You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So on 3.1 where it talks about define-syntax with example:
(define-syntax foo
(lambda (stx)
(syntax "I am foo")))
it explains that:
When we use define-syntax, we’re making a transformer binding. This tells the Racket compiler, "Whenever you encounter a chunk of syntax starting with foo, please give it to my transformer function, and replace it with the syntax I give back to you." So Racket will give anything that looks like (foo ...) to our function, and we can return new syntax to use instead. Much like a search-and-replace.
My questions:
What does it mean that "a syntax starting with foo"? What is a syntax? Do you mean the syntax object that is introduced on section 3.2, that's something with lexical environment and code location and s-expression etc? Or is that some other conceptual thing or is that a specific language construct? If the syntax mentioned here here is the syntax object that's mentioned in 3.2, then what could a chunk of syntax mean here? It reads more like a piece of textual code then a set of language constructs(which is syntax object).. So I am not really sure what exactly the syntax mean here.
I am not sure what makes define-syntax different here either? But I guess once I get what syntax mean here then define-syntax makes some sense too?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First of all, thanks for making this! :-)
So on 3.1 where it talks about
define-syntax
with example:(define-syntax foo (lambda (stx) (syntax "I am foo")))
it explains that:
My questions:
What does it mean that "a syntax starting with foo"? What is a syntax? Do you mean the syntax object that is introduced on section 3.2, that's something with lexical environment and code location and s-expression etc? Or is that some other conceptual thing or is that a specific language construct? If the syntax mentioned here here is the syntax object that's mentioned in 3.2, then what could a chunk of syntax mean here? It reads more like a piece of textual code then a set of language constructs(which is syntax object).. So I am not really sure what exactly the syntax mean here.
I am not sure what makes
define-syntax
different here either? But I guess once I get what syntax mean here then define-syntax makes some sense too?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: