You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2024. It is now read-only.
Bonus: it could be over-mega-great to add a "CONTRIBUTE.md" helper in order to help (this) api-client users to install/build current source. I miss how to install requirement to play unit tests for example an confirm my hypothesis.
(anyway it seems that /api/websitesdata level in 2.x umami responses are not undertaken here.)
Hey! I would love to add support for umami 2.x, but it's quite time-demanding due to their documentation being out of date. I usually have to reverse-engineer it by reading everything in the folders. Since I'm in my last university semester, I'm really busy lately. I also don't really use umami anymore, so it's a bit harder to test (usually I spin up a local docker container). If you could make a PR for it, it would be great! If you can't that's fine, but I can't guarantee when I'll be able to update it 😅
I had started work on it a while ago, so I might be able to push a branch with it started too. I'll see if I still have it around.
Hello! 👋 I no longer work in web development, and do not have a lot of free time or interest in maintaining this package anymore. I am closing all issues and PR for it and will archive the repository, but if anybody is interested in maintaining it, I am willing to transfer the repository and NPM package. I know you had been using this package for a while, sorry that I can't maintain it anymore!
hi, the goal is to make this api-client compatible with umami 2.9.0
there is an helper with the following ticket
boly38/umami-api-client#15
Bonus: it could be over-mega-great to add a "CONTRIBUTE.md" helper in order to help (this) api-client users to install/build current source. I miss how to install requirement to play unit tests for example an confirm my hypothesis.
(anyway it seems that
/api/websites
data
level in2.x
umami responses are not undertaken here.)Nb: notice this related issue on umami doc side: umami-software/website#150
thanks 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: