fishes in lakes, we can say lucy grows plants.\nAssuming henry plays games, we can say henry plays games.\nAssuming lucy plays games, we can say lucy fishes in lakes.\nIf lucy plays games, then lucy plays games.\nGiven that the fountain fishes in lakes, it follows that lucy plays games.", "statement": "The dog grows plants.", "reasoning": "Given that based on henry grows plants, it is evident that the fountain rides bikes, it is evident that the fountain rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of if henry plays games, then henry plays games, we deduce that henry plays games.\nApplying the logic of given that the fountain fishes in lakes, it follows that lucy plays games, we deduce that lucy plays games.\nApplying the logic of if lucy plays games, then lucy plays games, we deduce that lucy plays games.\nBecause based on lucy plays games, it is evident that lucy fishes in lakes, we can conclude that lucy fishes in lakes.\nApplying the logic of if lucy fishes in lakes, then lucy grows plants, we deduce that lucy grows plants.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because given that henry grows plants, it follows that the fountain rides bikes, given that the fountain fishes in lakes, it follows that lucy plays games, assumption of lucy playing games does not affect the dog, the dog grows plants is not supported by any rule\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe river swims well.\nThe fountain grows plants.\nThe festival grows plants.\nRules:\nBased on the river swims well, it is evident that the festival writes stories.\nWhen the fountain writes stories, we can conclude the fountain writes stories.\nWhen the fountain is happy, we can conclude the fountain writes stories.\nIf jianzhi grows plants, then the fountain is happy.\nAssuming the festival writes stories, we can say jianzhi grows plants.\nAssuming the festival grows plants, we can say the festival grows plants.", "statement": "Jianzhi swims well.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the river swims well, we can conclude the festival writes stories, we can see that the festival writes stories.\nGiven that assuming the festival writes stories, we can say jianzhi grows plants, it is evident that jianzhi grows plants.\nBecause based on the festival grows plants, it is evident that the festival grows plants, we can conclude that the festival grows plants.\nSince we know that when jianzhi grows plants, we can conclude the fountain is happy, it follows that the fountain is happy.\nGiven that based on the fountain is happy, it is evident that the fountain writes stories, it is evident that the fountain writes stories.\nGiven that when the fountain writes stories, we can conclude the fountain writes stories, it is evident that the fountain writes stories.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Based on the river swims well, it is evident that the festival writes stories, Assuming the festival writes stories, we can say jianzhi grows plants, If jianzhi grows plants, then the fountain is happy, When the fountain is happy, we can conclude the fountain writes stories, Jianzhi swims well is not implied by any of these, Jianzhi swims well is false\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nSophie is an engineer.\nThe pig is fluffy.\nThe book is fluffy.\nRules:\nAssuming the pig is fluffy, we can say the pig is an engineer.\nIf the book is fluffy, then the pig is an engineer.\nBased on the book takes pictures, it is evident that the book is an engineer.\nBased on the book paints pictures, it is evident that the book takes pictures.\nAssuming the pig paints pictures, we can say the book paints pictures.\nWhen the book is an engineer, we can conclude the pig is fluffy.\nWhen sophie is an engineer, we can conclude the pig paints pictures.", "statement": "The globe paints pictures.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the pig is fluffy, we can conclude the pig is an engineer, we can see that the pig is an engineer.\nGiven that assuming sophie is an engineer, we can say the pig paints pictures, it is evident that the pig paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the pig paints pictures, we can say the book paints pictures, we can see that the book paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the book paints pictures, it is evident that the book takes pictures, we can see that the book takes pictures.\nApplying the logic of given that the book takes pictures, it follows that the book is an engineer, we deduce that the book is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the book is an engineer, we can say the pig is fluffy, we can see that the pig is fluffy.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when sophie is an engineer, we can conclude the pig paints pictures, assuming the pig paints pictures, we can say the book paints pictures, based on the book paints pictures, it is evident that the book takes pictures, but there is no rule or fact about the globe, the globe paints pictures is not supported.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe dog paints pictures.\nThe musician is fast.\nThe dog is fast.\nRules:\nBased on the dog paints pictures, it is evident that the shop paints pictures.\nWhen the dog is fast, we can conclude the musician paints pictures.\nWhen the musician hosts parties, we can conclude the musician fishes in lakes.\nAssuming the musician hosts parties, we can say the musician hosts parties.\nAssuming the pig paints pictures, we can say the musician hosts parties.\nIf the musician paints pictures, then the musician fishes in lakes.\nIf the dog is fast, then the pig paints pictures.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the dog paints pictures, we can say the shop paints pictures, we deduce that the shop paints pictures.\nSince we know that based on the dog is fast, it is evident that the musician paints pictures, it follows that the musician paints pictures.\nBecause based on the dog is fast, it is evident that the pig paints pictures, we can conclude that the pig paints pictures.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the pig paints pictures, it is evident that the musician hosts parties, we can see that the musician hosts parties.\nBecause when the musician hosts parties, we can conclude the musician hosts parties, we can conclude that the musician hosts parties.\nGiven that if the musician hosts parties, then the musician fishes in lakes, it is evident that the musician fishes in lakes.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because there is no rule connecting the given facts or rules to the assertion 'Chuan is handsome', the assertion is not supported by any logical inference given the provided facts and rules.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe artist is an engineer.\nThe shop is an engineer.\nThe phone rides bikes.\nRules:\nWhen the artist is an engineer, we can conclude the shop rides bikes.\nBased on the artist is an engineer, it is evident that the artist is an artist.\nWhen the artist is an engineer, we can conclude the musician is an artist.\nWhen the phone rides bikes, we can conclude the musician is an artist.\nAssuming the musician is a scientist, we can say the phone rides bikes.\nAssuming the musician is an engineer, we can say the musician is a scientist.\nBased on the shop is an engineer, it is evident that the musician is an engineer.\nAssuming the artist is an artist, we can say the shop rides bikes.", "statement": "The artist is a scientist.", "reasoning": "Since we know that if the artist is an engineer, then the shop rides bikes, it follows that the shop rides bikes.\nGiven that based on the artist is an engineer, it is evident that the artist is an artist, it is evident that the artist is an artist.\nBecause given that the artist is an engineer, it follows that the musician is an artist, we can conclude that the musician is an artist.\nBecause given that the shop is an engineer, it follows that the musician is an engineer, we can conclude that the musician is an engineer.\nBecause assuming the musician is an engineer, we can say the musician is a scientist, we can conclude that the musician is a scientist.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the musician is a scientist, then the phone rides bikes, we can see that the phone rides bikes.\nApplying the logic of based on the phone rides bikes, it is evident that the musician is an artist, we deduce that the musician is an artist.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because based on the artist is an engineer, it is evident that the artist is an artist, assuming the artist is an artist, we can say the shop rides bikes, the shop rides bikes means the shop is an engineer, the shop is an engineer means it is evident that the musician is an engineer, assuming the musician is an engineer, we can say the musician is a scientist, the musician is an artist means when the musician is a scientist, the assumption the artist is an artist also implies the artist is a scientist. Therefore, the artist is a scientist.\",\n  \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe globe travels far.\nThe car travels far.\nEmma creates art.\nRules:\nWhen the globe travels far, we can conclude emma travels far.\nBased on the car travels far, it is evident that the car travels far.\nIf emma creates art, then the car travels far.\nWhen the globe travels far, we can conclude the car travels far.\nGiven that the globe is blue, it follows that the ocean is blue.\nBased on the globe is blue, it is evident that the car travels far.\nIf the globe is blue, then the globe is blue.\nBased on emma runs marathons, it is evident that the globe is blue.\nIf emma creates art, then emma runs marathons.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that when the globe travels far, we can conclude emma travels far, it follows that emma travels far.\nApplying the logic of if the car travels far, then the car travels far, we deduce that the car travels far.\nBecause based on the globe travels far, it is evident that the car travels far, we can conclude that the car travels far.\nApplying the logic of if emma creates art, then emma runs marathons, we deduce that emma runs marathons.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if emma runs marathons, then the globe is blue, we can see that the globe is blue.\nBecause if the globe is blue, then the globe is blue, we can conclude that the globe is blue.\nBecause if the globe is blue, then the ocean is blue, we can conclude that the ocean is blue.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because none of the rules and facts mention Chuan or anything related to being handsome, any conclusion about Chuan being handsome cannot be inferred from the given information. Therefore, the assertion that Chuan is handsome cannot be verified.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe city is funny.\nThe bridge goes to the hospital.\nThe bridge solves puzzles.\nRules:\nGiven that the bridge solves puzzles, it follows that the bridge becomes famous.\nAssuming the city solves puzzles, we can say the city goes to the hospital.\nAssuming the city goes to the hospital, we can say the city solves puzzles.\nAssuming charlie solves puzzles, we can say the city goes to the hospital.\nIf charlie goes to the hospital, then charlie solves puzzles.\nIf the bridge becomes famous, then charlie goes to the hospital.", "statement": "The sun solves puzzles.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that based on the bridge solves puzzles, it is evident that the bridge becomes famous, we can see that the bridge becomes famous.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if the bridge becomes famous, then charlie goes to the hospital, we can see that charlie goes to the hospital.\nBecause given that charlie goes to the hospital, it follows that charlie solves puzzles, we can conclude that charlie solves puzzles.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming charlie solves puzzles, we can say the city goes to the hospital, we can see that the city goes to the hospital.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the city goes to the hospital, we can say the city solves puzzles, we can see that the city solves puzzles.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n  \"reason\": \"Because the assertion does not logically follow from any rules or facts provided, the sun does not solve puzzles.\",\n  \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJack swims well.\nThe bridge is loud.\nThe sky is interesting.\nRules:\nAssuming the sky is interesting, we can say the bridge is interesting.\nGiven that the sky is interesting, it follows that the bridge is interesting.\nBased on jack swims well, it is evident that the bridge is interesting.\nAssuming the bridge is loud, we can say the sky is interesting.\nBased on the sky is a chef, it is evident that the bridge is loud.\nAssuming jack is interesting, we can say the sky is a chef.\nGiven that jack is a chef, it follows that jack is interesting.\nGiven that the sky is interesting, it follows that jack is a chef.", "statement": "The sky is loud.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of assuming the sky is interesting, we can say the bridge is interesting, we deduce that the bridge is interesting.\nGiven that based on the bridge is loud, it is evident that the sky is interesting, it is evident that the sky is interesting.\nBecause assuming the sky is interesting, we can say jack is a chef, we can conclude that jack is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if jack is a chef, then jack is interesting, we can see that jack is interesting.\nSince we know that assuming jack is interesting, we can say the sky is a chef, it follows that the sky is a chef.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that assuming the sky is a chef, we can say the bridge is loud, we can see that the bridge is loud.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the sky is interesting, we can say the bridge is interesting, Given that the sky is interesting, it follows that the bridge is interesting, Based on jack swims well, it is evident that the bridge is interesting, Assuming the bridge is loud, we can say the sky is interesting, Given that the sky is interesting, it follows that jack is a chef, The sky is loud.\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nJianzhi hosts parties.\nJianzhi hosts parties.\nChuan plays games.\nRules:\nIf jianzhi hosts parties, then the artist plays games.\nIf jianzhi hosts parties, then chuan plays games.\nIf jianzhi hosts parties, then the cloud creates art.\nIf jianzhi hosts parties, then jianzhi creates art.\nWhen the artist plays games, we can conclude jianzhi hosts parties.\nWhen jianzhi creates art, we can conclude the artist plays games.\nBased on chuan plays games, it is evident that jianzhi creates art.\nBased on jianzhi hosts parties, it is evident that the cloud creates art.", "statement": "Chuan hosts parties.", "reasoning": "Given that given that jianzhi hosts parties, it follows that the artist plays games, it is evident that the artist plays games.\nApplying the logic of assuming jianzhi hosts parties, we can say chuan plays games, we deduce that chuan plays games.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when jianzhi hosts parties, we can conclude the cloud creates art, we can see that the cloud creates art.\nGiven that if chuan plays games, then jianzhi creates art, it is evident that jianzhi creates art.\nGiven that based on jianzhi creates art, it is evident that the artist plays games, it is evident that the artist plays games.\nApplying the logic of assuming the artist plays games, we can say jianzhi hosts parties, we deduce that jianzhi hosts parties.\nBecause assuming jianzhi hosts parties, we can say jianzhi creates art, we can conclude that jianzhi creates art.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because If jianzhi hosts parties, then chuan plays games., Chuan plays games., Chuan plays games., it is evident that jianzhi creates art., Chuan plays games., it is evident that jianzhi creates art., we cannot conclude Chuan hosts parties.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe ocean plays football.\nAva plays football.\nAva plays football.\nRules:\nAssuming ava plays football, we can say ava plays football.\nIf the ocean plays football, then ava is loud.\nAssuming ava solves puzzles, we can say the ocean plays football.\nAssuming the ocean solves puzzles, we can say the ocean plays football.\nWhen ava is loud, we can conclude ava solves puzzles.\nGiven that the ocean plays football, it follows that the ocean solves puzzles.", "statement": "Chuan is handsome", "reasoning": "Since we know that assuming ava plays football, we can say ava plays football, it follows that ava plays football.\nGiven that assuming the ocean plays football, we can say the ocean solves puzzles, it is evident that the ocean solves puzzles.\nApplying the logic of when the ocean solves puzzles, we can conclude the ocean plays football, we deduce that the ocean plays football.\nGiven that based on the ocean plays football, it is evident that ava is loud, it is evident that ava is loud.\nApplying the logic of based on ava is loud, it is evident that ava solves puzzles, we deduce that ava solves puzzles.\nGiven that assuming ava solves puzzles, we can say the ocean plays football, it is evident that the ocean plays football.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\"reason\": \"Because the assertion 'Chuan is handsome' is not connected to any of the given facts or rules, Chuan is handsome is not supported or contradicted by the information provided\", \"answer\": 0}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nAva is a doctor.\nSophie is an engineer.\nThe bridge is a doctor.\nRules:\nGiven that sophie is an engineer, it follows that sophie is quiet.\nAssuming the bridge is a doctor, we can say ava is an engineer.\nWhen the musician is quiet, we can conclude the musician is quiet.\nAssuming sophie collects stamps, we can say the musician is quiet.\nGiven that sophie is quiet, it follows that sophie collects stamps.\nIf ava is an engineer, then sophie is quiet.\nAssuming ava is an engineer, we can say sophie is quiet.", "statement": "Sophie is a doctor.", "reasoning": "Since we know that given that sophie is an engineer, it follows that sophie is quiet, it follows that sophie is quiet.\nGiven that if the bridge is a doctor, then ava is an engineer, it is evident that ava is an engineer.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that if ava is an engineer, then sophie is quiet, we can see that sophie is quiet.\nBecause if sophie is quiet, then sophie collects stamps, we can conclude that sophie collects stamps.\nBecause assuming sophie collects stamps, we can say the musician is quiet, we can conclude that the musician is quiet.\nBecause when the musician is quiet, we can conclude the musician is quiet, we can conclude that the musician is quiet.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Sophie is an engineer, Sophie is not a doctor, Sophie is not a doctor\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe bakery dances gracefully.\nThe festival hikes mountains.\nThe festival dances gracefully.\nRules:\nWhen the festival hikes mountains, we can conclude jack carries bags.\nWhen the bakery dances gracefully, we can conclude the teacher hikes mountains.\nGiven that the festival is quiet, it follows that jack hikes mountains.\nIf the festival is quiet, then the festival is quiet.\nAssuming the teacher dances gracefully, we can say the festival is quiet.\nIf the bakery dances gracefully, then the teacher dances gracefully.\nAssuming the festival is quiet, we can say the teacher hikes mountains.", "statement": "The festival carries bags.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that when the festival hikes mountains, we can conclude jack carries bags, we can see that jack carries bags.\nSince we know that based on the bakery dances gracefully, it is evident that the teacher hikes mountains, it follows that the teacher hikes mountains.\nBecause when the bakery dances gracefully, we can conclude the teacher dances gracefully, we can conclude that the teacher dances gracefully.\nGiven that assuming the teacher dances gracefully, we can say the festival is quiet, it is evident that the festival is quiet.\nBecause based on the festival is quiet, it is evident that the festival is quiet, we can conclude that the festival is quiet.\nBecause assuming the festival is quiet, we can say the teacher hikes mountains, we can conclude that the teacher hikes mountains.\nGiven that when the festival is quiet, we can conclude jack hikes mountains, it is evident that jack hikes mountains.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because when the festival hikes mountains, we can conclude jack carries bags, the teacher hiking mountains does not imply the festival carrying bags, the festival hiking mountains does not directly conclude the festival carrying bags, the bakery dancing gracefully implying the teacher dances gracefully does not relate to the festival carrying bags, the festival's quietness does not directly relate to carrying bags, the festival hiking mountains directly implies jack carrying bags, not the festival, the teacher dancing gracefully implying the festival's quietness does not relate to carrying bags, the festival carries bags is not a concluded assertion based on any given rule or fact.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe teacher is loud.\nThe forest becomes famous.\nThe city is happy.\nRules:\nGiven that the forest becomes famous, it follows that the teacher is happy.\nGiven that the forest becomes famous, it follows that lucas is happy.\nBased on the forest becomes famous, it is evident that the forest is loud.\nIf the forest becomes famous, then the forest draws maps.\nBased on the teacher is happy, it is evident that the forest becomes famous.\nIf the city draws maps, then the teacher is happy.\nWhen lucas is happy, we can conclude the city draws maps.\nGiven that the city is happy, it follows that the forest is loud.", "statement": "Lucas draws maps.", "reasoning": "Applied Rule: since the fact that if the forest becomes famous, then the teacher is happy, we can see that the teacher is happy.\nBecause given that the forest becomes famous, it follows that lucas is happy, we can conclude that lucas is happy.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the forest becomes famous, it is evident that the forest is loud, we can see that the forest is loud.\nBecause based on lucas is happy, it is evident that the city draws maps, we can conclude that the city draws maps.\nGiven that if the city draws maps, then the teacher is happy, it is evident that the teacher is happy.\nGiven that given that the teacher is happy, it follows that the forest becomes famous, it is evident that the forest becomes famous.\nApplying the logic of if the forest becomes famous, then the forest draws maps, we deduce that the forest draws maps.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because the forest becomes famous, it follows that lucas is happy, when lucas is happy, we can conclude the city draws maps, if the city draws maps, then the teacher is happy, given that the forest becomes famous, it follows that the teacher is happy, based on the teacher is happy, it is evident that the forest becomes famous, {Lucas draws maps}\",\n    \"answer\": 1\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe moon is tall.\nAva cooks well.\nThe city is tall.\nRules:\nBased on the moon is tall, it is evident that the city is quiet.\nAssuming the moon is tall, we can say the stadium is quiet.\nAssuming ava swims well, we can say the city is quiet.\nIf the city swims well, then ava swims well.\nBased on the moon cooks well, it is evident that the city swims well.\nWhen the city is quiet, we can conclude the moon cooks well.", "statement": "Ava is tall.", "reasoning": "Because based on the moon is tall, it is evident that the city is quiet, we can conclude that the city is quiet.\nBecause given that the moon is tall, it follows that the stadium is quiet, we can conclude that the stadium is quiet.\nGiven that given that the city is quiet, it follows that the moon cooks well, it is evident that the moon cooks well.\nGiven that given that the moon cooks well, it follows that the city swims well, it is evident that the city swims well.\nGiven that given that the city swims well, it follows that ava swims well, it is evident that ava swims well.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that when ava swims well, we can conclude the city is quiet, we can see that the city is quiet.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"There are no rules that connect the given facts to the assertion Ava is tall.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe stadium is colorful.\nSarah is an engineer.\nThe cat is colorful.\nRules:\nIf sarah is an engineer, then the cat is an engineer.\nGiven that the cat reads books, it follows that sarah is colorful.\nGiven that the cat is colorful, it follows that the cat reads books.\nBased on sarah reads books, it is evident that the cat is colorful.\nWhen the stadium is colorful, we can conclude sarah reads books.\nIf the cat reads books, then sarah reads books.", "statement": "The cat teaches math.", "reasoning": "Applying the logic of based on sarah is an engineer, it is evident that the cat is an engineer, we deduce that the cat is an engineer.\nSince we know that based on the stadium is colorful, it is evident that sarah reads books, it follows that sarah reads books.\nGiven that if sarah reads books, then the cat is colorful, it is evident that the cat is colorful.\nApplying the logic of when the cat is colorful, we can conclude the cat reads books, we deduce that the cat reads books.\nSince we know that assuming the cat reads books, we can say sarah is colorful, it follows that sarah is colorful.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because given that the cat is colorful, it follows that the cat reads books, if the cat reads books, then sarah reads books, when the stadium is colorful, we can conclude sarah reads books, based on sarah reads books, it is evident that the cat is colorful, the cat teaches math is not a conclusion drawn from these rules, the negation of the assertion\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}, {"input": {"context": "Facts:\nThe chef is fast.\nThe garden plays instruments.\nThe garden grows plants.\nRules:\nGiven that the chef is fast, it follows that the chef is fast.\nIf the moon plays instruments, then the artist paints pictures.\nIf the artist paints pictures, then the moon paints pictures.\nBased on the moon paints pictures, it is evident that the moon plays instruments.\nGiven that the artist paints pictures, it follows that the moon paints pictures.\nAssuming the garden plays instruments, we can say the artist paints pictures.", "statement": "The artist grows plants.", "reasoning": "Because assuming the chef is fast, we can say the chef is fast, we can conclude that the chef is fast.\nApplied Rule: since the fact that based on the garden plays instruments, it is evident that the artist paints pictures, we can see that the artist paints pictures.\nBecause when the artist paints pictures, we can conclude the moon paints pictures, we can conclude that the moon paints pictures.\nSince we know that when the moon paints pictures, we can conclude the moon plays instruments, it follows that the moon plays instruments.\nSince we know that based on the moon plays instruments, it is evident that the artist paints pictures, it follows that the artist paints pictures.", "depth": 5, "flag": "False"}, "output": "```json\n{\n    \"reason\": \"Because Assuming the garden plays instruments, we can say the artist paints pictures, The garden plays instruments, ..., The artist grows plants is not necessarily true.\",\n    \"answer\": 0\n}\n```"}]}