From 949e3f33c75fa55058911492cb6d2c297407d242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akosh Farkash <akosh.farkash@iohk.io>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 14:07:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] PM-2929: Transaction data structure. (#15)

---
 .../interpreter/models/Transaction.scala      | 54 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/src/io/iohk/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/models/Transaction.scala

diff --git a/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/src/io/iohk/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/models/Transaction.scala b/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/src/io/iohk/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/models/Transaction.scala
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6c60b359
--- /dev/null
+++ b/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/src/io/iohk/metronome/checkpointing/interpreter/models/Transaction.scala
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+package io.iohk.metronome.checkpointing.interpreter.models
+
+import scodec.bits.BitVector
+
+/** Transactions are what comprise the block body used by the Checkpointing Service.
+  *
+  * The HotStuff BFT Agreement doesn't need to know about them, their execution and
+  * validation is delegated to the Checkpointing Service, which, in turn, delegates
+  * to the interpreter. The only component that truly has to understand the contents
+  * is the PoW specific interpreter.
+  *
+  * What the Checkpointing Service has to know is the different kinds of transactions
+  * we support, which is to register proposer blocks in the ledger, required by Advocate,
+  * and to register checkpoint candidates.
+  */
+sealed trait Transaction
+
+object Transaction {
+
+  /** In PoW chains that support Advocate checkpointing, the Checkpoint Certificate
+    * can enforce the inclusion of proposed blocks on the chain via references; think
+    * uncle blocks that also get executed.
+    *
+    * In order to know which proposed blocks can be enforced, i.e. ones that are valid
+    * and have saturated the network, first the federation members need to reach BFT
+    * agreement over the list of existing proposer blocks.
+    *
+    * The `ProposerBlock` transaction adds one of these blocks that exist on the PoW
+    * chain to the Checkpointing Ledger, iff it can be validated by the members.
+    *
+    * The contents of the transaction are opaque, they only need to be understood
+    * by the PoW side interpreter.
+    *
+    * Using Advocate is optional; if the PoW chain doesn't support references,
+    * it will just use `CheckpointCandidate` transactions.
+    */
+  case class ProposerBlock(value: BitVector) extends Transaction
+
+  /** When a federation member is leading a round, it will ask the PoW side interpreter
+    * if it wants to propose a checkpoint candidate. The interpreter decides if the
+    * circumstances are right, e.g. enough new blocks have been build on the previous
+    * checkpoint that a new one has to be issued. If so, a `CheckpointCandidate`
+    * transaction is added to the next block, which is sent to the HotStuff replicas
+    * in a `Prepare` message, to be validated and committed.
+    *
+    * If the BFT agreement is successful, a Checkpoint Certificate will be formed
+    * during block execution which will include the `CheckpointCandidate`.
+    *
+    * The contents of the transaction are opaque, they only need to be understood
+    * by teh PoW side interpreter, either for validation, or for following the
+    * fork indicated by the checkpoint.
+    */
+  case class CheckpointCandidate(value: BitVector) extends Transaction
+}