You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I predict a protein-peptide complex, I use different seeds to run 10 times, and I get different IPTMs and PTMs, some IPTMs are less than 0.8, and some IPTMs are greater than 0.8. Is this predicted complex credible or not?
Or when we use 10 seeds and get 50 predicted complexes, we only select the complex with the highest ranking_score, and further judge the credibility of the complex through indicators such as IPTM and PAE?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We suggest using chain_pair_iptm to rank specific chain-pair interactions - see the output documentation.
Correlations between chain_pair_iptm and accuracy are shown in Figure 4a of the AF3 paper. It doesn't break out scores for protein-peptide specifically, just general protein-protein, but 0.8 is considered a good iPTM score.
When I predict a protein-peptide complex, I use different seeds to run 10 times, and I get different IPTMs and PTMs, some IPTMs are less than 0.8, and some IPTMs are greater than 0.8. Is this predicted complex credible or not?
Or when we use 10 seeds and get 50 predicted complexes, we only select the complex with the highest ranking_score, and further judge the credibility of the complex through indicators such as IPTM and PAE?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: