Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Filtering by custom field #2066

Open
pH142857 opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Filtering by custom field #2066

pH142857 opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@pH142857
Copy link

In the old interface, I could filter invoices by custom field with this little guy:
Capture d’écran du 2024-09-23 15-02-25

In the new interface, I see no equivalent, only a “filter” text area looking in all the fields for the input string. This is much less convenient. Has the original filtering function disappeared and could it reappear, please?

@beganovich
Copy link
Member

Hi there,

The new search is unified & supports searching by custom values.

If you have invoices.custom1 set to "something", searching "something" on the invoices table will show that invoice.

Hope that helps.

@beganovich beganovich added the question Further information is requested label Oct 9, 2024
@pH142857
Copy link
Author

pH142857 commented Oct 9, 2024

Thanks for the answer @beganovich ; this is less convenient than a real column-wise filter because other results may appear, if the string is present in other columns than the one we're trying to filter-by. It's "usable" but not as great as what we had before, that's why I'm asking.

@beganovich
Copy link
Member

I see. That's a valid point. I can mark this as a feature request and we may come back later at it in different ways.

Perhaps like v4 did it or with inline filters like "custom1: value".

@beganovich beganovich added feature request and removed question Further information is requested labels Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants