Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

potens/potentia #53

Open
wehro opened this issue Mar 16, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

potens/potentia #53

wehro opened this issue Mar 16, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@wehro
Copy link
Collaborator

wehro commented Mar 16, 2019

You find pot-ens and pot-en-ti-a in the liturgical books, but I consider these hyphenations to be based on a faulty overgeneralization.
It is correct to hyphenate pot-es, pot-est and the like, because in this case the first element is a shortened potis and the second element a form of esse.
But potens is not a compound of potis and ens. The participle ens of esse has been introduced artificially in the late antiquity to translate the corresponding Greek participle. It was not known in classical times.
potens is older than ens and derives from a lost verb potere. It should be hyphenated po-tens just as pæ-ni-tens, the participle of pænitere. The same holds for po-ten-ti-a.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant