Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are informative DWPCs greater than permuted DWPCs? #119

Open
dhimmel opened this issue Jun 13, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Are informative DWPCs greater than permuted DWPCs? #119

dhimmel opened this issue Jun 13, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@dhimmel
Copy link
Collaborator

dhimmel commented Jun 13, 2018

We've had the thesis that DWPCs that measure truly connected nodes will be higher than P-DWPCs (mean permuted DWPCs). However, @zietzm and I were looking at P-DWPC and Z-DWPC distributions yesterday of the real network and a permuted network (permuted compared to permuted) and the distributions looked incredibly similar.

Some discussions from Project Rephetio that may have wisdom from the past:

One issue is that we don't have a great understanding of DWPCs and permuted DWPCs. I think we should start by exploring DWPCs and how they compare to permuted DWPCs. In whats ways are DWPCs from a permuted network different than from the unmodified network?

@zietzm
Copy link
Collaborator

zietzm commented Jun 14, 2018

Will post things for future reference: paths that we think contain information do not necessarily appear to have increased DWPC distributions above their permutations. In the following two graphs, I utilized the standard method (arcsinh, mean permutation, mean DWPC scaling). Note that for the time being, I am not utilizing degree-grouped permutations.

image

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants