You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I consider myself somewhat literate when it comes to functional programming (it was love at first sight), so naturally (or not?), I went straight down to the monad definition, kind of hoping for a mind-blowingly simple (possibly wrong, but practical) description. Next I went to Issues to create one showing my disappointment but thinking I ought to keep it constructive. Imagine my dismay and complacency when I realized somebody has already done it. Moreover, yours have been (from what I saw), solely constructive.
tldr. It's not an overstatement if I say I do not understand the aforementioned definitions.
For example, the algebraic laws for categories say that, for any arrow
f
.f;id == id;f == f
. These laws are essential for functors and monads.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: