Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
@hasan-nn rexnet is a bit of a weird network to use for feature extractor, it has such small/odd numbered bottleneck channel counts. I didn't use the 1280 net.features as one of the feature pyarmid features because it was so much larger than the rest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello there, I intend to use RexNet as a Feature extractor ( like for segmentation,object detection).
For rexnet_100 , the attribute 'feature_info' contains:
[{'num_chs': 16, 'reduction': 2, 'module': 'features.0'}, {'num_chs': 38, 'reduction': 4, 'module': 'features.2'}, {'num_chs': 61, 'reduction': 8, 'module': 'features.4'}, {'num_chs': 128, 'reduction': 16, 'module': 'features.10'}, {'num_chs': 185, 'reduction': 32, 'module': 'features.15'}]
Usually there are 5 extraction blocks with output_strides(reductions) = [2, 4, 8, 16, 32]
Given the above, I assume they are as follows:
and the last block in
net.features
is a rounded channel expansion to 1280 in rexnet_100 for the classifier head.Is this correct?
Thank you
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions