-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
supports notification workspace/didRenameFiles
#144
supports notification workspace/didRenameFiles
#144
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Lîm Tsú-thuàn <[email protected]>
The queries of the old document in queue also need to be handled (maybe just clear them) (in The new file is probably no longer a racket file, for example, someone create a racket file, but after a second, they realize it should be another language, then they rename it. So we need to check if the new file is a racket file. The most difficult part is, we probably need to consider other files that depends on the old file. |
@6cdh About dependency relation between files, I thought this is a big refactoring that should be another PR, and maybe a plan, what do you think? |
I think so. |
Signed-off-by: Lîm Tsú-thuàn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lîm Tsú-thuàn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lîm Tsú-thuàn <[email protected]>
@6cdh all suggestions are applied. |
Signed-off-by: Lîm Tsú-thuàn <[email protected]>
Thank you! |
resolve #142
@6cdh's suggestion
Doc
structure contains the URI, therefore, needs to update itscheduler.rkt
(I need to look into it)newUri
is*.rkt