You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've had the thesis that DWPCs that measure truly connected nodes will be higher than P-DWPCs (mean permuted DWPCs). However, @zietzm and I were looking at P-DWPC and Z-DWPC distributions yesterday of the real network and a permuted network (permuted compared to permuted) and the distributions looked incredibly similar.
Some discussions from Project Rephetio that may have wisdom from the past:
One issue is that we don't have a great understanding of DWPCs and permuted DWPCs. I think we should start by exploring DWPCs and how they compare to permuted DWPCs. In whats ways are DWPCs from a permuted network different than from the unmodified network?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Will post things for future reference: paths that we think contain information do not necessarily appear to have increased DWPC distributions above their permutations. In the following two graphs, I utilized the standard method (arcsinh, mean permutation, mean DWPC scaling). Note that for the time being, I am not utilizing degree-grouped permutations.
We've had the thesis that DWPCs that measure truly connected nodes will be higher than P-DWPCs (mean permuted DWPCs). However, @zietzm and I were looking at P-DWPC and Z-DWPC distributions yesterday of the real network and a permuted network (permuted compared to permuted) and the distributions looked incredibly similar.
Some discussions from Project Rephetio that may have wisdom from the past:
One issue is that we don't have a great understanding of DWPCs and permuted DWPCs. I think we should start by exploring DWPCs and how they compare to permuted DWPCs. In whats ways are DWPCs from a permuted network different than from the unmodified network?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: