-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support private gists #17
Comments
It would appear that this is due to the routes taking an |
I would also appreciate this feature. Sometimes you might want beautiful texts, but not have them appear in your gist timeline. |
Will have a think about it. Right now the service explicitly only supports public gists. |
If you do eventually support this, make sure to add the appropriate tags and HTTP headers so the content will not get cached or crawled by search engines: http://www.i18nguy.com/markup/metatags.html |
It might also be enabled as an option via configuration, in case someone wants to run a private-label gist.io on their own site, linking only to their own private gists. |
+1 |
I've polled the Github API, and it works the same with getting public and private Gists. So if I understand correctly, we just have to make the routes accept a hash and put a Robots:none header and that's it? Or am I missing something else here? |
That is correct. I wound up implementing this in a grails project as I Sent from my iPad On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Jonathan Allard [email protected] I've polled the Github API, and it works the same with getting public and So if I understand correctly, we just have to make the routes accept a hash — |
Was this pull request accepted? I would also appreciate this feature. Merge! |
@milesalex The maintainer hasn't responded |
@idan - Please?! |
I'm planning on implementing this, but a lot of changes under the hood will render #51 moot. |
Please support it |
Working on it :)
|
It would be amazing if gist.io supported private gists :) |
Is there anything I could do to help this to happen? |
It's now been a year my rejected pull request has been submitted. |
@joallard You should make a fork and host it on your own! Call it gist2.io! |
Sadly gist.io is not just having problems with private gists. At the moment it also cannot handle gists that once where private but then turned public. This is, what I just tried with https://gist.github.com/datenreisender/0128e842631b1c0b908f . After making it public I wanted to create a nice gist.io link for it but then discovered that http://gist.io/0128e842631b1c0b908f does not work. Only way for me to solve it would be to copy the content into a new gist that was public from the beginning on. But since this does not fit my workflow I rather abstained from creating a gist.io link. |
@datenreisender You could try draft.sx (disclaimer: my own fork). I would normally not announce that here, but since @idan seems to have abandoned the project... |
@idan ✔️ Issue can be closed. Working URLs:
Regarding
or
I'd suggest opening a dedicated issue for that if it is (still) desirable. |
Not sure if this is an intentional incompatibility, but this:
https://gist.github.com/85126ceb850513ecc276
Does not appear to map to this:
http://gist.io/85126ceb850513ecc276
When I attempt to access the gist.io link, I get a 404.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: