Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hausdorff distance implementation #4

Open
ogencoglu opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Hausdorff distance implementation #4

ogencoglu opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@ogencoglu
Copy link

Is there any difference (results or speed) of your Hausdorff distance implementation vs scipy and scikit-image's?

Also you might want to link your paper to the readme.

@DangDinhQuocTrung
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your question.
The implementation of HD95 was taken from medpy.
This is similar to EoFormer, a MICCAI paper from last year (MICCAI 2023), repo.

We conducted a small toy comparison between medpy and scikit-image implementation of Hausdorff distance.
We found that the results are the same up to the 14th decimal place.
However, medpy is roughly 70% slower.

@ogencoglu
Copy link
Author

OK so do I understand correctly that I should use my own scikit-image implementation because it is faster and yours is slower because it is from medpy?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants