Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

make AuthorizationCodeFlow more extendable #87

Open
wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

make AuthorizationCodeFlow more extendable #87

wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor

From [email protected] on November 20, 2013 14:47:10

Short description:
Currently there is no way to use own credential (let's say DataStore) AuthorizationCodeFlow.credentialDataStore

Purpose:
Use custom credentials (SomeCredential) based on generic Credential with custom field along with custom TokenResponse with custom field (SomeTokenResponse)

Workaround:
Implementation SomeAuthorizationCodeFlow from scratch is the only way to override get\setCredentialDataStore()

Used google-oauth-java-client:1.17.0-rc

Thanks.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-oauth-java-client/issues/detail?id=87
@wonderfly wonderfly added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. imported priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. labels Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly wonderfly self-assigned this Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly wonderfly removed their assignment May 20, 2016
@mattwhisenhunt mattwhisenhunt removed the priority: p1 Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release. label Jan 8, 2018
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added 🚨 This issue needs some love. and removed 2–5 stars labels Jun 8, 2018
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith removed the 🚨 This issue needs some love. label Jun 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@JustinBeckwith @mattwhisenhunt @wonderfly