You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the current form, the protocol is limited to small file sizes if one chose to utilize CDN. Traditionally, CDNs were not built to accept PUT/POST requests with the large body, and that trend is not likely to change, while potentially increasing the costs of the hosting service to accommodate for the unified host name. My main question is, is there a room to incorporate alternation in the host name for the PUTed files, or allow any sort of split?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the current form, the protocol is limited to small file sizes if one chose to utilize CDN. Traditionally, CDNs were not built to accept PUT/POST requests with the large body, and that trend is not likely to change, while potentially increasing the costs of the hosting service to accommodate for the unified host name. My main question is, is there a room to incorporate alternation in the host name for the PUTed files, or allow any sort of split?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: